Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
AA's Ex-TWA MD-80's & 757's  
User currently offlineWedgetail737 From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 5890 posts, RR: 6
Posted (9 years 2 months 6 days 12 hours ago) and read 5963 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Hello, everyone!

It's been a while since I've flown on an ex-TWA MD-80 or 757 with AA. Does anyone know if AA has been changing out the interiors on these birds?

29 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineCommavia From United States of America, joined Apr 2005, 11413 posts, RR: 62
Reply 1, posted (9 years 2 months 6 days 12 hours ago) and read 5958 times:

Yes -- AA is slowly but surely modifying the interiors of the TWA MD-80s to meet AA standard, including installing solid divider partitions between F and Y and changing the seat covers. Most MD-80 modification work is being performed as the planes come in for overhaul servicing in TUL or MCI. Most MD-80s will probably be modified within the next two years, as many have already been switched over to AA interiors.

The 757s, on the other hand, are not being as heavily modified as AA will be returning nearly all of these planes in the next 2-3 years as their leases expire. AA doesn't want non-standard 757s with Pratt engines complicating their all RR-powered 757 operations.

[Edited 2005-05-22 15:37:05]

[Edited 2005-05-22 15:37:38]

User currently offlineB757capt From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 1366 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (9 years 2 months 6 days 12 hours ago) and read 5939 times:

Good are any of the old TWA birds ETOPS rated?


The views written by this user are in no manner the views of my employer and should not be thought as such.
User currently offlineCommavia From United States of America, joined Apr 2005, 11413 posts, RR: 62
Reply 3, posted (9 years 2 months 6 days 12 hours ago) and read 5923 times:

Quoting B757capt (Reply 2):
Good are any of the old TWA birds ETOPS rated?

I am not certain, but I don't believe any of the remaining TWA planes with AA have ETOPs certifications. TWA obviously had ETOPS-certified 757s that flew to LIS, MAD, BCN, etc. and also on longer Caribbean flights to ANU, CUN, etc. but I think AA has already returned them to lessors. I could be wrong, though.


User currently offlineAA717driver From United States of America, joined Feb 2002, 1566 posts, RR: 13
Reply 4, posted (9 years 2 months 6 days 11 hours ago) and read 5848 times:

The ETOPS has probably been allowed to lapse. With the lower power engines, AA wouldn't put them on the longer flights and the rafts were pulled out shortly after 9/11.

Also, the 757's that were used on the LIS/BCN routes had higher allowable gross weights but it was just a paperwork thing--write Boeing a check and viola! you have a high gross weight 757! That didn't last.TC



FL450, M.85
User currently offlineCkfred From United States of America, joined Apr 2001, 5171 posts, RR: 1
Reply 5, posted (9 years 2 months 5 days 22 hours ago) and read 5533 times:

I seem to remember that AA is also installing the extended bins on the ex-TW MD-80s this year. If a plane is going into TUL or MCI for something less than a C-check, the bins will be replaced, although the rest of the cabin upgrades will be left for a full overhaul.

User currently offlineFlagshipAZ From United States of America, joined Jan 2001, 3419 posts, RR: 14
Reply 6, posted (9 years 2 months 5 days 21 hours ago) and read 5499 times:

Slightly off topic here, but is AA keeping & refurbishing all 103 MD-80s they inherited from TWA, or just the ones in revenue service at this time? Regards.


"Beer is living proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy." --Ben Franklin
User currently offlineQQflyboy From United States of America, joined Oct 2003, 2264 posts, RR: 13
Reply 7, posted (9 years 2 months 5 days 20 hours ago) and read 5435 times:

The good news is AA stepped up the installation schedule for installing power ports and expanded overhead bins to TWA MD-80s. As of May 1, 94% of all AA MD-80s (including TWA) have expanded bins and power ports. AA has 336 MD-80s in service, including TWA, and to be more specific, 316 have the bigger bins and power ports.

In addition, 263 MD-80s have been reconfigured, adding two more seats to f-class (16 in all) and five more seats to main cabin (120) in all. I know AA has taken a lot of flack for removing MRTC, however, AA removed a closet behind first class and a closet in the very back of the plane. Since these two closests were removed, the legroom in coach is still generous... it didn't go back to where it used to be. Remember, AA took out 10 seats from coach before and only added back five, after removing two closets.



The views expressed are mine alone and do not necessarily reflect my employer’s views.
User currently offlineTonytifao From Brazil, joined Mar 2005, 1014 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (9 years 2 months 5 days 13 hours ago) and read 5347 times:

What planes will AA use when they replace their 757 fleet once the lease ends?

User currently offlinePSU.DTW.SCE From United States of America, joined Jan 2002, 7521 posts, RR: 28
Reply 9, posted (9 years 2 months 5 days 13 hours ago) and read 5335 times:

The TWA 757's aren't being replaced by anything. AA inherited about 30 P&W powered 757-200's from the TWA merger. The large fleet of RR 757's that AA has always had will take over all necessary routes with others changing gauge as necessary.

User currently offlineDAYflyer From United States of America, joined Sep 2004, 3807 posts, RR: 3
Reply 10, posted (9 years 2 months 5 days 13 hours ago) and read 5323 times:

Quoting Commavia (Reply 1):
AA doesn't want non-standard 757s with Pratt engines complicating their all RR-powered 757 operations.

That makes sense, I wonder who the likely candidates are that will be picking up the birds when AA is finishes with them.



One Nation Under God
User currently offlineKYAir From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 362 posts, RR: 3
Reply 11, posted (9 years 2 months 5 days 12 hours ago) and read 5259 times:

I flew from DFW on Fri and noticed a couple AA MD-80's and one 757 that still have TW tail numbers. One MD-80 I saw for sure while on the taxiway waiting to take off was N-707TW. Haven't had a chance yet to see if there's a pic of it in the photo's section. When will all the tail numbers change? I thought this was already done.


Don't cry because it's over, smile because it happened - Dr. Seuss
User currently offlineCkfred From United States of America, joined Apr 2001, 5171 posts, RR: 1
Reply 12, posted (9 years 2 months 5 days 12 hours ago) and read 5225 times:

KYAir:

I don't think AA is going to change any tail numbers on ex-TWA MD-80s. I remember seeing DL 737s and 727s in ATL with tail numbers that ended with the letters WA, making them former Western aircraft. This was several years after the merger, and the aircraft were all in DL colors.


User currently offlineYukonTrader From Switzerland, joined May 2005, 207 posts, RR: 6
Reply 13, posted (9 years 2 months 5 days 11 hours ago) and read 5215 times:

Quoting KYAir (Reply 11):
When will all the tail numbers change? I thought this was already done.

Do they actually plan to do so, and if so, for what reason? Except for generating paper-work and the cost involved, there's not much return from such a scheme...

I dare to ask
a) after a quick glance at the AA fleet in jp 2004/05 - it doesn't list a single ex TW aircraft that would already have been re-registered into a registration (tail number) with AA, AM, AN... suffix, and
b) as I have never heard of it being planned?

Cheers, Lukas


User currently offlineCommavia From United States of America, joined Apr 2005, 11413 posts, RR: 62
Reply 14, posted (9 years 2 months 5 days 10 hours ago) and read 5122 times:

Sorry for the double post.

[Edited 2005-05-23 17:47:11]

User currently offlineCommavia From United States of America, joined Apr 2005, 11413 posts, RR: 62
Reply 15, posted (9 years 2 months 5 days 10 hours ago) and read 5121 times:

Quoting KYAir (Reply 11):
When will all the tail numbers change?

I doubt AA will change them any time soon, if ever. There is no need to pay the fees, etc. to reregister an airplane with a new tail number. It costs too much, for virtually no benefit except that the N---TW can become N---AA or -AN or -AM. It would be a waste of money and AA has been extremely fiscally responsible lately with very little money wasting.


User currently offlineLY4XELD From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 857 posts, RR: 15
Reply 16, posted (9 years 2 months 5 days 10 hours ago) and read 5114 times:

Quoting Wedgetail737 (Thread starter):
It's been a while since I've flown on an ex-TWA MD-80 or 757 with AA. Does anyone know if AA has been changing out the interiors on these birds?

Flew one just last night with TWA style paneling on the interior (i.e. a pattern), and TWA emblazoned on the bev. carts. They're still around, just few and far between.



That's why we're here.
User currently offlineSleekjet From United States of America, joined Jul 2001, 2046 posts, RR: 22
Reply 17, posted (9 years 2 months 5 days 10 hours ago) and read 5100 times:

I should know this but how does one tell the difference between the 757 P & W and the 757 RR?


II Cor. 4:17-18
User currently offlineN501US From United States of America, joined May 2005, 220 posts, RR: 0
Reply 18, posted (9 years 2 months 5 days 10 hours ago) and read 5070 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Paul Leach
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Victor Lopez



NWA = Pratt

AA = Rolls

Hope this helps



Fools and thieves are well disguised in the temple and the marketplace.....
User currently offlineSleekjet From United States of America, joined Jul 2001, 2046 posts, RR: 22
Reply 19, posted (9 years 2 months 5 days 10 hours ago) and read 5051 times:

Ah, so the RR's are the smaller of the two, but more powerful?


II Cor. 4:17-18
User currently offlineN501US From United States of America, joined May 2005, 220 posts, RR: 0
Reply 20, posted (9 years 2 months 5 days 9 hours ago) and read 5041 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

From the "A/C Data" tab here at A.net:

Two 166.4kN (37,400lb) RollsRoyce RB211-535C turbofans, or
178.8kN (40,200lb) RB211-535E4s, or
193.5kN (43,500lb) RB211-535E4-Bs, or
162.8kN (36,600lb) Pratt & Whitney PW2037s, or
two 178.4kN (40,100lb) PW2040s, or
189.5kN (42,600lb) PW2043s



Fools and thieves are well disguised in the temple and the marketplace.....
User currently offlineDALMD88 From United States of America, joined Jul 2000, 2534 posts, RR: 14
Reply 21, posted (9 years 2 months 5 days 6 hours ago) and read 4902 times:

Many also consider the RR to be more reliable. The PW have had pylon crack issues from the very start and a few years ago The entire fleet was having Stator Crack problems. I remember at DL we had engine less 757s everywhere while they were tearing down the bad ones. PW couldn't produce the parts fast enough. There was also a huge backlog of customer engines with the same problems.

User currently offlineLY4XELD From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 857 posts, RR: 15
Reply 22, posted (9 years 2 months 5 days 5 hours ago) and read 4853 times:

Quoting N501US (Reply 18):

NWA = Pratt

AA = Rolls

Hope this helps

AA flies both P&W (ex-TWA) and RR engines. You can tell the ex-TWA's in AA's fleet also by the lack of overwing exits.



That's why we're here.
User currently offlineCommavia From United States of America, joined Apr 2005, 11413 posts, RR: 62
Reply 23, posted (9 years 2 months 5 days 5 hours ago) and read 4826 times:

Quoting DALMD88 (Reply 21):
Many also consider the RR to be more reliable.

Can't comment specifically, but I know that AA is extremely pleased with the RB211 and 757 performance in general and those hard-working, reliable 757s have found a place as a workhorse in the AA fleet. They will be around for quite some time. AA is steadily returning the Pratt-powered 757s to lessors and will continue to out to 2007. The small sub-fleet of Pratt-powered planes does not fit with AA's over 100-strong RR-powered fleet. The Pratt fleet also costs more to maintain because AA has to send the engine overhauls out to DL for maintenance whereas the RB211s are maintained in-house at AFW.


User currently offlineB4real From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 2629 posts, RR: 5
Reply 24, posted (9 years 2 months 5 days 5 hours ago) and read 4820 times:

For the TWA MD-80's that are slowly getting the cabin conversion as described above, will any of them get the power adapters that the AA a/c have?


B4REAL, spelled like it sounds
25 Post contains links and images PSU.DTW.SCE : Here's a better comparison: Former TWA PW-powered 757-200: View Large View MediumPhoto © John K. Jonaitis Jr. AA RR-powered 757-200: View Large V
26 Post contains links and images September11 : AA 757 RR-powered View Large View MediumPhoto © Del Laughery AA 757 PW-powered View Large View MediumPhoto © Phil Derner Jr. You should see
27 N1120A : Welcome to the site and here is your first lesson about A.net. Don't use the A.net Data section RB211s use less fuel on the 757 than the PW2000 as we
28 Jetstar : "I doubt AA will change them any time soon, if ever. There is no need to pay the fees, etc. to reregister an airplane with a new tail number. It costs
29 PSU.DTW.SCE : Yes, there are many hidden costs besides the FAA fee. -decals -labor to change decals -changing cockpit placards -updating logbooks -updating maintena
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Delta MD-80's & 757's posted Thu Apr 12 2001 05:46:27 by Cba
AA's Ex-TWA 757 posted Thu Jan 9 2003 12:56:51 by FLY777UAL
AA/TWA MD-80's posted Wed Feb 13 2002 22:51:24 by SESGDL
AA's F/A Staffing For MD-80 And 757 posted Wed Dec 13 2000 19:11:50 by Jacobcal
AA And Delta MD-80/90 Replacements posted Wed Feb 15 2006 21:11:10 by 1337Delta764
AA Wary Of MD-80 Replacement, Lack Of Alternatives posted Wed Feb 1 2006 04:08:06 by MidnightMike
American Fleet Numbers For Ex-TWA MD-80s posted Fri Aug 26 2005 21:06:14 by NRA-3B
How Old Are AA's And AS' MD-80? posted Thu Jun 23 2005 20:42:11 by Newsisco
AA MSP-MIA MD-80 To 738 posted Fri Jan 14 2005 22:23:58 by Continental
AA How Many MD 80's posted Tue Aug 17 2004 11:08:40 by Muttley35