Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
RWY 28 Departure At STT  
User currently offlineTjwgrr From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 2626 posts, RR: 2
Posted (11 years 3 weeks 6 days 17 hours ago) and read 1360 times:

Just got back from STT into EWR on a CO 73G. We had what I thought was a very unusual departure from rwy 28 instead of rwy 10. Winds favored rwy 10, and all arrivals and other departures were from rwy 10.

We were totally full- not one seat left. My hunch was we were so heavy, the crew was concerned about the rate of climb with the higher terrain off rwy 10. Wanted to ask the crew about it after we arrived in EWR, but they were occupied.

To any STT experts here- how often does this occur, especially if the winds favor rwy 10?

Direct KNOBS, maintain 2700' until established on the localizer, cleared ILS runway 26 left approach.
2 replies: All unread, jump to last
User currently offlineViflyer From US Virgin Islands, joined May 1999, 502 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (11 years 3 weeks 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 1314 times:

The main reason your flight departed from rwy 28 even though winds favored rwy 10 (About 99% of the time the winds out of STT favor rwy 10), was more than likely because of a obstacle clearance. Taking off of rwy 10 you have according to the charts the main obstacle is the slope of the hill at the end of rwy 10. Depending on the weight and the climb rate calculated for your flight, it probably favored taking the tail wind penalty of taking off of rwy 28 vs. The minimum climb rate for rwy 28.

It's not really that unusual to see, not very often but no unusual. CO tends to use 28 quite often, every now and then NA uses it too. Everyone else tends to use 10 (All the other majors use either a 757 or one of the A320 family out of STT).

Hope that helps


Here's some info on the Rwys at STT http://www.airnav.com/airport/TIST

[Edited 2005-05-04 07:38:26]

I reject your reality and subsitute my own
User currently offlineAirbazar From United States of America, joined Sep 2003, 9890 posts, RR: 10
Reply 2, posted (11 years 3 weeks 6 days 3 hours ago) and read 1278 times:

So what you're saying is that an A320 has a better climb rate than a 73G?  bomb   wink 

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Freq For Rwy 11 Arrivals At EWR? posted Thu May 24 2007 00:38:27 by Timz
BA Morning Departure At YYZ posted Fri Oct 13 2006 15:07:59 by GoBlue
Closure Of RWY 7R/25L At LAX.... Impact? posted Sun Jul 2 2006 17:56:02 by 9V-SPJ
Future Of RWY 06/24C At CLE posted Tue May 24 2005 06:02:35 by Airknight
Odd BA Departure At SEA... posted Fri Aug 20 2004 02:19:16 by SupraZachAir
19R Departure At SFO This Morning posted Tue Mar 16 2004 19:10:29 by Roots
Extra BA Concorde Departure At JFK Friday Oct 3rd posted Fri Oct 3 2003 01:57:21 by LGA777
Rwy 13R-31L At DAL posted Thu Jul 31 2003 04:08:42 by DodgeCharger
Status Of RWY 17L/35R At MCO posted Sat Jan 11 2003 18:29:30 by DeltAirlines
Rwy 24L/06R At YYZ posted Mon Oct 7 2002 20:52:30 by Gmonney