Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Kingfisher-Indian Airlines Get Closer  
User currently offlineLAXDESI From United States of America, joined May 2005, 5086 posts, RR: 47
Posted (9 years 5 months 3 weeks 6 days 17 hours ago) and read 1894 times:

Here's the link to an article on Kingfisher getting to use Indian Airline's terminals at Delhi and Bombay:
http://www.financialexpress.com/fe_full_story.php?content_id=92481


NEW DELHI, MAY 30: Vijay Mallya’s Kingfisher Airlines has staged a coup of sorts by bagging the rights to use the spacious terminals of state carriers Indian Airlines and Alliance Air in New Delhi and Mumbai. Mallya’s success has, however, got the other private operators like Jet Airways, Air Sahara and Air Deccan crying foul. They have termed the allocation of terminal rights to Kingfisher Airlines as “dis criminatory” and lodged a protest with the civil aviation ministry. In both Delhi and Mumbai, the director general of civil aviation had allocated the older terminal to private players and the new terminal only to the public sector carriers.

But Kingfisher Airlines recently entered into a Rs 120 crore deal with Indian Airlines for ground handling and aircraft maintenance. As part of the deal, it was allowed to use the Indian Airlines and Alliance Air terminal.

“We had foreseen the total chaos at the metros airports, especially during peak hours,” Kingfisher Airlines president Alex Wilcox told FE. “We are utilising the airport infrastructure of Indian Airlines as part of the comprehensive arrangement with it,” he said.

At Delhi airport, Indian Airlines and its subsidiary, Alliance Air, utilise terminal 1A which has 33 check-in counters and handles 1,425 passengers at any given time. Terminal 1B is used by Jet, Sahara, Air Deccan, SpiceJet, and so on. It has only 17 check-in counters and handles 1,450 passengers.

“Complete chaos prevails at both the airports during peak hours,” an Air Sahara official said, adding, “it would have been fair if the Kingfisher-Indian Airlines deal was made known to us earlier”.

Air Deccan’s MD GR Gopinath agrees the allocation is discriminatory. “All the private airlines have strongly protested to the civil aviation ministry.”


COULD THIS LEAD TO MORE THAN JUST TERMINAL SHARING?

10 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineAseem From India, joined Feb 2005, 2046 posts, RR: 10
Reply 1, posted (9 years 5 months 3 weeks 6 days 17 hours ago) and read 1845 times:

Quoting LAXDESI (Thread starter):
COULD THIS LEAD TO MORE THAN JUST TERMINAL SHARING?

only till KF builds it's own infrastructure. Doubt GOI will divest IC in the hands of existing competitor. Shall go against the rules. Moreover GOI won't give controling stake to anybody.
rgds
VT-ASJ

[Edited 2005-05-31 05:36:28]


ala re ala, VT-ALA ala
User currently offlineMrniji From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (9 years 5 months 3 weeks 6 days 16 hours ago) and read 1817 times:

Quoting LAXDESI (Thread starter):
COULD THIS LEAD TO MORE THAN JUST TERMINAL SHARING?

Alliance building ("we are stronger together") is very normal in econoics, especially in an increasing competitive field like civil aviation in India.

The deal will be a big win-win for both airlines and a big drawback especially for DN and SpiceJet

Malviya reminds me at Brandson


User currently offlineLAXDESI From United States of America, joined May 2005, 5086 posts, RR: 47
Reply 3, posted (9 years 5 months 3 weeks 6 days 16 hours ago) and read 1814 times:

Quoting Aseem (Reply 1):
Doubt GOI will divest IC in the hands of existing competitor. Shall go against the rules

I was not aware of formalized rules which prohibit a competitor from acquiring a minority stake. Didn't Tata and SQ at one point explored the possibility of buying a 40% stake in AI, even though SQ is a competitor to AI.

Quoting Aseem (Reply 1):
Moreover GOI won't give controlling stake to anybody.

Kingfisher would settle for less than a majority stake to begin with, and hope that in about 5 years rules will be revised to allow a majority stake. Didn't something similar happen in the case of Maruti Automobiles?

Fleet compatibility is another plus factor for alliance/code sharing, and an eventual merger.


User currently offlineAseem From India, joined Feb 2005, 2046 posts, RR: 10
Reply 4, posted (9 years 5 months 3 weeks 6 days 16 hours ago) and read 1755 times:

Quoting LAXDESI (Reply 3):
I was not aware of formalized rules which prohibit a competitor from acquiring a minority stake. Didn't Tata and SQ at one point explored the possibility of buying a 40% stake in AI, even though SQ is a competitor to AI.

first of all, GOI would like to prevent any kind of monopoly developing. And suppose KF does take some stakes in IC, then GOI would fear that KF may try to kill IC for it own benefit. The kind Coca-Cola did to Thumbs-up.
The reason why TATA-SQ deal didn't go through is altogther a different story.

Quoting LAXDESI (Reply 3):
Kingfisher would settle for less than a majority stake to begin with, and hope that in about 5 years rules will be revised to allow a majority stake. Didn't something similar happen in the case of Maruti Automobiles?

Well if KF has to wait for 5yrs, then why take the burden of ICBig grin

Quoting LAXDESI (Reply 3):
Fleet compatibility is another plus factor for alliance/code sharing, and an eventual merger.

fleet compatibility is understandable, but that shall restrict KF's interest to maintenance. I'd call eventual merger as pure speculation.  twocents 
rgds
VT-ASJ



ala re ala, VT-ALA ala
User currently offlineMrniji From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (9 years 5 months 3 weeks 6 days 15 hours ago) and read 1740 times:

Quoting Aseem (Reply 4):
first of all, GOI would like to prevent any kind of monopoly developing. And suppose KF does take some stakes in IC, then GOI would fear that KF may try to kill IC for it own benefit. The kind Coca-Cola did to Thumbs-up.

quite frankly, from a Pol Science perspective, there are good reasons for the GOI to do that - the Soft drink industry is a scaring example


User currently offlineTKMCE From India, joined May 2002, 841 posts, RR: 2
Reply 6, posted (9 years 5 months 3 weeks 6 days 15 hours ago) and read 1733 times:

Quoting Mrniji (Reply 5):
Quoting Aseem (Reply 4):
first of all, GOI would like to prevent any kind of monopoly developing. And suppose KF does take some stakes in IC, then GOI would fear that KF may try to kill IC for it own benefit. The kind Coca-Cola did to Thumbs-up.

Ah sorry to take this a little off track but I am fascinated by the Softdrink industry as well (although to a little bit lesser extent than the aviation industry!). While Coke did try to kill of Thumos Up, apparently it was not very scussessful and they had to bring back the product. Well my local dukanwallahs including Biggies like Food World stock both equally.

The casualities I believe were Gold Spot and Limca (although the latter did make a reapparearance if I am not wrong albiet briefly!)


User currently offlineHAWK21M From India, joined Jan 2001, 31702 posts, RR: 56
Reply 7, posted (9 years 5 months 3 weeks 6 days 12 hours ago) and read 1689 times:

The KF-IC deal will only be temp until KF gets stablized.
If you've tasted Thumbs-up you'll know why it beats Coke & Pepsi  Smile
Parking at Nights is still a problem for KF A320.At times they are dumped at the IC Mx Hangar to be towed for morning Departure.

regds
MEL



Think of the brighter side!
User currently offlineAirIndia From United Arab Emirates, joined Jan 2001, 1653 posts, RR: 1
Reply 8, posted (9 years 5 months 3 weeks 6 days 11 hours ago) and read 1663 times:

Quoting HAWK21M (Reply 7):
If you've tasted Thumbs-up you'll know why it beats Coke & Pepsi

well put..!


User currently offlineLAXDESI From United States of America, joined May 2005, 5086 posts, RR: 47
Reply 9, posted (9 years 5 months 3 weeks 6 days 5 hours ago) and read 1569 times:

Quoting HAWK21M (Reply 7):
Parking at Nights is still a problem for KF A320.At times they are dumped at the IC Mx Hangar to be towed for morning Departure.

Will the terminal sharing deal solve the problem or not?


User currently offlineHAWK21M From India, joined Jan 2001, 31702 posts, RR: 56
Reply 10, posted (9 years 5 months 3 weeks 6 days 4 hours ago) and read 1560 times:

Quoting LAXDESI (Reply 9):
Will the terminal sharing deal solve the problem or not?

Priority is still given to IC Aircraft for night halts.
Maybe the Additional Bays being constructed will ease things,but that would be ready only around October.
regds
MEL



Think of the brighter side!
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Indian Airlines To Get New Sub-brand posted Wed Nov 30 2005 13:23:13 by Cricket
Golden Airlines Get A+ posted Mon Nov 13 2006 11:30:34 by Stylo777
Indian Airlines To Lease 5x A320 + 6 RJ posted Tue Oct 24 2006 09:58:59 by WINGS
Indian Airlines To Order Regional Jets posted Thu Sep 21 2006 10:56:28 by Flying-Tiger
Where Do Airlines Get Their Int'l Demographic Data posted Thu Apr 20 2006 22:09:27 by MSYtristar
Why Did Silkway Airlines Get Rid Of Their DC8s? posted Fri Apr 7 2006 11:12:51 by Airevents
Air-India Indian Airlines Merger Gets Green Signal posted Tue Apr 4 2006 20:23:08 by Aseem
Indian Airlines Acft Grounded For Lack Of Spares posted Sun Mar 12 2006 23:08:35 by Lumberton
Air India And Indian Airlines May Merge posted Mon Feb 20 2006 17:01:26 by LAXDESI
Indian Airlines Orders 43 A32X posted Mon Feb 20 2006 13:57:45 by Oldeuropean