Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Alaska Wins LAX-MEX Authority  
User currently offlineA330323X From United States of America, joined Oct 2003, 3039 posts, RR: 44
Posted (9 years 2 months 3 weeks 1 day 2 hours ago) and read 3135 times:

Alaska Airlines has won the LAX-MEX authority that it, American, Continental, and America West were competing for. America West has been awarded the backup authority.

See http://dmses.dot.gov/docimages/pdf92/328083_web.pdf.


I'm the expert on here on two things, neither of which I care about much anymore.
27 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineMAH4546 From Sweden, joined Jan 2001, 32602 posts, RR: 72
Reply 1, posted (9 years 2 months 3 weeks 1 day 2 hours ago) and read 3104 times:

I was hoping for American, but I knew Alaska would get this. They'll do great in the market.

I was shocked to read that LAX-MEX is the third largest US-Mexico O&D market (after NYC-MEX and MIA-MEX). I for sure would have thought it was the largest, even though there is so much traffic from Los Angeles to other gateways, like GDL.



a.
User currently offlineOzarkD9S From United States of America, joined Oct 2001, 5001 posts, RR: 21
Reply 2, posted (9 years 2 months 3 weeks 1 day 1 hour ago) and read 3071 times:

AA can still serve the route through the AS codeshare. Can't they?


Next Up: STL-LGA-RIC-ATL-STL
User currently offlineLaxintl From United States of America, joined May 2000, 24813 posts, RR: 46
Reply 3, posted (9 years 2 months 3 weeks 1 day 1 hour ago) and read 3054 times:

I'm sure Alaska will do a great job in the market also. The carrier has a strong and popular Mexico network, and the addition of Mexico City will only enhance this, and allow the carrier to add another feather to its cap.

Quoting OzarkD9S (Reply 2):
AA can still serve the route through the AS codeshare. Can't they?

AA allready code shares with Mexicana on the route. This was actualy one reason the DOT listed against AA's application.



From the desert to the sea, to all of Southern California
User currently offlineRwSEA From Netherlands, joined Jan 2005, 3077 posts, RR: 2
Reply 4, posted (9 years 2 months 3 weeks 1 day 1 hour ago) and read 3020 times:

This will be great for AS passengers. Also, it will be great for DL and AA passengers as they will be able to earn miles on AS. I bet the people who used to fly DL on this route are happy that they can still earn the SkyMiles.

AS sure seems to be building a nice Mexico network out of LAX. I recently heard that AS now carries the most international pax at LAX?


User currently offlineAS739X From United States of America, joined Apr 2003, 6088 posts, RR: 24
Reply 5, posted (9 years 2 months 3 weeks 1 day 1 hour ago) and read 3017 times:

Great news! Not even posted on www.alaskasworld.com!

Thanks guys!

ASSFO



"Some pilots avoid storm cells and some play connect the dots!"
User currently offlineGhost77 From Mexico, joined Mar 2000, 5215 posts, RR: 51
Reply 6, posted (9 years 2 months 3 weeks 1 day 1 hour ago) and read 2996 times:

Sweet!!!!! Super news!!!  champagne  Fares will drop dramatically on the route and flights to LAX via GDL!!!  checkmark  Any date given so far for first flight?

Welcome back AS!!  bigthumbsup 

Ricardo APM



Ricardo Morales - flyAPM - ¡No es que maneje rapido, solo estoy volando lento!
User currently offlineByrdluvs747 From United States of America, joined Jul 2004, 2346 posts, RR: 1
Reply 7, posted (9 years 2 months 3 weeks 1 day 1 hour ago) and read 2987 times:

Well, so much for all the "America West has a snowball's chance in..." talk. They came out better than CO and AA.

So now I have to place a mojo on AS Big grin



The 747: The hands who designed it were guided by god.
User currently offlineMGA From Nicaragua, joined Mar 2005, 726 posts, RR: 4
Reply 8, posted (9 years 2 months 3 weeks 1 day 1 hour ago) and read 2986 times:

Quoting MAH4546 (Reply 1):
I was shocked to read that LAX-MEX is the third largest US-Mexico O&D market (after NYC-MEX and MIA-MEX).

Where did you hear this?

Back to the subject; Will they fly a 738 on the route?

MGA



Que viva el guaro, el dinero y los aviones!!!
User currently offlineMAH4546 From Sweden, joined Jan 2001, 32602 posts, RR: 72
Reply 9, posted (9 years 2 months 3 weeks 1 day 1 hour ago) and read 2961 times:

Quoting Ghost77 (Reply 6):
Fares will drop dramatically on the route and flights to LAX via GDL!!!

Fares will not drop dramatically. This is still a high-fare market and Alaska is not a low-fare carrier.

Quoting MGA (Reply 8):
Where did you hear this?

It was in the final decission docket sent out by DOT.

Quoting MGA (Reply 8):

Back to the subject; Will they fly a 738 on the route?

Yes. One 738 and one 73G.



a.
User currently offlineLUV4JFK From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 462 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (9 years 2 months 3 weeks 1 day 1 hour ago) and read 2937 times:

Quoting MAH4546 (Reply 1):
I was shocked to read that LAX-MEX is the third largest US-Mexico O&D market (after NYC-MEX and MIA-MEX).

I highly doubt that NYC-MEX is the largest US-Mexico O&D market, especially when there are only 6 flights combined from JFK & EWR to Mexico City, while LAX has anywhere from 13 to 16 a day...at least! They must have made a mistake.

LUV4JFK
 yes 



John F. Kennedy International Airport: Where America Greets The World.
User currently offlineAdriaticus From Mexico, joined May 2004, 1136 posts, RR: 19
Reply 11, posted (9 years 2 months 3 weeks 1 day 1 hour ago) and read 2922 times:

Great news for SkyTeam members...!!

Quoting RwSEA (Reply 4):
I bet the people who used to fly DL on this route are happy that they can still earn the SkyMiles.

AM has continued to fly this route at all times, so SkyMiles accrual never stopped... Now there are just more options.

__Ad.



A300/18/19/20/21 B721/2 B732/3/G/8 B741/2/4 B752 B762/3/4 B772/3 DC8/9/10 MD11 TU134/154 IL62/86 An24 SA340/2000 E45/90
User currently offlineN1120A From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 26361 posts, RR: 76
Reply 12, posted (9 years 2 months 3 weeks 1 day 1 hour ago) and read 2882 times:

Quoting MAH4546 (Reply 9):
This is still a high-fare market and Alaska is not a low-fare carrier.

AS does tend to undercut competitors on Mexico routes.



Mangeons les French fries, mais surtout pratiquons avec fierte le French kiss
User currently offlineCoronado990 From United States of America, joined Oct 2003, 1597 posts, RR: 2
Reply 13, posted (9 years 2 months 3 weeks 23 hours ago) and read 2786 times:

Once LAX-MEX is established, will there be other AS non-stops to MEX such as SAN, SFO, PDX or SEA? SAN sure could use a non-stop to MEX.


Uncle SAN at your service!
User currently offlineEA CO AS From United States of America, joined Nov 2001, 13508 posts, RR: 62
Reply 14, posted (9 years 2 months 3 weeks 23 hours ago) and read 2773 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Here's the official press release:

Contact: Caroline Boren -or- Sam Sperry
206-392-5799 206-392-5038

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE May 4, 2005


ALASKA AIRLINES WINS APPROVAL TO SERVE MEXICO CITY


SEATTLE — Alaska Airlines received approval today from the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) to launch service between Los Angeles International Airport and Mexico City. Subject to government approval, Alaska will inaugurate service on Aug. 2 with one daily nonstop and will add a second daily nonstop shortly thereafter.

Flights will be routed Seattle-Los Angeles-Mexico City and Portland-Los Angeles-Mexico City, extending the benefits of Mexico City service to customers in the Pacific Northwest, Alaska and throughout Alaska Airlines’ route network.

“This award represents the culmination of our long pursuit of entry into the single largest U.S./Mexico market,” said Bill Ayer, chairman and chief executive officer of Alaska Airlines. “We are grateful to Secretary Mineta and the DOT for their favorable consideration of our application.”

The coveted route became available when Delta Air Lines, one of two U.S. carriers flying the route, announced that it would discontinue service at the end of January 2005. The United States-Mexico bilateral agreement, which governs air service between the two countries, limits service on the route to two carriers from each country.

Ayer said Alaska received hundreds of letters of support for its application. “We greatly appreciate the outpouring of support from our employees, union leadership, the communities we serve, and business and political leaders who, through their own grass-roots efforts, helped make a very compelling case for Alaska Airlines,” Ayer said.

Specifically, Ayer thanked members of the Alaska, Washington and Oregon congressional delegations, many of whom personally contacted the DOT to express their support for Alaska Airlines’ application; as well as Washington Governor Christine Gregoire, Oregon Governor Ted Kulongoski and Los Angeles Mayor James Hahn, who also conveyed to the DOT their backing of the Alaska bid.

A mile high and steeped in history, Mexico City is the capital city of Mexico. It is home to 20 million people making it the largest city in the world, as well as the oldest continuously inhabited city in the Western Hemisphere. It is frequented year-round by both leisure and business travelers.

Alaska Airlines inaugurated service to Mexico in 1988 and currently serves eight cities in Mexico, including Cancun, Los Cabos, Loreto, Guadalajara, Ixtapa/Zihuatanejo, Manzanillo, Mazatlan and Puerto Vallarta.

Alaska and sister carrier, Horizon Air, together serve more than 80 cities through an expansive network throughout Alaska, the Lower 48, Canada and Mexico. For reservations visit alaskaair.com. For more news and information, visit the Alaska Airlines newsroom on the Internet at http://newsroom.alaskaair.com.



"In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem - government IS the problem." - Ronald Reagan
User currently offlineN1120A From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 26361 posts, RR: 76
Reply 15, posted (9 years 2 months 3 weeks 23 hours ago) and read 2770 times:

Quoting Coronado990 (Reply 13):
Once LAX-MEX is established, will there be other AS non-stops to MEX such as SAN, SFO, PDX or SEA? SAN sure could use a non-stop to MEX.

They would have to apply for it, but if the routes are available, it should not be an issue. It would not be the same kind of fight over those destinations as there was over LAX-MEX



Mangeons les French fries, mais surtout pratiquons avec fierte le French kiss
User currently offlineEA CO AS From United States of America, joined Nov 2001, 13508 posts, RR: 62
Reply 16, posted (9 years 2 months 3 weeks 22 hours ago) and read 2717 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Once LAX-MEX is established, will there be other AS non-stops to MEX such as SAN, SFO, PDX or SEA? SAN sure could use a non-stop to MEX.

The flights will be routed SEA-LAX-MEX and PDX-LAX-MEX, respectively. Anyone wanting to fly to MEX from SFO or SAN will just be connecting through LAX via AS/AA codeshare service (and the one SFO-LAX flight they offer on their own metal).

This way they can maximize the revenue - LAX-MEX O&D traffic plus the connecting traffic from other cities.



"In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem - government IS the problem." - Ronald Reagan
User currently offlineSFOMEX From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 17, posted (9 years 2 months 3 weeks 22 hours ago) and read 2650 times:

Quoting Coronado990 (Reply 13):
Once LAX-MEX is established, will there be other AS non-stops to MEX such as SAN, SFO, PDX or SEA?

SFO-MEX should be next. Nowadays, only UA and MX fly the route which is odd if you consider the value of SFO as leisure and business destination. Moreover, ethnic travelers are all over the Bay Area.

Good luck to AS!


User currently offlineLACA773 From United States of America, joined Nov 2004, 4002 posts, RR: 2
Reply 18, posted (9 years 2 months 3 weeks 21 hours ago) and read 2544 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Congratulations to AS!!! I was hoping they'd get it, and here they are. They're clearly the best choice and will provide excellent service on this routing as well as high quality inflight service that will surpase anything AA has ever offered, the "nothing" HP offers out of PHX. I think they'll give UA a run for their money.

User currently offlineKahala777 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 19, posted (9 years 2 months 3 weeks 20 hours ago) and read 2498 times:

Quoting LACA773 (Reply 18):
They're clearly the best choice and will provide excellent service on this routing as well as high quality inflight service that will surpase anything AA has ever offered, the "nothing" HP offers out of PHX. I think they'll give UA a run for their money

Ha Ha, you seem to be confusing Alaska Airlines for some mighty Asian airline. Alaska, offers nothing more than any of the other competitors on the Los Angeles to Mexico market. In addition if you have flown Alaska Airlines lately you will notice that hard times have hit, more noticeably to in flight meals!


Regards - Kahala777


User currently offlineDALFlyer From United States of America, joined Aug 2000, 56 posts, RR: 0
Reply 20, posted (9 years 2 months 3 weeks 19 hours ago) and read 2434 times:

GOOD FOR AS! I am glad for them.

So much for increased international destinations by Delta. Then again, it's all about business as usual. I don't blame Delta for dropping the route although I wish they didn't. It's too expensive here in LA to operate a business. That's why you see big industries leaving California, especially Southern California.

Fly in the know!~Delta

DALFlyer


User currently offlineByrdluvs747 From United States of America, joined Jul 2004, 2346 posts, RR: 1
Reply 21, posted (9 years 2 months 3 weeks 18 hours ago) and read 2377 times:

Quoting LACA773 (Reply 18):
as well as high quality inflight service that will surpase anything AA has ever offered, the "nothing" HP offers out of PHX

 Yeah sure

Yeah....ok. Clearly its been a while since you've flown AS.



The 747: The hands who designed it were guided by god.
User currently offlineEA CO AS From United States of America, joined Nov 2001, 13508 posts, RR: 62
Reply 22, posted (9 years 2 months 3 weeks 17 hours ago) and read 2345 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Yeah....ok. Clearly its been a while since you've flown AS.

Typical grousing from Byrdluvs747 - that can be ignored.

AS isn't what they used to be - but they're still FAR superior to HP, and even my friends who are HP flight attendants and my fiancee who works in their Corporate office agree with that assessment.



"In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem - government IS the problem." - Ronald Reagan
User currently offlineN1120A From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 26361 posts, RR: 76
Reply 23, posted (9 years 2 months 3 weeks 17 hours ago) and read 2333 times:

Quoting DALFlyer (Reply 20):

So much for increased international destinations by Delta. Then again, it's all about business as usual. I don't blame Delta for dropping the route although I wish they didn't. It's too expensive here in LA to operate a business. That's why you see big industries leaving California, especially Southern California.

What are you talking about? As far as airlines go, LAX is one of the best places to operate. It is just a matter of DL wanting to slim down their ops and having the ability to code with AM.



Mangeons les French fries, mais surtout pratiquons avec fierte le French kiss
User currently offlineUnmlobo From United States of America, joined Apr 2004, 204 posts, RR: 1
Reply 24, posted (9 years 2 months 3 weeks 17 hours ago) and read 2339 times:

uhhh...I wouldn't say FAR superior especially for anything other than a transcon since those are the only AS flights I've been on recently that have had meals. Flying between PDX-PHX for example the service will be nearly identical, although if you fly on an Airbus HP you may get a movie if the movie their showing that month is short enough.


The views expressed do not necessarily represent those of Southwest Airlines its Directors or its Employees
25 AS739X : Coronodo990: Hate to break it to you, but do not look for AS to start a bunch of routes to MEX. AS passengers going to MEX will be routed thru LAX. We
26 Coronado990 : Thanks for your input AS739X. I guess we'll need to be satisfied with AM one-stop service to MEX or crossing the border for the non-stops out of TIJ.
27 PlaneGuy27 : Keep in mind. Alaska's route authority for MEX is only out of LAX-MEX. There are restrictions in the city pair markets - only two us and two mexican c
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Alaska Airines From MEX To LAX Any Info? posted Thu Jan 5 2006 08:28:47 by Theredbaron
Alaska LAX-MEX Started posted Tue Aug 2 2005 14:28:24 by AS739X
LAX-MEX Route Authority posted Thu Apr 21 2005 19:46:24 by Aacun
Alaska Airlines Files LAX-MEX To DOT Twice Daily posted Wed Feb 23 2005 23:15:29 by As739x
Alaska 4th Airline To Apply For LAX-MEX posted Fri Jan 14 2005 09:59:47 by Trvlr
AS LAX-MEX=Waste posted Mon Sep 5 2005 07:00:07 by Airlinerfreak
Mexicana's 767 Doing LAX-MEX? Yes? No? Maybe? posted Mon Aug 22 2005 21:42:06 by LAN340
LAX-MEX posted Tue Mar 29 2005 20:35:01 by CALMSP
LAX-MEX Approval, When? posted Fri Mar 25 2005 16:56:52 by AS739X
UA To Add An Additional LAX-MEX Flight posted Thu Mar 17 2005 21:35:34 by Iowaman