DfwRevolution From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR: Reply 3, posted (4 years 6 months 2 weeks 5 days 18 hours ago) and read 7364 times:
They've done a much better job incorperaing orders/deliveries into specific models than the previous website. At least on my machine, the page also loads much faster. The new colors are a blessing, I was so tired of that mid-80s scheme.
Isn't perfect, but it's an improvement.
---
Does anyone know where the Excel orders chart went?
ACdreamliner From United Kingdom (England), joined May 2005, 449 posts, RR: 1 Reply 4, posted (4 years 6 months 2 weeks 5 days 18 hours ago) and read 7352 times:
yeah! i like! well done airbus. sleek and cool
Flown: A320/A321/B732/B733/B734/B735/B737/B752/B753/B762/L1011-5/D8-Q4/ERJ195. Next Up: VS B744
FlyAUA From Austria, joined May 2005, 4180 posts, RR: 60 Reply 7, posted (4 years 6 months 2 weeks 5 days 17 hours ago) and read 7224 times:
Quoting EI321 (Reply 6): Yeah, I always thought the old one was a bit too vague with orders info.
Quoting DfwRevolution (Reply 3): They've done a much better job incorperaing orders/deliveries into specific models than the previous website.
How much simpler could they have made it other than putting a button at the bottom of the pay saying "CLICK HERE FOR ORDERS/DELIVERIES"???
LOL
I thought it was quite easy to find, and very hard to miss that excel file. The rest of the website though, not so navigation-friendly. This one is far better!
A340600 From United Kingdom (England), joined Aug 2003, 3978 posts, RR: 60 Reply 8, posted (4 years 6 months 2 weeks 5 days 17 hours ago) and read 7169 times:
Nice new site, much more user frienly than the last one,
DfwRevolution From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR: Reply 10, posted (4 years 6 months 2 weeks 5 days 17 hours ago) and read 7135 times:
Quoting FlyAUA (Reply 7): How much simpler could they have made it other than putting a button at the bottom of the pay saying "CLICK HERE FOR ORDERS/DELIVERIES"???
It required an Excel chart that was both a pain to load and navigate...
Quoting Jutes85 (Reply 9): looks like they have Boeing beat on this one
Not at all... it's easy to navigate, but it still lacks the in-depth information provided by Boeing's Airport Planning guides.
FlyAUA From Austria, joined May 2005, 4180 posts, RR: 60 Reply 12, posted (4 years 6 months 2 weeks 5 days 17 hours ago) and read 7019 times:
WHOAH, has anyone seen the new A380 videos in the multimedia gallery (in particular the interior video)??? I am still wiping the drool off my table and holding my jaw up. Good god....
Keta From Italy, joined Mar 2005, 400 posts, RR: 0 Reply 13, posted (4 years 6 months 2 weeks 5 days 16 hours ago) and read 6996 times:
Looks good indeed!
Did you check the images? Do I miss something or are large images only for press? I have downloaded high-resolution images from Airbus before to use them as desktop wallpaper, and I wanted to do the same now! That's one bad thing I find.
EI321 From Iraq, joined Jul 2009, 0 posts, RR: 0 Reply 14, posted (4 years 6 months 2 weeks 5 days 16 hours ago) and read 6970 times:
Quoting Jutes85 (Reply 9): looks like they have Boeing beat on this one
I still quite like Boeings site though. Not sure which is 'better'.
And why the hell is there still so little info about the A350!!! I know they are being coy 'till Paris but even a little bit more would be nice to see.
United787 From United States, joined May 2005, 1470 posts, RR: 0 Reply 16, posted (4 years 6 months 2 weeks 5 days 16 hours ago) and read 6933 times:
The new website is great. I hope this prompts Boeing into updating their website. They could make it a little more user friendly, like getting to each of the aircraft families.
"We're Generician Airlines, Nothing Special in the Air"
Norbb From Austria, joined Jun 2001, 24 posts, RR: 0 Reply 17, posted (4 years 6 months 2 weeks 5 days 16 hours ago) and read 6905 times:
Quoting FlyAUA (Reply 12): WHOAH, has anyone seen the new A380 videos in the multimedia gallery (in particular the interior video)??? I am still wiping the drool off my table and holding my jaw up. Good god...
FlyAUA From Austria, joined May 2005, 4180 posts, RR: 60 Reply 18, posted (4 years 6 months 2 weeks 5 days 16 hours ago) and read 6901 times:
Quoting EI321 (Reply 14): And why the hell is there still so little info about the A350!!! I know they are being coy 'till Paris but even a little bit more would be nice to see.
Check Flight International (24-30 May), page 11. Article is called "Airbus Eyes Extended-Range A350" in which airbus has clarified where the A350 currently has gotten to. Also interesting reading:
-page 13 (Airbus in Rescheduling Talks) talking about the deliveries of the A380 to the first three cutomers
-page 26 (A380 sale looms as Conran joins 'Protect U') talking about private VIP A380s deal struck with Lufthansa Technik
I know I know, I was bored today so I did some reading. LOL
JohnStevens From United Kingdom, joined May 2005, 43 posts, RR: 1 Reply 20, posted (4 years 6 months 2 weeks 5 days 16 hours ago) and read 6835 times:
Holy moly, that interior video of the 380... I think I've just wet myself. I'm off to watch it again, then again, and maybe when I'm done watching it, I'll watch it a little more.
But seriously I love the new site (and please lets not get into who's website is better A or B, that really would be taking it too far).
Quote: A380 First flight
19 July 2004
Toulouse-Blagnac International Airport, France
On April 27, 2005, the first A380 took to the air for a successful first flight that lasted three hours and 54 minutes, and landed in Toulouse, France at 14.23 local time.
Is it just me, or does that date of 19 July 2004 not make any sense with in the context of the paragraph?
Maybe I'm just nitpicking.
This is your captain speaking. I’ve turned off the no-smokin’ sign. Hell, if the plane is smokin' why can't you?
PM From Japan, joined Feb 2005, 5209 posts, RR: 60 Reply 24, posted (4 years 6 months 2 weeks 5 days 7 hours ago) and read 4862 times:
I also like the new site but I'm rather amused that one of the first things I read is...
the [2005] Airbus order book also includes 22 A330/A340, allowing this family's sales to surpass the 900 mark, becoming the best selling twin-aisle passenger aircraft ever
"Best selling twin-aisle ever"? Hmmm. I'm sure they'll come up with a reason why that statement is correct but on the face of it it seems a little optimistic!
ACdreamliner From United Kingdom (England), joined May 2005, 449 posts, RR: 1 Reply 25, posted (4 years 6 months 2 weeks 5 days 7 hours ago) and read 4728 times:
Quoting EI321 (Reply 14): EI321 From Ireland, joined May 2005, 80 posts, RR: 0
Reply 14, posted Wed Jun 1 2005 01:00:35 UTC+2 and read 2235 times:
Quoting Jutes85 (Reply 9):
looks like they have Boeing beat on this one
I still quite like Boeings site though. Not sure which is 'better'.
who said one had to be better? They are both good
Flown: A320/A321/B732/B733/B734/B735/B737/B752/B753/B762/L1011-5/D8-Q4/ERJ195. Next Up: VS B744
26 Leskova: I had my problems finding it at first, wasn't expecting it under "Corporate Information", but somehow I was more expecting it in the "Media Centre"..
Sponsor Message: 
From Belgium, joined Nov 2004, 1049 posts, 
From United Kingdom, joined Dec 2003, 1327 posts, 
From Austria, joined May 2005, 4180 posts, 
From , joined Dec 1969, posts, .gif){kind=small}
From United Kingdom (England), joined May 2005, 449 posts, 
From United States, joined May 2005, 220 posts, 
From Iraq, joined Jul 2009, 0 posts, 
From India, joined Oct 2004, 2633 posts, 
From Italy, joined Mar 2005, 400 posts, 
That's one bad thing I find.
From Canada, joined Apr 2004, 119 posts, 
From Japan, joined Feb 2005, 5209 posts, 
Printer friendly format 
