Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Japan To Develop RJ  
User currently offlineNosedive From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (9 years 3 months 3 weeks 2 days 16 hours ago) and read 1558 times:

Japan tries to get aerospace industry off the ground- The Japan Times

Quote:
The 50 billion yen project, shouldered equally by MHI and NEDO, aims to develop a 30- to 50-seat regional jet, a class of aircraft that faces relatively small competition in the world market.

I have a feeling it may become like....

Quote:
The YS-11, the 60- to 64-seat turboprop developed under a joint government-private sector project, is the only aircraft that made it to commercial production. Development began in 1959 with a budget of 5.7 billion yen.

Commercial production started in 1962, but it was terminated a little more than a decade later after 182 were built. The money-losing enterprise was not able to secure a market large enough to support itself.

But still, best of luck to the MJ!

5 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineRoseFlyer From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 9595 posts, RR: 52
Reply 1, posted (9 years 3 months 3 weeks 2 days 16 hours ago) and read 1552 times:

Quoting Nosedive (Thread starter):
a 30- to 50-seat regional jet, a class of aircraft that faces relatively small competition in the world market.

I thoroughly disagree with this statement. The ERJ series in particular fill this gap almost perfectly while the CRJ fills the upper half. The love affair with RJs at least in the US has reached its peak for the most part. There aren't many RJs being ordered any more. There is a lot of competition now, and both Bombardier and Embraer are focusing on larger planes since that is where the market is right now. There is no room right now with all the 50 seat RJs plus the super efficient props available now.

The only hope I believe that this plane will have is if it can finally combine RJ comfort and speed with turboprop efficiency. With the demanding schedules and high number of cycles, the CRJs and ERJs will begin to need replacements eventually, so that could set off a next generation RJ market, but that is in the future. This has to be an unbelievably good plane in order for it to sell. Even though regional aircraft have high turnaround and shorter life spans, for an airline to go for a new manufacturer, then the planes must be good. The Japanese are known for producing cheap yet good and reliable cars. If they can do to the aviation industry, what they did to cars, there is a chance. Who would have ever thought fifteen years ago that a Brazilian company would be leading the way in the 30 to 100 seat market?



If you have never designed an airplane part before, let the real designers do the work!
User currently offlineNosedive From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (9 years 3 months 3 weeks 2 days 15 hours ago) and read 1495 times:

Quoting RoseFlyer (Reply 1):
Quoting Nosedive (Thread starter):a 30- to 50-seat regional jet, a class of aircraft that faces relatively small competition in the world market.


I thoroughly disagree with this statement

You and me both.

Quoting RoseFlyer (Reply 1):
The only hope I believe that this plane will have is if it can finally combine RJ comfort and speed with turboprop efficiency.



Quoting RoseFlyer (Reply 1):
The Japanese are known for producing cheap yet good and reliable cars. If they can do to the aviation industry, what they did to cars, there is a chance.

The only way I can see this happening is via composite material, but will that lower the CASM enough to make the MJ attractive to regionals?


User currently offlinePlaneSmart From New Zealand, joined Dec 2004, 898 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (9 years 3 months 3 weeks 2 days 15 hours ago) and read 1474 times:

Expect a joint venture between B, Japanese and Brazilian or Canadian risk sharing partners on a range of jets, that may even include the 737 replacement. There may be 2 or even 3 production lines, with possibly none in the USA.

User currently offlineJet-lagged From United States of America, joined Mar 2002, 872 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (9 years 3 months 3 weeks 2 days 13 hours ago) and read 1431 times:

This is interesting. But I think China will beat them to it.

User currently offlineGQfluffy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (9 years 3 months 3 weeks 2 days 13 hours ago) and read 1426 times:

You assume countries will buy a/c from China.

fluffy


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Japan To Develop Passenger Airliner posted Wed Sep 6 2006 07:49:06 by Kalakaua
Japan, U.S. To Develop Supersonic Aircraft - Paper posted Sun May 7 2006 17:01:39 by Leelaw
ATR: No Plans To Develop RJ Family (Interview) posted Sun Jun 6 2004 03:07:43 by Teahan
Japan To Develop Supersonic Aircraft In March 2002 posted Thu Mar 1 2001 19:42:15 by Zennor
A380-900 Worth To Develop? posted Sat Dec 9 2006 21:00:10 by LHStarAlliance
Japan To Deliver 787 Sections posted Mon Dec 4 2006 19:33:51 by NYC777
Piper Aircraft To Develop VLJ posted Tue Oct 17 2006 10:07:57 by MrChips
Airbus To Develop Freighter Family posted Fri Jul 21 2006 15:05:50 by Cloudyapple
China To Develop Large Aircraft By 2015 posted Wed Mar 22 2006 19:19:50 by Egghead
What Happened To The RJ Defense Coalition? posted Wed Jan 25 2006 05:05:00 by Skibum9