Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Airbus Hollers @ AirTran's Ear  
User currently offlineFirstClass! From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (14 years 3 months 3 weeks 5 days 18 hours ago) and read 1089 times:

One of my clients happened to be a new AirTran FO(Another 'once in a blue moon' instance) fresh from training and he had quite a few things to say about the FL fleet:

Confirmed:
-there has been confirmation that AirTran held a phone conversation w/ the people at Airbus. This came from a memo FL employees get.
-AirTran and Boeing have not been having a good relationship ever since the 717 debut. Part of this is that AirTran must use the TWA sim @ St. Louis and they charge- excuse me, rob FL every time FL uses it. Also, Boeing's interest for marketing the 717 have focused to Asia(where there's more money; keep in mind that Boeing sold the 717's to FL at a lower price)

Unconfirmed(FO's opinion):
-AirTran is looking for a medium haul aircraft that seats exactly as much as the current 717. (Obviously this would serve routes such as the ATL-LAX nonstop)
-AirTran may order a few more* 717's from the options OR
-Airbus could purchase all of AirTran's 717 and give AirTran a good number of Airbus narrowbodies (just like Boeing purchased the A340s for the 777s to Singapore in case you didn't remember). Quite frankly I think that would be the nastiest move Airbus could do to Boeing.

*=AirTran's exercising options expiration date is coming up. They currently have 50 on options.

2 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineAa737 From United States of America, joined Oct 1999, 849 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (14 years 3 months 3 weeks 5 days 18 hours ago) and read 1012 times:

Everything I have heard about AirTran and the 717 was good. I read from many places that they loved the planes.

User currently offlineD L X From United States of America, joined May 1999, 11269 posts, RR: 52
Reply 2, posted (14 years 3 months 3 weeks 5 days 16 hours ago) and read 980 times:

This sounds like posturing from Airtran to get Boeing to negotiate better fees or no fees at all from the 717 sim in STL.


Send me a PM at http://www.airliners.net/aviation-forums/sendmessage.main?from_username=NULL
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
AirTran - Boeing Vs Airbus A Government Decision? posted Sat Apr 10 2004 21:16:30 by ChiGB1973
AirTran's Airbus Vs 717s posted Wed Apr 30 2003 21:41:30 by Gnomon
AirTran To Begin IND-LAS posted Mon Aug 6 2007 16:37:26 by MrSTL
Boeing & Airbus Amalgamate ..Could It Happen? posted Thu Aug 2 2007 17:01:25 by NEMA
Future Of MidWest (without AirTran) posted Thu Aug 2 2007 16:56:43 by NW748i
Airbus Throttle Detents (video) posted Thu Aug 2 2007 05:24:40 by Lostturttle
Lounge For Airtran posted Wed Aug 1 2007 16:25:53 by EXAAUADL
Seattle PI: Airbus A350 Muscles In On The 777 posted Tue Jul 31 2007 19:54:27 by Douwd20
AirTran: New PBI-SWF Route posted Mon Jul 30 2007 21:32:09 by MAH4546
AirTran 717 Paint Schedule posted Sun Jul 29 2007 09:35:12 by BR715-A1-30