Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
EU Ministers Agree Tax On Flying  
User currently offlineSchipholjfk From United States of America, joined Jan 2005, 579 posts, RR: 6
Posted (11 years 2 weeks 15 hours ago) and read 2622 times:

A voluntary air travel tax to fund aid for the world's poor was agreed in principle at the European finance ministers' meeting on Saturday.
The ministers are using the two-day session to talk about European economic growth and redesigning euro coins to reflect the larger European Union.

The Franco-German proposal for an aviation tax will see a tax on airline tickets.

Another option - a tax on jet fuel was rejected.

Full article here:

Is this such a good idea? As it is global commercial aviation has barely recovered from 9/11... and now more tax? And tax to aid poor countries! Money hardly ever solves problems related to povert. Billions of dollars are already forwarded in the form of aids and loans via UN, World Bank, IMF and hundreds of other "taxes" to poor countries. Problems such as corruption, etc can not be solved with money.

How does our European friends feel about paying another tax that seems to go no where? Will non-EU nationals flying into Euro zone be also forced to pay this tax? Interesting that tax on jet fuel was rejected, but direct tax with purchase of an airline ticket was not. What's the difference? Ultimately cost of all taxes are eventually passed on the end buyers - customers.

The fun of flying... love it !!!
12 replies: All unread, jump to last
User currently offlineScotron11 From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2004, 1276 posts, RR: 3
Reply 1, posted (11 years 2 weeks 11 hours ago) and read 2594 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

I much prefer the suggestion by EasyJet...."look to the oil industry if they want to solve world poverty."

I would say more so than trying to tax the flying public. Or even better, if they are real serious, take a percentage of their taxes on gasoline to create this " Tackle Poverty in Africa Fund".

The thing is, we elect these bozos and if they really cared about poverty in Africa, they would do something about it. It seems that they really want to get a tax going on aviation fuel.......I can just see them rubbing their hands....and the horrendous thing is, not one dime will ever see Africa!

User currently offlineHT From Germany, joined May 2005, 6526 posts, RR: 19
Reply 2, posted (11 years 2 weeks 11 hours ago) and read 2574 times:

I couldn´t find any indication on how much this tax will be ...
Any word on this yet ?

Carpe diem ! Life is too short to waste your time ! Keep in mind, that today is the first day of the rest of your life !
User currently offlineJGPH1A From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (11 years 2 weeks 11 hours ago) and read 2568 times:

Yet again the poor bloody air traveler is the milsch-cow for the tax coffers. When will they realise that air travel is no longer a luxury, but for many people, its the only way to get around ?

I think a windfall profit tax on the oil industry and privatised utilities is far more appropriate.

User currently offlineSNBru From Belgium, joined Feb 2005, 168 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (11 years 2 weeks 10 hours ago) and read 2535 times:

I thought i was a voluntary air travel tax. It is up to the passengers to decide if they want to pay the tax or not.

User currently offlineDLPMMM From United States of America, joined Apr 2005, 3672 posts, RR: 11
Reply 5, posted (11 years 2 weeks 4 hours ago) and read 2456 times:

I just love how the politicians try to cover their bases. They want to increase taxes, so they pick a cause that is hard to argue against (African relief). If someone is against it they are either heartless or a racist. They realized that there was no way the idea of an aviation fuel tax would be approved (even with the support of the luddite greeens), so they went to an additional ticket tax. They realize that even this tax will not be approved, so they change it again to a "voluntary tax", with the stated intention of making it manditory over time.

This has nothing to do with EU verses USA, as our politicians are the same.

I submit that if this has almost nothing to do with African relief, and everything to do with taxing authority, political power, and building bureaucracies.

The EU could redirect the same or more monies from thier budgets that is presently being wasted on politico's fact finding beach trips, or blue ribbon commissions looking into mating habits of cockroaches....And the average Joe gets suckered out of his money again under the guise of good intentions.

Sorry, spell checker is not working.

User currently offlineToulouse From Switzerland, joined Apr 2005, 2762 posts, RR: 56
Reply 6, posted (11 years 2 weeks 4 hours ago) and read 2439 times:

Tend to agree with you DLPMMM.

Long live Aer Lingus!
User currently offlineSchipholjfk From United States of America, joined Jan 2005, 579 posts, RR: 6
Reply 7, posted (11 years 2 weeks 2 hours ago) and read 2396 times:

Quoting SNBru (Reply 4):
I thought i was a voluntary air travel tax. It is up to the passengers to decide if they want to pay the tax or not.

Nothing is ever volutary. If you read the article it says France, Germany and Belgium intend to make it a MANDATORY tax. I think it says 2-3 Euro range. Nonetheless, when companies like ExxonMobil, BP, etc are making sky-high profit why is it that us the air travelers have to pay yet one more tax? Especially for a reason that makes no sense - throwing MORE money at poverty won't solve.

The fun of flying... love it !!!
User currently offlineAMSSpotter From Netherlands, joined Feb 2005, 271 posts, RR: 1
Reply 8, posted (11 years 2 weeks 1 hour ago) and read 2386 times:

Most EU countries have agreed on spending 0.7% of their annual budgets on development aid but only a few countries currently meet that standard. I can very well live with that standard but raising money as development aid by taxing air travel makes no sense and is unwise. The aviation industry is having a hard time already and imposing extra taxes is not going to make things easier.

According to an article in today's newspaper "De Telegraaf", the extra tax is indeed voluntarily and Finance-minister Zalm commented that probably nobody is even willing to pay this voluntarily tax.

[Edited 2005-05-16 19:39:29]

User currently offlineTomFoolery From Austria, joined Jan 2004, 577 posts, RR: 2
Reply 9, posted (11 years 2 weeks ago) and read 2347 times:

Oh great, another tax by the EU. Because 20% sales tax isnt enough. Airport taxes arnt doing it either. Hmm, another fund financed by the hard working europeans, so some corrupt or inept gocernment officials can just reach into the charity pot and laugh all the way to the bank. The EU needs to realize that it is was created to serve the interests and the needs of Europe, not the third world. It is up to the individual member states to decide these matters. Now, they want to invade a necessary part of commerce (air travel) and stick us, who make the wheels of comerce turn, with the bill! The EU needs to re-evaluate its initial mission. EUROPE. There is still plenty of work it can do here.

[Edited 2005-05-16 20:38:19]

Paper makes an airplane fly
User currently offlineWhiskeyHotel From United States of America, joined Aug 2004, 293 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (11 years 2 weeks ago) and read 2337 times:

EU Ponders New Tax On Flying (by Joni May 14 2005 in Civil Aviation) for additional arguments. Most of us seem to be opposed...but that doesn't seem to stop politicians. At the root of most human behaviour you'll find money. It's fungible power. The more taxes the politicians collect, the more collective power they have. Bend over, Europe...the parasite army's on the march. I'd like to propose a 10% VDT (Value-Deducted Tax) levied on politicians personally which charges them a percentage of the bloat and drag they add to the economy with each successive hare-brained scheme.

Isn't it cool that in a Democracy you can expect a vote to choose your leaders about 10 times in an average lifetime. Seems fair to me. Oh well, guess it's the best system out there...but that ain't saying much.

User currently offlineDstc47 From Ireland, joined Sep 1999, 1609 posts, RR: 3
Reply 11, posted (11 years 2 weeks ago) and read 2333 times:

There is less agreement on this tax among European Ministers than is being suggested.

Ireland, for one, has said it is not interested, and there was a report of an interview with the Irish Minister for Finance in the Irish Times today which is worth a look.

That site requires registration so cannot lgive a link.

User currently offlineDonder10 From Canada, joined Oct 2001, 6660 posts, RR: 20
Reply 12, posted (11 years 1 week 6 days 23 hours ago) and read 2301 times:

If they want to help to reduce povery how about eliminating export subsidies on agricultrual products?Could it be that Chirac owes his political life to the farm lobby?

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
EU Ponders New Tax On Flying posted Sat May 14 2005 18:56:45 by Joni
EU Approve/order Tax On Jet Fuel! posted Mon Jul 10 2006 16:26:58 by CHRISBA777ER
EU Emissions Tax On Air Travel? posted Mon Nov 14 2005 02:30:27 by VV701
EU Proposes Tax On Aviation Fuel posted Mon Feb 14 2005 07:14:39 by Scotron11
EU And Brazil:Talks On New Air Transport Agreement posted Wed Jan 29 2014 12:51:10 by af086
QF Have Started To Set Carbon Tax On Fees posted Wed Feb 15 2012 00:22:55 by fiscal
Funny - The Late Great Dave Allen On Flying posted Sun Jun 20 2010 14:19:51 by LGWGate49
US And EU Reach Preliminary Agreement On Airline Ownership posted Thu Mar 25 2010 08:59:11 by worldtraveler
EU To Lift Ban On Several Indonesian Airlines? posted Thu Jun 25 2009 18:00:11 by Danfearn77
Norwegian Pilot Comments On Flying Obama posted Wed Nov 12 2008 05:50:22 by Mortyman