CitationJet From United States of America, joined Mar 2003, 2235 posts, RR: 3 Reply 2, posted (7 years 12 months 4 days 8 hours ago) and read 10688 times:
That's why those Russians design heavy duty landing gears.
MD11LuxuryLinr From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 1385 posts, RR: 16 Reply 3, posted (7 years 12 months 4 days 8 hours ago) and read 10662 times:
Ever watch a DC8 or CRJ land? Fun..
Caution wake turbulence, you are following a heavy jet.
Z8 From United States of America, joined Jun 2001, 27 posts, RR: 0 Reply 8, posted (7 years 12 months 4 days 7 hours ago) and read 10381 times:
Quoting KLM685 (Reply 6): HAHAHAHA passengers must have been very freaked out!
The writing on the aircraft side states Yuri Gagarin Cosmonauts Training Centre.
I don't think any passengers are going to be particularly concerned about this landing
Afay1 From United States of America, joined Oct 2001, 1293 posts, RR: 3 Reply 10, posted (7 years 12 months 4 days 6 hours ago) and read 10260 times:
It is the Open Skies Treaty Aircraft, it is used to verify weapon's treaty compliance by visual means (cameras/sensors). There is a US equivalent of the plane as well.
SATL382G From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR: Reply 11, posted (7 years 12 months 4 days 6 hours ago) and read 10154 times:
Quoting Z8 (Reply 8): The writing on the aircraft side states Yuri Gagarin Cosmonauts Training Centre.
I don't think any passengers are going to be particularly concerned about this landing
Yup might even have NASA or ESA people aboard........
Quoting Afay1 (Reply 10): It is the Open Skies Treaty Aircraft, it is used to verify weapon's treaty compliance by visual means (cameras/sensors
Link or Reference please. Z8 nailed it as being a Cosmonaut training center airplane.
For the thread starter: "Don't" is a contraction of "do not". Did you really mean to say "This do not look right" rather than "This does not look right"?
Doona From Sweden, joined Feb 2005, 3707 posts, RR: 14 Reply 15, posted (7 years 12 months 3 days 19 hours ago) and read 9661 times:
Quoting SATL382G (Reply 11): For the thread starter: "Don't" is a contraction of "do not". Did you really mean to say "This do not look right" rather than "This does not look right"?
Us lowly people from the land of "Foreign" sometimes see television programs from the US, and I can tell you, you're not always helping when it comes to teaching the world the English language.
Cheers
Mats
Sure, we're concerned for our lives. Just not as concerned as saving 9 bucks on a roundtrip to Ft. Myers.
FoxBravo From United States of America, joined Nov 2003, 2806 posts, RR: 5 Reply 22, posted (7 years 12 months 3 days 16 hours ago) and read 7735 times:
Douglas7Seas From United States of America, joined May 2004, 129 posts, RR: 0 Reply 23, posted (7 years 12 months 3 days 16 hours ago) and read 7625 times:
Just an aside; saying "this don't look right", might show a significant sophistication with English. Is the writer mimicking the colloquialisms common in the U.S.? Gotta (oops) say, I like his subject matter regardless of how he writes/speaks English.
Afay1 From United States of America, joined Oct 2001, 1293 posts, RR: 3 Reply 24, posted (7 years 12 months 3 days 16 hours ago) and read 7559 times:
Here is one of the links providing information on the OPEN SKIES missions from the US Airforce and it has a picture of this aircraft at Travis AFB as well. http://public.amc.af.mil/news/2004/June/040623.htm
25 ViasaMSY: Is this kind of approach common in the CRJ?. The two times I have flown a CRJ the approaches have been quite amazing. Usually a quick flare really clo
27 Mig21UMD: CRJ's 200, have no leading edge slats so they come in over the fence quite fast for their size.
28 FoxBravo: Twin Otters, like CRJs, also have a nose-down attitude on approach that is very noticeable (and can be a bit scary the first time) in the cabin. And t
29 Toni_: I think this one was carrying CSKA Moscow fans to Lisbon for the UEFA Cup Final on May 18th. I saw heaps of Russian planes on approach on the days I s
32 Birdwatching: I'm not going to complain about the thread starter's grammar, but about the title in general. It is against the rules to name your thread like that. H
33 Jafa39: Send me some of what you're smoking, I read the title 400 times and still can't work out where Elvis fits in.
34 N766UA: lol! That made my night. I could understand using that excuse if he mispelled pneumonoultramicroscopicsilicovolcanoconiosis or something, but the dif
35 Jorge1812: There is or there was a pic on Anet with a plane somewhere in the Caribbean, on short finals but very unalinged with the runway. Pic was taken from th
36 NumberTwelve: Have seen a Tupolev in FRA landing with front gears. First I thought that we have to expect a crash but it landed safely. Was very impressive to see.