Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Qantas Vs. Australian  
User currently offlineFA4B6 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (9 years 2 months 2 weeks 22 hours ago) and read 2150 times:

Im confused.

What is the difference between QANTAS and Australian Airlines? And where does JetStar and JetStarAsia fit into all of this? Whats the story? I love Australian Airlines livery and logo!


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Neville Murphy
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Gerry Stegmeier



View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Grahame Hutchison
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Melvin Rafi



15 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineTed747 From Australia, joined Jul 2003, 195 posts, RR: 2
Reply 1, posted (9 years 2 months 2 weeks 21 hours ago) and read 2130 times:

Ok - as basic as i can be after a few red wines at lunch.....

Qantas - is a full service carrier with F/J/Y on most routes servicing long haul destinations. It is also a full service carrier on domesitc routes offering J/Y classes to major domestic ports.

Australian Airlines - is an all economy class international carrier servicing South east Asian ports. It is based in Cairns. Flys an all 767 fleet. Destinations include Singapore, Denpasar, Hong Kong etc.

Jetstar - is a low cost domestic carrier serving leisure destinations such as the Gold Coast, Tasmainia etc. Operates with a current combo of 717 and A320 fleet - moving to an all A320 fleet eventually.

Jetstar Asia - is a low cost international carrier serving South East Asian ports based out of Singapore.

hope this basic info sheds some light.

t.


User currently offlineFA4B6 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (9 years 2 months 2 weeks 21 hours ago) and read 2109 times:

Seems to me like someone at QANTAS Group has too much time on their hands! Arent Australian and JetStar a little redundant? [mmm wine sounds good]

User currently offlineMiami1 From Australia, joined Feb 2001, 706 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (9 years 2 months 2 weeks 21 hours ago) and read 2104 times:

Redundent how?

Jetstar is aimed specifically at low cost and leisure markets and allows the Group to compete with Virgin Blue. Jetstar is aimed specifically at routes under 5 hours.

Australian Airlines is Qantas' way of minimising losses on marginal international routes over 3 hours where Mainline cannot make profit.

AO is full-service Y class, whereas Jetstar is paid food and drinks, free seating etc... (Although JQ International flights will have allocated seating.)


User currently offlineFA4B6 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (9 years 2 months 2 weeks 21 hours ago) and read 2088 times:

Quoting Miami1 (Reply 3):
Australian Airlines is Qantas' way of minimising losses on marginal international routes over 3 hours where Mainline cannot make profit.

ok I dont get it .. how can Australian make a profit on these routes when QANTAS cant yet Australian is owned by QANTAS .. Im sorry for being so lost .. just seems confusing.


User currently offlineMonteycarlos From Australia, joined Mar 2005, 2107 posts, RR: 28
Reply 5, posted (9 years 2 months 2 weeks 21 hours ago) and read 2071 times:

Quoting FA4B6 (Reply 2):
Seems to me like someone at QANTAS Group has too much time on their hands! Arent Australian and JetStar a little redundant? [mmm wine sounds good]

Yes wine is good.

Australian and Jetstar aren't redundant when you think about it because they are both offering products which QF do not offer. Australian offers the cheaper leisure travel internationally and Jetstar offers low cost travel domestically which allows QF to maintain its own operations domestically and internationally while allowing for two seperate entities with differing leadership structure.



It's a beautiful night to fly like a phoenix...
User currently offline777STL From United States of America, joined Dec 2004, 3610 posts, RR: 3
Reply 6, posted (9 years 2 months 2 weeks 21 hours ago) and read 2071 times:

Quoting FA4B6 (Reply 4):
ok I dont get it .. how can Australian make a profit on these routes when QANTAS cant yet Australian is owned by QANTAS .. Im sorry for being so lost .. just seems confusing.

Australian is all economy and offers less service, it's an international LCC if you will. Qantas is full service, a traditional international airline. Plus with Australian, Qantas can cheapen the service without having to worry about the cheapening being associated with the Qantas name, if that makes any sense.



PHX based
User currently offlineMiami1 From Australia, joined Feb 2001, 706 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (9 years 2 months 2 weeks 21 hours ago) and read 2073 times:

Staff efficiency and productivity. Lower wages. Also more efficient systems in regards to catering etc. Scheduling efficiencies.

AO flights are not eligible for FF point accural.

One class layout that Qantas cannot use without damaging its marketing image.

Generally AO is a much leaner, well-oiled operation as a stand alone unit.


User currently offlineTed747 From Australia, joined Jul 2003, 195 posts, RR: 2
Reply 8, posted (9 years 2 months 2 weeks 20 hours ago) and read 2070 times:

Yep - the reds were good now feel like a sleep but have 3 hours left at the office  Embarrassment

Reason AO can make money on routes that QF can't is becuare AO has significantly lower operating costs than the parent Qantas. Australian may be owned by Qantas but it operates in its own right. ie Cabin crew on AO are paid less than crew on QF. It has much tighter turn around times than QF. ie quicker to turn around a 767 than a 747 and planes dont make money sitting on the tarmac. You can also fit more seats on a all y class 767 operated by AO than a dual class 767 operated by QF. Catering costs are lower as level of in flight service is different. I may be wrong here as I have not flown AO but I dont imagine there would be inseat entertainment units in each seat so lower infastructure costs etc etc. ...

Someone more sobre than me may be able to better articulate??


User currently offlineTed747 From Australia, joined Jul 2003, 195 posts, RR: 2
Reply 9, posted (9 years 2 months 2 weeks 20 hours ago) and read 2059 times:

Qantas is very sensitive to it image as a full service premium long haul carrier and like the guys said above dont want to cheapen that by cutting services and product whilst still flying under the name of Qantas itself.

need another wine .....


User currently offlineTBCITDG From Australia, joined Jan 2004, 921 posts, RR: 3
Reply 10, posted (9 years 2 months 2 weeks 20 hours ago) and read 2013 times:

A friend of mine told me that they will change to product in the future to offer a 2 class operation. Also his new contract sates that they are now able to fly longer routes on another aircraft type.

1. Can Qantas replace almost any route with Australian (claiming that it is unprofitable)?
2. Won't costs go up at Australian if they offer a different product?
3. Won't people prefer to pay an SQ ticket, should AO ever fly to Europe and the like? I mean prices aren't that much different should they fly to Honolulu, or Athens etc etc etc than full service carriers?


User currently offline6thfreedom From Bermuda, joined Sep 2004, 3325 posts, RR: 20
Reply 11, posted (9 years 2 months 2 weeks 19 hours ago) and read 2013 times:

Quoting Ted747 (Reply 1):
Australian Airlines - is an all economy class international carrier servicing South east Asian ports. It is based in Cairns. Flys an all 767 fleet. Destinations include Singapore, Denpasar, Hong Kong etc.

Not quite.

1. AO is a full service, all economy, leisre destination airline.

2. AO has a MAJOR investment in Japan, serving Nagoya, Osaka, Fukuoka and Sapporo from Cairns.

3. It's focus is predominatly inbound travel from Asia to Cairns [Northern Australia].

4. Outbound destinations from southern Australia are Bali/Singapore. Sabah use to be served, but has been dropped. Phuket charters operated over the next few months, and possible future services to Vietnam, Hawaii and/or Singapore


User currently offlineBill142 From Australia, joined Aug 2004, 8442 posts, RR: 8
Reply 12, posted (9 years 2 months 2 weeks 12 hours ago) and read 1801 times:

AO and JQ are subsidiaries with different management. Both cater to different markets and have different operating structures. Jetstar is actually the remnants of Impulse Airlines.

User currently offlineFA4B6 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 13, posted (9 years 2 months 2 weeks 12 hours ago) and read 1780 times:

Thanks for clearing this up for me everyone!

User currently offlineAirnewzealand From New Zealand, joined Oct 2000, 2542 posts, RR: 6
Reply 14, posted (9 years 2 months 2 weeks ago) and read 1650 times:

AO is a good carrier, as stated i will not go thru what or who they focus on.

AO has recently re-negotiated thir contracts, tho They can still only operate one type of aircraft (QF were trying to get them to operate the 747-300). and no a two class service does not make sense for the markets they are covering- if it has been said (tho wouldnt put it pass QF).

Catering is basically the same guys (they serve same meals as QF usually.)
The good thing about AO is wages are alot cheaper as are the airports they serve.Though rumour in the pipeline is they will soon be doing HNL from CNS or BNE. Things will get very interesting.

Cheers
AirNewZealand


User currently offlineQFATWA From New Zealand, joined Jun 1999, 732 posts, RR: 0
Reply 15, posted (9 years 2 months 1 week 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 1523 times:

Just to add a couple of things:

After takeoff a service of towel (prepackaged) and water (bottle poured) is made so that the customer has crew interaction immediately, before the crew sett up beverage or meal carts.

AO catering is not like QF who buy from a subsidiary called Snapfresh. AO is catered by Caterair in Cairns (for all ex CNS) and Sydney, Alpha in Darwin and another caterer in Bali. All meals are prepared daily to AO specifications based on the route/passenger mix - appropriate to the cultural taste. {Good for jobs in Cairns}.

There is a meal choice - vegetarian [which suits most palates] and meat as there are no special meals (very expensive item!!). A child's meal may be ordered and a fruit platter on request. All other normal special meals (except Kosher) are covered by the above choice. Much easier for the crew too!!

All aircraft to Japan, HKG and Singapore are catered for the return trip - part of the keeping costs low [no paying for meals in Japan at yen rates!!]. There are two main meals (out of each port) and a snack bag into the Asian city, and a breakfast muffin snack into CNS.

AO introduced the cafe style/size take away hot beverage cup (now followed by QF domestic) to serve a full size cup of tea or coffee - once through the cabin gives the customer a full sized hot beverage rather than the mini-cup designed to fit the height of the tray. A second service is on request.

Ice creams are served mid flight.

AO (after the contract is signed - still in the pre-vote period) will be able to diversify the fleet or change base aircraft type - any more than one aircraft defeats the "simplicity plan". The 747-300 is to AO a dead issue - not part of the plan [although many at QF will try to push it to AO]. QF have placed inseat entertainment in 5 of the 6 [Nalanji is now in storage at Avalon and not destined to have inseat entertainment], but only operate three in regular service. The 747-300 with inseat entertainment doesn't match the AO 767-300 fleet with wall screens [big cost to have inseat entertainment]. They are old generation aircraft [4 pilots including 2nd officer and Flight Engineer - none of these on the AO payroll now!!] and carry big costs which AO can't sustain.

The rumour of HNL is precisely that - not a good option for AO as the 767-300 is a two pilot aircraft [rare to carry a third pilot and HNL is too long for two pilot operation]. There are other factors against HNL!!

AO is a low cost carrier designed to achieve a bare profit on routes where QF can't make money, and to keep the Australian flag in markets from which QF would withdraw.It is NOT a low fare carrier - it is designed to be a part of the QANTAS group operations and attempts to find its own unique markets - Sapporo (a hit with Australian skiers), Phuket - non stop from Sydney, and Sabah - big for frequent flyer redemption, but insufficient yield to maintain the service and return a profit.

AO will grow conservatively - currently delayed the sixth aircraft due to fuel prices and the tight state of the aviation business as profits are hard to make, and AO will not jeopardise the future by making risky business decisions.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
QF Vs JetStar Vs Australian posted Wed Dec 14 2005 00:58:49 by HAVIK747
Qantas VS Swiss posted Fri Jun 25 2004 11:00:27 by Qantasflyer
LAX-SYD: Qantas VS United (Market Share) posted Tue Jun 15 2004 14:02:06 by United Airline
Qantas Vs. UA To Oz posted Tue Feb 3 2004 20:39:44 by BCAInfoSys
Qantas Or Australian Pilots. posted Thu Nov 15 2001 23:40:01 by Mirrodie
Qantas VS. Ansett posted Mon Jul 3 2000 14:05:39 by Qantas 747
Qantas & The Australian Flag posted Sat May 27 2006 02:11:57 by Monkeyboi
Jetstar A320 Vs Qantas 738 posted Sun Apr 16 2006 09:19:48 by AirbusA6
Qantas To Shut Down Australian posted Tue Apr 11 2006 21:41:41 by LY4XELD
Ditch Australian Airlines, Qantas Urged posted Mon Jan 30 2006 02:54:01 by Chrisrad