Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Plane Enters DC Restricted Airspace  
User currently offlineAirWillie6475 From United States of America, joined Jan 2005, 2448 posts, RR: 1
Posted (9 years 6 months 2 weeks 6 days 14 hours ago) and read 1827 times:

I don't know if this has been posted before but a Cessna 152 entered the restricted airspace around D.C today. The occupants of the 152 were a couple of average Joes that claimed they were lost. They came within 3 miles of the white house, come on how stupid can you be?

23 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineL-188 From United States of America, joined Jul 1999, 29813 posts, RR: 58
Reply 1, posted (9 years 6 months 2 weeks 6 days 14 hours ago) and read 1820 times:

Not near as stupid as the feds that evacuated heaven and earth in DC.

I hope these guys get those NASA forms filed ASAP.

I wonder how much that needless panic on the part of the feds cost us the taxpayer.



OBAMA-WORST PRESIDENT EVER....Even SKOORB would be better.
User currently offlineSTLGph From United States of America, joined Oct 2004, 9500 posts, RR: 26
Reply 2, posted (9 years 6 months 2 weeks 6 days 14 hours ago) and read 1814 times:

and now for the zinger--

i wonder how much that private pilot got paid by the feds to fly into that airspace to make it look like..."we're still vulnerable"

ho ho hum!

:p



if assumptions could fly, airliners.net would be the world's busiest airport
User currently offlineL-188 From United States of America, joined Jul 1999, 29813 posts, RR: 58
Reply 3, posted (9 years 6 months 2 weeks 6 days 14 hours ago) and read 1811 times:

Quoting STLGph (Reply 2):
i wonder how much that private pilot got paid by the feds to fly into that airspace to make it look like..."we're still vulnerable"

I wasn't going to say that but I wonder if that isn't the case, after all they don't want to open up Reagan National for non-airline traffic, but AOPA and NBAA has been pushing for it.

This may have been a stunt by DHS and TSA to keep that airport closed.



OBAMA-WORST PRESIDENT EVER....Even SKOORB would be better.
User currently offlineAirWillie6475 From United States of America, joined Jan 2005, 2448 posts, RR: 1
Reply 4, posted (9 years 6 months 2 weeks 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 1787 times:

A cessna 152 holds like 26 gallons of fuel thats less then a full size Suv I doubt that it would dent the white house wall as long as its going less than 100. A Honda Civic can cause more damage then a 152. Obviously there were some needless evacuations that took place. I don't think the NASA forms would help the pilots much though in getting their charges reduced.

User currently offlineEnviroTO From Canada, joined Aug 2004, 829 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (9 years 6 months 2 weeks 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 1767 times:

The size of the aircraft didn't fit the reaction. I have seen what happens when a Cessna 152 hits a house and I can tell you the damage is less than what a car does in damage and far less than what a truck or bus could do. Even more sad is that although they overreacted (personal opinion) the plane was less than 1 minute from the White House before they intercepted it. Cessna 152s are relatively slow so a larger aircraft which travels much faster... scary to think.

User currently offlineNosedive From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 6, posted (9 years 6 months 2 weeks 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 1768 times:

Quoting L-188 (Reply 3):
This may have been a stunt by DHS and TSA to keep that airport closed.

Are you suggesting that TSA is intelligent?


User currently offlineSTLGph From United States of America, joined Oct 2004, 9500 posts, RR: 26
Reply 7, posted (9 years 6 months 2 weeks 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 1756 times:

Quoting L-188 (Reply 3):
I wasn't going to say that but I wonder if that isn't the case, after all they don't want to open up Reagan National for non-airline traffic, but AOPA and NBAA has been pushing for it.

seriously....a student pilot and an instructor....they cannot be that ignorant to the no fly zone around the nation's capital, especially if they are going to be going to an air show. they have got to know something about aviation.

i'm going with it's a stunt, myself.



if assumptions could fly, airliners.net would be the world's busiest airport
User currently offlineAgentM From United States of America, joined Jul 2004, 43 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (9 years 6 months 2 weeks 6 days 12 hours ago) and read 1725 times:

From what I've read they did know about the ADIZ, and even planned 'around' it. One account I read was saying that they planned to fly in between two restricted areas. What I get from that is they were either planning to fly between Camp David and the DC ADIZ, or they just misunderstood how the DC ADIZ works. There is a lot of misunderstanding in that you can fly around & under the IAD/DCA/BWI/ADW airspace like it's a normal class B, but the ADIZ encompasses all the class B from it's outermost 10000ft ceiling all the way to the surface (so those 1500, 2500ft, etc floors don't mean anything if you didn't file an ADIZ flight plan). That's just the north side of it.

I can't see why they flew so close to the capitol, I mean it's not hard to see that you're over or approaching a large metropolitan area and just maybe you should be talking to someone.

Does anyone know the exact path of their flight? I haven't seen anything on news sites yet. I would be really surprised if they came over the Baltimore area because of the obviousness of being around Baltimore, and enough time for the F-16 pilots to eat a nice meal before intercepting.

I'll agree with TSA stunt  Smile


User currently offlineHAWK21M From India, joined Jan 2001, 31702 posts, RR: 56
Reply 9, posted (9 years 6 months 2 weeks 6 days 12 hours ago) and read 1722 times:

Any possibility of a "Drill".  Smile
regds
MEL



Think of the brighter side!
User currently offlineJGPH1A From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 10, posted (9 years 6 months 2 weeks 6 days 11 hours ago) and read 1721 times:

Quoting HAWK21M (Reply 9):
Any possibility of a "Drill".

Any possibility of a massive, hysterical, paranoid over-reaction ? I think so !! If that Cessna had hit the Capitol or the White House, it would probably have bounced off into the flower beds.

Get a grip, America !


User currently offlineClipperhawaii From United States of America, joined Dec 1999, 2033 posts, RR: 11
Reply 11, posted (9 years 6 months 2 weeks 6 days 11 hours ago) and read 1704 times:

Quoting JGPH1A (Reply 10):
Get a grip, America !

Get a grip? We have a grip. And the grip is strong around any perceived terrorist or terrorist act. Now, where was I before I responded to this silly comment from a foreigner?



"You Can't Beat The Experience"
User currently offlineFlybulldog From United States of America, joined Aug 2000, 369 posts, RR: 0
Reply 12, posted (9 years 6 months 2 weeks 6 days 7 hours ago) and read 1627 times:

What I don't get is how close the plane actually got to the White House. What if it was a terrorist really bent on crashing a plane into the White House with some type of explosive in his plane? What if he was flying something a little faster than a Cessna? Seems like there are some major holes in the security system around DC.

User currently offlineFanoftristars From United States of America, joined Jul 2000, 1614 posts, RR: 5
Reply 13, posted (9 years 6 months 2 weeks 6 days 7 hours ago) and read 1613 times:

Quoting EnviroTO (Reply 5):
the plane was less than 1 minute from the White House before they intercepted it. Cessna 152s are relatively slow so a larger aircraft which travels much faster... scary to think.

Good point. Based on their reaction time, a much faster plane could have made it all the way!



"FLY DELTA JETS"
User currently offlineFlyingTexan From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 14, posted (9 years 6 months 2 weeks 6 days 6 hours ago) and read 1593 times:

Quoting AirWillie6475 (Thread starter):
I don't know if this has been posted before

I’m sure it was pontificated about in real time of this board.

I had a co-worker on Capitol Hill yesterday. He said it’s not too pleasant having machine gun clad officers burst into an office and tell you to run for your life with no info.

And our country deploys an army in and around DC. Much ado about nothing, in my opinion.


User currently offlineCosmicCruiser From United States of America, joined Feb 2005, 2255 posts, RR: 15
Reply 15, posted (9 years 6 months 2 weeks 6 days 6 hours ago) and read 1585 times:

Quoting Clipperhawaii (Reply 11):
Get a grip? We have a grip. And the grip is strong around any perceived terrorist or terrorist act. Now, where was I before I responded to this silly comment from a foreigner?

Thank you, well said!!

Quoting Flybulldog (Reply 12):
What if it was a terrorist really bent on crashing a plane into the White House with some type of explosive in his plane?

Of course, that's why I'm surprised at all the comments implying that a C-150 would bounce off into the garden. Thank God some of you aren't in charge. Do you remember after 9/11 that they found that there was an attempt to get cropdusters for chemical/bacterial distribution? yeah, I know, not unlike "Goldfinger". Agree with the rules ,actions, etc. or not there has to be zero tolerance or why do anything.
I would prefer this post to end or some of us may say things that should be avoided on this nice aviation website.


User currently offlineSacflyer From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 371 posts, RR: 2
Reply 16, posted (9 years 6 months 2 weeks 6 days 6 hours ago) and read 1563 times:

Quoting CosmicCruiser (Reply 15):
on this nice aviation website.

Which website is that? Do you have a link?



I'm just happy that RR ratings can't be in negative numbers!
User currently offlineTheunclesam From United States of America, joined Feb 2005, 55 posts, RR: 0
Reply 17, posted (9 years 6 months 2 weeks 6 days 6 hours ago) and read 1542 times:

Oh great, Daley's at it again!

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/l...,1,7425994.story?coll=chi-news-hed

If you can't read it, basically Daley wants to have the airspace over Chicago restricted. I wonder how long until he poses a toll for wanting to fly in his air?  Yeah sure



"So what's your robot do?" "Collects data about the surrounding enviroment. Then drives into walls."
User currently offlineLAPA_SAAB340 From Spain, joined Aug 2001, 390 posts, RR: 4
Reply 18, posted (9 years 6 months 2 weeks 6 days 4 hours ago) and read 1490 times:

There is a lot of misunderstanding in that you can fly around & under the IAD/DCA/BWI/ADW airspace like it's a normal class B, but the ADIZ encompasses all the class B from it's outermost 10000ft ceiling all the way to the surface (so those 1500, 2500ft, etc floors don't mean anything if you didn't file an ADIZ flight plan).

The ADIZ includes all the surface area of the class B from the surface up to 17,999ft (not the class B ceiling). Above that you're in class A so you're under a flight plan anyway.

The restricted areas they said they'd be flying between could be the Camp David prohibited area to the northwest and the ADIZ, or the ADIZ and the retricted area around NAS Patuxent River southeast of DC.

While ADIZ violations are common, I find it hard to believe these guys managed to penetrate so deep and not realize they were near downtown DC until they were 3 miles from the White House (if that is indeed as close as they got...?).

Interestingly enough, AOPA had recently been making a strong push to relax the ADIZ restrictions in the DC area, and reopen National to GA traffic...


User currently offlineLTBEWR From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 13170 posts, RR: 15
Reply 19, posted (9 years 6 months 2 weeks 6 days 4 hours ago) and read 1463 times:

As noted above, the issue with a small general private aircraft in such critical airspace as a major city like DC, is the fear of it containg high explosives, chemicals, biohazrds, or nuclear material and dumping/exploding it. And it wouldn't have to be 'middle eastern males' doing it either, as it could also be some anti-government nutcase. I recall that about 10 years ago a small GA crashed within the White House grounds, piloted by a nutcase.
As the pilot here did enter space he should have been well aware to be careful of, good VFR situation, clear signs of a place not to be in, not responding by radio when first entered the embargoed area and legitment fears, then there was a good case for the attention given to this incursion. I hope this pilot gets a substantual suspension of his license and be required to learn the special rules for flying in the DC and other urban areas.


User currently offlineTheunclesam From United States of America, joined Feb 2005, 55 posts, RR: 0
Reply 20, posted (9 years 6 months 2 weeks 6 days 4 hours ago) and read 1445 times:

The real problem here is that Joe Public will believe anything these idiots (Politicians) say when it comes to "National Security". The safety of the Capitol is NOT what these politicians care about; it's about getting re-elected. And to do that you have to make Joe Public think you are a good guy and what better scapegoat than something that most people don't have a clue about?

I think it's very important for those of us who do have a clue to educate people about this kind of stuff. If you fly, please take a friend or colleague at work up sometime. Don't put them through steep turns, and short finals; but show them the beauty of flight and the knowledge and skill you have acquired from your years of practice and the thousands you have spent. The more educated people are about what we do, the more they'll understand that these politicians are out ONLY to keep their jobs.



"So what's your robot do?" "Collects data about the surrounding enviroment. Then drives into walls."
User currently offlineSacflyer From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 371 posts, RR: 2
Reply 21, posted (9 years 6 months 2 weeks 5 days 21 hours ago) and read 1340 times:

Quoting Clipperhawaii (Reply 11):
Get a grip? We have a grip. And the grip is strong around any perceived terrorist or terrorist act.

I think it was the perception part of it that he was talking about.



I'm just happy that RR ratings can't be in negative numbers!
User currently offlineSPREE34 From United States of America, joined Jun 2004, 2258 posts, RR: 9
Reply 22, posted (9 years 6 months 2 weeks 5 days 19 hours ago) and read 1303 times:

All of this non-sense in D.C. has proven one thing. The terrorist have been successful. Paranoia now rules the day. Freedom has been diminished, and will continue to be, because we can't seem to "get over it" and move on.

JGPH1A said..."Any possibility of a massive, hysterical, paranoid over-reaction ? I think so !! If that Cessna had hit the Capitol or the White House, it would probably have bounced off into the flower beds.

Get a grip, America ! "

Like it or not, the guy is right. Closed borders, with airliners landing outside of the US for screening, then taking off again for the US destination may be in our future.

Ready for the National ID card?



I don't understand everything I don't know about this.
User currently offlineATLFlyer323 From United States of America, joined Jan 2005, 618 posts, RR: 0
Reply 23, posted (9 years 6 months 2 weeks 5 days 18 hours ago) and read 1276 times:

Why does everyone make such a security fuss!! I would rather be safe than sorry, and I know that I'm not taking anything onto a plane that could cause harm to it. LET THE PEOPLE DO THEIR JOBS!! I know everyone says we haven't gotten over it, well o well maybe we have maybe we haven't who knows. As a matter of fact I would love wonder maybe JUST MAYBE how many peoples lives just may have been saved do to the upping in security. I would never have guessed that aviation enthusiasts would complain about trying to keep what they care about safer it almost disgusts me. I know that some rules are to harsh but there's always the good and bad, it just seems to me that most of the people on the boards love to bring out the bad. But hey that's only my opinion Big grin
~Brandon



Everyday, the fluffy temptation of wheat!
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Plane Circles DC Restricted Airspace posted Thu Jun 20 2002 04:23:16 by CcrlR
Small Plane Circling DC Area? posted Mon Oct 1 2001 13:30:54 by Contrails
Can Anyone Tell Me What Plane I Flew On?! DC-8 ATI posted Tue Aug 29 2006 19:08:03 by Gh123
Mystery DC-10 And RAF Plane. Can Anyone ID? posted Mon Jan 17 2005 00:55:41 by Matt D
DC-10, I Love This Plane! posted Sat May 3 2003 09:49:32 by SJCguy
Wash DC Closing More Airspace posted Sun Feb 9 2003 18:00:42 by HlywdCatft
DC Airspace posted Wed Oct 23 2002 03:00:53 by Sleekjet
Any News On The Pilot Who Busted DC Airspace? posted Thu Apr 4 2002 18:29:10 by Zionstrat
NWA DC-9's Future? posted Tue Jun 10 2008 10:17:03 by 3holeflyer
My Idea For The Next Delta Specialty Plane posted Mon Jun 9 2008 07:33:39 by SXDFC