Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
LAX T6 Congestion  
User currently offlineFLY777UAL From United States of America, joined May 1999, 4512 posts, RR: 3
Posted (9 years 5 months 3 weeks 5 days 11 hours ago) and read 1829 times:

As I usually only use T6 in the evenings, I have yet to come across a time of congestion while going through security screening, and always pass through screening within three minutes of first stepping foot on the escalator.

Are there times in the morning or mid-day when the lines are long? It seems as if the carriers operating out of T6 (UA, CO, DL) don't really have any big "push" times and that the departing flights are well spread out throughout the day.

F L Y 7 7 7 U A L

9 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineLaxintl From United States of America, joined May 2000, 26150 posts, RR: 50
Reply 1, posted (9 years 5 months 3 weeks 5 days 11 hours ago) and read 1809 times:

Waits early morning and noonish can be longer.

The line to security has at times snaked down the stairs towards the ticket counters during peak travel days. The crowds can also be somewhat dependant on what flights UA & DL decided to gate at T-6 which varies from day to day.



From the desert to the sea, to all of Southern California
User currently offlineAADC10 From United States of America, joined Nov 2004, 2103 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (9 years 5 months 3 weeks 5 days 10 hours ago) and read 1790 times:

The security line at T6 seems to be longer in the mornings when the UA widebodies depart out of T6. Sometimes it is faster to go through security at T7, which is actually between T7 and T6.

User currently offlineCory6188 From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 2692 posts, RR: 5
Reply 3, posted (9 years 5 months 3 weeks 5 days 10 hours ago) and read 1778 times:

On January 3rd, 2004, on a CO flight departing for EWR at 10:30 AM, my family and I waited at least 45 minutes to even be allowed up the stairs to get to the main waiting line, and then another 40 minutes once we were up there. It was insane.

It has its moments, believe me.


User currently offlineWGW2707 From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 1197 posts, RR: 34
Reply 4, posted (9 years 5 months 3 weeks 5 days 10 hours ago) and read 1733 times:

Yes, that's right, in the morning T6 can definitely be a nightmare. I've stood in line there for ages a few times myself. That terminal is...interesting.

-WGW2707


User currently offlineCory6188 From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 2692 posts, RR: 5
Reply 5, posted (9 years 5 months 3 weeks 5 days 9 hours ago) and read 1676 times:

Interesting is being really generous...

It's a dump, to put it mildly. That terminal is stuck in the 70s and needs to be knocked down and rebuilt. Talk about a time warp to fly out of EWR's C-3 and land in LAX's T6.


User currently offlineFLY777UAL From United States of America, joined May 1999, 4512 posts, RR: 3
Reply 6, posted (9 years 5 months 3 weeks 5 days 9 hours ago) and read 1659 times:

Quoting Cory6188 (Reply 5):
That terminal is stuck in the 70s and needs to be knocked down and rebuilt.

Are they just waiting to find out what the go-ahead is going to be with the LAX Master Plan before proceeding with upgrades, or do UA, CO, and DL not care about the facility?

F L Y 7 7 7 U A L


User currently offlineLaxintl From United States of America, joined May 2000, 26150 posts, RR: 50
Reply 7, posted (9 years 5 months 3 weeks 5 days 8 hours ago) and read 1631 times:

Quoting FLY777UAL (Reply 6):
Are they just waiting to find out what the go-ahead is going to be with the LAX Master Plan before proceeding with upgrades, or do UA, CO, and DL not care about the facility?

The masterplan really does not have much to do with T-6.

The facility actually was somewhat upgraded already in the 1990s with UAs funding for a new lobby, and a federal inspection facility along with some required gate area modifications.
I doubt you'll see any additional upgrades as neither UA,CO,DL really have a major stake and would not get a good return on any investments.

The only way I could see T-6 receive a major facelift is to have its current tenants move out and have the city or a single new major tenant foot the bill for a significant redesign.



From the desert to the sea, to all of Southern California
User currently offlineJrlander From United States of America, joined Aug 1999, 1106 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (9 years 5 months 3 weeks 5 days 7 hours ago) and read 1573 times:

It is too bad that all Skyteam carriers can't take it over and make 5&6 a major facility. The American Skyteam members may not have the finances, but with a customs/immigration facility the combined terminals could make a nice facility for AF, KE and China Southern (as it enters the alliance).

User currently offlineLaxintl From United States of America, joined May 2000, 26150 posts, RR: 50
Reply 9, posted (9 years 5 months 3 weeks 5 days 3 hours ago) and read 1501 times:

Quoting Jrlander (Reply 8):
It is too bad that all Skyteam carriers can't take it over and make 5&6 a major facility. The American Skyteam members may not have the finances, but with a customs/immigration facility the combined terminals could make a nice facility for AF, KE and China Southern

I very doubt you would ever see Skyteam members colocated at LAX. While a T-5/6 option might be somewhat appealing, getting NWA away from terminal-2 is a nonstarter. The carrier is a partial owner of LAX-2 Corp (along with Air Canada and Hawaiian Air) which owns and manages terminal 2. NWA derives handsome revenue from its ownership stake in the facility via passenger fee's and facility rentals from all tenant airlines.
In addition DL's presence contines to weaken at LAX, while CO has been a relatively small player for many years.

Quoting FLY777UAL (Thread starter):
As I usually only use T6 in the evenings, I have yet to come across a time of congestion while going through security screening

Check out the TSA web site for expected wait times based on historical information. T-6 actually has some of the longer expected wait times amongst the various terminals at LAX.
http://waittime.tsa.dhs.gov/index.html



From the desert to the sea, to all of Southern California
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
How Long Has CO Been Using DL Gates At T6, LAX? posted Tue Jul 12 2005 11:17:24 by B-787
What Does The X In LAX Stand For? posted Sun Dec 10 2006 13:31:25 by RootsAir
LAX Runway Work Ahead Of Schedule posted Sat Dec 9 2006 18:20:00 by Laxintl
Mexicana Applies For Culiacan - LAX posted Sat Dec 9 2006 17:57:39 by Laxintl
6 QF 744 Aircraft At LAX Today posted Sat Dec 9 2006 05:12:49 by PA110
Air India Applied Codeshare With EVA To LAX/SFO posted Fri Dec 8 2006 19:56:35 by Jimyvr
40 MIN Enough At LAX For AA-UA. posted Fri Dec 8 2006 05:44:05 by Boston92
AA 169 LAX-NRT Question posted Wed Dec 6 2006 22:25:11 by BALAX
Air NZ Undersupplies LHR-LAX Route posted Tue Dec 5 2006 00:55:29 by Koruman
AC->QF: Bags Checked Through At LAX? posted Mon Dec 4 2006 22:04:21 by YVR99