Toksans From Japan, joined Dec 2003, 86 posts, RR: 3 Posted (10 years 10 months 4 weeks 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 10031 times:
We are hearing the argument between "hub and spoke" and "point to point" operation recently. But I wonder who actually developed "hub and spoke" system.
Mel Olsen, who developed American Airlines "hub and poke" system, experienced it already at Atlanta in 1972.
However, FedEX seems to have it at this time, in 1972, at their Memphis.
I would appreciate if anyone clarify it.
Toksans from Tokyo. Photographing and flying the plane are things to do for my life.
Ckfred From United States of America, joined Apr 2001, 5841 posts, RR: 2
Reply 4, posted (10 years 10 months 4 weeks 1 day 15 hours ago) and read 9888 times:
I've always been under the impression that it was DL. If you were on DL's 6am departure out of Augusta, GA for ATL, you could be anywhere on the DL route map, east of the Mississippi River, for a breakfast meeting and anywhere west of the Mississippi for lunch.
Knope2001 From United States of America, joined May 2005, 3388 posts, RR: 34
Reply 6, posted (10 years 10 months 4 weeks 1 day 15 hours ago) and read 9871 times:
The hub & spoke system existed way back in the 1950's, with two of the largest and most coordinated "banked" hubs being Delta in Atlanta and United in Chicago.
A few things made hub & spoke more pronounced in the 80's after deregulation:
(1) Carriers were allowed to fill in gaps at their hub city. In the regulated days, even a comparably large-scale hub like United at O'Hare lacked flights to key "spoke" cities. For example, United didn't get to have flights from their Chicago hub to Atlanta (Delta, Eastern & Northwest), Cincinnati (Delta & American) Dallas (American & Braniff) Houston (Braniff & Delta) Kansas City (Braniff & TWA), Phoenix (TWA & American), any Florida city (Delta, Eastern 7 Northwest) and several additional cities. When deregulation came, United and other hub airlines could quickly fill these long-desired missing spoke routes.
(2) Under regulation, airlines were required to serve money-losing markets and routes, many of which were linear "milk runs". Over the decades the big airlines slowly shed some of these, but deregulation gave them the chance to really get out of these markets and focus on their profitable core cities.
(3) Under regulation, routes were awarded in fits and starts over the course of years. So until about 1980 many airlines had small smatterings of point-to-point routes in many different areas. Deregulation let them concentrate on key focus cities and dump peripheral routes to other airlines. This help airlines to naturally become very hub-focused after deregulation.
(4) Code-sharing regional airline deals and the end of widespread interlining really forced airlines to chose a few select cities to focus on. It used to be that someone flying from, say, Omaha to Louisville would fly United to Chicago and then Delta to Louisville with a joint fare between the two airlines. When United started flying Chicago-Louisville themselves, suddenly all the traffic bound for Louisville from places like Omaha, Des Moines, Lincoln, Grand Rapids, etc flying United into Chicago stopped feeding the Delta flights to Louisville in favor of the on-line connection with United's Louisville flights. Hubs and connecting traffic became very much polarized, and so point-to-point routes outside of the hub & spoke system quickly dwindled.
The hub & spoke system definitely became more popular and pronounced in the 80's after deregulation. But it did clearly existed decades earlier.
Commavia From United States of America, joined Apr 2005, 13449 posts, RR: 62
Reply 7, posted (10 years 10 months 4 weeks 1 day 14 hours ago) and read 9802 times:
Quoting N867BX (Reply 4): I think Al Gore invented the hub and spoke system.
Classic, simply classic. ROTFLMAO.
Anyway, as to who "invented" hub and spoke, the answers are a bit illusive, IMHO. The first "hubs" probably appeared in the 1970s, but true hubs -- in today's sense of the word -- with millions of flights, to millions of cities, tons of gates, tons of people, etc., probably didn't really happen until the 1980s in the post-deregulation environment. I think Braniff deserves a lot of the credit for developing the modern hub as we now know it. Their DFW hub was probably the first hub in the today's sense of the word, with 727s coming in from every landing strip within 1000 miles connecting to other 727s going everywhere else. All the other airlines ran with the hub and perfected it, and today it is undergoing somewhat of an evolution as more and more airlines that can are moving their hubs to a depeaked, non-banked hub schedule model pioneered on a large-scale first by AA in ORD and then in DFW.
AeroWesty From United States of America, joined Oct 2004, 20822 posts, RR: 60
Reply 11, posted (10 years 10 months 4 weeks 1 day 11 hours ago) and read 9598 times:
Hub and spokes were in existence for a long time prior to deregulation. TWA operated one in Kansas City in the 1930's, and later at Chicago, St. Louis and New York. Pan Am operated it's first real hub in Honolulu also before the jet age (the Miami "hub" was not really for connecting Pan Am to Pan Am flights but spokes out to the Caribbean and South America). Eastern was hubbing in Atlanta long before it was a flicker in Delta's eyes.
ODAFZ From Afghanistan, joined Jul 2004, 357 posts, RR: 5
Reply 12, posted (10 years 10 months 4 weeks 1 day 10 hours ago) and read 9597 times:
Just another historical fact, Middle East Airlines (MEA) was instrumental in establishing a Hub & Spoke system in Beirut in the early seventies. The morning wave coming from the Gulf states would connect to the dense European destinations served by the company (daily flights to ATH,ORY,LHR,FCO) and the evening wave coming from Europe would connect to the Middle East and Gulf destinations (daily flights to JED, CAI, AMM, BAH, DOH,...). It was an extremely bold and innovative approach which allowed the company to be extremely profitable during the early seventies
Mariner From New Zealand, joined Nov 2001, 27615 posts, RR: 81
Reply 13, posted (10 years 10 months 4 weeks 1 day 10 hours ago) and read 9551 times:
Um - I think we probably need some definition of hub and spoke here.
A number of airlines in other countries were running effective hub and spoke way back when.
MEA is quoted above in the early 70's, but in 1952, my father worked for a BOAC subsidiary, Arab Airways (Jerusalem) Ltd., based in Amman, Jordan.
They ran services from Cairo, Aden, jeddah, Baghdad, Damsacus, Beirut, Aqaba - and Jerusalem. It was, to all intents and purposes, hub and spoke, especially in the case of Jerusalem.
In those days, it was the only way to fly from Jerusalem (east) to other places in the Middle East. Flights were scheduled to leave Jerusalem and arrive in Amman in time to connect with some of the flights to Cairo, Beirut, etc.
It was enormously popular with tourists/pilgrims going to Jerusalem as, in those days, many of the most holy places were on the Jordan side.
There was a competitor airline, Air Jordan, which was part owned by TWA, that was doing much the same thing.
AeroWesty From United States of America, joined Oct 2004, 20822 posts, RR: 60
Reply 16, posted (10 years 10 months 4 weeks 1 day 10 hours ago) and read 9517 times:
(Pssst. Southwest hubs.) They began running hubs the day they started allowing people to check luggage through to their final destination, as long as it was on another Southwest flight. The difference is that supposedly each flight in and out of said Southwest hub has to be profitable as a standalone point-to-point service, not just as a feeder to the hub, or they'll drop it.