Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
British Airways To Malaysia  
User currently offlineDavied From South Africa, joined Oct 2004, 24 posts, RR: 0
Posted (9 years 3 months 3 weeks 5 days 9 hours ago) and read 5136 times:

I am a huge fan of British Airways and I was wondering why British Airways don't offer flights either from London Heathrow or Gatwick to Malaysia? Can anybody please tell me why these routes for BA don't exist?
Thanks David  Sad

28 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineG-CIVP From United Kingdom, joined Mar 2001, 1321 posts, RR: 10
Reply 1, posted (9 years 3 months 3 weeks 5 days 9 hours ago) and read 5107 times:

I think this has been discussed before on the forum but basically MAS have the market stitched up!

User currently offlineConcordeBoy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (9 years 3 months 3 weeks 5 days 9 hours ago) and read 5100 times:

BA dropped KUL at the advent of FF&S claiming that the yield wasn't there.

User currently offlineCarduelis From United Kingdom, joined Dec 2001, 1585 posts, RR: 10
Reply 3, posted (9 years 3 months 3 weeks 5 days 9 hours ago) and read 5077 times:

Do you mean FS&S - Future Size and Shape?


Per Ardua ad Astra! ........ Honi Soit Qui Mal y Pense!
User currently offlineB742 From United Kingdom, joined Mar 2005, 3767 posts, RR: 19
Reply 4, posted (9 years 3 months 3 weeks 5 days 8 hours ago) and read 4995 times:

Maybe we could see BA return to KLIA in the future!

What other long routes haul routes have BA also dropped?

Rob!


User currently offlineKaran69 From India, joined Oct 2004, 2887 posts, RR: 18
Reply 5, posted (9 years 3 months 3 weeks 5 days 8 hours ago) and read 4995 times:

I am not sure exactly when , but i do know they used to serve it via BOM as my father had once flown them in the early or mid 90s on the BOM-KUL-BOM route on their B742

User currently offlineAA B777-200 From Netherlands, joined Mar 2001, 505 posts, RR: 4
Reply 6, posted (9 years 3 months 3 weeks 4 days 23 hours ago) and read 4790 times:

It has always amazed me, espcially when you learn that MH flies twice daily nonstops!

User currently offlineHB-IWC From Indonesia, joined Sep 2000, 4502 posts, RR: 72
Reply 7, posted (9 years 3 months 3 weeks 4 days 22 hours ago) and read 4772 times:

BA last served KUL five times weekly with B772 before closing the route because of what was called the lack of yields. Before the B772, KUL was served by B744 with a tag on to Jakarta (up to 6 weekly flights) and for a short period of time with a tag on to SYD thrice weekly.

BA has closed down quite a couple of routes in Asia in the last ten years, including Osaka, Nagoya, Seoul, Manila, Taipei, Kuala Lumpur, Jakarta and Colombo.

I don't believe we'll see BA back in Kuala Lumpur any time soon. The airline seems to be concentrating on reiforcing their core markets, and it is likely that Singapore and Hongkong will be strengthened further rather than resources being spread out of various (new or reopened) stations.


User currently offlineG-CIVP From United Kingdom, joined Mar 2001, 1321 posts, RR: 10
Reply 8, posted (9 years 3 months 3 weeks 4 days 22 hours ago) and read 4743 times:

Just to say, I thought MAs flew to London three times a day? (unless the evening arrival night stops).

User currently offlineSydscott From Australia, joined Oct 2003, 2965 posts, RR: 20
Reply 9, posted (9 years 3 months 3 weeks 4 days 22 hours ago) and read 4719 times:

Quoting HB-IWC (Reply 7):
The airline seems to be concentrating on reiforcing their core markets, and it is likely that Singapore and Hongkong will be strengthened further rather than resources being spread out of various (new or reopened) stations.

Also remembering that all the services through Singapore are jointly done with Qantas giving BA a much better control over yields, scheduling and pricing. I doubt you'd see BA return to KL without being able to fly on to Australia under the JSA.

Also BA dont really have any LHR slots that they could allocate to the service.


User currently offlineAlanUK From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 10, posted (9 years 3 months 3 weeks 4 days 22 hours ago) and read 4695 times:

The main problem is the fact that MAS is highly and unfairly subsidized on the route. BA had to drop the route when MAS came up with silly fares that were simply impossible to compete against.

That also explains why MAS have so much frequency between KUL and LHR/MAN, as well as many other European cities. As usual, it's very easy to run an airline business with a government behind... (SQ/EK...)

Safe flying.


User currently offlineUnited Airline From Hong Kong, joined Jan 2001, 9168 posts, RR: 15
Reply 11, posted (9 years 3 months 3 weeks 4 days 21 hours ago) and read 4676 times:

I suppose they will be back again one day

What about TPE, MNL and AKL?


User currently offlineHB-IWC From Indonesia, joined Sep 2000, 4502 posts, RR: 72
Reply 12, posted (9 years 3 months 3 weeks 4 days 21 hours ago) and read 4644 times:

Quoting Sydscott (Reply 9):
Also BA dont really have any LHR slots that they could allocate to the service.

Given the large number of slots that BA is currently controling, I doubt there would be any problem in reallocating a slot used for domestic or European operations to accomodate additional longhaul traffic.


User currently offline6thfreedom From Bermuda, joined Sep 2004, 3325 posts, RR: 20
Reply 13, posted (9 years 3 months 3 weeks 4 days 19 hours ago) and read 4554 times:

Quoting G-CIVP (Reply 8):
Just to say, I thought MAs flew to London three times a day? (unless the evening arrival night stops).

KUL-LHR is 18 pw, with 4 pw KUL-MAN.

*T*TF*S 10:30a KUL 4:35p MAN 2 MH 12 Non-stop 744 13:05


*TW**SS 9:00a KUL 3:10p LHR 3 MH 8 Non-stop 744 13:10

MTWTFSS 12:00p KUL 6:10p LHR 3 MH 4 Non-stop 744 13:10 Effective Mar 27
MTWTFSS 11:40p KUL 5:50a+1 LHR 3 MH 2 Non-stop 744 13:10 Effective Mar 26

The MH8 return flight MH 7, stops in Penang 2pw and Langkawi 2pw on the return flight from LHR....


User currently onlineAIR MALTA From Malta, joined Sep 2001, 2498 posts, RR: 1
Reply 14, posted (9 years 3 months 3 weeks 4 days 15 hours ago) and read 4411 times:

And what about Seoul and Osaka... Are the yields so bad on those routes?


Next flights : BRU-ZRH-CAI (LX)/ BRU-FCO-TLV (AZ)
User currently offlineCedarjet From United Kingdom, joined May 1999, 8086 posts, RR: 54
Reply 15, posted (9 years 3 months 3 weeks 4 days 15 hours ago) and read 4410 times:

Seoul was only a tag-on to Tokyo. I'm surprised about the other Japanese routes though, I remember it was at the height of a recession that BA canned Osaka and Nagoya but I always expected them to be reinstated, certainly Osaka.

Re KL: do Qantas fly there? I remember they dropped the route for a while. Odd that such a major city could be without service from BA or QF, QF expecially cos it's so close to Oz. The Malaysian and British gov'ts had a massive falling out over something or other which affected traffic for BA. Most of MH's traffic on the route connects on to Australia or somewhere.



fly Saha Air 707s daily from Tehran's downtown Mehrabad to Mashhad, Kish Island and Ahwaz
User currently onlineAIR MALTA From Malta, joined Sep 2001, 2498 posts, RR: 1
Reply 16, posted (9 years 3 months 3 weeks 4 days 14 hours ago) and read 4348 times:

Quoting Cedarjet (Reply 15):
Seoul was only a tag-on to Tokyo.

Seould has had its own dedicated service but it was wxed. BA used to serve Tokyo, Osaka, Nagoya and Fukuoka... Those were days!



Next flights : BRU-ZRH-CAI (LX)/ BRU-FCO-TLV (AZ)
User currently offline6thfreedom From Bermuda, joined Sep 2004, 3325 posts, RR: 20
Reply 17, posted (9 years 3 months 3 weeks 4 days 14 hours ago) and read 4341 times:

QF and BA continue to focus on SIN as their SE Asian hub. KUL does not offer the same level of cargo and business traffic as SIN does.

Given KUL's proximity to SIN, I do not think they will re-enter the market anytime soon.

Also, as stated earlier, MH has a VERY agreesive pricing policy which would scare QF/BA. Furthermore, MH now has a very competitive product, especially in J/F.


User currently offlineRtfm From United Kingdom, joined Oct 2004, 417 posts, RR: 0
Reply 18, posted (9 years 3 months 3 weeks 4 days 14 hours ago) and read 4338 times:

Quoting Cedarjet (Reply 15):
Seoul was only a tag-on to Tokyo.

It may have been at one time, but when it was dropped it was a stand-alone destination.

Quoting Cedarjet (Reply 15):
Re KL: do Qantas fly there? I remember they dropped the route for a while.

No they don't; part of the reason a lot of carriers stopped flying to KUL was the very high airport charges when the new airport opened. That and the falling yields at the time meant that KUL became uneconomical to operate, especially when SIN was a better mini-hub for BA/QF.


User currently offlineGuyBetsy1 From Canada, joined Aug 2001, 840 posts, RR: 6
Reply 19, posted (9 years 3 months 3 weeks 4 days 13 hours ago) and read 4275 times:

Actually KUL has one of the regions lowest airport charges.. even when the new airport opened.

QF had already stopped flying to KUL before the new airport opened. They used to do something like SYD-SIN-KUL and v.v. with full traffic rights between SIN and KUL too!

BA did LHR-KUL-CGK v.v. BA banks heavily on the front end of the aircraft which out of Malaysia is weak.. but the back is full. But this doesn't matter to BA who would rather can the flights than fly that way.


User currently offlineThenoflyzone From Canada, joined Jan 2001, 2416 posts, RR: 11
Reply 20, posted (9 years 3 months 3 weeks 4 days 12 hours ago) and read 4220 times:

BA recently dropped CCS/BOG from their route network as well!

I wonder what destination they are going to scrap next!

TheNoFlyZone

[Edited 2005-04-30 19:11:34]


us Air Traffic Controllers have a good record, we haven't left one up there yet !!
User currently offlineFlyCaledonian From United Kingdom, joined Dec 2003, 2080 posts, RR: 3
Reply 21, posted (9 years 3 months 3 weeks 3 days 15 hours ago) and read 3601 times:

Osaka, Fukuoka, Nagoya, Seoul, Taipei, Manila, Kuala Lumpur, Colombo, Perth, Brisbane, Auckland, Karachi, Jeddah, Dhahran, Riyadh, Gaborone, Durban, Lilongwe, Seychelles, Abidjan, Santiago de Chile, Bogota, Caracas, Montego Bay, San Juan, San Jose (Costa Rica), Havana, Charlotte, Pittsburg and San Diego among others have all been ditched from the BA longhaul network in the past ten years.

But Denver, Phoenix, Abuja and Luanda have all been added, Melbourne was reinstated, while Shanghai comes online in June, followed by Bangalore in October.

As has been mentioned already, BA has upped capacity on many core routes and prefers to use its alliance partners more for flights that had low frequency or were tag ons, e.g. AA at MIA for South and Central America, plus the Caribbean, IB at MAD for the same, CX at HKG for Northeast Asia and QF at SIN for Australia. BA also has its franchise carriers - Comair provide a netwrork of flights for BA from JNB, while BMED operate smaller niche longhaul routes for BA from LHR.



Let's Go British Caledonian!
User currently offlineChinaeastern From China, joined Apr 2004, 348 posts, RR: 0
Reply 22, posted (9 years 3 months 3 weeks 2 days 22 hours ago) and read 3377 times:

any possibility for BA to extend PVG to AKL?

User currently offlineRTFM From United Kingdom, joined Oct 2004, 417 posts, RR: 0
Reply 23, posted (9 years 3 months 3 weeks 2 days 21 hours ago) and read 3343 times:

Quoting Chinaeastern (Reply 22):
any possibility for BA to extend PVG to AKL?

I would have thought that extrememly unlikely. I don't think that BA would have traffic rights between China and NZ so you would either have to take LHR-PVG seats away or you would end up with a pretty empty flight between PVG & AKL (similar issue that VS have with their LHR-HKG-SYD flight at the moment - and they do have HKG-Oz traffic rights).

With BA-QF JSA and oneworld, there are plenty of other options from LHR-AKL; either over LAX or via the SIN-SYD Kangaroo routes.


User currently offlineMAS777 From United Kingdom, joined Jul 1999, 2935 posts, RR: 6
Reply 24, posted (9 years 3 months 3 weeks 2 days 21 hours ago) and read 3340 times:

Quoting HB-IWC (Reply 7):
BA last served KUL five times weekly with B772 before closing the route because of what was called the lack of yields.

BA was actually operating 6x week 777 into KUL before they planned to revert to the 744 as GuyBetsy1 also mentioned BA was weak in the front end of the plane but cargo and economy loads were healthier than ever. The 777 'Y' cabin was too small for KUL and BA was in fact planning to revert to flying the 744 before the plug was pulled.

Quoting AlanUK (Reply 10):
The main problem is the fact that MAS is highly and unfairly subsidized on the route. BA had to drop the route when MAS came up with silly fares that were simply impossible to compete against.

That also explains why MAS have so much frequency between KUL and LHR/MAN, as well as many other European cities. As usual, it's very easy to run an airline business with a government behind..

British Airways fares were often the cheaper option to Kuala Lumpur and MAS actually usually charged more as their flights were always full to the brim. MAS fares have declined SINCE BA's withdrawal in order to compete with the likes of SQ, EK, CX, QR, etc. MAS fares have also dropped since as they now have the available capacity to charge lower fares for their cheapest seats with the monopoly it has on the route. MAS obtained these additional rights into Heathrow AS A RESULT of BA's withdrawal as the UK CAA awarded them to MAS, a few months after BA surrended them.

Also note that fares to KUL continue to cost more than flights to SIN today (even BA/QF fares LHR-SIN).


Speaking to friends and family who work at Waterside. BA was due to complete a new round of talks with the CAA and DCA(Malaysia) as it was keen to return to KUL by Winter 2005. These talks were scheduled for early this year but have heard nothing since.

I think BA has realised that perhaps withdrawing from KUL was perhaps a rather short-sighted move since it paved a 'golden' route for one of its main rivals in the SE Asian/Australian region. As many would say - you keep your friends close but your enemies closer. If BA/QF still operated to KUL - you probably wouldn't have seen MAS expanding so much in both the UK/Australia over the past few years - especially since LHR/Oz are MAS' cashcow longhaul routes.


25 ZKSUJ : AKL being one, others that spring to mins are MNL and PER
26 Ex_SQer : The Singapore government does not subsidize SQ's operations, and neither does it inject cash into the carrier. If my memory is correct, what was more
27 Post contains images Cx346 : lets not forget oneworld. BA limits CX's options in Europe, and vice versa, for the sake of better yields and profits on the network overall. why do y
28 MAS777 : but BA, QF and CX hardly cooperate on the OneWorld alliance in Asia - which is a shame. BA operated a 'dog-leg' code-share with CX flying LHR-HKG-KUL
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
British Airways To Fly Cardiff - New York JFK? posted Mon Dec 4 2006 01:55:13 by 8herveg
British Airways To Upgrade Dubai (DXB) posted Fri Oct 6 2006 22:24:21 by B742
British Airways To Expand In Eastern Europe posted Thu Mar 16 2006 12:22:14 by Vfw614
British Airways To Close Vienna Office.... posted Fri Feb 3 2006 22:36:22 by Beaucaire
British Airways To Seattle posted Wed Dec 7 2005 21:34:20 by Wrighbrothers
British Airways To Hassi Massaoud posted Fri Apr 8 2005 16:17:50 by AIR MALTA
British Airways To Addis Ababa Summer Schedule posted Tue Mar 29 2005 07:37:00 by ETStar
British Airways To Cut Back On 1st Class posted Thu Jul 29 2004 20:03:35 by Worldoftui
British Airways To Get A321 Next Month posted Mon Apr 19 2004 10:43:18 by Starlionblue
British Airways To Fly 747 To Riat Again? posted Sat Jan 3 2004 12:36:36 by Airplanepics