Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
TZ & WN, Next Airlines Merger In The USA?  
User currently offlineKC135TopBoom From United States, joined Jan 2005, 5566 posts, RR: 36
Posted (3 years 6 months 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 1195 times:

Will TZ and WN merge? They could call themselves TWNZ (twins?), LOL.

This gets WN into the bigger US Military Contracts, and a little fleet diversification. It also gets them into DFW and around the Wright Admendment, while at the same time maintianing their hebs at DAL and MDW.

This gives TZ the stability (and cash) they need.

It gives both airlines the mid section of the US.

What are the down sides of such a merger?

28 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineDfwRevolution From United States, joined Mar 2004, 7684 posts, RR: 55
Reply 1, posted (3 years 6 months 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 1193 times:

Quoting KC135TopBoom (Thread starter):
It also gets them into DFW and around the Wright Admendment, while at the same time maintianing their hebs at DAL and MDW.

They are currently trying to avoid that like the plauge, doing so would literally give ammunition to DFW to use against themselves. WN has made a point not to expand the WN/TZ codeshare to DFW because they do not want to "confuse" the issue one bit.

Quoting KC135TopBoom (Thread starter):
Will TZ and WN merge?

I think they will maintain their current status for the time being. If ATA were to completly collapse, WN would likely pick-up certain portions of their domestic opperations only. It doesn't suit them to add x-number of 757 at this time.

User currently offlineKC135TopBoom From United States, joined Jan 2005, 5566 posts, RR: 36
Reply 2, posted (3 years 6 months 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 1164 times:

But, without WN's help, TZ will not be able to get the B-763s or B-742s they want. Unless they have financial help somewhere else.

User currently offlineFlypdx From United States, joined Apr 2005, 627 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (3 years 6 months 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 1137 times:

No I don't see this coming..It really just doesn't make sense. Southwest is getting enough done with the codeshare, and doesn't need to buy the money troubled airline..


Aircraft I've Flown On:727-200,737-2,3,4,5,7,8,752,753,762,763,772,A319/320/321,CRJ-100/200, SF340,DC9-10,30,RJ85,MD80,E
User currently offline1millionflyer From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (3 years 6 months 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 1137 times:

WN Will NEVER acquire another airline completely...mark my words on this

User currently offlineWnsocal From United States, joined Jan 2005, 129 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (3 years 6 months 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 1120 times:

Quoting 1millionflyer (Reply 4):
WN Will NEVER acquire another airline completely

Never is a mighty long time.


Airline Nut
User currently offline1MillionFlyer From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 6, posted (3 years 6 months 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 1117 times:

Quoting Wnsocal (Reply 5):
Never is a mighty long time.

Yep

User currently offlineAirlinerfreak From United States, joined Jan 2005, 1264 posts, RR: 13
Reply 7, posted (3 years 6 months 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 1109 times:

My bets are that it will never happen. Though US and America West got away with it I do not think that TZ and WN would. Also WN would be making a big mistake by acquiring TZ!!

User currently offlineLN-MOW From United States, joined Jan 2000, 1783 posts, RR: 15
Reply 8, posted (3 years 6 months 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 1081 times:

Not gonna happen. WN already has a good chunk of the domestic military charters, they don't nees ATA's 'help' to get more.

767's seems to be hard to get. ATA now has booked time for two L-1011 D-checks in England, according to the Yahoo-board ...


- I am LN-MOW, and I approve this message.
User currently offlineAeroman62 From United States, joined Jan 2004, 154 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (3 years 6 months 1 day 19 hours ago) and read 1049 times:

WN has acquired, and in one case, absorbed the aircraft and operations of two airlines, namely Muse Air and Morris Air. The great thing about WN is that they'll do what makes sense to make money at any juncture in time, the TZ code share is something no one could have imagined 3 years ago.

User currently offline1MillionFlyer From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 10, posted (3 years 6 months 1 day 19 hours ago) and read 1035 times:

I know that Morris especially was a large acquisition, but they were an all 733 fleet. TZ has no fleet commonality.

User currently offlineN77014 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 11, posted (3 years 6 months 1 day 19 hours ago) and read 1026 times:

Morris Air was basically a shell; leased everything, complementary route system, and a very small work force that was easily integrated into WN.

TZ, on the other hand, is really two airlines in one, with a rather militant union and many years in existence. On paper, it would not be a good match.

User currently offlineFATFlyer From United States, joined May 2001, 4535 posts, RR: 24
Reply 12, posted (3 years 6 months 1 day 19 hours ago) and read 1017 times:

Quoting 1MillionFlyer (Reply 10):
but they were an all 733 fleet

It wasn't just aircraft. Morris also was originally set up closely following the Southwest model. There were boarding cards instead of seat assignments, etc. Lots of commonality that made that merger a little easier.


"Travel is fatal to prejudice, bigotry, and narrow-mindedness." - Mark Twain
User currently offlineJuventus From United States, joined Dec 2004, 2470 posts, RR: 2
Reply 13, posted (3 years 6 months 1 day 19 hours ago) and read 1013 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

How about UPS and FeDex, and call it FedUp.

User currently offlineDfwRevolution From United States, joined Mar 2004, 7684 posts, RR: 55
Reply 14, posted (3 years 6 months 1 day 19 hours ago) and read 1006 times:

Quoting 1MillionFlyer (Reply 10):
I know that Morris especially was a large acquisition, but they were an all 733 fleet. TZ has no fleet commonality.

They opperate 737-800, which have full cockpit commonality with the 737NG opperated by WN. TZ will also begin opperating "classic" 737 this fall. The only lack of commonality is their 757 fleet...

Quoting Airlinerfreak (Reply 7):
Also WN would be making a big mistake by acquiring TZ!!

For what reason?

Quoting 1millionflyer (Reply 4):
WN Will NEVER acquire another airline completely...mark my words on this

And they will never protest the Wright Ammendment  Yeah sure

User currently offlineN77014 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 15, posted (3 years 6 months 1 day 19 hours ago) and read 996 times:

Quoting DfwRevolution (Reply 14):
Quoting 1MillionFlyer (Reply 10):
I know that Morris especially was a large acquisition, but they were an all 733 fleet. TZ has no fleet commonality.

They opperate 737-800, which have full cockpit commonality with the 737NG opperated by WN. TZ will also begin opperating "classic" 737 this fall. The only lack of commonality is their 757 fleet...

Quoting Airlinerfreak (Reply 7):
Also WN would be making a big mistake by acquiring TZ!!

For what reason?

Quoting 1millionflyer (Reply 4):


WN Will NEVER acquire another airline completely...mark my words on this

And they will never protest the Wright Ammendment

Buying an airline merely to acquire common aircraft is a poor business reason. There has to be inherent value, as what Morris offered to WN when they bought them.

TZ, as I pointed out earlier, offers too many dissimilarities to WN for a merger. Perhaps the closest they would come would be as a separate division, as Muse Air was. The issue of merging certificates, routes, seniority lists, fleet types; a real headache.

User currently offlineFlyingTexan From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 16, posted (3 years 6 months 1 day 19 hours ago) and read 983 times:

Quoting 1millionflyer (Reply 4):
WN Will NEVER acquire another airline completely...mark my words on this

Don't put anything beyond Southwest.

User currently offlineFlyboyaz From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 17, posted (3 years 6 months 1 day 19 hours ago) and read 981 times:

Quoting FlyingTexan (Reply 16):
Don't put anything beyond Southwest.

Exactly! I think WN will have to change in the future to keep competing with other carriers. As they tend to like smaller, less used cities...this can cause a problem in the future when they run out of markets to go in. I dare say they might have to acquire smaller planes that can be used in even smaller markets....like FAT, BFL, EUG, PSP, etc. They do just fine of course with what they have, but in general you have to keep growing to remain competitive.

User currently offlineN77014 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 18, posted (3 years 6 months 1 day 18 hours ago) and read 945 times:

FAT, BFL, and PSP are growing areas. I think the only think keeping WN out right now are terminal facilities.

User currently offlineOzarkD9S From United States, joined Oct 2001, 3474 posts, RR: 30
Reply 19, posted (3 years 6 months 1 day 18 hours ago) and read 995 times:

Look at a map. There are scads of cities WN could serve without changing thier business model. Just off the top of my head:

COS, DSM, MSP/RST, MKE, GRR, DAY, CAE, SAV, FAT, ICT, MEM, GPT, RSW, SWF, ROC, SYR, PWM, BTV, MDT, ABE, RIC, TYS etc...

WN has a ton of long-term growth potential without integrating another airline.


Namaste
User currently offlineFlyboyaz From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 20, posted (3 years 6 months 1 day 17 hours ago) and read 887 times:

Some of those cities don't have enough traffic to support the amount of frequencies WN likes.

Considering how slow they expand, yes they have quite a long time until they need to change things.

User currently offlineKC135TopBoom From United States, joined Jan 2005, 5566 posts, RR: 36
Reply 21, posted (3 years 6 months 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 713 times:

Quoting FlyingTexan (Reply 16):
Don't put anything beyond Southwest.

I agree.  Silly

If WN decides that TZ is part of their business plan, it will happen.