Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Rolls To Power New Boeing 737  
User currently offlineAeroPiggot From United States of America, joined May 2005, 284 posts, RR: 0
Posted (9 years 3 months 1 week 3 days 23 hours ago) and read 5988 times:

It seem that Rolls-Royce is in the running to join the engine offerings on the new Boeing 737 replacement aircraft currently in PD. See the link below:

http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/news/b...mid401266?source=This%20is%20Money


A scientist discovers that which exists, an engineer creates that which never was.
25 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineBoeing7E7 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (9 years 3 months 1 week 3 days 23 hours ago) and read 5959 times:

That'll just about cover the 737 replacement rumors.

My hunch is Rolls and GE will have an engine and it will be interchangeable.


User currently offlineLHB727230Adv From Germany, joined Mar 2005, 255 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (9 years 3 months 1 week 3 days 23 hours ago) and read 5938 times:

Good news for RR, finally they can catch up in the short-haul market. Also, it gives airlines more options with their engine choice. Very good news indeed.

Cheers,
Alex  bigthumbsup 


User currently offlineAA61Hvy From United States of America, joined Nov 1999, 13977 posts, RR: 57
Reply 3, posted (9 years 3 months 1 week 3 days 23 hours ago) and read 5926 times:

I wonder what will it sound like. I'm guessing somewhere between a 757 and F100. (I'm an engine freak, sorry)
And yes All engines have different sounds  Wink



Go big or go home
User currently offlineDLKAPA From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (9 years 3 months 1 week 3 days 23 hours ago) and read 5917 times:

Quoting Boeing7E7 (Reply 1):
My hunch is Rolls and GE will have an engine and it will be interchangeable.

It's already been said somewhere that Boeing will make a Pylon that is compatable to both types, so that an engine conversion can take place in one business day.


User currently offlineBoeing7E7 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (9 years 3 months 1 week 3 days 22 hours ago) and read 5887 times:

I'm thinking it's going to look more like a T-Tail 717/727/MD-80/90 and less like a 737.

Unless they find a way to make a smaller engine and still keep the plane low to the ground for handling.


User currently offlineACdreamliner From UK - Scotland, joined May 2005, 519 posts, RR: 1
Reply 6, posted (9 years 3 months 1 week 3 days 22 hours ago) and read 5830 times:

just wish PW would get back into the market....


Where are you going?
User currently offlineAeroPiggot From United States of America, joined May 2005, 284 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (9 years 3 months 1 week 3 days 22 hours ago) and read 5799 times:

Quote:
I'm thinking it's going to look more like a T-Tail 717/727/MD-80/90 and less like a 737

You may be on to something there "7E7", remember the 7J7, I believe we may come back to that type of configuration. I could even envision a dual isle version, but very "stubby" looking??  eyebrow 



A scientist discovers that which exists, an engineer creates that which never was.
User currently offlineOptionsCLE From United States of America, joined Jun 2004, 467 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (9 years 3 months 1 week 3 days 22 hours ago) and read 5778 times:

I'd be very surprised to see a T-tail. Look at the A320 family, longer landing gear than the 737 yet I'm sure they still handle fine on the ground.

-Andrew


User currently offlineBoeing7E7 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 9, posted (9 years 3 months 1 week 3 days 22 hours ago) and read 5734 times:

Quoting OptionsCLE (Reply 8):
I'd be very surprised to see a T-tail. Look at the A320 family, longer landing gear than the 737 yet I'm sure they still handle fine on the ground.

They supposedly won't fit under a 320 wing either so we'd be talking 757 height so I wouldn't be surprised at all to see a T-Tail.


User currently offlineIkramerica From United States of America, joined May 2005, 21532 posts, RR: 60
Reply 10, posted (9 years 3 months 1 week 3 days 22 hours ago) and read 5718 times:

Quoting Boeing7E7 (Reply 1):
My hunch is Rolls and GE will have an engine and it will be interchangeable.

no doubt.

Quoting OptionsCLE (Reply 8):
I'd be very surprised to see a T-tail. Look at the A320 family, longer landing gear than the 737 yet I'm sure they still handle fine on the ground.

not handling like a car, handling for baggage, etc. The DC9/727/737 etc. design is such that you can load baggage standing on the ground, for more rural areas (very important in the 60s/70s). The A320 is designed higher off the ground for more "improved" airports and terminals.

But I would also be surprised by a T-Tail. B will find a solution that keeps the plane low (though it will be taller than now) but doesn't require a squat engine. A new wing will help.



Of all the things to worry about... the Wookie has no pants.
User currently offlineSrbmod From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 11, posted (9 years 3 months 1 week 3 days 22 hours ago) and read 5652 times:

I wonder if an engine based on the BR-700 family could potentially be that engine. I would love to see them develop a more powerful version of the BR-715, perhaps a BR-720? Or could it be a new version of the Tay?

User currently offlineHermansCVR580 From United States of America, joined Jul 1999, 509 posts, RR: 1
Reply 12, posted (9 years 3 months 1 week 3 days 13 hours ago) and read 5308 times:

Hey its sounding like this could be the super super 727 with a two person flight deck  Wink Any concept drawings of what this plane might look like?? I'm courious about this one Smile


The right decision at the wrong time, is still a wrong decision. "Hal Carr"
User currently offlineJet-lagged From United States of America, joined Mar 2002, 872 posts, RR: 0
Reply 13, posted (9 years 3 months 1 week 3 days 12 hours ago) and read 5221 times:

Quoting AA61Hvy (Reply 3):
And yes All engines have different sounds

Like rrrrrrrrrrrrr or zzzhhhhhhhhh or something? Can you describe with letters??


User currently offlinePM From Germany, joined Feb 2005, 6923 posts, RR: 63
Reply 14, posted (9 years 3 months 1 week 3 days 12 hours ago) and read 5220 times:

If you read the article it's nothing new. Boeing are going to replace the 737 one day. (Hardly news.) When they do, they'll probably offer two engine types. (Not unexpected.) Those types are likely to be from CFM and IAE. (No surprises there.) RR have a stake in IAE.

I don't see it suggesting that Rolls-Royce will have an engine on the next 737 so let's not get too carried away. It just says that both CFM and IAE will be offered. Good news for RR (and PW) but not quite what the title of this thread implies.

What is more interesting is that the source (though not one noted for its insight into the world of aerospace) repeats the rumour that RR may yet end up on the 747ADV.


User currently offlineRevelation From United States of America, joined Feb 2005, 12565 posts, RR: 25
Reply 15, posted (9 years 3 months 1 week 3 days 7 hours ago) and read 4912 times:

I haven't thought about it much, but why is mounting the wing on top of the fuselage out of favor for commercial aircraft? I imagine it makes supporting the landing gear more difficult and so may lead to a heavier aircraft, but I'm just guessing.


Inspiration, move me brightly!
User currently offlineFlyBoy84 From United States of America, joined May 2005, 382 posts, RR: 4
Reply 16, posted (9 years 3 months 1 week 3 days 6 hours ago) and read 4769 times:

From what I've heard, the 737 replacement will be built in three versions (120, 150, and 190 pax). Therefore, larger and more powerful engines might be fitted to match the planes characteristics since it appears that the engine will be used on a plane with a high degree of variation in lowest to highest capacity (even though composites will probably be extensively used). The 190 pax narrowbody would be about the size of the 757. Wouldn't a larger, more powerful engine and a slightly longer wingspan give the largest narrowbody greater "hot-and-high" performance?

I would think the new plane would stand taller for better engine clearance. I'd like to see this as the 757 is my favorite Boeing. Leave the low riders to the RJs.


User currently offlineSrbmod From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 17, posted (9 years 3 months 1 week 3 days 6 hours ago) and read 4705 times:

Quoting Revelation (Reply 15):
I haven't thought about it much, but why is mounting the wing on top of the fuselage out of favor for commercial aircraft? I imagine it makes supporting the landing gear more difficult and so may lead to a heavier aircraft, but I'm just guessing.

It really only makes sense when the operational profile for the a/c requires good short field performance, which is why the C-130, C-141, C-5, C-17, Do-228/328/328Jet, ATR-42/72, DHC Dash 7/8, Shorts 330/360, Fokker F-27, and Bae-146/Avro RJ for example have high mounted wings. In most of these a/c the landing gear are located in the fuselage like on any other a/c, with the exceptions being the DHC Dash 7 and Dash 8 (Which have main gear mounted in the engine nacelles) and the F-27 (Nacelle mounted engines).


User currently offlineDAYflyer From United States of America, joined Sep 2004, 3807 posts, RR: 3
Reply 18, posted (9 years 3 months 1 week 3 days 6 hours ago) and read 4659 times:

Quoting ACdreamliner (Reply 6):
just wish PW would get back into the market....

PW is going nowhere on the commercial side anytime soon. They are going to slowly become a strictly millitary provider eventually since they lost out on A-350/787 and A-380/747 Adv. The only thing they have left is narrowbody and millitary applications. What would be interesting is if they can get the engine contract for the new USAF tanker.....



One Nation Under God
User currently offlineF14D4ever From United States of America, joined May 2005, 319 posts, RR: 4
Reply 19, posted (9 years 3 months 1 week 3 days 5 hours ago) and read 4605 times:

Quoting PM (Reply 14):
... the source (though not one noted for its insight into the world of aerospace) repeats the rumour that RR may yet end up on the 747ADV.

By repeating this silly rumor, they pretty well solidify their reputation for lack of insight, eh?

But we digress ...



"He is risen, as He said."
User currently offlinePM From Germany, joined Feb 2005, 6923 posts, RR: 63
Reply 20, posted (9 years 3 months 1 week 2 days 17 hours ago) and read 4342 times:

Quoting DAYflyer (Reply 18):
What would be interesting is if they can get the engine contract for the new USAF tanker.....

They did. Boeing selected them for the now defunct 100 767 deal. Might that give them an edge in the next version of this deal?

Quoting F14D4ever (Reply 19):
By repeating this silly rumor, they pretty well solidify their reputation for lack of insight, eh?

Indeed.


User currently offlineAirframeAS From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 14150 posts, RR: 24
Reply 21, posted (9 years 3 months 1 week 2 days 17 hours ago) and read 4309 times:

What happens to CFM in all of this? I think CFM should pitch into the deal with GE and RR to give even more of an option...


A Safe Flight Begins With Quality Maintenance On The Ground.
User currently offlinePM From Germany, joined Feb 2005, 6923 posts, RR: 63
Reply 22, posted (9 years 3 months 1 week 2 days 16 hours ago) and read 4293 times:

Quoting AirframeAS (Reply 21):
What happens to CFM in all of this? I think CFM should pitch into the deal with GE and RR to give even more of an option...

Er, you know of course that CFM is 50% owned by GE? Just as there is very little chance of an "RR" engine on the next 737 because RR's involvement will be through IAE, there won't a "GE" engine there either because it'll be CFM.


User currently offlineGQfluffy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 23, posted (9 years 3 months 1 week 2 days 16 hours ago) and read 4269 times:

Quoting Jet-lagged (Reply 13):
Quoting AA61Hvy (Reply 3):
And yes All engines have different sounds

Like rrrrrrrrrrrrr or zzzhhhhhhhhh or something? Can you describe with letters??

Nah...I'm sure one will sound like an overgrown lawn mower, and the other like a vacuum cleaner on steroids...

fluffy


User currently offlineAirframeAS From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 14150 posts, RR: 24
Reply 24, posted (9 years 3 months 1 week 2 days 16 hours ago) and read 4241 times:

Quoting PM (Reply 22):
Er, you know of course that CFM is 50% owned by GE?

I learn something new on a daily basis, I didnt know that... thanks for that!



A Safe Flight Begins With Quality Maintenance On The Ground.
User currently offlineLightsaber From United States of America, joined Jan 2005, 13138 posts, RR: 100
Reply 25, posted (9 years 3 months 1 week 2 days 8 hours ago) and read 4104 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting PM (Reply 20):

They did. Boeing selected them for the now defunct 100 767 deal. Might that give them an edge in the next version of this deal?

Yes. Pratt didn't get "slapped" like Boeing did. But then again, its politics.

Quoting PM (Reply 22):
because RR's involvement will be through IAE,

By contract, neither RR nor Pratt can build an engine in the 27k to 35k range nor offer an de-rage/enhanced version of an existing engine *without* IAE first declining to build/offer an engine for an airframe. So RR on its own is very unlikely. All reports are IAE. GE wouldn't want to piss of AF, so they'll probably do a CFM engine; but I'm not sure on the details there.

Lightsaber



Societies that achieve a critical mass of ideas achieve self sustaining growth; others stagnate.
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Ryanair Orders UP To 150 New Boeing 737-800! posted Thu Jan 24 2002 14:29:35 by Airblue
Rolls-Royce To Power Monarch Boeing 787s posted Thu Oct 5 2006 14:46:25 by Leelaw
KLM To Buy Six Boeing 737 posted Mon Nov 13 2006 19:44:56 by AeroPiggot
American Not Eager To Buy New Boeing Jet..yet posted Wed Jun 8 2005 23:01:59 by NYC777
Jet Airways To Buy 10 Boeing 737-800 posted Fri Apr 15 2005 03:34:45 by BoeingBus
JAT Airways To Purchase Eight Boeing 737-800s posted Fri Oct 15 2004 23:33:33 by Kalakaua
MAS In Talks To Buy New Boeing Planes posted Sat Jan 25 2003 01:59:54 by OdiE
Ethiopian Airlines Orders New Boeing 737 And 767s. posted Sat Dec 7 2002 02:15:11 by Flight152
New Boeing 737 Derivative Announced? posted Sun Mar 31 2002 13:27:39 by Aviatsiya.ru
Gatx Capital Leases Two New Boeing 737-800 Aircraf posted Mon May 14 2001 04:30:48 by United Airline