Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
AC's Challenge W/ 3xx/76x To Compete With Others  
User currently offlineTurbojet From United States of America, joined Jun 2005, 21 posts, RR: 0
Posted (9 years 5 months 1 week 6 days 3 hours ago) and read 3893 times:

Now AC has to stick to 345/333/76x for a while. How will AC compete with the others such as AI, AF, or EK in the near future?

I think 333 is fine. However, 76x is too dated. Even refurbished, its maintenance cost will gradually go north. Compared to AF and AI's 777 fleet, 345 doesn't have much operational cost advantage. Competing with EK, I think EK's 345 operational cost in terms of human resource would be lower than AC. Although with a sound start after reconstruction, it is still difficult for AC to face future challenge.

[Edited 2005-06-20 01:54:44]

[Edited 2005-06-20 01:55:13]

17 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineAC787 From Canada, joined Mar 2005, 337 posts, RR: 1
Reply 1, posted (9 years 5 months 1 week 6 days 3 hours ago) and read 3866 times:

Your rlly going crazy with the AC topics  Smile

Quoting Turbojet (Thread starter):
Now AC has to stick with 345/333/76x for a while. How will AC compete with the others such as AI, AF, or EK in near future?

They'll compete just fine with most of these carriers for the time being, they were going to hold most of those types until 2010 at least. And its still safe to say most people will pick AC over AI when it comes to products. Also don't forget that its AC's stated goal to have PTVs for all there aircraft in the near future. EK still doesn't really "compete" with AC yet so only time will tell.


User currently offlineYUL332LX From Canada, joined Feb 2004, 820 posts, RR: 1
Reply 2, posted (9 years 5 months 1 week 6 days 3 hours ago) and read 3858 times:

It was certainly not the original plan but AC will probably keep the 343s and refurbish 'em with the PTVs after all.


E volavo, volavo felice più in alto del sole, e ancora più su mentre il mondo pian piano spariva lontano laggiù ...
User currently offlineLawgman From Canada, joined Feb 2005, 71 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (9 years 5 months 1 week 6 days 2 hours ago) and read 3794 times:

How will AC compete? The same way it always has. The real problem is how will it continue to expand to India, Asia and to a lesser extent, South America. Air Canada's profitability and future is ties to expanding to these three markets. Air Canada will need to consistently fly Toronto-Delhi non-stop, but it does not have the plances to do so.

As for its 767s, AC has a wacky mixture of 767s. Original 762s, original 763s, Canadian Airlines 763s, various 763s from the used market. Instead of Boeing assiting with the modernization of these planes (winglets and interiors), Air Canada is going to have to come up with a solution for these planes. The interior of many of them (especially the CND ones) are shabby and out of date.


User currently offlineYegbey01 From United States of America, joined Nov 2003, 1732 posts, RR: 3
Reply 4, posted (9 years 5 months 1 week 6 days 2 hours ago) and read 3781 times:

Why wouldn't AC just buy more Airbuses...
A346's and A330s and 350s


User currently offlineAC777LR From Canada, joined Apr 2006, 487 posts, RR: 40
Reply 5, posted (9 years 5 months 1 week 6 days 2 hours ago) and read 3738 times:

Quoting Yegbey01 (Reply 4):
Why wouldn't AC just buy more Airbuses...
A346's and A330s and 350s

It would pose the same problem as the Boeings, excluding the A330.



Member since April 2000
User currently offlineA360 From Portugal, joined Jun 2005, 434 posts, RR: 8
Reply 6, posted (9 years 5 months 1 week 6 days 2 hours ago) and read 3731 times:

^Of course....
We all know that AC can perfecly live without 777's and 787's like many other companies do... This was bad news for AC.... but let's not turn this into a drama!

And guess what: There are airlines which have 340's and make profit with them!!  Wow!

^Yes, that was sarcastic!


User currently offlineMham001 From United States of America, joined Feb 2005, 3695 posts, RR: 3
Reply 7, posted (9 years 5 months 1 week 6 days 2 hours ago) and read 3694 times:

The stated reason Milton bought the Boeings was because they would save the company a lot of money over a short period of time. Between maintaining older planes with a lower cyle, the fuel savings, and the maintenance package, the new planes were a no-brainer and fit in with the need to cut long-term costs. It would be a blunder to ignore the fiancial implications of the 787 for AC.

[Edited 2005-06-20 02:59:39]

User currently offlineCXYYZ From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 8, posted (9 years 5 months 1 week 6 days 1 hour ago) and read 3636 times:

Quoting AC777LR (Reply 5):
It would pose the same problem as the Boeings, excluding the A330.

Can we say for sure that AC doesn't have an agreement in place concerning the A346s? They had planned on operating them, so could someone provide a definitive answer as to whether or not they have an agreement with the pilots to operate them?


User currently offlineYUL332LX From Canada, joined Feb 2004, 820 posts, RR: 1
Reply 9, posted (9 years 5 months 1 week 6 days 1 hour ago) and read 3590 times:

Quoting CXYYZ (Reply 8):
They had planned on operating them, so could someone provide a definitive answer as to whether or not they have an agreement with the pilots to operate them?

They do not an agreement AFAIK. Just like they did not have an agreement for the A345s until they negotiated a last-minute agreement last year.



E volavo, volavo felice più in alto del sole, e ancora più su mentre il mondo pian piano spariva lontano laggiù ...
User currently offlineSebring From Canada, joined Jul 2004, 1666 posts, RR: 14
Reply 10, posted (9 years 5 months 1 week 6 days ago) and read 3504 times:

As I stated in another thread, the training issue - the problem of introducing a new fleet type - was a key factor in the pilot vote. AC asked the pilots for additional flying for three years while it trained for a big Boeing fleet. It is not at all clear to me that the 346, being so much similar to the 345, 343, 330, etc, would present such a training issue. And AC had no problem negotiating a wage rate for the 777 and 787. The general opinion of the pilots who have posted on websites is that almost everyone felt that AC applied the proper weight-based formula, and therefore pay was not an issue. Presumably they would propose such a formula for the 346.

User currently offlineSchipholjfk From United States of America, joined Jan 2005, 579 posts, RR: 6
Reply 11, posted (9 years 5 months 1 week 6 days ago) and read 3463 times:

Quoting AC787 (Reply 1):
And its still safe to say most people will pick AC over AI when it comes to products.

Exactly what has AC done to deserve this crown? Please explain.



The fun of flying... love it !!!
User currently offlineCXYYZ From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 12, posted (9 years 5 months 1 week 5 days 20 hours ago) and read 3328 times:

Quoting YUL332LX (Reply 9):
They do not an agreement AFAIK. Just like they did not have an agreement for the A345s until they negotiated a last-minute agreement last year.

Thanks for the info!


User currently offlineBrons2 From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 3017 posts, RR: 4
Reply 13, posted (9 years 5 months 1 week 5 days 20 hours ago) and read 3312 times:

They should retain the A340/A330 on the 300+ seat market.

Problem is, A does not offer a 762/763 replacement capacity wise. The A350 does not change this. Now, they could grow into the A332/A358..but will they?



Firings, if well done, are good for employee morale.
User currently offlineLawgman From Canada, joined Feb 2005, 71 posts, RR: 0
Reply 14, posted (9 years 5 months 1 week 5 days 13 hours ago) and read 3135 times:

Quoting Sebring (Reply 10):
As I stated in another thread, the training issue - the problem of introducing a new fleet type - was a key factor in the pilot vote. AC asked the pilots for additional flying for three years while it trained for a big Boeing fleet.

As I just posted in another thread, the Globe and Mail is reporting that this vote was really about original Air Canada pilots indicating their displeasure in how the pilot seniority list was created when Air Canada purchased Canadian Airlines. If the article is correct, it looks like it had nothing to do with wages or training.


User currently offlineKrisYYZ From Canada, joined Nov 2004, 1593 posts, RR: 0
Reply 15, posted (9 years 5 months 1 week 5 days 12 hours ago) and read 3085 times:

Quoting Yegbey01 (Reply 4):
Why wouldn't AC just buy more Airbuses...
A346's and A330s and 350s

A330's/A350's have a slight possibility but the A350 is a little big for AC's needs. The A346's have little chance with AC, since the whole business plan is to have an all twin engine long haul fleet. Milton has expressed this very clearly, AC does not particularly like the A340's and does not want more 4 engine aircraft.

The reason that AC got rid of its B744 combies was the fuel usage and higher than normal ZFW issue.

Krisyyz


User currently offlineSQuared From Canada, joined May 2005, 387 posts, RR: 0
Reply 16, posted (9 years 5 months 1 week 5 days 12 hours ago) and read 3063 times:

Quoting Lawgman (Reply 14):
.

As I just posted in another thread, the Globe and Mail is reporting that this vote was really about original Air Canada pilots indicating their displeasure in how the pilot seniority list was created when Air Canada purchased Canadian Airlines. If the article is correct, it looks like it had nothing to do with wages or training.

Yes, I read that article too. It's depressing to think that a grudge would cause AC to cancel an order that could have made Air Canada into a world-class competitor. Sad

SQuared


User currently offlineEnviroTO From Canada, joined Aug 2004, 829 posts, RR: 0
Reply 17, posted (9 years 5 months 1 week 5 days 9 hours ago) and read 2937 times:

^ Especially when you consider the CP pilots got the shorter end of the stick in that agreement. One father working for CP ended up with less seniority than his son working at AC... but still the original AC pilots want more.

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Airbus A300-800 Or How To Compete With The 783? posted Wed Feb 22 2006 09:20:55 by PADSpot
Boeing - SQ Must Buy Boeing To Compete With QF? posted Mon Dec 26 2005 21:06:14 by Halibut
A Way For Airbus To Compete With 773ER posted Wed Nov 23 2005 01:56:30 by BG777300ER
NW To Compete With Frontier On IND-CUN posted Mon Nov 21 2005 04:47:53 by Indy
Aviacsa Gets Ready To Compete With New LCC's posted Sun Sep 11 2005 22:56:32 by Rojo
772NG Or 787-10 To Compete With A350-900? posted Fri May 20 2005 00:53:18 by NorCal
Lufthansa To Compete With LCCs posted Thu May 12 2005 15:28:12 by Bicoastal
How Is Airbus Going To Compete With The 7E7? posted Sat Jun 12 2004 02:25:55 by BoeingBus
Was The A320 Built To Compete With The 757 posted Thu May 13 2004 02:06:14 by 747400sp
AF/KLM Plans To Compete With FR & EZY.. posted Tue Apr 13 2004 17:09:46 by Richardw