Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Colgan Air  
User currently offlineJetSOUTHEAST From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (9 years 4 months 1 week 6 days 20 hours ago) and read 1746 times:

Hi,
I was wondering when Colgan Air decided to go with Continental, and why CO dumped SkyWest. I submitted a resume to Colgan for F/A, and I hear they are "desperate" for F/A's and one of their F/A's told me they have a HUGE turnover rate, just curious, I thought Colgan was just a dinky commuter with B1900s. Wow, things change.

9 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineEMBQA From United States of America, joined Oct 2003, 9364 posts, RR: 11
Reply 1, posted (9 years 4 months 1 week 6 days 20 hours ago) and read 1729 times:

Your age may hurt you. What is their minumum requiremnet..? I would think 21 at least as you serve alcohol.

You, they are growing...and getting bigger soon.



"It's not the size of the dog in the fight, but the size of the fight in the dog"
User currently offlineDLKAPA From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (9 years 4 months 1 week 6 days 20 hours ago) and read 1723 times:

Quoting EMBQA (Reply 1):
I would think 21 at least as you serve alcohol.

18 in Texas with a permit from the state.

Colgan is flying Saabs (I think) as Continental Connection, they started around the beginning of the year I think on intra-texas flights. Don't know why they dumped OO.


User currently offlineFlyHoss From United States of America, joined Feb 2005, 598 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (9 years 4 months 1 week 6 days 20 hours ago) and read 1716 times:

I don't think "dumped" is the proper expression. As I understand it, the contract was let out for bid as scheduled. Colgan underbid SkyWest and offered a few more seats per plane as well. SkyWest was given the opportunity to match the bid but chose not to. SkyWest is a excellent operator and I hate to see them go, but they have plenty of replacement flying. In other words, SkyWest doesn't need the CO contract, IMHO. SkyWest has been smart to not rely on just one major carrier.


A little bit louder now, a lil bit louder now...
User currently offlineRsmith6621a From United States of America, joined Aug 2005, 194 posts, RR: 2
Reply 4, posted (9 years 4 months 1 week 6 days 19 hours ago) and read 1660 times:

I would not consider it a letdown if ColganAir doesnt consider you.

Colgan Air Hired me last year for a position as a Dispatcher at their Manassas VA HQ, they told me to bring my wife back the following week after the interview and start looking for housing and to take my DOT drug test...they even had Bekins call me to set up a move consultation. After that call I never heard from them....Bekins came out to my home and did an estimate and submitted it to Colgan but Colgan never called me nor returned my numorous calls. A month later they were back to advertising for the same position....I finally got ahold of them and their excuse was.....they needed someone more local than I was...

There are better ponds to swim in Id leave Colgan alone.....think about why they have high turnover???....it not that people are finding better jobs.



Did You Ever Think Freedom Could Be this Bad
User currently offlineTornado82 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (9 years 4 months 1 week 6 days 18 hours ago) and read 1589 times:

Colgan flies alot of Saab's for US as well, many of which are based in PIT.

User currently offlineJetSOUTHEAST From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 6, posted (9 years 4 months 1 week 6 days 16 hours ago) and read 1533 times:

Yeah but its a foot in the door, I have to take it if they offer it, its already hard enough to become a f/a.

User currently offlineIFly4UAL From United States of America, joined Sep 2000, 63 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (9 years 4 months 1 week 6 days 9 hours ago) and read 1504 times:

My brother works for Colgan. He keeps me informed about a lot of things. Some things I can tell you about Colgan (in relation to other airlines):

*They have a LOT of F/A bases. A good number of the cities they serve are F/A bases.
*They currently are flying SAAB 340s and B1900s--and there is a pretty strong rumor (some have even said that the first one is on the property) that they are considering SAAB 2000s as well, but I don't know how much truth is in that.
*The F/A group is non-union.
*There are very few overnight trips, which is not good in my opinion. It pretty much eliminates your per diem pay, which, if you've ever flown for another airline, you know is a good portion of your paycheck.

They seem to be a good company overall, but I would be concerned about their highly conservative way of conducting business. It almost seems they are nervous about growing. This is my perception, which of course could be dead wrong. Best of luck in your search for a F/A position.



BGR--Vacation Spot for All the Flying Crazies
User currently offlineVEEREF From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 8, posted (9 years 4 months 1 week 6 days 8 hours ago) and read 1462 times:

Quoting IFly4UAL (Reply 7):
They seem to be a good company overall, but I would be concerned about their highly conservative way of conducting business. It almost seems they are nervous about growing. This is my perception, which of course could be dead wrong. Best of luck in your search for a F/A position.

Actually you are right. Having flown for them for 6 years, being conservative has served them very well. The senator is very careful not to over expand. One good thing about them is that they will not subsidize an unprofitable route with a profitable one. If a route does not make money it will be discontinued. They are primarily a niche carrier which is part of the reason they are still in turboprop equipment. The pay could be better but it is still higher than some carriers.


User currently offlinePSU.DTW.SCE From United States of America, joined Jan 2002, 7661 posts, RR: 27
Reply 9, posted (9 years 4 months 1 week 6 days 7 hours ago) and read 1453 times:

Colgan has traditionally operated in the Northeast flying a mix of B-1900's and Saabs, under the USAirways Express name. Some of the service is at-risk, while a lot is Essential Air Service routes.

In the past 6 months, they were awarded a contract to fly turboprop routes as Continental Connection out of IAH. This replaced Skywest, as said by offering a slightly larger aircraft and more advantagous costs. Thus, the rapid build-up of Saab operations in Texax.

Hence the rapid hiring at Colgan. They have been quickly gearing up for operations in Texas which has strained the company. Many people who start out at Colgan have jumped ship for the larger regionals like Pinnacle, Mesaba, Comair, Trans-State, etc. The addition of numerous more Saab aircraft has required significantly more crews.

The rumors about new fleet types are unfounded. The Saab2000 won't happen, as there are only about 3 currently operated in the United States, thus a complete lack of support services. They simply are not readily available


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Colgan Air Requests Relief For EAS At BFD/JHW posted Mon Sep 18 2006 23:43:09 by A330323X
Colgan Air HEF Flights posted Sat Feb 4 2006 19:37:49 by Moose1226
Colgan Air Routes Between Ohio And West Virginia posted Wed Aug 10 2005 03:30:27 by Mats
Colgan Air Interview posted Fri Jul 22 2005 21:49:57 by JetSOUTHEAST
Colgan Air posted Thu Jun 16 2005 03:05:03 by JetSOUTHEAST
Colgan Air (a.k.a. CO Connection) DRT-IAH posted Fri Apr 15 2005 18:54:01 by Jhooper
Colgan Air Taking Over SkyWest CoConnection Routes posted Fri Jan 21 2005 17:00:52 by Ssides
Is Colgan Air A Good Place To Work? posted Wed Sep 15 2004 05:01:22 by GMUAirbusA320
Colgan Air Acquired Ex- BEX Saab 340s? posted Mon Feb 16 2004 04:30:19 by Pwm2txlhopper
Air Berlin Expects Yearly Growth Of 10-13 Percent posted Wed Dec 13 2006 09:51:44 by PlaneHunter