Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Marketing Philisophies  
User currently offlineF4n From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (16 years 1 month 2 weeks 2 days 3 hours ago) and read 1140 times:

To all: As a relatively recent participant in the Forum, I am always amazed at how strongly people feel about A3XX(feasibility, potential,ect) and its competitor, the 747 and its potential developments. While I understand that much of that feeling has to do with one's personal circumstances(citizenship, employment,ect), I wonder why there has not been much time devoted to exploring how Boeing and Airbus can come to such different conclusions about the a/c marketplace and the planes needed to serve it. After all, they both talk to the same airlines.
I realize that this post may take us back to ground which has been previously debated, but again, I am relatively new here. If this bothers you, please pass it by; if not, I welcome your thoughts and insights!



3 replies: All unread, jump to last
User currently offlineKLM 777 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (16 years 1 month 2 weeks 2 days 3 hours ago) and read 1007 times:

Airbus needed a way to get a leg-over on Boeing. Since the latter was already known for its high-quality aircraft, Airbus countered with ungodly amounts of technology. IFE, Drop-down screens, fully FBW aircraft that more or less fly themselves.....

User currently offlineYaki1 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (16 years 1 month 2 weeks 2 days 1 hour ago) and read 996 times:

The small commercial airliners (737, A319/20) are not very profitable compared to products like the 747. Airbus wants a larger part of the higher margin aircraft, so they have more incentive to take risks and enter the market. Boeing has recently spent a significant amount of money on there new FAIT tooling for the 747 production line, and hopes to produce the fleet for many more years. When Boeing first produced the 747 they were a bold risk taker, now they seem more inclined to only react to Airbus. Eventually a new large aircraft will be produced, as great at the 747 is it can't live forever, the question is whether now is the time. The advantage for Airbus is that it would be new technology, it may make it as the large aircraft of the future. (There is a particular need for a large freighter which is now the 747's major markets). Many people predicted Boeing was wrong with the 747 as they do with the 3xx, only time will tell.

User currently offlineAb.400 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (16 years 1 month 2 weeks 2 days 1 hour ago) and read 998 times:

Airbus is hungry for the top, the 747 is more than aging and the 777 is nothing to take serious. Since more and more airlines benefit from comunality and economies which is offered by Airbus, the logical step is towards A3XX. Boeing seems to be asleep, wonder where all the money went which they earned while beeing undisputed leader in civil-AC-market.

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Airlines Doing A Poor Job Of Marketing Products posted Tue Jun 2 2009 13:29:39 by TomFoolery
Marketing Gimmicks On The 787 And A350? posted Wed Apr 1 2009 11:43:00 by CEO@AFG
PIT Details Marketing, Rev Guarantees For PIT-CDG posted Sat Dec 13 2008 16:52:45 by TOLtommy
DL/AS To Announce Marketing Alliance posted Thu Nov 13 2008 23:23:06 by OA412
British Airways New Marketing Campaign..but Is It? posted Tue Aug 5 2008 07:30:29 by OA260
Airlines (Volaris) Different Marketing Gimmicks posted Wed Jul 9 2008 12:55:58 by Marcus
Youngstown Launches Marketing Plan For Allegiant posted Thu Mar 20 2008 13:26:50 by YNGguins
DFW Launches Marketing Campaign In LatAm posted Wed Nov 7 2007 10:37:51 by USADreamliner
Youngstown-Warren Looking For Marketing Director posted Thu Sep 20 2007 12:38:57 by YNGguins
New Route Marketing Question posted Thu Jul 26 2007 16:26:07 by Mrmoose