Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
A340 Retrofit?  
User currently offlineStirling From Italy, joined Jun 2004, 3943 posts, RR: 21
Posted (9 years 5 months 2 weeks 6 days 17 hours ago) and read 1935 times:

Is it possible for an A340-200 or A340-300 to have it's powerplants upgraded ala' the DC-8-70 series, KC-135R, and Convairliner (CV-240/340/440)


I tried searching the archives, I would have swore this was mentioned briefly once in the past with no luck.....


Delete this User
15 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineKL808 From United States of America, joined May 1999, 1584 posts, RR: 2
Reply 1, posted (9 years 5 months 2 weeks 6 days 17 hours ago) and read 1909 times:

you wanna put CFM56 on that thing. I dont think that would be advisable.

You could probably retrofit the engines to get performance like the E version.

Drew



AMS-LAX-MNL
User currently offlineSammyk From United States of America, joined exactly 15 years ago today! , 1690 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (9 years 5 months 2 weeks 6 days 17 hours ago) and read 1880 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Umm doesn't the A342/343 already have CFM56s?

User currently offlineBennett123 From United Kingdom, joined Aug 2004, 7698 posts, RR: 3
Reply 3, posted (9 years 5 months 2 weeks 6 days 17 hours ago) and read 1859 times:

I think that he meant re-engining, rather than re-engining with CFM56.

I could be wrong.


User currently offlineStirling From Italy, joined Jun 2004, 3943 posts, RR: 21
Reply 4, posted (9 years 5 months 2 weeks 6 days 14 hours ago) and read 1745 times:

I was thinking along the lines of the RR Trent 556.

CFMs on a Convairliner? That would be a sight to see!  wideeyed 
Since it most likely would only need one! Put that baby on top of the fuselage!
Kinda like one of those first generation German fighters! (btw, which one am I thinking about?)

So, I'll ask again, with more clarity...Can the powerplants on the A340-200 and A340-300 be uprated?



Delete this User
User currently offlineKC135TopBoom From United States of America, joined Jan 2005, 12158 posts, RR: 51
Reply 5, posted (9 years 5 months 2 weeks 6 days 14 hours ago) and read 1728 times:

Quoting Stirling (Reply 4):
Kinda like one of those first generation German fighters! (btw, which one am I thinking about?)

Me-163 or the V-1?

Quoting Stirling (Reply 4):
Can the powerplants on the A340-200 and A340-300 be uprated?

How about 4 PW-2040s from the B-757?

Yeah, get rid of the "hairdryer" engines on the A-342/3


User currently offlineKC135R From United States of America, joined Apr 2005, 728 posts, RR: 4
Reply 6, posted (9 years 5 months 2 weeks 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 1684 times:

Quoting Sammyk (Reply 2):
Umm doesn't the A342/343 already have CFM56s?

Yes it does, they are CFM56-5C's, with a 31,200 - 34,000 thrust rating, the most powerful CFM's.

Funny thing is, as much as I love them on the -135, they look awful on the A340's IMO - that airplane looks like the engines are way too small.

Now the A340-5 and -6, those engines look about right.


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Santhosh Fernandez
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Gerardo Dominguez



Now if the could just do something about that odd landing gear arrangement on the A345, which is - BTW, other than that gear - one of my favorite airplanes looks wise! Smile

Quoting Stirling (Thread starter):
Is it possible for an A340-200 or A340-300 to have it's powerplants upgraded ala' the DC-8-70 series, KC-135R, and Convairliner (CV-240/340/440)

I don't see why not, in theory it should be possible. However IMO, I would guess that for the payback on a fairly new airplane with good engines it would be cost prohibitive. What would be the point of replacing the engines exactly?


User currently offlineN1120A From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 26605 posts, RR: 75
Reply 7, posted (9 years 5 months 2 weeks 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 1660 times:

Quoting KC135TopBoom (Reply 5):
How about 4 PW-2040s from the B-757?

If it were that simple, you could strap some RB211s to them. It is not that simple.

Quoting Stirling (Reply 4):
I was thinking along the lines of the RR Trent 556.

And burn up all of the fuel the tanks hold half again as fast? Not a good idea

Quoting KL808 (Reply 1):
you wanna put CFM56 on that thing. I dont think that would be advisable.

They already have CFM56s. Perhaps that is the point?



Mangeons les French fries, mais surtout pratiquons avec fierte le French kiss
User currently offlineMonteycarlos From Australia, joined Mar 2005, 2107 posts, RR: 28
Reply 8, posted (9 years 5 months 2 weeks 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 1655 times:

Quoting KL808 (Reply 1):
you wanna put CFM56 on that thing. I dont think that would be advisable.

Dude, the engine option for the A342/3 is a CFM56.

Quoting Bennett123 (Reply 3):
I think that he meant re-engining, rather than re-engining with CFM56.

Yeah, thats definately what he meant!

Quoting Stirling (Reply 4):
I was thinking along the lines of the RR Trent 556.

Nah, screw that! Try sticking the GE-90-115 on it! Imagine four of those suckers on it. Assuming they didn't break the wings of, its highly likely that they would put this plane into orbit!

Then there wouldn't be any jokes about the A343 climb rate!

I would think that even the Trent 400's (I think thats the one - the A330 powerplant?) would go pretty well with this aircraft! I wonder what it would be like with the four CF6-80's on it?



It's a beautiful night to fly like a phoenix...
User currently offlineKC135R From United States of America, joined Apr 2005, 728 posts, RR: 4
Reply 9, posted (9 years 5 months 2 weeks 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 1651 times:

Quoting N1120A (Reply 7):
They already have CFM56s. Perhaps that is the point?

HAHA! I never looked at it like that, maybe that was his point????!!!????  Smile


User currently offlineBrons2 From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 3015 posts, RR: 4
Reply 10, posted (9 years 5 months 2 weeks 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 1644 times:

Perhaps CFM could announce some sort of performance uprating for the existing engines. Getting them closer to 40K lbs would help with the climb performance, I'm sure.


Firings, if well done, are good for employee morale.
User currently offlineStirling From Italy, joined Jun 2004, 3943 posts, RR: 21
Reply 11, posted (9 years 5 months 2 weeks 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 1640 times:

Quoting KC135R (Reply 6):
What would be the point of replacing the engines exactly?

Down the road....
In the advent more efficient engines come along?...or maybe an existing operator that might need to increase MTOW increase for range, or for enhanced take-off performance from less than ideal airports...?(but that would probably require MUCH MORE engineering than just slapping some new fans under the wings)
Or, possibly an airline that might not be unable to justify the expense of a newer model -500 or -600...?

Quoting KC135TopBoom (Reply 5):
How about 4 PW-2040s from the B-757?

Now that's a HOTROD!



Delete this User
User currently offlineN1120A From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 26605 posts, RR: 75
Reply 12, posted (9 years 5 months 2 weeks 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 1636 times:

Quoting Brons2 (Reply 10):
Perhaps CFM could announce some sort of performance uprating for the existing engines

Would probably be difficult as that engine is getting pretty maxed out as it is



Mangeons les French fries, mais surtout pratiquons avec fierte le French kiss
User currently offlineKC135R From United States of America, joined Apr 2005, 728 posts, RR: 4
Reply 13, posted (9 years 5 months 2 weeks 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 1626 times:

Quoting Stirling (Reply 11):
Now that's a HOTROD!

Yeah...Like the C-17 with its 4 PW2040's FYI, and it's TO performance is quite impressive, especially for such a "rotund" airplane!  

Quoting Stirling (Reply 11):
(but that would probably require MUCH MORE engineering than just slapping some new fans under the wings)

The KC-135 got a whole modernization with the CFM's including re-skinned wings, new wiring, new struts, new engine struts (to accommodate the new engines of course), and the engines - which effectively doubled the airplanes total thrust capability. Oh yeah, plus, the CFM56 makes the coolest noises when it throttles up, IMO of course!

[Edited 2005-05-10 08:15:40]

User currently offlineStirling From Italy, joined Jun 2004, 3943 posts, RR: 21
Reply 14, posted (9 years 5 months 2 weeks 6 days 12 hours ago) and read 1618 times:

Quoting KC135TopBoom (Reply 5):
Me-163 or the V-1?

Close! You got me thinking though!

It was the Heinkel He-162

http://www.vectorsite.net/avhe162.html

or Henschel Hs-132

http://www.luft46.com/henschel/hs132.html



Delete this User
User currently offlineRikkus67 From Canada, joined Jun 2000, 1661 posts, RR: 1
Reply 15, posted (9 years 5 months 2 weeks 6 days 11 hours ago) and read 1541 times:

I realize this post is about re-engining the A340, however....

When suggesting the re-engining of the Convair, I believe there was a misquote. The 240,340, and 440 were the largest fleet of airliners ever to get the engine upgrade...these became 540, 600, and 640's IIRC.

There was also a proposal to put CFM-56's on the CV880 and CV990 fleet**, as the usable lifespan of those airframes were still favorable. However, the re-engining would have involved replacing the 4 engines with 2....and the proposal obviously never went past that. I imagine climb rate and cruise speed would still be comarable to the original performance...a crotch rocket among 4 holers...

(**the very last 707 was initially reengined with CFM-56's also.... the powerplants were eventually changed back to JT3D's, when airlines were looking at the 757 more than another re-engined 1st gen. jet)



AC.WA.CP.DL.RW.CO.WG.WJ.WN.KI.FL.SK.ACL.UA.US.F9
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
LAN A340 New Business Class Retrofit Update posted Mon Dec 29 2008 05:45:25 by Hardiwv
Another Arik Air A340 500 Delivery From Airbus? posted Fri Aug 28 2009 10:11:59 by Corernagh14
Is Etihad Phasing Out A340-500? posted Fri Aug 28 2009 01:37:35 by Erhard
Thai Airways And Their Four A340 500 posted Wed Aug 26 2009 12:01:41 by Corernagh14
BA New Club World Retrofit Status posted Sun Aug 23 2009 13:55:10 by LY777
Iberia A340-600 Orders posted Sat Aug 22 2009 01:54:37 by Corernagh14
VS A340 Return's To HKG As Emergency posted Thu Aug 20 2009 14:42:48 by T8KE0FF
Identify This A340 posted Sun Aug 16 2009 03:22:07 by OHLHD
Kingfisher A340-500 - 3 Aircraft At TLS posted Sun Aug 16 2009 02:27:22 by Corernagh14
KLM 747 IFE Retrofit Status posted Thu Aug 6 2009 16:07:03 by Nantoine