Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
US Department Of Justice Approves HP-US Merger!  
User currently offlineSHUPirate1 From United States of America, joined Sep 2003, 3670 posts, RR: 17
Posted (9 years 3 months 3 days 16 hours ago) and read 5386 times:

Phoenix, June 23, 2005 - America West Holdings Corp. (NYSE: AWA) and US Airways Group Inc. (UAIRQ:OB) today confirmed that the airlines have been informed by the U.S. Department of Justice that the Department has completed its review of the proposed merger of the two airlines and that the waiting period under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976 will expire at midnight tonight without a formal request from the Department for additional information (commonly referred to as a "second request").

On May 19, 2005, America West and US Airways announced an agreement to merge and create the first full-service nationwide airline, with a consumer-friendly pricing structure offering a network of low-fare service to more than 200 cities across the U.S., Canada, Mexico, Latin America, the Caribbean and Europe, and amenities that include a robust frequent flyer program, airport clubs, assigned seating and First Class cabin service. The airlines will operate under the US Airways brand.

When completed, the merger will be anchored by $500 million in new equity investment that has already been announced, as well as other potential equity and financing sources still under negotiation, and participation by suppliers and business partners that will provide the company with more than $1.5 billion in cash at the time of the transactions closing.

The merger remains subject to other approvals, including America West shareholders, US Airways creditors and the U.S. Bankruptcy Court, the Securities and Exchange Commission, the U.S. Department of Transportation and the Air Transportation Stabilization Board.

The two companies said today in a joint statement that they remain on track to secure all necessary regulatory approvals this summer, with the goal of closing on transaction by early fall.

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

Certain of the statements contained herein should be considered "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward looking statements may be identified by words such as "may," "will," "expect," "intend," "anticipate," "believe," "estimate," "plan," "could," "should," and "continue" and similar terms used in connection with statements regarding the companies' outlook, expected fuel costs, the RASM environment, and the companies' respective expected 2005 financial performance. Such statements include, but are not limited to, statements about the benefits of the business combination transaction involving America West Holdings Corporation ("America West") and US Airways Group, Inc. ("US Airways" and, together with America West, the "companies"), including future financial and operating results, the companies' plans, objectives, expectations and intentions and other statements that are not historical facts. Such
statements are based upon the current beliefs and expectations of America West and US Airways' management and are subject to significant risks and uncertainties that could cause the companies' actual results and financial position to differ materially from these statements. Such risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, the following: the ability of the companies to obtain and maintain any necessary financing for operations and other purposes, whether debtor-in-possession financing, in the case of US Airways, or other financing; the ability of the companies to maintain adequate liquidity; the duration and extent of the current soft economic conditions; the impact of global instability including the continuing impact of the continued military presence in Iraq and Afghanistan and the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001 and the potential impact of future hostilities, terrorist attacks, infectious disease outbreaks or other global events; changes in prevailing interest
rates; the ability to attract and retain qualified personnel; the ability of the companies to attract and retain customers; the cyclical nature of the airline industry; competitive practices in the industry, including significant fare restructuring activities by major airlines; the impact of changes in fuel prices; economic conditions; labor costs; security-related and insurance costs; weather conditions; government legislation and regulation; relations with unionized employees generally and the impact and outcome of the labor negotiations; US Airways ability to continue as a going concern; US Airways' ability to obtain court approval with respect to motions in the Chapter 11 proceedings prosecuted by it from time to time; the ability of US Airways to develop, prosecute, confirm and consummate one or more plans of reorganization with respect to the Chapter 11 proceedings; risks associated with third parties seeking and obtaining court approval to terminate or shorten the
exclusivity period for US Airways to propose and confirm one or more plans of reorganization, to appoint a Chapter 11 trustee or to convert the cases to Chapter 7 cases; the ability of US Airways to obtain and maintain normal terms with vendors and service providers; US Airways' ability to maintain contracts that are critical to its operations; the potential adverse impact of the Chapter 11 proceedings on US Airways' liquidity or results of operations; the ability of US Airways to operate pursuant to the terms of its financing facilities (particularly the financial covenants); the ability of US Airways to fund and execute its Transformation Plan during the Chapter 11 proceedings and in the context of a plan of reorganization and thereafter; and other risks and uncertainties listed from time to time in the companies' reports to the SEC. There may be other factors not identified above of which the companies are not currently aware that may affect matters discussed in the
forward-looking statements, and may also cause actual results to differ materially from those discussed. The companies assume no obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statement to reflect actual results, changes in assumptions or changes in other factors affecting such estimates other than as required by law. Similarly, these and other factors, including the terms of any reorganization plan of US Airways ultimately confirmed, can affect the value of the US Airways' various prepetition liabilities, common stock and/or other equity securities. Accordingly, the companies urge that the appropriate caution be exercised with respect to existing and future investments in any of these liabilities and/or securities. Additional factors that may affect the future results of America West and US Airways are set forth in their respective filings with the SEC, which are available at http://www.shareholder.com/americawest/edgar.cfm and http://investor.usairways.com/edgar.cfm,
respectively.

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION AND WHERE TO FIND IT

In connection with the proposed transaction, a registration statement, including a proxy statement of America West, and other materials will be filed with the SEC. WE URGE INVESTORS TO READ THE REGISTRATION STATEMENT AND PROXY STATEMENT AND THESE OTHER MATERIALS CAREFULLY WHEN THEY BECOME AVAILABLE BECAUSE THEY WILL CONTAIN IMPORTANT INFORMATION ABOUT THE PROPOSED TRANSACTION. Investors will be able to obtain free copies of the registration statement and proxy statement (when available) as well as other filed documents containing information about US Airways and America West at http://www.sec.gov, the SEC's website. Free copies of America West's SEC filings are also available on America West's website at http://www.shareholder.com/americawest/edgar.cfm, or by request to Investor Relations, America West Airlines 111 West Rio Salado Pkwy, Tempe, Arizona 85281. Free copies of US Airways' SEC filings are also available on US Airways' website at
http://investor.usairways.com/edgar.cfm or by request to Investor Relations, US Airways Group, Inc., 2345 Crystal Drive, Arlington, VA 22224.

This communication shall not constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy any securities, nor shall there by any sale of securities in any jurisdiction in which such offer, solicitation or sale would be unlawful prior to registration or qualification under the securities laws of any such jurisdiction. No offering of securities shall be made except by means of a prospectus meeting the requirements of Section 10 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

PARTICIPANTS IN THE SOLICITATION

America West, US Airways and their respective executive officers and directors may be deemed, under SEC rules, to be participants in the solicitation of proxies from America West's stockholders with respect to the proposed transaction. Information regarding the officers and directors of America West is included in its definitive proxy statement for its 2005 Annual Meetings filed with the SEC on April 15, 2005. Information regarding the officers and directors of US Airways is included in its 2004 Annual Report filed with the SEC on Form 10-K on March 2, 2005. More detailed information regarding the identity of potential participants, and their interests in the solicitation, will be set forth in the registration statement and proxy statement and other materials to be filed with the SEC in connection with the proposed transaction.

Please note that the press release was sent to me in full via e-mail, and as such, I do not have a link.


Burma's constitutional referendum options: A. Yes, B. Go to Insein Prison!
45 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineSrbmod From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (9 years 3 months 3 days 16 hours ago) and read 5370 times:

That was quick, wasn't it? Now will the rest of the merger issues go as smoothly as this?

User currently offlineUnitedTristar From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (9 years 3 months 3 days 16 hours ago) and read 5300 times:

Quoting SHUPirate1 (Thread starter):
The merger remains subject to other approvals, including America West shareholders, US Airways creditors and the U.S. Bankruptcy Court, the Securities and Exchange Commission, the U.S. Department of Transportation and the Air Transportation Stabilization Board.

This approval usually comes quickly. It is the DOT they have to worry about. But word on that is they are going to be OK. The DOJ just makes sure nothing illegal is going on.

-m

 airplane 


User currently offlineGigneil From United States of America, joined Nov 2002, 16347 posts, RR: 85
Reply 3, posted (9 years 3 months 3 days 16 hours ago) and read 5295 times:

I dunno. Here in the US the DOJ is the big one. The DOT is a breeze.

UA/US got the approval of everyone but the DOJ. The DOJ is the one that enforces competitiveness laws.

N


User currently offlineSHUPirate1 From United States of America, joined Sep 2003, 3670 posts, RR: 17
Reply 4, posted (9 years 3 months 3 days 16 hours ago) and read 5291 times:

Quoting UnitedTristar (Reply 2):
This approval usually comes quickly. It is the DOT they have to worry about. But word on that is they are going to be OK. The DOJ just makes sure nothing illegal is going on.

The Department of Justice, if I recall correctly, was not so quick to approve the United takeover of US Airways (although, as fate would have it, rightfully so)



Burma's constitutional referendum options: A. Yes, B. Go to Insein Prison!
User currently offlineUnitedTristar From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (9 years 3 months 3 days 15 hours ago) and read 5267 times:

Quoting Gigneil (Reply 3):
UA/US got the approval of everyone but the DOJ. The DOJ is the one that enforces competitiveness laws.



Quoting SHUPirate1 (Reply 4):
The Department of Justice, if I recall correctly, was not so quick to approve the United takeover of US Airways

I thought it was the DOT. My BAD!  Smile

-m

 airplane 


User currently offlineB744F From Germany, joined Jan 2006, 0 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (9 years 3 months 3 days 15 hours ago) and read 5192 times:

Not sure how this was approved so quickly. Unless they had friends in high places, the DOJ takes their time.

User currently offlineGigneil From United States of America, joined Nov 2002, 16347 posts, RR: 85
Reply 7, posted (9 years 3 months 3 days 15 hours ago) and read 5181 times:

I think this was a pretty clearcut case. The networks had practically no overlap. A merger was clearly procompetitive.

N


User currently offlineEchster From United States of America, joined Sep 2004, 399 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (9 years 3 months 3 days 15 hours ago) and read 5174 times:

I think now is the time for mergers in the US airline industry. The market conditions for the majors are so horrible, I can't really see government intervention in preventing them as in previous years.

User currently offline1MillionFlyer From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 9, posted (9 years 3 months 3 days 15 hours ago) and read 5167 times:

My friends that are FO's for HP are so screwed

User currently offlineAlberchico From United States of America, joined exactly 10 years ago today! , 2921 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (9 years 3 months 3 days 15 hours ago) and read 5154 times:

Wow that was quick. But as was said on an earlier post, because of the state of U.S airlines, the goverment will approve just about any merger.

One quick question, will the new airline be called U.S Airways , America West or adopt a whole new identity?



short summary of every jewish holiday: they tried to kill us ,we won , lets eat !
User currently offlineCommavia From United States of America, joined Apr 2005, 11648 posts, RR: 61
Reply 11, posted (9 years 3 months 3 days 15 hours ago) and read 5149 times:

Quoting Echster (Reply 8):
I think now is the time for mergers in the US airline industry.

I agree. I think this is probably why DOJ basically took five minutes (hyperbole, of course) to approve the HP-US merger, compared with their examination of the UA-US, AA-TW, and even NW-CO (yes, yes, I know, not a real merger, but still) tie-ups.

The DOJ recognizes the consolidation is naturally going to happen to the industry because of how beat up it has been over the last few years and they are now much more open to it. Now, I'm not saying that DOJ would just let AA and UA merge with nothing to say about it, but I think that in general the DOJ is probably much more open to the proposition of airline mergers today than pre-9/11 because there is almost no major market in the U.S. that does not have access to low fares through WN, B6, FL, F9, NK, etc.


User currently offlineAlberchico From United States of America, joined exactly 10 years ago today! , 2921 posts, RR: 0
Reply 12, posted (9 years 3 months 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 5096 times:

Quoting Commavia (Reply 11):
no major market in the U.S. that does not have access to low fares through WN, B6, FL, F9, NK, etc.

What about the NorthWest area?



short summary of every jewish holiday: they tried to kill us ,we won , lets eat !
User currently offlinePhoenixX2 From United States of America, joined Apr 2005, 100 posts, RR: 0
Reply 13, posted (9 years 3 months 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 5077 times:

It is still in the 30 day "counter bid" faze. This was just one of the hurdles. It was a little quicker than anybody thought, but the DOJ must be starting their 4th early. This is probably proof that even Washington is pushing this through. Rgds

User currently offlineYUL332LX From Canada, joined Feb 2004, 820 posts, RR: 1
Reply 14, posted (9 years 3 months 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 5057 times:

http://biz.yahoo.com/rb/050623/airlines_usairways.html?.v=1


E volavo, volavo felice più in alto del sole, e ancora più su mentre il mondo pian piano spariva lontano laggiù ...
User currently offlineCommavia From United States of America, joined Apr 2005, 11648 posts, RR: 61
Reply 15, posted (9 years 3 months 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 5050 times:

Quoting Alberchico (Reply 12):
What about the NorthWest area?

I said no major market. The largest markets in the Pacific Northwest region, SEA, PDX, GEG and BOI, all do have low-fare service via WN.


User currently offlinePhoenixX2 From United States of America, joined Apr 2005, 100 posts, RR: 0
Reply 16, posted (9 years 3 months 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 5036 times:

Quoting PhoenixX2 (Reply 13):
It is still in the 30 day "counter bid" faze

My bad. This is what I get for going to a meeting (on my day off) for this very thing. Between their and here things do change. Thanks


User currently offlineCltguy From United States of America, joined Sep 2004, 598 posts, RR: 0
Reply 17, posted (9 years 3 months 3 days 13 hours ago) and read 4935 times:

I can't wait for this to go through...so I can take my trip to ANC all the way on "US Airways"

User currently offlineHPRamper From United States of America, joined May 2005, 4058 posts, RR: 8
Reply 18, posted (9 years 3 months 3 days 13 hours ago) and read 4901 times:

Quoting Commavia (Reply 15):
I said no major market. The largest markets in the Pacific Northwest region, SEA, PDX, GEG and BOI, all do have low-fare service via WN.

No "major" market? If Seattle isn't a major market, I don't know what is. All my references show Seattle as the 15th largest metropolitan center in the country, ranked higher than Baltimore, Orlando, St. Louis, Pittsburgh, Columbus, Indianapolis, Las Vegas and Tampa Bay.

B6 now services PDX and SEA. HP also services SEA, PDX, GEG, BOI, EUG and MFR. WN goes to PDX, SEA, GEG and BOI. F9 serves the big two, PDX and SEA.
SEA is also served by Independence Air, and not sure if they are an LCC but Sun Country from Minneapolis.


User currently offlineCommavia From United States of America, joined Apr 2005, 11648 posts, RR: 61
Reply 19, posted (9 years 3 months 3 days 13 hours ago) and read 4884 times:

Quoting HPRamper (Reply 18):
No "major" market? If Seattle isn't a major market, I don't know what is. All my references show Seattle as the 15th largest metropolitan center in the country, ranked higher than Baltimore, Orlando, St. Louis, Pittsburgh, Columbus, Indianapolis, Las Vegas and Tampa Bay.

Huh?

My original words in reply 11:

there is almost no major market in the U.S. that does not have access to low fares through WN, B6, FL, F9, NK, etc.

Alberchico then asked:

What about the NorthWest area?

To which I then answered:

I said no major market. The largest markets in the Pacific Northwest region, SEA, PDX, GEG and BOI, all do have low-fare service via WN,

meaning that the four largest markets in the Pacific Northwest, and yes, those are them -- SEA, PDX, GEG and BOI -- all have access to low-fare service via Southwest Airlines. Who on earth would ever dispute that SEA is not a "major" market? Of course it is, and I never said anything to the contrary.


User currently offlineWilax From United States of America, joined Jun 2002, 465 posts, RR: 3
Reply 20, posted (9 years 3 months 3 days 13 hours ago) and read 4836 times:

What is to happen to US Airways' Star Alliance membership? I would doubt that it would carry over to HP, but could US handle the pullout of UA's feed and codesharing?

User currently offlineLTBEWR From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 13116 posts, RR: 12
Reply 21, posted (9 years 3 months 3 days 12 hours ago) and read 4777 times:

This is good for all parties. As noted above, the Hall-Scott-Rodino DOJ clearance is more of a formality under the Bush administration, but is still needed to prevent too much concentration of critical business in a few companies. As noted above, as little route overlap, the problems with airlines today, sufficient competition and with the possible death of US if this didn't go thorugh all helped it 'breeze' through.
I have assisted in the physical filings for these clearances in DC with the FTC and DOJ to speed up the filings and return of clearances (and got some US/DL FF miles too!).


User currently offlineAvek00 From United States of America, joined Oct 2004, 4388 posts, RR: 19
Reply 22, posted (9 years 3 months 3 days 12 hours ago) and read 4731 times:

Quoting PhoenixX2 (Reply 13):
This is probably proof that even Washington is pushing this through.

Not necessarily - there simply isn't much that would raise antitrust concerns, so the DOJ was able to approve the merger quickly. DOT will likely take more time and raise concerns over DCA and CLT (though the merger will likely be approved under the failing firm doctrine).



Live life to the fullest.
User currently offlinePanAm330 From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 2679 posts, RR: 9
Reply 23, posted (9 years 3 months 3 days 12 hours ago) and read 4711 times:

Quoting Alberchico (Reply 10):
One quick question, will the new airline be called U.S Airways , America West or adopt a whole new identity?

The new entity will carry the US Airways nameplate, but will apparently be based in Tempe, AZ.

Quoting Wilax (Reply 20):
What is to happen to US Airways' Star Alliance membership? I would doubt that it would carry over to HP, but could US handle the pullout of UA's feed and codesharing?

It won't carry over to HP, because HP won't exist. US will remain in Star Alliance.


Excellent news, I think. Can't wait for all the new west coast airports to open up thanks to HP!


User currently offlineANCFlyer From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 24, posted (9 years 3 months 3 days 12 hours ago) and read 4690 times:

Quoting Cltguy (Reply 17):
I can't wait for this to go through...so I can take my trip to ANC all the way on "US Airways"

And I can FINALLY use my US Airways miles on somethnig besides Untied . . . out of ANC  Smile


25 727LOVER : Ummmm no....u think they'd allow AA and UA to merge? US/HP has hardly any overlap. If DOJ doesn't approve this one, they wouldn't approve ANY merger.
26 Avek00 : Not so fast - US' continued participation in the Star Alliance requires United's approval on a modification to the terms of the UA/US codesharing arr
27 DCA-ROCguy : No surprise here. These two airlines' networks have almost no overlap, and together they'll represent under 10 percent of seat capacity in the United
28 Indy : Good news for US/HP. I hope this works out well for them.
29 Commavia : I agree. While the DOJ, IMO, is more open to mergers, they still probably wouldn't allow any of the big five (w/o US) to merge with each other withou
30 SHUPirate1 : Yes, considering that DC Air would have been 49% owned by American Airlines!
31 Flyingbronco05 : I learned in my aviation administration class that mergers GENERALLY = death. Bye bye to both USAirways and America West!
32 Commavia : Beat me to it. Per the terms of the UA-AA-US deal, AA was going to wet-lease ex-US F100s to DCAir and DCAir was going to assume virtually all of US'
33 Post contains images PhoenixX2 : That is why our educational system is in turmoil. This will rewrite the books on Mergers. Your professor will have to read the book. Rdgs
34 DCA-ROCguy : Beat me to it. Per the terms of the UA-AA-US deal, AA was going to wet-lease ex-US F100s to DCAir and DCAir was going to assume virtually all of US' s
35 Cltguy : The real story is that United didn't want the deal to go through when they realized they had paid too much for USAirways (remember the days when they
36 RL757PVD : Thats the exact opposite I learned. In a class I took with Darryl Jenkins, a widely respected industry analyst he used the following quote referring
37 DCA-ROCguy : Thats the exact opposite I learned. In a class I took with Darryl Jenkins, a widely respected industry analyst he used the following quote referring t
38 Slider : LMAO! This is going to be fun to watch.
39 Jdwfloyd : My question is when will I get to use my term pass benefits on HP?
40 Goingboeing : Gosh...I hate to be the thrower of cold water, but remember when AA and TWA merged? It might have worked had 9/11 not happened. When HP and US decided
41 HPRamper : My mistake was all in my interpretation. Two ways to take that sentence... "I said no MAJOR market." "I said NO major market." Thus the breaks of wri
42 Gigneil : One airline capable of profit at $50 is better with oil at $70 than two airlines that can't presently make money at all. N
43 Ouboy79 : And one thing you'll learn when you get out from behind the books, is 90% of what is taught in the classroom is worthless in the real world. It's a s
44 John : UA paid 50 million to be exact...pocket change in the world of big business my friend!
45 Post contains links PhoenixX2 : http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/05179/529389.stm This is going to be interesting, but we will see within the next four days. Rgds
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Department Of Justice Sides With NWA Management posted Thu Aug 24 2006 02:48:57 by KarlB737
HP/US Realignment Of A/C Through Merger posted Mon Sep 11 2006 22:38:46 by Flyboy7974
Milton Dreams Of A US-AC Merger... posted Mon Sep 26 2005 23:35:16 by YULQC
What Wiill Happen In Case Of US-UAL Merger? posted Wed Jan 10 2001 23:01:31 by VivaGunners
Swarm Of Bees On US Airbus posted Mon Sep 25 2006 14:26:58 by UAL747
US Airways Merger Turbulence posted Sun Apr 2 2006 08:43:36 by JetBlueAUS
US/HA Merger Idea posted Wed Oct 26 2005 03:19:18 by HPRamper
US/HP Submit Merger Applications To DOT posted Sat Jul 9 2005 07:44:24 by A330323X
US Airline Merger Predictions posted Thu May 26 2005 10:49:55 by DeltaA380
US/BA Merger posted Mon Nov 24 2003 02:30:38 by Mlsrar