Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
777-200ER/-200LR Mixed Fleet  
User currently offlineFLY777UAL From United States of America, joined May 1999, 4512 posts, RR: 3
Posted (9 years 5 months 1 week 3 days ago) and read 1993 times:

I'm sure this is going to sound confusing as hell...

I am curious to see if there are any significant economic pitfalls for an airline to operate a mixed 777-200ER/LR fleet with roughly the same number of each model.

In thinking to the range of markets which can be served by both aircraft from the United States to Asia, some flights (such as the N. Pacific destinations of Japan, Korea, China) are perfect for the passenger/freight load an -ER has, while the -LR would be overkill. On other flights to the S. Pacific (Australia, Singapore, Thailand), the -LR is the best performer where the -ER would see many operational limits placed on westbound flights.

Operating with this mix between the two aircraft seems as if it wouldn't allow for maximum effeciency in aircraft scheduling, as a NRT-LAX -ER flight cannot turn and operate a full LAX-MEL trip. In short, Would the unnecessary weight which the -LR aircraft would bring to the shorter N. Pacific routes be outweighed by the operational flexibility of operating an entirely -LR fleet on an airline's Pacific route network?

F L Y 7 7 7 U A L

2 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineRJ111 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (9 years 5 months 1 week 2 days 20 hours ago) and read 1835 times:

Interesting! I guess it would depend on the fleet size, schedules and many other factors. A fleet of 3 772ERs and 3 772LRs might be silly, but a fleet of 30 772ERs and 10 772LRs wold be very beneficial i'd imagine. The 772LR weighs roughly 10 tons more than the ER, that's a lot of dead weight if it isn't needed. I'm sure there would be ways to get around the scheduling, so that the right plane is being used for the right mission, like you mentioned. The only real concern would be flexibility if a plane goes tech. Which is a relatively rare occurance.

User currently offlineCubsrule From United States of America, joined May 2004, 23203 posts, RR: 20
Reply 2, posted (9 years 5 months 1 week 2 days 20 hours ago) and read 1822 times:

Quoting RJ111 (Reply 1):
The only real concern would be flexibility if a plane goes tech. Which is a relatively rare occurance.

Fleet size and scheduling could be such that the spare is always an LR. Thus, if an LR goes tech, they are set, and if an ER goes tech, they are stuck hauling some more weight around, but hopefully the flight can go out basically as scheduled- and the additional fuel burn is presumably much cheaper than the 250 stranded pax.



I can't decide whether I miss the tulip or the bowling shoe more
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
787-10 Versus 777-200, 777-200ER, And 777-200LR posted Fri Jun 16 2006 20:59:30 by AerospaceFan
777-200LR A Replacment For 777-200ER? posted Sun Oct 23 2005 01:36:37 by Kaitak744
Headrests On Delta 767-400ER And 777-200ER posted Wed Oct 25 2006 20:31:42 by 1337Delta764
First Thai 777-200ER Takes Off! With Pics posted Tue Oct 24 2006 12:55:29 by Qantas744ER
SQ 777-200ER Economy? posted Wed Aug 9 2006 21:15:46 by DptMAN
Upgrades; 777-200ER posted Thu May 4 2006 19:53:39 by SunriseValley
What Routes For TG's New 777-200ER's? posted Sun Jan 15 2006 18:01:13 by Warreng24
NZ 777-200ER To Visit WLG posted Fri Jan 13 2006 04:31:20 by NZ1
EZY 10 Years! Mixed Fleet Or Changing To Airbus? posted Sat Nov 12 2005 11:19:22 by Boeing777/747
1st NZ 777-200ER Delivered posted Thu Oct 27 2005 21:11:25 by Wedgetail737