Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
New Airport For New Orleans MSY?  
User currently offlineSquirrel83 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (9 years 2 months 2 weeks 10 hours ago) and read 3294 times:

Found this in the USA Today ~ Looks like they allready have plans. . . But I can't seem to find any pictures or if they rename the airport. But then again its just a study NOT Final.

New Orleans officials are studying the possibility of building a new airport in suburban St. Charles Parish or in eastern New Orleans that would totally replace the current Louis Armstrong International Airport.

The idea of building a new airport in eastern New Orleans was rejected in the early 1990s because of environmental problems and the cost.

Two other airport proposals have been circulating in political circles. The Louisiana Airport Authority, created in the early 1990s by then-Gov. Edwin Edwards, hopes to build a cargo airport between Donaldsonville and White Castle and is seeking money from the Legislature to begin the venture.


http://www.usatoday.com/travel/news/2005-05-17-new-orleans-airport_x.htm

http://www.corgan.com

15 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineDrerx7 From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 5162 posts, RR: 8
Reply 1, posted (9 years 2 months 2 weeks 10 hours ago) and read 3233 times:

They definatley need a new runway--a new airport would be nice--but I find Armstrong pleasantly functional and I don't believe the terminal structure is at capacity.


Third Coast born, means I'm Texas raised
User currently offline2travel2know From Panama, joined Apr 2005, 3580 posts, RR: 4
Reply 2, posted (9 years 2 months 2 weeks 9 hours ago) and read 3186 times:

How about making BTR (Baton Rouge) New Orleans other airport?


I don't work for COPA Airlines!
User currently offlineMSYtristar From United States of America, joined Aug 2005, 6522 posts, RR: 51
Reply 3, posted (9 years 2 months 2 weeks 8 hours ago) and read 3157 times:

I would love to see MSY get knocked down. A third of the airport is very nice (the Concourse D ticketing/baggage/gate area) but the rest is antiquated. The problem with these two new proposals is that both would affect Lake Pontchartrain in some way. In the end it will probably be the location which is the "lesser of the two evils" so to speak that gets the project. The one good thing I see about the proposals is that both sights would have at least one of the runways be 11,000ft. long.

User currently offlineTom in NO From United States of America, joined Nov 1999, 7194 posts, RR: 33
Reply 4, posted (9 years 2 months 2 weeks 8 hours ago) and read 3093 times:

Couple more articles from the local paper about Nagin's new airport thoughts:

http://www.nola.com/news/t-p/frontpa...?/base/news-3/1116395789125280.xml
http://www.nola.com/news/t-p/frontpa...?/base/news-3/1116311405276280.xml

The environmentalists are already out in force on this issue, especially on the Bonnet Carre option, saying, and they do have a point, that the issues regarding changes and the future of Lake Pontchartrain could not be mitigated, therefore an airport should be built out there.

With regards to existing MSY runway capacity, with our current level of operations, MSY does not need additional runways, although environmental studies are being conducted for adding an additional north/south runway out at the west end of the field in St. Charles Parish. From what I've heard and observed, my thinking is that it'll never be built.

Tom at MSY



"The criminal ineptitude makes you furious"-Bruce Springsteen, after seeing firsthand the damage from Hurricane Katrina
User currently offlineGeoffm From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2004, 2111 posts, RR: 6
Reply 5, posted (9 years 2 months 2 weeks 7 hours ago) and read 3058 times:

From a couple of visits as a passenger, it was a pleasant enough airport to use. A little tight on the airline parking perhaps (maybe only on the day I flew). But putting it further away would increase the time to get to the city. So you could put in a high speed rail link........ ah, I see the problem! USA and high speed rail do not mix!

Geoff M.


User currently offlineHPRamper From United States of America, joined May 2005, 4037 posts, RR: 8
Reply 6, posted (9 years 2 months 2 weeks 7 hours ago) and read 3029 times:

If they built the airport in another location, would it still even be designated MSY? Since that stands for the StockYards that once occupied the land it is currently on.

User currently offlineWilliam From United States of America, joined Jun 1999, 1260 posts, RR: 1
Reply 7, posted (9 years 2 months 2 weeks 6 hours ago) and read 2990 times:

When will SWA finish re-installing the gates in the concourse they are in?

User currently offlineTom in NO From United States of America, joined Nov 1999, 7194 posts, RR: 33
Reply 8, posted (9 years 2 months 2 weeks 5 hours ago) and read 2967 times:

Quoting HPRamper (Reply 6):
If they built the airport in another location, would it still even be designated MSY

Good question. I'm thinking it would not retain the MSY code. Our airport director/board would likely petition to use something like JAZ/JZY, something to reflect the culture down here, although to me MSY does fit (MeSsY).

However, from everything I've heard, it is a pain in the rear to change airport codes, both within the FAA structure, and airline issues.

It would depend on if the current MSY would remain as an airport, or be demolished for other use (ala Stapleton).

Quoting William (Reply 7):
When will SWA finish re-installing the gates in the concourse they are in?

I'm looking at your question two ways, so I'll answer it both ways:

1) Southwest has not yet leased the gates at the end of concourse B (gates B10, B12, and B15), hence no need yet for them or us (the Avaition Board) to hang jetways from those gates.

2) the airport has just begun a program to install new jetways on all gates at MSY. Due to some funding limitiations, we are starting with only 17 (unsure where they'll go), the delivery of which will start in early 2006.

Hope one of these covered your quesiton.

Tom at MSY



"The criminal ineptitude makes you furious"-Bruce Springsteen, after seeing firsthand the damage from Hurricane Katrina
User currently offlineDoninfc From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 135 posts, RR: 2
Reply 9, posted (9 years 2 months 4 days 7 hours ago) and read 2771 times:

...resurecting an older topic here to add some thoughts.

Clearly the current MSY terminal is not at capacity in terms of runways and gate space and probably won't be for a while. Once the 8-gate addition to concourse D is completed, the terminal will have a 48-gate capacity. I believe right now only about 34 gates are in use.

The problem is that continuing to patch a 1960-era design doesn't solve many core deficiencies. Sure you can rebuild concourses and remodel the main terminal but it doesn't change the fact that the infrastructure will never adequately accommodate the current and future level of traffic. Even though MSY ranks somewhere around 40 in the country for passenger traffic, almost 100% of that traffic is O&D. This means the ticketing and arrivals areas and the airport road system realizes very high volume for a facility of it's size. The arrivals area especially is completely inadequate. During peak hours the traffic often backs up on to the access road and Airline Highway, and sometimes blocks the departures ramp. It's only going to get worse and there's no good way to fix it since the current terminal is pinned in on all sides.

If efforts fail to build a new airport at another site, I would propose building a new terminal directly to the west of the current terminal. You would have to relocate the rental car shacks and a few hangars, but I think it's plausible. You may also have to build in phases and tear down the west side of the current terminal first in order to reuse the land for part the new terminal. The new ticketing and arrivals area could be double in size/length in order to space out traffic, and the road system could be vastly improved. I would also envision a mall area inside security with local interest shops and restaurants as a jumping off point to the gate areas. An airport is often the first impression people get when visiting a city, and the current MSY terminal doesn't exactly dazzle. I think a new terminal would be an extremely worthwhile investment and the sooner the better.


User currently offlineConcordeBoy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 10, posted (9 years 2 months 4 days 4 hours ago) and read 2715 times:

Quoting Squirrel83 (Thread starter):
or if they rename the airport.



Quoting HPRamper (Reply 6):
would it still even be designated MSY?

As Tom stated, there was effort a few years ago to change the designator to JZY (along with the name change)... but that seems to have been shelved indefinitely

Quoting 2travel2know (Reply 2):
How about making BTR (Baton Rouge) New Orleans other airport?

Which would essentially be a direct inverse of the current situation.

It's worth noting that BTR is actually larger (by land area) than MSY... and also has more airport-priority land available for purchase.

Quoting Tom in NO (Reply 4):
From what I've heard and observed, my thinking is that it'll never be built.

Corgan believes the same thing.

Quoting Doninfc (Reply 9):
If efforts fail to build a new airport at another site, I would propose building a new terminal directly to the west of the current terminal.

That's been proposed for decades now, building a new terminal for Southwest or some of the airlines/startups who've expressed interest in hubbing here---- but the City of Kenner ain't havin' it.

Without their support, the necessary infrastructure (i.e., tearing down some of the low-income housing and installing entry/exits to I-10) cannot happen... which has remained the sticking point for year upon year for such an endeavor.

Then there's the cost:
Nagin's people (taken with due bias into account) claim that the price of doing what I just described, plus a new runway, would be about $4B... versus $5B for an all-new world-class airport in the infrastructural league of DEN and DTW's new terminal.


User currently offlineType-Rated From United States of America, joined Sep 1999, 4952 posts, RR: 19
Reply 11, posted (9 years 2 months 4 days 2 hours ago) and read 2654 times:

"A third of the airport is very nice (the Concourse D ticketing/baggage/gate area) but the rest is antiquated...."

Actually, I quite like vintage airports.

Quoting Doninfc (Reply 9):
The problem is that continuing to patch a 1960-era design doesn't solve many core..

Actually, isn't MSY a 1950's design? Does anyone know when the airport was built? I'd like to say 1957-8 or so......



Fly North Central Airlines..The route of the Northliners!
User currently offline2travel2know From Panama, joined Apr 2005, 3580 posts, RR: 4
Reply 12, posted (9 years 2 months 4 days 2 hours ago) and read 2621 times:

Quoting ConcordeBoy (Reply 10):
Which would essentially be a direct inverse of the current situation.

It's worth noting that BTR is actually larger (by land area) than MSY... and also has more airport-priority land available for purchase.

Are you trying to say that BTR is too far from MSY and New Orleans itself to be considered New Orleans other airport?
What would be cheaper? (1) Major, really major infrastructure development @ MSY, (2) A Brandnew New Orleans Airport, or (3) A Decent - Comfortable BTR with Highspeed rail service to New Orleans?



I don't work for COPA Airlines!
User currently offlineConcordeBoy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 13, posted (9 years 2 months 4 days ago) and read 2575 times:

Quoting Type-Rated (Reply 11):
Actually, I quite like vintage airports.

too bad business travelers, and potential hubbing airlines, don't

Quoting Type-Rated (Reply 11):
Actually, isn't MSY a 1950's design?

The airfield was commissioned in 1941, but immediately commandeered by the government due to WWII.

Commercial ops began in 1946. 1947, the airport was 2nd only to (the now) MDW for title of nation's busiest from MDW... and it handled more Latin American traffic than any other in the country.

*sigh*

Quoting 2travel2know (Reply 12):
Are you trying to say that BTR is too far from MSY and New Orleans itself to be considered New Orleans other airport?

No, I'm saying that the generally-lower fairs, (limited) international service, and plethora of nonstop and alliance offerings (MSY is the only point in LA served by the Star Alliance)... tend to draw BTR pax to MSY.

BTR propaganda states that they lose about 300,000 local pax to MSY per year.

Quoting 2travel2know (Reply 12):
What would be cheaper? (1) Major, really major infrastructure development @ MSY,

$4B in the shortrun, but would cost us in the longrun

Quoting 2travel2know (Reply 12):
(2) A Brandnew New Orleans Airport, or

$5B in the shortrun, but would be more benefitial longterm

Quoting 2travel2know (Reply 12):
(3) A Decent - Comfortable BTR with Highspeed rail service to New Orleans?

Never going to happen:
1) too many beaurocratic lines to cross
2) benefits BTR much more than MSY

...much more likely to see the resumption of nonstop air service between the two cities than that.


User currently offlineDoninfc From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 135 posts, RR: 2
Reply 14, posted (9 years 2 months 3 days 23 hours ago) and read 2522 times:

Quoting Type-Rated (Reply 11):
Actually, isn't MSY a 1950's design? Does anyone know when the airport was built? I'd like to say 1957-8 or so......

The current terminal opened for business in late 1959, so I guess you could say it was a 50's design. Although there's hardly anything original remaining. The original concourses (C & D) have been completely torn down and rebuilt within the last 10 years. Concourses A and B were added in the mid 70's.

Incidentially, when MSY opened in 1959, it was the first US commercial airport to have departures and arrivals separated on different levels. Very state-of-the-art for its time.


User currently offlineN1120A From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 26376 posts, RR: 76
Reply 15, posted (9 years 2 months 3 days 19 hours ago) and read 2463 times:

Quoting Drerx7 (Reply 1):
They definatley need a new runway--a new airport would be nice--but I find Armstrong pleasantly functional and I don't believe the terminal structure is at capacity.

MSY is nowhere near runway or terminal capacity, certainly not after 10/28 reopens in November

Quoting 2travel2know (Reply 2):
How about making BTR (Baton Rouge) New Orleans other airport?

It already kindof is, but just like the White Castle alternative, it is over an hour away drivng fast

Quoting 2travel2know (Reply 12):
(3) A Decent - Comfortable BTR with Highspeed rail service to New Orleans?

BTR is tiny. It looks like a miniature ONT terminalwise. While it does have more land area, the land is inefficiently used as is and would have to undergo a total redesign. Also, the runways are short



Mangeons les French fries, mais surtout pratiquons avec fierte le French kiss
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
New Orleans (MSY) International posted Thu Apr 8 2004 03:27:11 by DFWJIM
Winter Ops At New Orleans (MSY) posted Sun Nov 2 2003 18:06:07 by Dsuairptman
Frontier Airlines Begins New Orleans (MSY) Service posted Fri Feb 1 2002 23:29:35 by BA
New Orleans New Airport Name posted Sat Jul 14 2001 04:59:25 by Big777jet
TV Seats At New Orleans (MSY) posted Sun Dec 3 2000 17:51:12 by CathayPacific
New Airport At Kobe/Japan posted Sun Nov 19 2006 18:18:51 by BizFlyer
RDU Airport- New Terminal C posted Sun Nov 5 2006 05:49:21 by MEACEDAR
BRU Officially 'Brussels Airport', New Routes posted Mon Oct 30 2006 20:12:24 by UA777300ER
Major Award For Madrid Airport's New Terminal! posted Sat Oct 14 2006 22:12:10 by Kaitak
Luggage Issues With Bangkok's New Airport posted Sat Sep 30 2006 16:54:31 by Chulalongkorn