Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
User currently offlineSndp From Belgium, joined Feb 2000, 553 posts, RR: 2
Posted (16 years 3 weeks 5 days 10 hours ago) and read 1641 times:

The fact that SR will take 85% in SN is good for both. SN will be able to grow, as being the second most important member of the Qualiflyer Group (certainly in Europe) and being able to grow its hub at BRU. IF SR decides however to have KLM as a partner, it will certainly be the case that Schiphol will become a very important hub, together with Zurich, and not BRU. Who thinks this is the case and that this is going to happen? Should SN fear the move of KLM to SR and will those two join in a sort of alliance?

3 replies: All unread, jump to last
User currently offlineLJ From Netherlands, joined Nov 1999, 4809 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (16 years 3 weeks 5 days 6 hours ago) and read 1541 times:

Although very unlikely, I believe that a link up between SR and KL shouldn't be ruled out. If the AZ/KL deal falls out definitely (AZ still owes KL 100 million Euro's and I don't know how AZ will ever be able to repay KLM) a link up between KL and SR is (from a KLM perspective) the more likely to happen than a link up with AF (KLM has once said that they would never cooperate with a inefficient airline) or LH to big already. Only BA is still a possibility (never rule out a Anglo-Dutch connection).

Laurens Janssen

User currently offlineTripple7 From Netherlands, joined Aug 1999, 539 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (16 years 3 weeks 5 days 4 hours ago) and read 1537 times:


personnaly I think a link up between SR and KLM is quite unlikely. SR and KLM are both the same kinds of airlines. KLM and SR both have a small home market and have very big intercontinental networks and both rely on transfer passengers rather than on travellers from their home markets. That's why a link between these two airlines is unlikely also SN has its hub in Brussel, which is far too close to Amsterdam and thereby SN would be the smallest airline then and would not get as much traffic which would make the airline unprofitable. I don't think SR wants that to happen with a 85% stake in SN.

See ya.


User currently offlineZRH From Switzerland, joined Nov 1999, 5601 posts, RR: 32
Reply 3, posted (16 years 3 weeks 4 days 11 hours ago) and read 1514 times:

I don't think either that this alliance will happen. SN and Brussels is one problem. An other is the U.S. partner. I can't imagine that SR gives up AA in favour of Northwest. But KLM is definitly the more interesting partner for SR than Alitalia would be. In Alitalia is SR not interested at all.

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
SR/SN/KLM posted Thu May 4 2000 16:08:42 by Sndp
SR,SN,EI All Without A Domestic Market? posted Tue Nov 6 2001 13:55:05 by Airblue
SR/SN CEO's? posted Mon Nov 27 2000 03:05:24 by Blink182
Possble Alliance Between SR/SN,AA,JAL,CX,QF And... posted Sat Oct 14 2000 23:59:20 by Blink182
SR/SN-no More Delta? posted Fri Aug 11 2000 05:48:07 by Blink182
SR/SN To Mexico City posted Thu Jun 22 2000 19:46:43 by Reno_air
AA/SR/SN posted Fri May 12 2000 18:06:48 by Fleet Service
About SR/SN Flights To Kinshasa posted Tue May 2 2000 22:37:42 by Avion
Delta: AF -vs- SR/SN posted Thu Mar 16 2000 22:41:13 by BizJet
What Next With SN SR posted Sun Sep 30 2001 08:34:57 by Flying lsd