Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Why Couldn't We Sit In The Last 4 Rows?  
User currently offlineClimb1 From United Kingdom, joined Apr 2005, 128 posts, RR: 0
Posted (9 years 6 months 2 weeks 15 hours ago) and read 7535 times:

Hello all!
Last month myself and the missus popped over to DUB for the day. We flew with Ryanair and was on a 732 out and 738 in. Both flights were pretty full. However on the return leg, we were the first few people on and as we got on the back the stewardess said that we couldnt sit on the back row. Fair enough I thought, so I sat 5th row from the rear. Eventually more and more people got on and it got busy. Then the steward guy tells the people sittin behind us that they are not allowed to sit in the last FOUR rows but didnt fully explain why at the time. Of course these people had fully settled into their seats and now they were playin musical chairs before pushback.
Luckily we just missed out being moved around by ONE row. So there I was enjoying my window seat  Smile but some of the other pax were less than impressed about bein told one thing than the other.
Soo anyway, my question is, why? Why was it that on a pretty full plane there was to be no pax sittin on the last four rows during take off.
Which reminds me, they did allow a few people to sit at the rear once in the cruise.

Thanks in advance.
Climb1


In my eyes the Boeing 747 will ALWAYS be the queen of the skies!
34 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineLeskova From Germany, joined Oct 2003, 6075 posts, RR: 70
Reply 1, posted (9 years 6 months 2 weeks 15 hours ago) and read 7512 times:

Don't really know - but could it have been a balance-question?

I remember taking a flight from Windhoek Eros Airport to Johannesburg on a CRJ, and before takeoff we were told that no-one was permitted to sit in the first 4, 5 or 6 (not sure any more - it's been a few years since) rows until we reached our cruising altitude: at that time, we were given the explanation that it had to do with a combination of the short runway, the hot weather and the high altitude, and that the weight distribution would not allow the plane to get off the ground in time if people were seated further in front.

With the wings on the B737 being far more forward than on the CRJ, perhaps it was something similar...

Regards,
Frank



Smile - it confuses people!
User currently offlineSATL382G From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (9 years 6 months 2 weeks 14 hours ago) and read 7480 times:

Quoting Climb1 (Thread starter):
as we got on the back

If it's open seating and boarding thru the rear door the crew will want some folks seated up front first to keep the aircraft from sitting on it's tail. Normally only an issue on cargo aircraft, but probably something to be careful of when loading pax from the rear door.

Keep in mind people will normally grab the first seat they see wether getting on a plane or a bus.....


User currently offlineSpantax From Belgium, joined Nov 2004, 323 posts, RR: 1
Reply 3, posted (9 years 6 months 2 weeks 14 hours ago) and read 7391 times:

Hi, I have flown with Ryanair a lot of times and what I have often noticed is that they don't allow to use the 4-5 FIRST rows. I have always thought it was in order to avoid checking/cleaning (because, as you must know, Ryanair doesn't hire people to clean their aircraft but this job is done by the flight attendants themselves). But perhaps I am wrong . Curious to read the "good" answer. A Ryanair insider listening maybe? Cheers


A300.10.19.20.21.30.40,AN26,ATR42,AVR146,B717.27.37.47.57.77,B1900,C130,C212,CH47,CRJ200.700,DC9,DHC4,ERJ135.190,F27
User currently offlineSATL382G From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (9 years 6 months 2 weeks 14 hours ago) and read 7370 times:

Quoting Spantax (Reply 3):
Hi, I have flown with Ryanair a lot of times and what I have often noticed is that they don't allow to use the 4-5 FIRST rows. I have always thought it was in order to avoid checking/cleaning (because, as you must know, Ryanair doesn't hire people to clean their aircraft but this job is done by the flight attendants themselves). But perhaps I am wrong . Curious to read the "good" answer. A Ryanair insider listening maybe? Cheers

When taking a busload of pax out to the aircraft I always told the pax as they came aboard to go to the rear to find a seat. The bus loaded faster that way.
Maybe the crews are applying a similar concept but don't bother after the first few rows?


User currently offlineJmc757 From United Kingdom, joined Mar 2000, 1301 posts, RR: 7
Reply 5, posted (9 years 6 months 2 weeks 13 hours ago) and read 7287 times:

Were those four rows empty the whole flight? If so it was probably a weight/balance issue.

All aircraft have a loadsheet, which ensures the aircraft is loaded correctly and not out of balance. Sometimes, if you've got a half empty load, getting an aircraft in balance can be a little tricky and you soemtimes have to play balancing games with baggage and pax to get it in trim. I've enever known it with 738, though have never worked with one.

Dash 8 Q400s can be subject to this alot! The main (and only really) baggage hold is in the back. So if you've got a pretty empty flight, youll need majority of pax towards the front of the aircraft to make sure its not tail heavy (as all bags and cargo are in the back). Then again, on a very full flight, the aircraft can be pretty nose heavy, so youll block rows one and two for example. In reality, it probably doesnt mean the difference between the aircraft taking off or not, it just so the calculations on the load sheet are correct. If the loadsheet says nose heavy or tail heavy then plane dosnt go - simple as! Often had to play musical chairs with passengers on the good old Dash!

Perhaps soemone who does load control with 737s may be able to shed some more light. IIRC, a Pegasus Airlines 738 had a tail strike on take off due to some dodgy loading and weights...?


User currently offlineRedDragon From United Kingdom, joined Jul 2004, 1135 posts, RR: 6
Reply 6, posted (9 years 6 months 2 weeks 13 hours ago) and read 7235 times:

Wasn't it a First Choice A321 that suffered a tail strike due to dodgy loading and weights, taking off from one of the Greek islands? (I'm being too lazy to fight the search engine, sorry.)

I wouldn't have thought that a fairly full 738 would have problems with weight and balance... (do FR take belly cargo? I can't remember.) The rear-door loading theory sounds plausible though, even if possibly slightly over-protective?

Rich


User currently offlineDiesel1 From UK - Wales, joined Mar 2001, 1638 posts, RR: 11
Reply 7, posted (9 years 6 months 2 weeks 13 hours ago) and read 7225 times:

I've heard this about Ryanair before - it would have made much more sense if the crew on that flight had put something across these rows to stop pax sitting there in the first place...


I don't like signatures...
User currently offlineRedDragon From United Kingdom, joined Jul 2004, 1135 posts, RR: 6
Reply 8, posted (9 years 6 months 2 weeks 13 hours ago) and read 7218 times:

Don't be silly, two lengths of string would cost too much!

User currently offlineMhodgson From United Kingdom, joined Dec 2002, 5047 posts, RR: 25
Reply 9, posted (9 years 6 months 2 weeks 11 hours ago) and read 7025 times:

I've had this on FR, BLK-STN on an ex-Buzz 734 (BZZF). To indicate that no-one should sit in either the front or rear 4 rows, the tray tables were lowered to 'block' the rows off, and announcements were made as people boarded.


No trees were harmed by this message. However, several million electrons were terribly inconvenienced
User currently offlineSpantax From Belgium, joined Nov 2004, 323 posts, RR: 1
Reply 10, posted (9 years 6 months 2 weeks 7 hours ago) and read 6797 times:

Hi, I have just received this message from a Ryanair insider. Very interesting, although the "something to do with Fuel Economy" remains quite intriguing for me.

"I am involved in the dispatch or FR Aircraft, on the 737-800s if there
are less than a specific number of punters on board than the first 4
and last 4 rows are blocked off. I believe it is in the region of 165
passengers.

There are blockers on the front row of seats but the f/a should
indicate to passengers when boarding that they cannot use the first/last 4
rows.

As assumed this is linked to weight balance and also something to do
with Fuel Economy.

Additionally all baggage is loaded into Cargo Hold 2 first (main front
cargo hold). Which I believe is different to how most other operators
work, who load through the rear cargo hold first. Again this is for the
same reason.

Sorry, I'm not a full a.net member otherwise I would have posted this
up myself. Please feel free to quote any of the above in a message."



A300.10.19.20.21.30.40,AN26,ATR42,AVR146,B717.27.37.47.57.77,B1900,C130,C212,CH47,CRJ200.700,DC9,DHC4,ERJ135.190,F27
User currently offlineSNATH From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 3247 posts, RR: 22
Reply 11, posted (9 years 6 months 2 weeks 7 hours ago) and read 6747 times:

I flew SFO-SEA on an AS B739 last December. It was mostly empty and the crew made an announcement that we could change seats to find an empty row if we wished, provided that we didn't seat on the last N rows (I can't remember how many). They explicitly said that the restriction was due to a weight-balance issue, given that the plane was mostly empty and didn't have a lot of cargo either. So, I'd assume FR does something similar.

Quoting RedDragon (Reply 8):
Don't be silly, two lengths of string would cost too much!

 rotfl   rotfl   rotfl   rotfl   rotfl 

Thanks for that!

Tony



Nikon: we don't want more pixels, we want better pixels.
User currently offlineRoseFlyer From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 9703 posts, RR: 52
Reply 12, posted (9 years 6 months 2 weeks 7 hours ago) and read 6699 times:

Moving the center of gravity towards the wing does increase the fuel efficiency of the airplane. The benefits are extremely small and only happen during climb when the nose is pitched up. The airplane probably would have been perfectly safe with all seats filled, but shifting the center of gravity towards the wing helps, which is what they did. Most flight attendants/customer service agents would have trouble explaining the physics behind it, so that is probably why you didn't get a good response.

The fuel efficiency comes from the plane requiring less input from the elevators during climb. This is occurs because the elevators produce a smaller moment arm when climbing to keep the nose up attitude if all the weight of the passengers/baggage is centered on the wing. If the weight is all concentrated in the center, then less force is required during the climb from the elevators and horizontal stabilizer. The elevators are in an up position during climb, and are causing a force down on the tail, which essentially requires more lift from the main wing, and thus more thrust and fuel. The more elevator input, the less efficient the plane is on climb. So by keeping those passengers out of back/front of the plane, Ryanair probably decreased the force on the wing by a couple hundred pounds, which results in less fuel burn.

Ryanair is one of the few airlines that actually takes this into effect on many flights. I have seen AS do it as well to a lesser degree, especially on their 734s as well as TAME of Ecuador. AS will limit the number of people in first class on their flights (I have seen this happen on a SEA-SNA flight in Nov 2003). The small efficiency gain is obviously worth it for Ryanair since they don not care about offering high comfort and good service, but rather about cutting costs. Most airlines though care more about passenger comfort and do not force people the sit in middle seats when there are aisle and window seats available.



If you have never designed an airplane part before, let the real designers do the work!
User currently offlineRedDragon From United Kingdom, joined Jul 2004, 1135 posts, RR: 6
Reply 13, posted (9 years 6 months 2 weeks 6 hours ago) and read 6634 times:

Quoting RoseFlyer (Reply 12):
Most airlines though care more about passenger comfort and do not force people the sit in middle seats when there are aisle and window seats available.

Just to clarify, it's a forward/centre/rear cabin issue, not an aisle-middle-window thing. Although I'm assuming from the rest of your post that you understand that and that this was just a typo?  Smile


User currently offlineJAM747 From United States of America, joined Feb 2005, 550 posts, RR: 1
Reply 14, posted (9 years 6 months 2 weeks 6 hours ago) and read 6617 times:

maybe some one in the tech/ops section could shed more light on this topic.

User currently offlineLTBEWR From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 13170 posts, RR: 15
Reply 15, posted (9 years 6 months 2 weeks 6 hours ago) and read 6572 times:

Considering the high prices of fuel, especially in Europe where FR does business, their rock bottom fares and general hyper-cheap policies, even saving a relatively few lbs/ltrs/kgs of fuel (maybe 20 ltrs. on climb?) on each possible flight may mean over the fleet 100,000 + Euros a year. Every little bit helps to keep you making a profit.

User currently offlineRoseFlyer From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 9703 posts, RR: 52
Reply 16, posted (9 years 6 months 2 weeks 5 hours ago) and read 6510 times:

Quoting RedDragon (Reply 13):
it's a forward/centre/rear cabin issue, not an aisle-middle-window thing

Sorry if I gave the wrong impression. I was just saying that Ryanair doesn't mind cramming people in sections and putting someone in every seat around the wing and forcing people into middle seats and other bad seats that are uncomfortable rather then allowing them to sit in more desirable seats (window and aisle seats that may be left in the front or back).



If you have never designed an airplane part before, let the real designers do the work!
User currently offlinePSAjet17 From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 341 posts, RR: 0
Reply 17, posted (9 years 6 months 2 weeks 3 hours ago) and read 6410 times:

I find it hard to believe that the reason noone could sit in the last four rows was due to weight and balance. What happens when two or three people move aft to use the lavatory?

Usually, the reason rows are blocked is due to the number of flight attendants on the flight. If I am not mistaken, one flight attendant is required for every 50 usuable seats on the aircraft. If the plane holds 160+, blocking the last four rows would take the count to 150 or less and only require three attendants not the four with full seating.


User currently offlineRedDragon From United Kingdom, joined Jul 2004, 1135 posts, RR: 6
Reply 18, posted (9 years 6 months 2 weeks 3 hours ago) and read 6381 times:

Quoting PSAjet17 (Reply 17):
Usually, the reason rows are blocked is due to the number of flight attendants on the flight. If I am not mistaken, one flight attendant is required for every 50 usuable seats on the aircraft. If the plane holds 160+, blocking the last four rows would take the count to 150 or less and only require three attendants not the four with full seating.

Someone please correct me if I'm wrong, but I can't see that this would let an airline get round flight attendant minima. If there are 189 passenger seats physically installed on the aircraft, then they need four flight attendants whether they like it or not - surely putting the tray tables down (or using string  Wink) doesn't negate this?

Rich


User currently offlineStirling From Italy, joined Jun 2004, 3943 posts, RR: 21
Reply 19, posted (9 years 6 months 2 weeks 3 hours ago) and read 6376 times:

Quoting PSAjet17 (Reply 17):
I find it hard to believe that the reason noone could sit in the last four rows was due to weight and balance. What happens when two or three people move aft to use the lavatory?

From what I can tell, the benefits of such practice are on take-off, when folks are not allowed to leave their seats.

Quoting RoseFlyer (Reply 12):
The fuel efficiency comes from the plane requiring less input from the elevators during climb



Delete this User
User currently offlineClimb1 From United Kingdom, joined Apr 2005, 128 posts, RR: 0
Reply 20, posted (9 years 6 months 2 weeks 2 hours ago) and read 6336 times:

Hello again.  Smile
Just to clarify, before pushback people were told to move from the last four rows. However once in the cruise, a woman and two small kids were allowed to sit in the row behind us (fourth from back) for the rest of the flight. Then two adults sat in the opposite side to the woman and kids, also fourth row from the back. There was still the last three rows vacant throughout, but i dont know whether it was meant to be that way or no one wanted to ask if they could sit there once in the cruise.
Many thanks
Climb1



In my eyes the Boeing 747 will ALWAYS be the queen of the skies!
User currently offlinePipoA380 From Switzerland, joined May 2005, 1594 posts, RR: 51
Reply 21, posted (9 years 6 months 1 week 6 days 16 hours ago) and read 6059 times:

Quoting Climb1 (Reply 20):
Then two adults sat in the opposite side to the woman and kids, also fourth row from the back. There was still the last three rows vacant throughout, but i dont know whether it was meant to be that way or no one wanted to ask if they could sit there once in the cruise.

I guess it's a question of cleaning up the aircraft. 3 Rows less to clean is about 10% less, so I just guess that it's instruction to save time. The woman and kids were probably put there because they had boarded late and were not sitting together, and the two other certainly just did the same as they saw that woman do that!

Riding an airplane is just not as nice as it used to be.... just a hell cheaper!



It's not about AIRBUS. it's not about BOEING. It's all about the beauty of FLYING.
User currently offlineCirrostratus From Italy, joined May 2005, 27 posts, RR: 0
Reply 22, posted (9 years 6 months 1 week 6 days 16 hours ago) and read 5978 times:

I had the same experience. Husband and I sat in the last row and were promptly moved. I asked why, not to be a snooty passenger, but because I was genuinely interested. The f/a said it was a weight and balance issue for take off and that after we became airborne we could then return to the rear seats if we so desired.

User currently offlineLapper From United Kingdom, joined Mar 2002, 1567 posts, RR: 7
Reply 23, posted (9 years 6 months 1 week 6 days 15 hours ago) and read 5860 times:

Ryanair vary the number of rows blocked off according to how busy the flight is.

It is done to help stabilise the aircraft, hence saving fuel. Apparently a Boeing Standard Operating Procedure.

- Up to 70 passengers: Rows 1-6 and the rearmost 4 rows are blocked.
- 70-132 passengers: Rows 1-6 and the rearmost row are blocked.
- 132+ passengers: Rows 1 and 2 are blocked, unless needed.

Jeremiah


Courtesy http://www.airliners.net/discussions...eral_aviation/read.main/1201754/4/ reply 5.

Thanks Teahan! (also read Crosswind's reply on the same thread.)


User currently offlinePlymSpotter From Spain, joined Jun 2004, 11689 posts, RR: 60
Reply 24, posted (9 years 6 months 1 week 6 days 15 hours ago) and read 5700 times:

Last time I flew Ryanair this happened and the stewardess helpfully told me it was because the aircraft (B732) was getting very old and could no longer lift the full weight. Do they have a policy about scaring their customers so they sweat more before getting on the aircraft and save fuel stirthepot 

Dan Smile



...love is just a camouflage for what resembles rage again...
25 Miami1 : Blocking seats is purely to do with weight and balance and loadsheet. It has NOTHING to do with the number of FAs or to lessen the cleaning required!
26 Cschleic : Seems Alaska does take this into account. I was once on a PDX-SJC flight that was fairly empty. They didn't restrict passengers to a certain section,
27 Go3Team : This has also happened to me on an FR flight. As I got on the plane (one of the last in line) I was amazed to see the first four rows empty. I prepare
28 IrishMD11 : Centre of gravity is damned important indeed. I remember flying on Danair DA1277(G-AXCP) from LGW to GVA on the 11.02.77. Was sitting forwards of the
29 N312RC : I was once on a Northwest DC9-30 departing from Jacksonville, FL and they had to move people forward.. I was in seat 2A up in First and they unexpecte
30 EI321 : I flew on ryanair 738 Dublin to Reus (spain) a month ago. The flight from DUB Was full but on the return flight they blocked the rear 7 rows with the
31 RedDragon : What aircraft was this, the One-Eleven maybe? Rich
32 IrishMD11 : Oops, I did forget that detail. Yes, she was on of those good old BAC 1-11's. Cheers! Gerry
33 PADSpot : If I was an innocent, uninformed passenger, this statement would have caused me to leave the airplane instantaneously. Stricken with fear. That sound
34 RedDragon : Not to mention a more accurate explanation!
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Airline's We've Said Hello To In The Last Year posted Mon Dec 2 2002 18:53:28 by Demoose
Airline's We've Said Goodbye To In The Last Year posted Mon Dec 2 2002 18:44:27 by Demoose
Why Are We Still Paying The Recent Fuel Surcharges posted Tue Oct 10 2006 09:54:22 by Skyhigh
Q 400 And ATR 72 Why Not More Orders In The US? posted Sat Apr 22 2006 22:15:15 by Cumulonimbus
Trans-Atlantic In The Last Row? posted Sat Jan 28 2006 19:43:21 by Gnomon
Can One Still Sit In The Jumpseat On Singapore? posted Sat Feb 5 2005 22:17:07 by UAL747
Why Did AA B777 In IND Last Night? posted Sat Dec 18 2004 18:08:19 by Big777jet
Why No Russian Planes In The U.S.? posted Tue Sep 28 2004 01:55:33 by Wedgetail737
UK Charter Airlines We Lost In The 90's posted Wed Mar 3 2004 12:07:00 by ACEregular
Why Did USAirways Expand In The Carribiean posted Thu Dec 4 2003 14:12:23 by DL685