LAXDESI From United States, joined May 2005, 3280 posts, RR: 9 Posted (4 years 4 months 4 weeks 13 hours ago) and read 2333 times:
As per Economic Times, Jet will delay the start of its BOM-BRU-EWR service to end of July as it needs more time to get all the necessary approvals. Looks like Jet has missed the peak season from American side and may also lose out on the student traffic from India to USA, as most make their plans early.
Perhaps they should use their A340s on Singapore and Kuala Lumpur sectors until they can start EWR service.
Kkfla737 From United States, joined Oct 2004, 1033 posts, RR: 1 Reply 1, posted (4 years 4 months 4 weeks 7 hours ago) and read 2198 times:
Well, hopefully they'll get the approvals needed and the baseless allegations of the Jet Airways USA company will be dropped. Hopefully this date will not have to be pushed back again.
TGV From France, joined Dec 2004, 799 posts, RR: 18 Reply 3, posted (4 years 4 months 3 weeks 6 days 23 hours ago) and read 2041 times:
Quoting Snehnath (Reply 2): You can be pretty sure that Boeing is going to push for the approval for 9W given the recent 777 order.
Or you can reverse the sentence, and guess that buying 777 was necessary to receive the required approval: after all this is what we are used to hear about Airbusses and CDG slots !
Avoid AFKL 773 sardine cans with their 3-4-3 config in Y ! AF 772 are next
LAXDESI From United States, joined May 2005, 3280 posts, RR: 9 Reply 4, posted (4 years 4 months 3 weeks 6 days 17 hours ago) and read 1930 times:
Quoting TGV (Reply 3): Or you can reverse the sentence, and guess that buying 777 was necessary to receive the required approval: after all this is what we are used to hear about Airbusses and CDG slots !
Another conspiracy theory- maybe there is something to it.
Jaysit From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR: Reply 6, posted (4 years 4 months 3 weeks 6 days 16 hours ago) and read 1837 times:
Another conspiracy theory- maybe there is something to it.
It's the same conspiracy theory.
This is standard counter charging. The party faced with a regulatory complaint denies the charge, and the complainant then files a countercharge that is even more far-fetched. It's a delaying tactic that many regulatory agencies face. When burdened with several petitions, they have to then create a docket which is then subject to greater scrutiny, etc. Of course, agencies do not like this, and tend to penalize such complainants in any future actions. Hope this petty little Maryland company gets its just desserts.
Behramjee From Canada, joined Aug 2003, 3749 posts, RR: 43 Reply 8, posted (4 years 4 months 2 weeks 4 days 11 hours ago) and read 1641 times:
will 9Ws BRU-EWR flights connect both ways with its BOM-CMB and BOM-SIN/KUL flights? or are they mainly aiming for that flight catering to the India-BRU-USA market?
LAXDESI From United States, joined May 2005, 3280 posts, RR: 9 Reply 9, posted (4 years 4 months 2 weeks 4 days 11 hours ago) and read 1622 times:
It will be interesting to see what their load factors will be given that they would miss the peak season. Does anyone know what AI's load factors are in September-November period.
N77014 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR: Reply 11, posted (4 years 4 months 2 weeks 3 days 20 hours ago) and read 1467 times:
Quoting Behramjee (Reply 8): will 9Ws BRU-EWR flights connect both ways with its BOM-CMB and BOM-SIN/KUL flights? or are they mainly aiming for that flight catering to the India-BRU-USA market?
BRU is essentially just a fuel stop on BOM-EWR. Allegedly there is little BRU-BOM traffic.
Nycank From United States, joined May 2000, 232 posts, RR: 0 Reply 12, posted (4 years 4 months 2 weeks 3 days 17 hours ago) and read 1386 times:
Quoting N77014 (Reply 11): BRU is essentially just a fuel stop on BOM-EWR. Allegedly there is little BRU-BOM traffic.
I doubt it - There is enough demand to fly non-stop between Surat and Antwerp - Absent that, BOM-BRU makes perfect sense. Currently Surat area accounts for a heft chunk of India's 9B$ diamond polishing business.
LAXDESI From United States, joined May 2005, 3280 posts, RR: 9 Reply 13, posted (4 years 4 months 2 weeks 3 days 11 hours ago) and read 1288 times:
As per Economic Times, delays from Weeks to months are possible. Will the Indian side retaliate in the future by sitting on approval applications from US airlines?
Quote:
David Modesitt from the office of the secretary of transportation, USA, told ET that clearances may take "from Weeks to months".
N77014 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR: Reply 14, posted (4 years 4 months 2 weeks 3 days 9 hours ago) and read 1241 times:
Quoting Nycank (Reply 12): I doubt it - There is enough demand to fly non-stop between Surat and Antwerp - Absent that, BOM-BRU makes perfect sense. Currently Surat area accounts for a heft chunk of India's 9B$ diamond polishing business.
True. It is not like one can trust diamonds to be shipped via air freight.
Sam737 From India, joined Apr 2005, 16 posts, RR: 0 Reply 16, posted (4 years 4 months 2 weeks 2 days 21 hours ago) and read 1090 times:
me thinks that the reason that the permission for the US flights were delayed from the DGCA end itself is because 9w were falling short of quite a few million ASKMs in the domestic sector for cat2 and 3 routes. that's why the number of flights have been increased during the month of May and June as the DGCA needed to see substantial progress on 9w meeting these requirements.
Nycank From United States, joined May 2000, 232 posts, RR: 0 Reply 17, posted (4 years 4 months 2 weeks 2 days 20 hours ago) and read 1061 times:
Quoting N77014 (Reply 14): True. It is not like one can trust diamonds to be shipped via air freight.
I've seen on many a BRU-JFK trips; atleast few folks who arrive with a small briefcase/bag cuffed to their hands. I'm sure they are pretty heavily bonded too
[bond-themed music playing ... Diamonds are for ever...]
LO231 From Belgium, joined Sep 2004, 2185 posts, RR: 30 Reply 22, posted (4 years 4 months 1 week 6 days 22 hours ago) and read 658 times:
Quoting N77014 (Reply 11): BRU is essentially just a fuel stop on BOM-EWR. Allegedly there is little BRU-BOM traffic.
No, it's not only that. July and December are the heaviest months for BRU-India traffic, all connecting via ZRH, FRA or LON, but the rest of the year we're doing quite well, too. 99% of my customers are Indian diamond traders from Mumbai.
And we are like 6 travel agencies in proximity of 200 meters....
Regards,
LO231
Next flights:BRU-THF-BRU/SN, BRU-VCE-BRU/SN, BRU-VIE-BRU/OS, BRU-MAD-FRA-BRU/IB, SN and LA
Sponsor Message: 
From United States, joined May 2005, 3280 posts, 
From India, joined Apr 2005, 97 posts, 
From France, joined Dec 2004, 799 posts, 
From , joined Dec 1969, posts, 
From Canada, joined Aug 2003, 3749 posts, 
I've seen on many a BRU-JFK trips; atleast few folks who arrive with a small briefcase/bag cuffed to their hands. I'm sure they are pretty heavily bonded too 
From Belgium, joined Sep 2004, 2185 posts, 
Printer friendly format 
