Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
A380 Compliant Runways In Australia-NZ  
User currently offlineAvalon From Australia, joined May 2005, 87 posts, RR: 1
Posted (9 years 6 months 3 weeks 4 days ago) and read 4103 times:

It seems that in Australia/NZ, only Melbourne (Tullamarine) & Sydney are taking steps to widen their runways for the A380. Would this mean that the A380 would not be able to land & take off from any other airport in this region?

Does anyone know if the military airports in this region could accommodate an A380 take off & landing - or if Avalon's runway is wide enough?

15 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineMonteycarlos From Australia, joined Mar 2005, 2107 posts, RR: 28
Reply 1, posted (9 years 6 months 3 weeks 4 days ago) and read 4085 times:

Quoting Avalon (Thread starter):
It seems that in Australia/NZ, only Melbourne (Tullamarine) & Sydney are taking steps to widen their runways for the A380. Would this mean that the A380 would not be able to land & take off from any other airport in this region?

Melbourne has finished its runway accomodation works for the A380, and Sydney is yet to start (financing issues I believe) but it will be done at some point.

I think that 45m (which is pretty standard of the runway width for most military and high-RPT movement airports in both NZ and Australia) is wide enough for the A380 but its more a problem of taxiway width and runway/taxiway shoulder erosion. As someone pointed out, the outer engine of the A380 is another 7m from that of the 744 so it does significantly effect the erosion of those shoulders which can lead to the faster degredation of the runway/taxiway itself.

Quoting Avalon (Thread starter):
Does anyone know if the military airports in this region could accommodate an A380 take off & landing - or if Avalon's runway is wide enough?

Some military aerodromes would be capable, some not. But Avalon should be capable also... in fact I think that it can probably take the A380 on the taxiways... After all it has seen C-5a's and An-124's but I am not completely sure on this.



It's a beautiful night to fly like a phoenix...
User currently offlineNAV20 From Australia, joined Nov 2003, 9909 posts, RR: 36
Reply 2, posted (9 years 6 months 3 weeks 4 days ago) and read 4075 times:

Not just runways - they're taking the opportunity to spend out big on terminal expansion as well ($150M. altogether). Our civil servants never miss a chance to spend our money unwisely  Smile

So far as I know those are the only two airports to be modified. Presumably others could be used for landing in an emergency - but chances are that the A380 would be stuck there because the taxiways wouldn't be wide enough for it to taxi in and out.

It's a matter of concern to me that the only alternate on trips to LAX or SFO, in the event of trouble, is probably Honolulu - and they have said that they are definitely not planning to accommodate the A380.



"Once you have flown, you will walk the earth with your eyes turned skywards.." - Leonardo da Vinci
User currently offlineFlyAUA From Austria, joined May 2005, 4604 posts, RR: 55
Reply 3, posted (9 years 6 months 3 weeks 3 days 23 hours ago) and read 4022 times:

Quoting Avalon (Thread starter):
It seems that in Australia/NZ, only Melbourne (Tullamarine) & Sydney are taking steps to widen their runways for the A380. Would this mean that the A380 would not be able to land & take off from any other airport in this region?

Runways are not an issue since the A380 can land at any airport that accomodates a B744 (gear loads on the A380 are lower than current largest airliners). Also, the A380 does not need a special runway in terms of length. Taxiways and terminal space on the other hand could be an issue. I believe that once demand justifies it, and once airlines demand it from their airports, others might also prepare for the A380 apart from the 2 you have already named.

Here is the link to the A380 airport planning manual.



Not drinking, also isn't a solution!
User currently offlineWunala From Australia, joined Mar 2005, 950 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (9 years 6 months 3 weeks 3 days 23 hours ago) and read 4015 times:

Quoting NAV20 (Reply 2):
It's a matter of concern to me that the only alternate on trips to LAX or SFO, in the event of trouble, is probably Honolulu - and they have said that they are definitely not planning to accommodate the A380.

Hopefully there wont be any problems, but I hope it never needs to have an emergancy landing at RAR. Last time I took of from there in a NZ 767, we literally used the entire runway.


User currently offlineMonteycarlos From Australia, joined Mar 2005, 2107 posts, RR: 28
Reply 5, posted (9 years 6 months 3 weeks 3 days 23 hours ago) and read 4009 times:

Quoting FlyAUA (Reply 3):
I believe that once demand justifies it, and once airlines demand it from their airports, others might also prepare for the A380 apart from the 2 you have already named.

Its a very good point in that between SYD, MEL and BNE... which other airports in Australia have a need to plan for the A380? I mean BNE doesn't really (and thats why they haven't yet) but in the future might. Demand will be the key driver.

Also just a sidenote... Regardless of the A380, Airport master plans generally show very large expansion. Passenger numbers won't change because of the A380, but with changes and growth in the travel market. I know this is the case for MEL and probably SYD.



It's a beautiful night to fly like a phoenix...
User currently offlineVirginFlyer From New Zealand, joined Sep 2000, 4577 posts, RR: 40
Reply 6, posted (9 years 6 months 3 weeks 3 days 23 hours ago) and read 3971 times:

Auckland has also been working on their runway (which is why you'll see in all the recent Auckland photos that the 'standby' 05L/23R runway is in use) : http://www.airliners.net/search/phot...0%2F%20NZAA%29&distinct_entry=true

You can see some construction going on here:


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Jonathan Rankin
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Colin Hunter



And read about it here - they are working in stages, and it will all be ready by the end of 2006, in time for A380s:

http://www.auckland-airport.co.nz/Ne...sHistory/press_releases.php?rid=98

Brisbane's runway is already capable of receiving the A380.

V/F



"So powerful is the light of unity that it can illuminate the whole earth." - Bahá'u'lláh
User currently offlineMonteycarlos From Australia, joined Mar 2005, 2107 posts, RR: 28
Reply 7, posted (9 years 6 months 3 weeks 3 days 23 hours ago) and read 3950 times:

Quoting VirginFlyer (Reply 6):
Brisbane's runway is already capable of receiving the A380.

Yes but what of the terminal and taxiways?



It's a beautiful night to fly like a phoenix...
User currently offlineFlyAUA From Austria, joined May 2005, 4604 posts, RR: 55
Reply 8, posted (9 years 6 months 3 weeks 3 days 23 hours ago) and read 3935 times:

Quoting Monteycarlos (Reply 5):
Its a very good point in that between SYD, MEL and BNE... which other airports in Australia have a need to plan for the A380?

Exactly! I don't really think that any of the other airports need major expansion at the moment though since MEL and SYD are the main international ones. The other ones are mainly regional airports aren't they? I am not so knowledgable about the Australian playing field so I'm relying on you for an answer Big grin



Not drinking, also isn't a solution!
User currently offlineMonteycarlos From Australia, joined Mar 2005, 2107 posts, RR: 28
Reply 9, posted (9 years 6 months 3 weeks 3 days 22 hours ago) and read 3907 times:

Quoting FlyAUA (Reply 8):
The other ones are mainly regional airports aren't they? I am not so knowledgable about the Australian playing field so I'm relying on you for an answer

Well, essentially the others aren't 'regionals' as such... well at least the main ones like Perth, Adelaide, Cairns etc. but they are hardly A380 destinations. I think the major RPT movement airports in Australia are (and if I miss any someone let me know):

Cairns
Brisbane
Rockhampton
Coolangatta
Brisbane
Canberra
Melbourne
Adelaide
Perth
Broome
Darwin
Alice Springs

And I guess you could say the 'regionals' are the others such as Albury/Wodonga and the many others around WA, NSW, QLD, NT and SA.



It's a beautiful night to fly like a phoenix...
User currently offlineVirginFlyer From New Zealand, joined Sep 2000, 4577 posts, RR: 40
Reply 10, posted (9 years 6 months 3 weeks 3 days 22 hours ago) and read 3890 times:

Quoting Monteycarlos (Reply 7):
Yes but what of the terminal and taxiways?

From what I gather, they are also capable of handling the aircraft.

V/F



"So powerful is the light of unity that it can illuminate the whole earth." - Bahá'u'lláh
User currently offlineMonteycarlos From Australia, joined Mar 2005, 2107 posts, RR: 28
Reply 11, posted (9 years 6 months 3 weeks 3 days 22 hours ago) and read 3882 times:

Quoting VirginFlyer (Reply 10):
From what I gather, they are also capable of handling the aircraft.

Ah very nice indeed. If Airbus penetrate Japan or China a bit more we might actually see a few of them up in BNE!

Cheers V/F!



It's a beautiful night to fly like a phoenix...
User currently offlineAvalon From Australia, joined May 2005, 87 posts, RR: 1
Reply 12, posted (9 years 6 months 3 weeks 3 days 22 hours ago) and read 3888 times:

Dear FlyAUA

Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane, Perth, Cairns, Adelaide and Darwin airports all host international flights (Canberra to a miniscule degree, and Coolangatta [Gold Coast] sort of...). If any other city besides Syd & Melb were to host the A380, I guess it would be Brisbane because Qantas flies non-stop from Brisbane to LAX (with others via Auckland), and the Pacific route seems to favour the A380 the most - IMHO, this would be at least several years after A380 flights commence from Syd & Melb.

Besides LAX, Brisbane international flights serve mostly East & SE Asian countries, as well as NZ.

Perth too focuses on East & SE Asian countries, with flights to South Africa & a few to NZ (Air NZ only).

Cairns is a holiday destination for East & South East Asian countries; Adelaide only has some flights to Singapore, HK, Bali & Auckland; Darwin just does Singapore & Bali & probably Jakarta.

Most flights from Europe tend to be from London and terminate in Sydney or Melbourne. Passengers for the other Australian cities mentioned transfer at hubs in Singapore, Bangkok or HK to continue to these cities.

This is a rough guide (& others may add/correct it) - but I think it lays something of a template, wherein A380's would only fly to Syd & Melb (from London & the US), with Brisbane (with flights from the US) possibly the only other city that may take the A380 within the next decade. Perth would rank next, but probably a much longer way down the path. A possible, different route for the A380 in Aust could be flights to South Africa - because of the consistently high loads on this route of late; and probably just from Syd-JNB, not out of Perth.


User currently offlineAvalon From Australia, joined May 2005, 87 posts, RR: 1
Reply 13, posted (9 years 6 months 3 weeks 3 days 22 hours ago) and read 3869 times:

Hey Monteycarlos,

Pls excuse my ignorance, but what does RPT (in yr message) stand for?
Thanks in advance.


User currently offlineFlyAUA From Austria, joined May 2005, 4604 posts, RR: 55
Reply 14, posted (9 years 6 months 3 weeks 3 days 22 hours ago) and read 3865 times:

Quoting Monteycarlos (Reply 9):
Well, essentially the others aren't 'regionals' as such... well at least the main ones like Perth, Adelaide, Cairns etc. but they are hardly A380 destinations.



Quoting Avalon (Reply 12):
Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane, Perth, Cairns, Adelaide and Darwin airports all host international flights (Canberra to a miniscule degree, and Coolangatta [Gold Coast] sort of...). If any other city besides Syd & Melb were to host the A380, I guess it would be Brisbane because Qantas flies non-stop from Brisbane to LAX (with others via Auckland), and the Pacific route seems to favour the A380 the most - IMHO, this would be at least several years after A380 flights commence from Syd & Melb.

Ok slight misunderstand with my wording. Sorry guys. With regional I didn't mean to say tiny little airports which only offer domestic flights. I was just implying that the others apart from SYD MEL, and BNE (as you pointed out too) and not major international airports. Sure they have international flights, but I doubt they will need A380s in the near future.

Thanks for all the info guys... makes more sense now though  Smile



Not drinking, also isn't a solution!
User currently offlineMonteycarlos From Australia, joined Mar 2005, 2107 posts, RR: 28
Reply 15, posted (9 years 6 months 3 weeks 3 days 22 hours ago) and read 3861 times:

Quoting Avalon (Reply 13):
Pls excuse my ignorance, but what does RPT (in yr message) stand for?

Regular Public Transport

If you're interested - http://www.casa.gov.au

Have a flick through the pages in there, especially the Information for Air Operators section. Its mostly legislation based but quite relevant.

Enjoy!



It's a beautiful night to fly like a phoenix...
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Ever DC9 In Australia/NZ? posted Wed Oct 8 2003 15:56:55 by Thaigold
Malaysia In Australia NZ posted Thu Jan 25 2001 11:09:43 by ZK-NBT
When Will The A380 Be In Australia? posted Sat Nov 12 2005 05:44:04 by Aviation
A380 In Australia posted Sat Nov 12 2005 01:04:45 by Aussieindc
A380 Arrives In Australia! posted Thu Nov 10 2005 10:36:49 by Jetfuel
Air NZ Rebuilds Images In Australia posted Thu Sep 2 2004 23:16:26 by CXoneWorld
A380 Test Drive In India? posted Mon Nov 20 2006 04:41:32 by Amritpal
A380 Arrival Time In YVR? posted Fri Nov 3 2006 20:12:18 by Dimsum
Looks Like The A380 Is Now In BMI Colors posted Thu Nov 2 2006 15:59:17 by APFPilot1985
A380 Comes To Melbourne Australia posted Sat Sep 23 2006 07:31:48 by AeroplaneFreak