Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Boeing Comment On 787 Windows  
User currently offlineC172 From United States of America, joined Jun 2005, 109 posts, RR: 0
Posted (9 years 1 month 2 days 2 hours ago) and read 11321 times:

To calm all you a-netters down who think the 787 is going to be fitted with regular size windows, I provide this link.

http://www.boeing.com/news/releases/2005/q2/nr_050613h.html

Artist renditions are exactly that... artistic interpretations! Don't get too excited when you see a drawing.

Now, if you will let me editorialize, the 787 will ultimately take the wind out of the A380s sails. Airbus will not see the great success Boeing saw when rolling out the biggest airliner on earth.

32 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineKL911 From Ireland, joined Jul 2003, 5114 posts, RR: 12
Reply 1, posted (9 years 1 month 2 days 1 hour ago) and read 11280 times:

Quoting C172 (Thread starter):
Airbus will not see the great success Boeing saw when rolling out the biggest airliner on earth.

They already had..... The A380 is on every channel worldwide everyday...
I'm sure even 'normal' passengers are waiting to fly it...


KL911



Next trip : DUB-AUH-CGK-DPS-KUL-AUH-CDG-ORK :-)
User currently offlineGQfluffy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (9 years 1 month 2 days 1 hour ago) and read 11247 times:

Quoting KL911 (Reply 1):
They already had..... The A380 is on every channel worldwide everyday...

But will it have the numbers and last as long as the 747 line? Only time will tell. It definetly has the potential.

fluffy


User currently offlineRlwynn From Germany, joined Dec 2000, 1075 posts, RR: 1
Reply 3, posted (9 years 1 month 2 days 1 hour ago) and read 11225 times:

Quoting KL911 (Reply 1):
The A380 is on every channel worldwide everyday...
I'm sure even 'normal' passengers are waiting to fly it...

I have not seen it anywhere but here since the day it first flew. Thats quite a statement you make there.



I can drive faster than you
User currently offlineC172 From United States of America, joined Jun 2005, 109 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (9 years 1 month 2 days 1 hour ago) and read 11207 times:

Quoting GQfluffy (Reply 2):
But will it have the numbers and last as long as the 747 line? Only time will tell. It definetly has the potential.

That is the point, exactly. Boeing has sold thousands of 747s. We will have to wait and see if the A380 matches that. My gut feeling is no.


User currently offlineDazeflight From Germany, joined Jun 1999, 578 posts, RR: 2
Reply 5, posted (9 years 1 month 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 10777 times:

Quoting Rlwynn (Reply 3):
I have not seen it anywhere but here since the day it first flew. Thats quite a statement you make there.

Well, at least if he had said "today" instead of "everyday" he would be right. Because, yes, today, the A380 was on probably most channels worldwide, even if just for a few seconds.

Quoting C172 (Reply 4):
My gut feeling is no

You mean your hope, right?

ciao
Daniel


User currently offlineHalls120 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 6, posted (9 years 1 month 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 10672 times:

I remember my first ever airplane flight - on an AA 747 from LAX to JFK. It was magical to an 18 year old. That said, I avoid 747's these days like the plague, and I will likewise do the same when faced with the possibility of flying on a A380.

I fly 75K-100K miles a year, most of it long haul. The LAST thing I want to do is be up in the air with 400-500 other people, all trying to use the facilities at the same time, and even worse, descending on customs en masse upon arrival. Given the choice, I will opt for a B767 over a B777/A330, and a 777/330 over a B747/A340 any time I can. (I also believe B has it right with their point to point strategy. I look for non-stop flights whenever possible.)

I'm not knocking the A380 - I think it is a magnificent achievement, and I hope A sells many of them. (Even though they are, IMHO, one of the ugliest planes in the air). I likewise encourage everyone to opt for the A380 and the 747ADV when they are both in the air. That way, there will be more room for me on the smaller and eminently more civilized "smaller" aircraft.....


User currently offlineIkramerica From United States of America, joined May 2005, 21457 posts, RR: 60
Reply 7, posted (9 years 1 month 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 10631 times:

Quoting Halls120 (Reply 6):
That way, there will be more room for me on the smaller and eminently more civilized "smaller" aircraft.....

Me too.  Smile I'll fly the 747Adv and the 380 once, and then try to never fly them again. Unless of course the experience is so amazing that it wins me over. But an economy seat is an economy seat is an economy seat, no?



Of all the things to worry about... the Wookie has no pants.
User currently offlineIkramerica From United States of America, joined May 2005, 21457 posts, RR: 60
Reply 8, posted (9 years 1 month 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 10601 times:

"He credited the innovative and integrated Product Lifecycle Management (PLM) toolset developed by Paris-based Dassault Systemes with providing a real competitive advantage."

The French are saving Boeing's bacon. This must be pissing off Airbus a little.  Wink



Of all the things to worry about... the Wookie has no pants.
User currently offlineSchipholjfk From United States of America, joined Jan 2005, 579 posts, RR: 6
Reply 9, posted (9 years 1 month 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 10589 times:

Quoting KL911 (Reply 1):
The A380 is on every channel worldwide everyday...
I'm sure even 'normal' passengers are waiting to fly it...

Worldwide? You could not have watched TV in every country. It was not on any U.S. channels especially with all the Michael Jackson verdict. And as far as normal people... most of them have no idea what A380 is. And given the route this aircraft will fly (long haul between selected cities), most "normal" people will never get a chance to fly it. They have a greater chance that they will experience Southwest, JetBlue, Ryanair, Easyjet, SilkAir, etc in their lifetime than an A380 experience!



The fun of flying... love it !!!
User currently offlineLehpron From United States of America, joined Jul 2001, 7028 posts, RR: 21
Reply 10, posted (9 years 1 month 1 day 17 hours ago) and read 10214 times:

How did a thread about 787's windows evolve into a A380/747 cold war? Oh yeah, this happy tid bit:

Quoting C172 (Thread starter):
Now, if you will let me editorialize, the 787 will ultimately take the wind out of the A380s sails. Airbus will not see the great success Boeing saw when rolling out the biggest airliner on earth.

Dude, A380 is the first to roll out in a digial age, it will get the first spot light. When 787 rolls out is will get even more ratings (relatively) simply because it will become a symbol of Americanism, again, if anyone cares. 15,000 A.net members against 6 billion people make us less than a percent of a percent of the population.

Quoting KL911 (Reply 1):
They already had..... The A380 is on every channel worldwide everyday...
I'm sure even 'normal' passengers are waiting to fly it...

have you been the southern west coast of the USA lately? Either it is MJ's trial...well, I don't pay much attention I do know that an airplane rarely shows up. Usualy it is someone killed or oh I rememebr, tornados and midwest weather is news here cuz we normally don't have any. No A380 or 787 talk.

Quoting GQfluffy (Reply 2):
But will it have the numbers and last as long as the 747 line?

Does it matter? As noted by other members, 747 was a massive capacity increase when it rolled out while A380 isn't much over 747. Considering the numbers of 747's sold, I'd say the ratio would be the inverse of the capacity ratios of both planes as the absolute maximum number of delivered units ever. Will it ever get there, no, it's like an inverse curve going to infinity.

That has got to be the most unrelative and random idea that I could come up with that happens to be completely irrational.  Smile

First there are four versions of 747's, there are 2 versions of A380's planned, so we'll cut the number in half, just like that. Big grin Let's do the math: 400/555 = 720/999. 720/999 * 0.5 = 360/999 = 0.360360360...

Total 747's ever delivered from Boeing's website: 1358
http://active.boeing.com/commercial/...lModel=747&ViewReportS=View+Report
1358 * 0.360360 = 489.3.......489 A380's will be delivered, including the stretch and any freighters small or large...doesn't look good! Had we not halved it, 979 A380's. I have always believe they would sell about 800 as an absolute maximum.

ANYWAY, back to topic, I think 787's big windows will be a good touch but for people like me who enjoy scenery but are afraid of heights, a big window will give me the feeling of falling out of my seat. Not that I will stay straped the whole time.  Smile



The meaning of life is curiosity; we were put on this planet to explore opportunities.
User currently offlineC172 From United States of America, joined Jun 2005, 109 posts, RR: 0
Reply 11, posted (9 years 1 month 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 10126 times:

Now, if you will let me editorialize, the 787 will ultimately take the wind out of the A380s sails. Airbus will not see the great success Boeing saw when rolling out the biggest airliner on earth.

Airbus will not see the great success Boeing saw when rolling out the biggest airliner on earth. Planes sold? Media attention? No. That's not the point. With the 747, Boeing brought forth a brand new revolutionary product that changed the face of aviation forever. The A380 won't have the same effect. That's all I'm saying. No math or debate needed. The A380 is a massive airliner, the 747 was the first.

The 787 will not compete head-to-head against the A380. The A380 certainly has some routes that it will be competitive on. It just seems that the trend in aviation is to go smaller farther and in better comfort.

The Airbus behemoth is exactly that, an air bus.


User currently offlineLehpron From United States of America, joined Jul 2001, 7028 posts, RR: 21
Reply 12, posted (9 years 1 month 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 10062 times:

Quoting C172 (Reply 11):
Airbus will not see the great success Boeing saw when rolling out the biggest airliner on earth.

China, India and Egypt had great civilizations before Christianity came along, keep that in mind.  Wink

Quoting C172 (Reply 11):
The A380 is a massive airliner, the 747 was the first.

Again, relevancy? You sound as if you are venting out at a small group of Airbus nutcases that sincerely believe A380 will replace 747 in the history books, as if it is a celebrity. It will not, the majority of us know that, are you just reiterating? I certainly hope you do not plan to down play its significance in retaliation to that idiot minority group -- making more enemies isn't good.  Wink

Quoting C172 (Reply 11):
It just seems that the trend in aviation is to go smaller farther and in better comfort.

Dude, do you know what it means to be biased? When something 'seems like' whatever to you, it is limited to what you have seen, think about that. What you are doing with A380 is judging an SUV on a hybrid's theory by comparing it directly to Boeing's core belief of getting smaller and more frequent. The argument you are putting forth does not fly.



The meaning of life is curiosity; we were put on this planet to explore opportunities.
User currently offlineNA From Germany, joined Dec 1999, 10599 posts, RR: 10
Reply 13, posted (9 years 1 month 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 10011 times:

Ikramerica: "Me too. I'll fly the 747Adv and the 380 once, and then try to never fly them again. Unless of course the experience is so amazing that it wins me over. But an economy seat is an economy seat is an economy seat, no?"

No. I had the advantage to take part in A380 seat-tests where state-of-the-art eco-seats were there for comparison. The proposals for the A380 were all considerably better. And what I tested was not Airbus promotion...
If the A380 can deliver on economics, tickets could and eventually will be cheaper on it compared to, lets say, the 777. Then you get the pax, especially if the seats are better, too.

Lets not forget one thing: During the projected production circle of the A380 as well as the 787 we will see the demise of affordable fuel. In 20 years, with the fuel price easily tripled, 5% difference in fuel economics will be decicive, not like today, where airlines can somehow still compete with aircraft 25% less effective than others.


User currently offlineIkramerica From United States of America, joined May 2005, 21457 posts, RR: 60
Reply 14, posted (9 years 1 month 1 day 15 hours ago) and read 9979 times:

What I meant was being crammed into economy in a big jet is all about the same, though comfort will vary. And as I said, if it is much better, it might win me over.

But also, seats are provided by third parties, right? If an airline wants the same Recaro advanced economy seat on it's A380 and 787, can't they order them?



Of all the things to worry about... the Wookie has no pants.
User currently offlineGlacote From France, joined Jun 2005, 409 posts, RR: 2
Reply 15, posted (9 years 1 month 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 9748 times:

Quoting Lehpron (Reply 10):
Let's do the math: 400/555

This assumption comes from nowhere. Besides you shall take constant seating density and thus consider floor area. The A388 has 50% more space than the B744, at 555m² vs 375m².

Quoting Lehpron (Reply 10):
I think 787's big windows will be a good touch but for people like me who enjoy scenery but are afraid of heights, a big window will give me the feeling of falling out of my seat

Big windows are:
1) heavy (because of the glass itself and the required structural reinforcement around)
2) of little use IMO (you spend 12 out of 15 hours with curtain down) and possibly deprecated by a wider screen showing oustide videos (I prefer see the beneith the aircraft or in front of it rather than perpendicular to it).
3) not so big after all : quite standard after all (but this is a very rough estimate)


User currently offlineToulouse From Switzerland, joined Apr 2005, 2757 posts, RR: 58
Reply 16, posted (9 years 1 month 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 9682 times:

Quoting KL911 (Reply 1):
I'm sure even 'normal' passengers are waiting to fly it...

Very true, as I live in Toulouse, when I've travelled abroad recently and mentioned I live in Toulouse to just about anybody, I've been amazed that just about everyone has said... Wow, that's where Airbus is, I saw their new plane (some say 380, others just the jiant Airbus). Also while descending from an EI Airbus 320 on a remote stand at MAD a few weeks ago, onc on the bus I was amazed to see a mother say to her child, "look, we've been on an Airbus plane, the makers of the biggest airliner ever... do you remember seeing it on TV?"... To which the child responds "Yeah, wow, I can't wait to fly on one!". So I think Airbus has gained incredible public knowledge recently withthe launch of the 380.



Long live Aer Lingus!
User currently offlineCkfred From United States of America, joined Apr 2001, 5155 posts, RR: 1
Reply 17, posted (9 years 1 month 1 day 9 hours ago) and read 8238 times:

KL911:

I heard on CNBC a very good reason not to fly the A380. Six hundred people all trying to pull their wheeled bags out of the overheads upon arrival.


User currently offlineDeltaGuy767 From United States of America, joined Jun 2005, 658 posts, RR: 2
Reply 18, posted (9 years 1 month 1 day 7 hours ago) and read 7333 times:

A coiple points I would like to make.

Quoting KL911 (Reply 1):
They already had..... The A380 is on every channel worldwide everyday...
I'm sure even 'normal' passengers are waiting to fly it...

Yes but couldn't you make the argument that the 787 would be paraded as much as the A-380 at least in the US?

Quoting C172 (Thread starter):
Now, if you will let me editorialize, the 787 will ultimately take the wind out of the A380s sails.

Oh no another A vs. B battle

Quoting Ckfred (Reply 17):
KL911:
I heard on CNBC a very good reason not to fly the A380. Six hundred people all trying to pull their wheeled bags out of the overheads upon arrival.

I couldn't agree with you more

Greetings from little BDL and BAF
DeltaGuy767



A Good Landing is one you walk away from!
User currently offlineGQfluffy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 19, posted (9 years 1 month 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 6266 times:

Quoting Toulouse (Reply 16):
So I think Airbus has gained incredible public knowledge recently withthe launch of the 380.

In Europe...

But in the USA, Boeing has the same response, more or less...

Touche


fluffy


User currently offlineViscount630 From United Kingdom, joined Mar 2005, 235 posts, RR: 0
Reply 20, posted (9 years 1 month 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 5872 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

OMG - WHY are the B vs A brigade comparing the A380 to the 787....?????? They're two totally DIFFERENT aircraft designed for totally DIFFERENT markets!  banghead  Even 787 vs A350 is a tenuous comparison.

For crying out loud - put your Uncle Sam suits away and enjoy the fascinating differences that the varied airline/aerospace industry that we all CLAIM to have an interest in, provides, and stop taking cheap shots at each other in the name of some pointless "competition". Anyone would think that Boeing and Airbus take a blind bit of notice as to what anyone on here has to say anyway.......!  duck 

Sheesh!



RIP Dan-Air. Where the Secret was SERVICE.
User currently offlineKen777 From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 8164 posts, RR: 8
Reply 21, posted (9 years 1 month 1 day 5 hours ago) and read 5700 times:

I don't look for cheaper "basic fares" on either the 380 or 747 (any version). Any savings will be used for fuel, wages & salaries and more capital investments. Lower fares will continue to come from the need to fill empty seats, regardless of the plane, and seasonal fares - like the US to the UK in the winter.

Where the 380 can be attractive to pax is those situations where the airline provides more room and a comfortable seat for the cattle car section - especially for the very long hauls. That can generate pax loyalty, just as sitting in the upper deck of a 747 can generate a desire to continue sitting in the upper deck.


User currently offlineIkramerica From United States of America, joined May 2005, 21457 posts, RR: 60
Reply 22, posted (9 years 1 month 1 day 5 hours ago) and read 5569 times:

Quoting Glacote (Reply 15):
not so big after all

1/4 of a door is pretty big. 21".

Quoting Ken777 (Reply 21):

agreed. and once again, just like the 747, people will "know" what they are flying, much more than on a 767,777,A330,A340, etc.

but as for saving money on fares, that is never the goal of an airline. the goal is to make as much profit as possible. if this jet gives them better economics, inspires people to fly with them, and they can charge the same for a seat (or more...) then it is a win for them.



Of all the things to worry about... the Wookie has no pants.
User currently offlineThunderbird1 From United States of America, joined Jun 2004, 225 posts, RR: 0
Reply 23, posted (9 years 1 month 1 day 2 hours ago) and read 3985 times:

I hope the 787 retains the big windows, but I'm more concerned about Boeing scrapping the cool streamlined (TGV-looking) nose.

User currently offlineC172 From United States of America, joined Jun 2005, 109 posts, RR: 0
Reply 24, posted (9 years 1 month 1 day 2 hours ago) and read 3963 times:

Quoting Lehpron (Reply 12):
Again, relevancy? You sound as if you are venting out at a small group of Airbus nutcases that sincerely believe A380 will replace 747 in the history books, as if it is a celebrity. It will not, the majority of us know that, are you just reiterating? I certainly hope you do not plan to down play its significance in retaliation to that idiot minority group -- making more enemies isn't good.



Quoting Lehpron (Reply 12):
Dude, do you know what it means to be biased? When something 'seems like' whatever to you, it is limited to what you have seen, think about that. What you are doing with A380 is judging an SUV on a hybrid's theory by comparing it directly to Boeing's core belief of getting smaller and more frequent. The argument you are putting forth does not fly.

I'm not venting or arguing. Just discussing. Just my opinions. My opinion is that you're taking this a little too serious.


25 Trolley Dolley : What really cracks me up is that in these A v B debates, all sorts get thrown around- nationalism, technology and marketing strategy. Some of the stuf
26 N867BX : All you a.netters are not normal!!
27 Areopagus : The A380 may have twice the passengers and twice the roll-on baggage of the 787, but it also has twice as many aisles and twice as many exits. Is it r
28 C172 : 787 windows will be "50% bigger than the competition". That will make for a large window. As far as window darkening goes, individual control will be
29 Post contains images BoogyJay : We're finally back to topic I thought they were going for an electronic glass -a la Mayback roof - which can be darkened remotely by the crew. Is this
30 EmiratesA345 : Actually, they haven't. 1358 is not thousands. Mark
31 Post contains images FlyAUA : Cool... Larger windows are great I think most airliners are headed this way now. The 787, 350, etc... Just not sure if it's economical. It contradicts
32 C172 : And here's what I said: The 787 will not compete head-to-head against the A380. The facts are straight.
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
FI: Boeing Focuses On 787 Weight Not Rate posted Tue Aug 15 2006 13:56:44 by Leelaw
Boeing's Bair On 787's Weight Problem posted Thu Jun 1 2006 23:32:10 by Saturn5
Boeing Briefs Journalists On 787 Refinements posted Mon Jun 12 2006 19:54:28 by BoomBoom
Boeing Unveils Plans To Reduce Drag/Weight On 787 posted Mon Jun 12 2006 14:59:26 by Leelaw
Boeing Close To Breakeven On 787 posted Sun May 21 2006 13:29:02 by Lumberton
Boeing Use Of Rfid On 787 Program posted Fri Nov 4 2005 20:25:21 by MrComet
Boeing Has New 787 Graphics Up On Site posted Tue Jun 14 2005 05:15:25 by DL021
Boeing Signs Deal With Cos. On 787 Jet posted Thu May 26 2005 15:09:23 by NYC777
Kawasaki And Boeing Team Up On 787 posted Sun May 1 2005 18:13:17 by Bhill
Boeing Reviewing Second 787 Production Line posted Mon Nov 6 2006 18:50:56 by Aeropiggot