Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Airplanes That Don't Fit The Airline.  
User currently offlineDc-9-10 From United States of America, joined Jul 1999, 585 posts, RR: 0
Posted (14 years 7 months 1 week 5 days 14 hours ago) and read 2329 times:

Have you noticed that some aircraft just dont fit with an airline. Like the 757 for Northwest or the 777 for Delta. How about any others you can think of.

31 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlinePbb152 From United States of America, joined Feb 2000, 619 posts, RR: 2
Reply 1, posted (14 years 7 months 1 week 5 days 13 hours ago) and read 1773 times:

What do you mean, they don't look right in an airline's color scheme, or they don't seem to make economic sense to an airline's needs? Either way, I disagree with both of your examples.

User currently offlineB744 From New Zealand, joined Dec 1999, 491 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (14 years 7 months 1 week 5 days 9 hours ago) and read 1727 times:

I think I know what you're getting at. NW757's and DL777s are good examples. They just look kinda odd, and don't seem to fit in.


User currently offlineTrident From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2000, 484 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (14 years 7 months 1 week 5 days 7 hours ago) and read 1698 times:

DC-10's in the old BA scheme. I never associated DC-10's with BA, they only inherited them following the BCal takeover.

Viscounts in the first BA scheme - the scheme was too "modern" for the Viscount's 50's shape.



User currently offlineMEA-707 From Netherlands, joined Nov 1999, 4353 posts, RR: 35
Reply 4, posted (14 years 7 months 1 week 5 days 6 hours ago) and read 1689 times:

Please explain your examples... I don't get it yet.
NW 757... an oddball, OK, because NW always ignored the 737 and 767, but the 40 757s flying right now are the only aircraft filling the gap between their 150-seaters and their big DC-10s and 747s, which makes it perfect for their longer transcon flights, or long thin routes like MSP-ANC.
The Delta 772 is a good replacement for their Tristars and MD-11s. The 767 is a bit to small for their longest and most prestigious routes, and I imagine it's marketing-wise to fly a well-liked big aircraft. Imagine if DLs biggest aircraft was the 767 (if the Tristars and MD-11s are retired), DL would be taken less seriously by customers and press, and nobody would believe they're almost the biggest airline in the world. Of course economics is the main factor... therefore DL (and AA) don't buy 744s, but the 772 is able to perfom fine economically on their route-system.
Best examples of airliners which doesn't fit in, are the ones bought for political reasons. BOAC and BEA (before becoming BA) were stuck with British built aircraft which they didn't want. In the cold war, airlines had to buy aircraft of their alleys, so many (ex) communist countries got Tupolevs while they preferred Boeing/Airbus.
Or sometimes an airline isn't happy with an airliner, which was originally planned to replace half or whole their fleet in that range, and ends up with a small number, along other comparible types. The 15 MD-90s of Delta are an example, which operate alongside older 722s and MD-80s and newer 738s, all with about the same capacities. Or the MD-11s of Delta and American (they originally planned to get 40 each of them, I guess, but they stopped after 15/18).



nobody has ever died from hard work, but why take the risk?
User currently offlineJet Setter From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (14 years 7 months 1 week 5 days 6 hours ago) and read 1663 times:

Why doesn't the 777 fit at Delta?
737-800, 757-200, 767-200, 767-300, 767-400, 777-200... there's a pattern there - looks like a familiy to me 


User currently offlineDL Widget Head From United States of America, joined Apr 2000, 2100 posts, RR: 5
Reply 6, posted (14 years 7 months 1 week 5 days 4 hours ago) and read 1642 times:

You couldn't be more wrong about the 777 and Delta. The 777 is a bit bigger and far more economical than the MD11 which Delta wants to evetually eliminate from the fleet. The 777 has proven popular with the flight crews, maintenance, management, and the passengers. So, I don't understand your point.

User currently offlinePH-BZA From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 7, posted (14 years 7 months 1 week 5 days 3 hours ago) and read 1629 times:

Please don't flame me if I'm wrong...

I would have to say American's A300-600 since American is looking to become an all-Boeing fleet plus the fact that they already have 767-200/300's.

PH-BZA


User currently offlineMas777 From United Kingdom, joined Jul 1999, 2937 posts, RR: 6
Reply 8, posted (14 years 7 months 1 week 5 days 3 hours ago) and read 1619 times:

Malaysia Airlines' Airbus A330s are a bit odd aren't they - the fleet of them seem to pop up on the strangest of routes that you wouldn't think MAS would put them on.

They were a great A300 replacement - granted but their role has been superceded by the 747/777 mix that MAS now operates.

MAS should dispose of them as its likely they will order the 777LR (and not the A340NG as discussed before). MAS should also order a mix of 737NG and 757s. Its odd that MAS never found a use for the 757 - it would fit it perfectly - as MAS likes using the 737 on regional routes but has found the A330/777 often too large as a replacement when the 737s are full.



User currently offlineCV990A From United States of America, joined Sep 1999, 1425 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (14 years 7 months 1 week 5 days 3 hours ago) and read 1626 times:

Actually, I have to agree, I could never understand why AA bought the A300, when it already had the 767. Also, why are airlines buying both the A330/A340 and the 777, wouldn't it make more economic sense to operate just one family of long-haul airliners?


Kittens Give Morbo Gas
User currently offlinePH-BZA From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 10, posted (14 years 7 months 1 week 5 days 3 hours ago) and read 1618 times:

Hey, do you know any airliners other than Cathay Pacific that operate all three of the A330, A340 and the 777?

PH-BZA



User currently offlineLH423 From Canada, joined Jul 1999, 6501 posts, RR: 54
Reply 11, posted (14 years 7 months 1 week 5 days 3 hours ago) and read 1604 times:

I agree with you CV990A and PH-BZA, the A300 really doesn't make much sense, but I'm pretty sure the main reason for their place in the AA fleet goes back to the late 80's. The 767 was fairly new, as was the newer varsion of the A300, the -600R. Both were similar in range and capacity, and both could fit in similar roles. The reason the A300's found their way into the AA fleet is because Boeing more-or-less refused to lower their price on the 767-300ER. Although AA favoured the Boeing aeroplane, they threatened to buy the A300 if Boeing didn't lower the price. Boeing thought AA was bluffing, and refused. AA subsequently bought 35 of them, and Boeing later reduced the price, and AA now has almost 50 767-300ER in their fleet.

Well, up until recently the A320's in British Airways fleet. They were only there because of the B-Cal purchase, and there are only 10 of them. Now, of course, the A319 and A320 will become the dominant short-haul aeroplane in the BA fleet.

LH423



« On ne voit bien qu'avec le cœur. L'essentiel est invisible pour les yeux » Antoine de Saint-Exupéry
User currently offlineBacardi182 From United States of America, joined Jan 2000, 1088 posts, RR: 1
Reply 12, posted (14 years 7 months 1 week 5 days ago) and read 1580 times:

i think the 737-800s just dont fit in at american. they just dont look right. I think that the A300s at american fit in very well at their miami hub. are you sure that AA bought them? i thought they are leasing them and can return them anytime they want? i think that the 767s at JAL dont fit in very well either. Why does cathay pacific operate both the 777/747 and A330/A340?

User currently offlineAKelley728 From United States of America, joined Dec 1999, 2194 posts, RR: 5
Reply 13, posted (14 years 7 months 1 week 5 days ago) and read 1572 times:

In recent history, I think of a few examples:

A300s with Continental
MD-80s with Northwest
MD-90s with American (yeah, yeah, I know they got them from Reno)

Any other examples?


User currently offlineJet Setter From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 14, posted (14 years 7 months 1 week 4 days 23 hours ago) and read 1565 times:

In the UK;
Monarch - 1 DC-10 rest of fleet A320, A321, A300-600R, A330, B757
Airtours - 1 DC-10 rest of fleet A320, A321, B757, B767, A330
JMC Airlines - 2 DC-10s rest of fleet A320, B757
Virgin Atlantic - 1 A321 (G-VATH - just replaced A320 G-OUZO) rest of fleet A340, B747

Also,
Sabena - 2 MD-11s
Iberia - 3 B737-400s (operated by Air Europa) 2 B767-300s
Aer Lingus - MD-11
Air Fance - 5 F100s, 8 F27s (Cargo!)


User currently offlinePH-BZA From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 15, posted (14 years 7 months 1 week 4 days 23 hours ago) and read 1564 times:

Some more:

A310's with Delta (now out of service)

A31x's/A32x's with United - IMO the 737NG would look better since they already operate a large fleet of 737's

A310's with Aeroflot - the only Airbus jets they have. Then again, why would it need them with 767-300ER's?

PH-BZA





User currently offlineHamlet69 From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 2745 posts, RR: 58
Reply 16, posted (14 years 7 months 1 week 4 days 23 hours ago) and read 1548 times:

A few that strike me:

JAL's 737-400s & ANA's A32X, seeing little planes in these widebody fleets is weird.

The Concorde deserves its own airline!

The A318 in any fleet. The plane looks too big to be that short.



Honor the warriors, not the war.
User currently offlineCV990A From United States of America, joined Sep 1999, 1425 posts, RR: 0
Reply 17, posted (14 years 7 months 1 week 4 days 23 hours ago) and read 1555 times:

Let's see here- Air France operates the A330/A340 and the 777, Singapore also operates the A340 and 777.
Also the A310's arrived first at Aeroflot- I think they were the first Western equipment certified in the former USSR, that's why Aeroflot has them- the 737s/767s/777s were a later series of orders.
Sabena's MD-11s are operated by CityBird- they're not actually owned by Sabena, also Aer Lingus' MD-11 is a seasonal wet-lease from World to increase capacity. The 737s and 767s at Iberia are leased from Air Europa because Iberia is prohibited from adding types to their fleet as an EU condition for Spanish governemnt loans to the airline- the A321/A319 order pre-dated this exemption 'tho...



Kittens Give Morbo Gas
User currently offlineBacardi182 From United States of America, joined Jan 2000, 1088 posts, RR: 1
Reply 18, posted (14 years 7 months 1 week 4 days 23 hours ago) and read 1545 times:

how about AR's A310 or LanChile's sole 747F? How about Varig 747s, they just didnt look right!

User currently offlineJet Setter From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 19, posted (14 years 7 months 1 week 4 days 22 hours ago) and read 1540 times:

Iberia have reached agreement with their pilots are now operating their own 767s using their own pilots, sensible really when you consider they're still adding to their sizeable 757 fleet. Ture, Air Europa do operate the 737-400s, but they are effectively part of the IB fleet in full livery etc - it is a bit strange seeing a 737 in Iberia livery!

Sabena now dry leases the MD-11s from CityBird using it's own crews (according to the article in "Airways" a few months back) Again looks strange in the Sabena livery - ditto an Aer Lingus MD-11 wearing full livery!


User currently offlineMD-90 From United States of America, joined Jan 2000, 8508 posts, RR: 12
Reply 20, posted (14 years 7 months 1 week 4 days 21 hours ago) and read 1530 times:

To change the subject a little bit, how about airplanes that really fit well with their airline? Some of my favorites are below:
Delta:
MD-88 (quiet and comfortable, perfect for their short southeastern routes)
L-1011 (Queen of the Atlantic)
MD-90 (there aren't enough of them, but it's excellent hot-and-high performance and good serve it well out west).

Midwest Express:
The 717 was made for them. They've already practically announced that they'll be ordering some soon to repkace aging DC-9s.

Weird aircraft of the past:
Pan Am's DC-10s and L-1011s. You never think of PAA with anything but 747s.
Delta and AA's 747s. They just didn't look right.


User currently offlineAmtrakGuy From United States of America, joined Sep 1999, 500 posts, RR: 0
Reply 21, posted (14 years 7 months 1 week 4 days 21 hours ago) and read 1529 times:

For me..I think DC-9 doesn't look good in NWA livery....very ugly looking...727 was better. Maybe the 717 will be better???? 717-300/400? (if they ever come out with one)

Dave


User currently offlineSWA737-500 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 22, posted (14 years 7 months 1 week 4 days 11 hours ago) and read 1492 times:

HeHe, don't forget America West's 747-200s   That was a weird time.

User currently offline1011 FAN From United States of America, joined Dec 1999, 67 posts, RR: 0
Reply 23, posted (14 years 7 months 1 week 4 days 5 hours ago) and read 1486 times:

Definately the AA 737s ... When you think of AAs narrow body fleet you think MD80 or 757...I guess it will take some getting uesd to..
As far as what just seems right...DL L-1011s, UA DC-10s, TWA747s SW 737s...


User currently offlineDc-9-10 From United States of America, joined Jul 1999, 585 posts, RR: 0
Reply 24, posted (14 years 7 months 1 week 3 days 23 hours ago) and read 1472 times:

I guess that i didnt make my statement well enough. I am not talking about economic statue of the airplane but how the aircraft just donest seem to fit with the airline in a sceme. Like when you think of the 777 you think of United or BA NOT Delta, and when you think of the 757 you think of Delta or American.
get the idea.


25 Cody : I always though Eastern DC-10's, and 747's as well as United L1011's were wierd in both the scheme and the fleet uncommanality.
26 Samurai 777 : How about these? PWA(Pacific Western Airlines) - This Canadian domestic airline (now a part of CP) had 767-200s, and stranger still, they used it more
27 AKelley728 : Thinking back a few years, Eastern had a few DC-8s in it's fleet. Now that was a strange site. Also Continental had a few 747s (ex PeoplExpress?)also
28 Ctbarnes : Re: CO 747's: In the late 60's Continental was lobbying the Nixon Administration for authority to serve Australia and New Zeland. Sources close to the
29 Post contains links and images WorldTraveller : How about the Concorde in Singapore's and Braniff colors? Click for large versionPhoto © AirNikon This one looks really cool, though: Click for l
30 NWA Man : I agree with WorldTraveller, and I'll expand...The 747SP doesn't look good in any color on any airline. CO's DC-10s really don't fit, and they're bein
31 Heffer : So everyone thinks that a BAe 146/Avro fits all airlines... That is nice to see!!! They are a strange, but nice little airplane... Heffer
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Airlines That DON'T Operate The 737? posted Mon Aug 18 2003 20:43:40 by Ssides
Colour Schemes That Don't Flatter The Aircraft? posted Sat Apr 27 2002 04:13:14 by Dripstick
THY Was The Airline That Operated More 707 Models! posted Fri Aug 18 2006 21:45:04 by CV990
China Southern: Don't Use The Lavatories posted Thu Nov 30 2006 19:55:42 by Mortyman
LAX: Name The Airline Photographer 1998 posted Fri Nov 17 2006 14:39:27 by SJC-Alien
Identify The Airline (Convair Propliner) posted Sun Sep 24 2006 09:01:55 by MIAMIx707
Who's That Guy On The Alaska Tail? posted Fri Aug 25 2006 06:25:19 by Flamedude707
Copa Lands In MAO, 31st Destination Of The Airline posted Tue Jul 18 2006 10:12:53 by Hardiwv
Have RJ's Ruined The Airline Industry? posted Mon Jun 19 2006 08:41:30 by Apodino
Rod Eddington On The Airline Industry And China posted Sun Jun 11 2006 20:19:35 by Concorde001