Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Raked Vs. Blended Wingtips  
User currently offlinePADSpot From Germany, joined Jan 2005, 1676 posts, RR: 5
Posted (9 years 2 months 3 weeks 3 days 2 hours ago) and read 2473 times:

I just asked myself if the recent switch that Boeing apparently made from promoting blended winglets to raked wingtips (see 777LR, P-8A concept etc) is purely caused be new aerodynamical insight or if it has more an economic reason. Namely that Boeing tries to circumvent the licenses Aviation Partners has got with its blended wingtips technology. Having its own technology should save Boeing some dollars with each airplane they sell.

I am looking forwards to your comments!

Cheers,
Jan

7 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineFutureFO From Ireland, joined Oct 2001, 3132 posts, RR: 21
Reply 1, posted (9 years 2 months 3 weeks 3 days 1 hour ago) and read 2444 times:

The wingtips on the 767-400 and the new 777's are called straked not raked. I actually like the design of the straked wingtips vs. the blended winglets.


Sean from MCO and MKE



I Don't know where I am anymore
User currently offlineTyphaerion From United States of America, joined Jun 2005, 619 posts, RR: 4
Reply 2, posted (9 years 2 months 3 weeks 2 days 22 hours ago) and read 2372 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

I have not yet been through enough aerodynamics to say for certain, but if I had to guess, the aerodynamic difference would be profound. The Blended Winglets do very well to reduce drag induced by wing-tip vorticies by changing the shape of the pressure transition around the wing tips. The "raked" wing-tips that Boeing is promoting with the 777-200LR and 777-300ER are designed to increase the lift the wing produces so as to require less power on takeoff and landing and reduce fuel consumption.

The difference is between lift increasing objects and drag reducing objects. A subtle difference, but that is my take on it. Most of the info I am using to support this came off the Boeing website. I did a search for "raked wingtips" The link is at the bottom. The rest came from my knowledge of blended winglets and their effects from my aerodynamic classes at Embry-Riddle.

So I dont think it was an economic issue, I just think that the winglets that would be required on the 777 would be so big as to have to massively increase the weight of the aircraft due to the materials required to support the wingtip. I would love to see the research behind this technology however. It would be fascinating.

Let me know if this helped any.

Boeing Website Search Results

Edited for content  Wink

[Edited 2005-06-27 16:33:13]


For some, the sky is the limit. For us, it is only the beginning... -- Jack Hunt
User currently offlineGigneil From United States of America, joined Nov 2002, 16347 posts, RR: 84
Reply 3, posted (9 years 2 months 3 weeks 2 days 22 hours ago) and read 2332 times:

This is the once weekly topic about this.

Lots of very good information exists in tech/ops and this forum about these devices.

N


User currently offlineRedFlyer From United States of America, joined Feb 2005, 4327 posts, RR: 28
Reply 4, posted (9 years 2 months 3 weeks 2 days 21 hours ago) and read 2305 times:

Quoting Typhaerion (Reply 2):
The difference is between lift increasing objects and drag reducing objects

Why doesn't someone look into adding raked wingtips to other a/c post-production instead of the winglets? I would think if the raked wingtips are more efficient by increasing lift they would be more desirable on the 737NG than the winglets.

Quoting Gigneil (Reply 3):
This is the once weekly topic about this.

Why are there some individuals who are so quick to point out that the topic has been discussed previously, rather than contribute something useful to the thread or, even better yet, just ignore it entirely and skip over it so the rest of us can enjoy it? What is the harm done that motivates some to spout off about how the topic has been discussed before?



My other home is a Piper Cherokee 180C
User currently offlineDAYflyer From United States of America, joined Sep 2004, 3807 posts, RR: 3
Reply 5, posted (9 years 2 months 3 weeks 2 days 21 hours ago) and read 2281 times:

I myself wonder if the 737 will ever see these wingtips as opposed to the blended winglets. Are they capable of being retrofitted to older airframes to improve efficiency as well?


One Nation Under God
User currently offlinePADSpot From Germany, joined Jan 2005, 1676 posts, RR: 5
Reply 6, posted (9 years 2 months 3 weeks 2 days 15 hours ago) and read 2134 times:

Thanks very much for your comment so far !

Quoting FutureFO (Reply 1):
The wingtips on the 767-400 and the new 777's are called straked not raked.

Well ... on its website and there in the 767-400ER article Boeing spells it "raked" wingtips. But I don't want to get into hairsplitting anyway ...

Quoting Typhaerion (Reply 2):
The "raked" wing-tips that Boeing is promoting with the 777-200LR and 777-300ER are designed to increase the lift the wing produces so as to require less power on takeoff and landing and reduce fuel consumption.

But especially with a long-hauler like a 777LR or 773ER take off and landing accounts for a extremely small portion of the whole flight. Following your argumentation blended wingtips should be better for such a plane then as they reduce drag for the entire flight ??!!

Quoting Gigneil (Reply 3):
This is the once weekly topic about this.

As my question was more about the managerial background of the introduction of the raked wingtip technology I thought it was better placed here.

So has nobody any suggestion as regards this? For my two cents the whole story is more about getting rid of Aviation Partners ... savings in license costs might only be a few ten thousand dollars or even a little more than 100.000 $, but a penny saved is a penny got ...

[Edited 2005-06-28 00:28:05]

User currently offlineDfwRevolution From United States of America, joined Jan 2010, 977 posts, RR: 51
Reply 7, posted (9 years 2 months 3 weeks 2 days 13 hours ago) and read 2077 times:

>> For my two cents the whole story is more about getting rid of Aviation Partners ... savings in license costs might only be a few ten thousand dollars or even a little more than 100.000 $, but a penny saved is a penny got ...

Nope, the advantages of raked wingtips are aerodynamic and structural, nothing to do with Aviation Partners.

You should heed Gigneil's advice, but here's the tip versus winglet nutshell:

They create virtually the same result, but wingtips do not require wing reinforcement as winglets do. When aircraft like the 744 and 737NG have winglets installed, wing reinforcements must be installed as well. This makes the airplane heavier for the same fuel savings effect. In a longhaul airplane, eliminating a few hundred pounds of additional weight is big savings.

Aircraft like the commercial 737NG are unlikely to ever have raked wingtips because they take up more gate space than blended winglets. This isn't so much a problem for large longhaul airplanes, but for small aircraft trying to fit into constrained gates, it is a major consideration.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Raked Wingtips Vs. Blended Winglets posted Wed Dec 6 2006 23:33:11 by Iloveboeing
Wingtips Or Raked Wings Preferred? posted Mon Dec 26 2005 07:22:17 by AirCanada014
Blended Wing Tips Vs Winglets posted Wed Apr 6 2005 20:14:16 by Kamboi
A320 Wing Fences Vs. B737 Blended Winglets? posted Sat Feb 1 2003 03:49:21 by N777UA
777-300ER Raked Wingtips? posted Tue Jun 11 2002 19:30:59 by Flight Level
Raked Wingtips For New 777 posted Mon Jan 28 2002 15:24:28 by Cruising
B787/Blended Wing Body Vs. Airbus posted Tue Jul 31 2001 00:53:33 by Ajax
Raked Winglets VS. Regular Winglets posted Tue Jan 9 2001 02:44:32 by DeltaAir
773LR To Have Raked Wingtips? posted Thu Oct 5 2000 22:38:16 by USAirways737
What Are Raked Wingtips? posted Sun Feb 20 2000 15:49:55 by A student