Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Japanese Widebodies On Domestic Routes  
User currently offlineLazyshaun From United Kingdom, joined May 2005, 548 posts, RR: 0
Posted (9 years 3 months 3 weeks 6 days 4 hours ago) and read 4035 times:

Hi all,

I would like to know why the two main Japanese airlines (JAL/ANA), use so many widebodies for their domestic routes? Why not just use 737s or 320s for these routes? I know using things like a 757 or maybe 767, but 773 and 744 are too large I think to use on these small routes. This goes for eastern routes in general really, as many eastern airlines use large aircraft for small routes (e.g. Japan to China, Korea, Malaysia, Thailand)

Thanks for any help.

-lazyshaun-


I came. I saw. I conquered
11 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineKtachiya From Japan, joined Sep 2004, 1794 posts, RR: 2
Reply 1, posted (9 years 3 months 3 weeks 6 days 4 hours ago) and read 4024 times:

I think you might have found a lot of information if you had read other posts on similar topics as this. Although there is a shift to frequency nowadays, think about how congested many airports in Japan are.

NRT only has one long rwy 34L/16R
ITM only has one long rwy 32L/14R
KIX has one rwy 06/24
OKA has one rwy 12/30
NGO has one rwy 18/36

So even if you wanted to get A320 and 737 off the ground on this, this is impossible. Think about the nature of Japanese ppl and look at the island nature of the whole country. Then airtransportation should be the easiest ways of taking you to places.



Flown on: DC-10-30, B747-200B, B747-300, B747-300SR, B747-400, B747-400D, B767-300, B777-200, B777-200ER, B777-300
User currently offlineFlySSC From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 7411 posts, RR: 57
Reply 2, posted (9 years 3 months 3 weeks 6 days 4 hours ago) and read 3994 times:

Quoting Lazyshaun (Thread starter):
Why not just use 737s or 320s for these routes?

BIG demand + Slot restrictions + economical considerations = Better to use 1 B744 rather than 4 A320.


User currently offlineDoona From Sweden, joined Feb 2005, 3769 posts, RR: 13
Reply 3, posted (9 years 3 months 3 weeks 6 days 3 hours ago) and read 3975 times:

Quoting Lazyshaun (Thread starter):
This goes for eastern routes in general really, as many eastern airlines use large aircraft for small routes (e.g. Japan to China, Korea, Malaysia, Thailand)

Japan to Korea? Say, NRT to ICN? A small route? I hope you mean that it is short. The Asian markets are huge! The population centres in Japan, and indeed the rest of Asia, are bigger than Europe and the USA. And since Japan is a pretty small place (geographically), demand for flying from Tokyo to Osaka is pretty huge. And as Ktachiya and FlySSC have already pointed out, since the amount of traffic is still pretty great, larger A/C are needed.

Cheers
Mats



Sure, we're concerned for our lives. Just not as concerned as saving 9 bucks on a roundtrip to Ft. Myers.
User currently offlineDAL767400ER From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (9 years 3 months 3 weeks 6 days 3 hours ago) and read 3932 times:

Quoting Lazyshaun (Thread starter):
Why not just use 737s or 320s for these routes?

Because then you'd see ANA and JAL planes depart every 5 minutes after another on one single route, due to the demand  Wink .


User currently offlineLurch From United States of America, joined Jul 2008, 0 posts, RR: 1
Reply 5, posted (9 years 3 months 3 weeks 6 days 2 hours ago) and read 3914 times:

JAL and ANA use 747-400D D = Domestic which should be a give away as in these machines are specially made to handle a lot more cycles than a standard 747-400 1 take off 1 landing = 1 cycle.

JAL operate 8 747-446D machines and 2 747-346SR machine all on domestic and short routes along with a lot of its old 747-346s.

Also JAL Domestic has a massive fleet made up of a300s 767 777 DC-10-40s and loads of different MDs all on domestic routes!

ANA have 13 747-481Ds and 2 older 747-281SR in service and loads of non er 777s as well


User currently offlineKahala777 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 6, posted (9 years 3 months 3 weeks 6 days 2 hours ago) and read 3910 times:

Quoting Ktachiya (Reply 1):
So even if you wanted to get A320 and 737 off the ground on this, this is impossible.

Funny ANA and JAL do it daily!

 Wink


Regards - Kahala777


User currently offlineMAS777 From United Kingdom, joined Jul 1999, 2935 posts, RR: 6
Reply 7, posted (9 years 3 months 3 weeks 6 days 2 hours ago) and read 3863 times:

Malaysia Airlines also uses widebodies on domestic routes with the A330/332, 777 and 744 being flown on domestic sectors.

User currently offlineCarpethead From Japan, joined Aug 2004, 2954 posts, RR: 3
Reply 8, posted (9 years 3 months 3 weeks 6 days 1 hour ago) and read 3841 times:

If HND had four runways, then the largest aircraft would be a 767/AB6. Unfortunately, it has only three runways and in essense is only a two runway operational airport. HND-CTS, FUK, & ITM are one of the top three airport pairs for pax numbers worldwide (HND-CTS being #1). ITM is smack in a city with slot limitation not due to congestion but limiting the amount of flights. Other than a handful of trunk routes to FUK, HND, CTS, & OKA, ITM is basically an A320/737 airport.

If Tokyo planners had foresight in the 1960s, they should have built four runways, but they didn't. Thus leading to use of 744D, 773, 772, 763 & AB6 on routes no more than two hours. HND is in all purposes slot limited due to congestion because from 0800 to 2100, there is a steady flow of arrivals and departures. NRT isn't that congested operationally but, the operators are very conservative to slot allocation.


User currently onlineN1120A From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 26450 posts, RR: 75
Reply 9, posted (9 years 3 months 3 weeks 6 days 1 hour ago) and read 3825 times:

Quoting Ktachiya (Reply 1):
NRT only has one long rwy 34L/16R

Which both the 773 and 744D can use for short hauls

Quoting Ktachiya (Reply 1):
ITM only has one long rwy 32L/14R

Which narrowbodies can use

Quoting Carpethead (Reply 8):
If HND had four runways, then the largest aircraft would be a 767/AB6.

Likely the 747/777 Domestics would still fly in because of demand and seat-mile costs



Mangeons les French fries, mais surtout pratiquons avec fierte le French kiss
User currently offlineFlySSC From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 7411 posts, RR: 57
Reply 10, posted (9 years 3 months 3 weeks 5 days 12 hours ago) and read 3685 times:

JAL and ANA were not the only airlines to use widebodies on a Domestic network.
Former French domestic Airline "Air Inter" was operating until the mid-90's a strong fleet of 22 A300 configured in a single 314 Y seats.
Air Inter (IT) was the launch company for the A330-300 and operated up to 4 aircraft, configured in a single 412 Y seats on the biggest routes in France, from ORY to MRS, NCE, BOD, TLS mostly.
All this was before the TGV (High speed train) expansion.
In 1988, IT leased a B747-100 from AF and was operating it from ORY to MRS, NCE and BOD weekdays.
IT was close to make a deal with JAL to buy 3 second-hand B747SR but finally, after strong pressure from Airbus, they bought 4 second-hand A300 (from Dan-Air & Hapag-Lloyd).


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Marc Lehmann
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Alastair T. Gardiner



View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Remi Dallot
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Remi Dallot



User currently offline123 From Bolivia, joined Nov 2003, 745 posts, RR: 3
Reply 11, posted (9 years 3 months 3 weeks 5 days 11 hours ago) and read 3652 times:

Just check www.amadeus.net for any given Monday, HND/ITM (Haneda, Tokyo, to Itami, Osaka) and you will note the high quantity of widebody frequencies on that one given route. The airlines do that because of slot, yes, but also because normally the loads are really very high. Not to forget, the bullet train that runs paralell I think every 10 minutes. You´ve got a huge quantity of travellers between - in this example - these two cities only.

Different is SDD (Santos Dumont, Rio) - CGH (Congonhas, Sao Paulo), where no widebodies are used probably because of airport / runway capacities, but if you want you can fly just about every 15 minutes between those cities. It´s like hopping on a city bus.

LH takes occasionally a 744 between FRA/BER (TXL) due to high loads, but that is not scheduled, it is normally last-minute adjustment due to demand.

RG use their MD-11 / 777 between POA-GRU-GIG both to meet demand and also as ferry flights, which is same as LB using their 763's between CBB-VVI


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
How Do They Fill Up Widebodies On Domestic Routes? posted Tue Aug 1 2006 04:57:12 by BizJet
CO Widebodies On Domestic Routes posted Tue Aug 23 2005 20:36:39 by MFEFlyer
747s On Domestic Routes In Japan posted Tue May 3 2005 19:52:26 by Lindy Field
747's On Domestic Routes? posted Mon Jun 24 2002 04:44:33 by Hamfist
Does Delta Still MD-11s On Domestic Routes In US? posted Tue Jun 11 2002 22:39:32 by Bobcat
Less Widebodies On Regional Routes For Qatar Airwa posted Tue Mar 19 2002 16:43:50 by Qatar
747's On Domestic Routes World Wide posted Thu Sep 13 2001 16:50:16 by Airmale
Free Alcohol On Domestic Routes? posted Sat Sep 9 2000 17:33:51 by SEVEN_FIFTY7
3 Class 757's On Domestic Routes posted Sat Sep 4 1999 22:56:04 by OCX
Using 777 On Domestic Routes posted Fri Jul 2 1999 06:24:40 by William