Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Air India Pilots Grounded  
User currently offlineNisson From United States of America, joined exactly 10 years ago today! , 58 posts, RR: 0
Posted (9 years 4 months 2 weeks 4 days 17 hours ago) and read 4234 times:

Here is the story of AIR INDIA tail strike in LAX couple of weeks ago: http://web.mid-day.com/news/city/2005/june/111247.htm both pilots according to story are grounding pending investigation on incident. I KNOW IT WAS DISCUSSED IN PREVIOUS FORUM, JUST WANTED TO GIVE UPDATE, THANKS

[Edited 2005-06-10 07:52:47]

24 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineDLKAPA From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (9 years 4 months 2 weeks 4 days 17 hours ago) and read 4217 times:

Hopefully the repair was sufficient and not a slapstick job to get the plane back in the air.

User currently offlineAirWillie6475 From United States of America, joined Jan 2005, 2448 posts, RR: 1
Reply 2, posted (9 years 4 months 2 weeks 4 days 17 hours ago) and read 4189 times:

If no one heard the tail-strike then it probably was very gentle so it is not that big of a deal. How come no body saw this at Frankfurt, I mean doesn't the tower or other planes see other planes taking off? No body saw anything? On the other hand who tail strikes a 747 anyways, very unprofessional.

User currently offlineJetfixr From United States of America, joined May 2005, 30 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (9 years 4 months 2 weeks 4 days 16 hours ago) and read 4160 times:

Quoting AirWillie6475 (Reply 2):
On the other hand who tail strikes a 747 anyways, very unprofessional

This was a combie acft, I heard there are "classic" mistakes that can result in a tailstrike on a combie.


User currently offlineNisson From United States of America, joined exactly 10 years ago today! , 58 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (9 years 4 months 2 weeks 4 days 16 hours ago) and read 4148 times:

Quoting AirWillie6475 (Reply 2):
If no one heard the tail-strike then it probably was very gentle so it is not that big of a deal. How come no body saw this at Frankfurt

Airwillie6475, thanks for pointing this out, it was in FRANKFURT where the tail strike happen, bringing the question, what would of happen if there was a punture in the fuselage and the jumbo was over water. I suspect there would be a warning of this in the cockpit, but one small hole can be the end for the jumbo.


User currently offlineB747-437B From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (9 years 4 months 2 weeks 4 days 15 hours ago) and read 4046 times:

Quoting Jetfixr (Reply 3):
This was a combie acft,

No.

The tailstrike was on VT-ESO which is an all pax config 744.

There was an unrelated incident on the combi VT-AIM the following week that did not involve a tailstrike but also resulted in an AOG in LAX.


User currently offlineHAWK21M From India, joined Jan 2001, 31684 posts, RR: 56
Reply 6, posted (9 years 4 months 2 weeks 4 days 15 hours ago) and read 4031 times:

Quoting Nisson (Reply 4):
what would of happen if there was a punture in the fuselage and the jumbo was over water

Tail strike is not necessary before the Aft Pressure Bulkhead.It can be aft of it too which is a Non Pressurized zone.
regds
MEL



Think of the brighter side!
User currently offlineB747-437B From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 7, posted (9 years 4 months 2 weeks 4 days 15 hours ago) and read 4035 times:

Quoting HAWK21M (Reply 6):
Tail strike is not necessary before the Aft Pressure Bulkhead.It can be aft of it too which is a Non Pressurized zone.

In this case, the damage was to the APU housing area rather than the pressure bulkhead. The aircraft has been tested by Boeing and UAL in LAX after the repairs and been given a clean bill of health structurally. She has been back in service for over a week now.


User currently offlineA340roy From Germany, joined May 2004, 50 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (9 years 4 months 2 weeks 4 days 13 hours ago) and read 3912 times:

Quoting AirWillie6475 (Reply 2):
On the other hand who tail strikes a 747 anyways, very unprofessional

you must understand that the pilot is compeletely dependant on the ground services department who give him the load sheet, from which the trim sheet is made out, and necessary thrust and pitch calculations are given to the pilot. He has to blindly believe the calculated figures because he trusts that the ground services people know their responsibilities during calculations. This particular tail-strike was a mis-calculation from the handling agents - FRAPORT, due to which the tail-strike took place, althought it was a small one.

I agree about your opinion of "unprofessional" people, but here, it was surely not the pilot.

cheerz,
roy



AR-FRA
User currently offlineNimish From India, joined Feb 2005, 3262 posts, RR: 9
Reply 9, posted (9 years 4 months 2 weeks 4 days 7 hours ago) and read 3696 times:

Quoting A340roy (Reply 8):
This particular tail-strike was a mis-calculation from the handling agents - FRAPORT, due to which the tail-strike took place, althought it was a small one.

If this is the case - does AI have access to any sort of compensation from FRAPORT? They've lost pots of money due to this tailstrike and the subsequent AOG.



Latest Trip Report - GoAir BLR-BOM-BLR
User currently offlineGARUDAROD From United States of America, joined Apr 2000, 1518 posts, RR: 1
Reply 10, posted (9 years 4 months 2 weeks 4 days 7 hours ago) and read 3658 times:

Isnt the APU housing near the extreme end of the tail ???
That must have been some tail strike to hit it that far back.
10days out of service seems to be alot for just an APU housing,
was there other internal damage that resulted in maybe the entire
tail fairing being replaced?



Cargo doesn't whine, moan, or complain
User currently offlineB747-437B From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 11, posted (9 years 4 months 2 weeks 4 days 6 hours ago) and read 3566 times:

Quoting A340roy (Reply 8):
This particular tail-strike was a mis-calculation from the handling agents - FRAPORT, due to which the tail-strike took place

Lets not jump to conclusions yet. The matter is being investigated and will determine who is to blame. In the meanwhile it remains a fact that an aircraft flew a 12 hour flight after suffering a tailstrike that nobody was aware of and the mere point that such an event could happen in today's aviation world with everyone being oblivious to it is cause enough for concern.


User currently offlineHAWK21M From India, joined Jan 2001, 31684 posts, RR: 56
Reply 12, posted (9 years 4 months 2 weeks 3 days 13 hours ago) and read 3302 times:

Quoting B747-437B (Reply 11):
The matter is being investigated and will determine who is to blame.

When will the report be out.What did the Preliminary report state.
regds
MEL



Think of the brighter side!
User currently offlineTRVYYZ From Canada, joined Oct 2004, 1373 posts, RR: 10
Reply 13, posted (9 years 4 months 2 weeks 3 days 11 hours ago) and read 3256 times:

Quoting B747-437B (Reply 11):
nobody was aware of and the mere point that such an event could happen in today's aviation world with everyone being oblivious to it is cause enough for concern.

May be a camera could be installed at the wing or somewhere to monitor the tail during the take-off as a safety feature.


User currently offlineIrishMD11 From Switzerland, joined Jan 2004, 88 posts, RR: 0
Reply 14, posted (9 years 4 months 2 weeks 3 days 9 hours ago) and read 3186 times:

Quoting GARUDAROD (Reply 10):
Isnt the APU housing near the extreme end of the tail ???
That must have been some tail strike to hit it that far back.

I totally agree...seems that the responsibility is being "shoved around the board"...

Gerry



ATR 72,Avro 85,BAC 1-11,Concorde,Trident,BAE146,BN Islander,707,727,737,741,743,744757,767,772,773,DC-9,DC-10,MD-11,MD-8
User currently offlineBurnsie28 From United States of America, joined Aug 2004, 7554 posts, RR: 8
Reply 15, posted (9 years 4 months 2 weeks 3 days 7 hours ago) and read 3130 times:

Grounding the pilots because of this is rediculous, it apprently wasnt that bad if they didnt feel anything and none of the warnings went off and they still made it all the way to LA without a problem, and its AI problem for poor fleet planning.


"Some People Just Know How To Fly"- Best slogan ever, RIP NW 1926-2009
User currently offlineGoodday From Japan, joined May 2005, 55 posts, RR: 0
Reply 16, posted (9 years 4 months 2 weeks 3 days 7 hours ago) and read 3130 times:

Are they Indian pilots or expats? Are there many expats pilots working for AI these days?

User currently offlineB747-437B From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 17, posted (9 years 4 months 2 weeks 3 days 6 hours ago) and read 3075 times:

Quoting Burnsie28 (Reply 15):
Grounding the pilots because of this is rediculous

It is standard procedure after any incident to ground a pilot until the investigation is concluded. This holds true for virtually every airline.

Quoting Goodday (Reply 16):
Are there many expats pilots working for AI these days?

Plenty on the 777 fleet but the 744 fleet still has a vast majority of Indian pilots.


User currently offlineHAWK21M From India, joined Jan 2001, 31684 posts, RR: 56
Reply 18, posted (9 years 4 months 2 weeks 2 days 19 hours ago) and read 2919 times:

Quoting B747-437B (Reply 17):
Quoting Burnsie28 (Reply 15):
Grounding the pilots because of this is rediculous

It is standard procedure after any incident to ground a pilot until the investigation is concluded. This holds true for virtually every airline.

It depends on the Seriousness of the Incident Involved.If its serious then pending compleation of Investigations yes Grounding is done.
In other minor Incidents its not applicable.
regds
MEL



Think of the brighter side!
User currently offlineBurnsie28 From United States of America, joined Aug 2004, 7554 posts, RR: 8
Reply 19, posted (9 years 4 months 2 weeks 2 days 19 hours ago) and read 2919 times:

But Ai makes it sound like they are basically going to fire them, and it couldnt have been THAT bad if no one noticed, let alone ATC or anyone else at FRA, and they continued all the way to LAX without an issue.


"Some People Just Know How To Fly"- Best slogan ever, RIP NW 1926-2009
User currently offlineHAWK21M From India, joined Jan 2001, 31684 posts, RR: 56
Reply 20, posted (9 years 4 months 2 weeks 2 days 19 hours ago) and read 2871 times:

Quoting Burnsie28 (Reply 19):
But Ai makes it sound like they are basically going to fire them

How did you conclude that.
regds
MEL



Think of the brighter side!
User currently offlineJetfixr From United States of America, joined May 2005, 30 posts, RR: 0
Reply 21, posted (9 years 4 months 2 weeks 2 days 18 hours ago) and read 2800 times:

Quoting B747-437B (Reply 5):
The tailstrike was on VT-ESO which is an all pax config 744.

There was an unrelated incident on the combi VT-AIM the following week that did not involve a tailstrike but also resulted in an AOG in LAX.

You are right VT-ESO is not a combie, my mistake. AIM which is the combie, had the weather radar problem.


User currently offlineJetfixr From United States of America, joined May 2005, 30 posts, RR: 0
Reply 22, posted (9 years 4 months 2 weeks 2 days 9 hours ago) and read 2676 times:

As far as "not the pilots fault" the problem herein lies in the fact that the company in question have two versions of the same aircraft. The combi-freight version and the full passenger version. Pilot error could have come from the pilot being used to one over the other and put in the wrong numbers into the FMC. Here in lies the possible pilot error. It has been told to me from various jumbo pilots "classic combie error". No one is saying the pilots are in error, but when they put in the numbers they can tell if they look good or not and question the trim sheet. As has been mentioned the jury is still out until the inquiry has been concluded.

User currently offlineNudelhirsch From Germany, joined Oct 2003, 1438 posts, RR: 19
Reply 23, posted (9 years 4 months 2 weeks 2 days 9 hours ago) and read 2661 times:

Quoting TRVYYZ (Reply 13):
May be a camera could be installed at the wing or somewhere to monitor the tail during the take-off as a safety feature.

Sure, and bring back the FE to monitor the little TV... The crew has enough other things to do during T/O.



Putana da Seatbeltz!
User currently offlineB747-437B From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 24, posted (9 years 4 months 2 weeks 2 days 9 hours ago) and read 2656 times:

Quoting Jetfixr (Reply 22):
the problem herein lies in the fact that the company in question have two versions of the same aircraft

The captain in question had not yet operated a single flight on the sole Combi at the time of the incident.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Are Air India Pilots Overworked? posted Tue Mar 21 2006 08:28:22 by EK380
Air India Pilots Unconditionally Withdraw Strike posted Fri May 2 2003 11:29:22 by B747-437B
Air India Pilots Walk Out, 50% Flights Cancelled posted Fri Apr 25 2003 11:02:31 by B747-437B
Air India Pilots May Force Grounding Of Flights posted Thu Apr 24 2003 17:42:19 by B747-437B
Air India De-recognizes Striking IPG Pilots Union posted Tue Apr 29 2003 19:00:51 by B747-437B
Air India To Hire Replacement Pilots To Bust Union posted Sat Apr 26 2003 22:47:05 by B747-437B
Air India Revamping? posted Sat Nov 25 2006 04:35:49 by Dc10s2hnl
Air India Set To Join Star Alliance posted Thu Nov 23 2006 22:15:08 by Karan69
Air India To Lease 4 Boeing Widebody Aircraft posted Mon Nov 13 2006 21:50:35 by B742
Air India Introducing Economy Plus? posted Fri Oct 27 2006 18:20:48 by Ag92
Air India Pilots Unconditionally Withdraw Strike posted Fri May 2 2003 11:29:22 by B747-437B
Air India Pilots Walk Out, 50% Flights Cancelled posted Fri Apr 25 2003 11:02:31 by B747-437B
Air India Pilots May Force Grounding Of Flights posted Thu Apr 24 2003 17:42:19 by B747-437B
Air India Express 738 Incident - Pilots Blamed posted Wed Nov 24 2010 13:08:43 by kaitak
Air India De-recognizes Striking IPG Pilots Union posted Tue Apr 29 2003 19:00:51 by B747-437B
Air India To Hire Replacement Pilots To Bust Union posted Sat Apr 26 2003 22:47:05 by B747-437B
Air India A319 Tailstrike posted Tue Mar 13 2012 19:18:24 by ABpositive
Air Asia Pilots Could Not Land A330 Manually posted Thu Feb 9 2012 22:33:49 by RickNRoll