Avion From Bouvet Island, joined May 1999, 2205 posts, RR: 7 Posted (15 years 3 months 3 weeks 1 day 17 hours ago) and read 1448 times:
Why didn't Crossair order the 717 instead of the ER-190. If i recall correctly both seat about the same amount of passengers. Crossair has placed a firm order for 60 ERJ-190 why didnt Boeing get this sizeable order.
ZRH From Switzerland, joined Nov 1999, 5585 posts, RR: 34
Reply 1, posted (15 years 3 months 3 weeks 1 day 17 hours ago) and read 1346 times:
Crossair has ordered the ERJ 135, 145 and 170. Together with the 190 they have an aircraft family witch is more economic and they perhaps got the better price. I think that's the reason why they didn't order the B 717.
LH423 From Canada, joined Jul 1999, 6501 posts, RR: 53
Reply 2, posted (15 years 3 months 3 weeks 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 1336 times:
You know how people are always saying that the airlines favour Airbus because of the cockpit and cabin commonality, well the same rule applies here. I'm pretty sure that because of the ERJ-145 is the max for the a/c design, the ERJ-170/190 are totally different aeroplanes on the exterior, and hence cannot be common fleet-wide, BUT the pilots can fly the ERJ-135/145, and others can fly the ERJ-170/190, which offers more commonality to the fleet than the 717 would.
« On ne voit bien qu'avec le cœur. L'essentiel est invisible pour les yeux » Antoine de Saint-Exupéry
Sammyk From United States of America, joined Oct 1999, 1696 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (15 years 3 months 3 weeks 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 1320 times:
I thought the EMB-170/190 will be 2+2 as opposed to the 1+2 on the -135/145. How would this make it a common cabin? I think these are completely different aircraft. Different engines, cockpit, fuselage, etc. I would imagine if they had more in common to their little cousins, they would get it to market sooner.