Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Thai A346 Osaka-New York?  
User currently offlineSouthpaw8669 From United States of America, joined Nov 2003, 141 posts, RR: 7
Posted (9 years 5 months 2 weeks 5 days 10 hours ago) and read 3201 times:

Would anybody happen to know why Thai flew from Osaka to New York today?

Flt 790D

thanks


Eric


@southpawcapture
14 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineMEL From Canada, joined Oct 1999, 1100 posts, RR: 13
Reply 1, posted (9 years 5 months 2 weeks 5 days 9 hours ago) and read 3108 times:

Maybe subbing in for the A340-500 and thus requiring a fuel stop at Kansai?


NO URLS in signature
User currently offlineRJpieces From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (9 years 5 months 2 weeks 5 days 9 hours ago) and read 3048 times:

Perhaps it was a VIP flight.

User currently offlineSan747 From United States of America, joined Dec 2004, 4966 posts, RR: 12
Reply 3, posted (9 years 5 months 2 weeks 5 days 9 hours ago) and read 3000 times:

Quoting MEL (Reply 1):
Maybe subbing in for the A340-500 and thus requiring a fuel stop at Kansai?

That seems most likely... Would that be the first visit for a TG A346 at JFK then?



Scotty doesn't know...
User currently offlineArtBKK From Thailand, joined Mar 2005, 31 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (9 years 5 months 2 weeks 5 days 8 hours ago) and read 2930 times:

They had an engine problem which result in equipment switch to A346.

User currently offlineBkkair From Thailand, joined Aug 2001, 409 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (9 years 5 months 2 weeks 4 days 9 hours ago) and read 2479 times:

The return flight, TG791/06 Jul, an A346 made it from JFK-BKK non-stop in 16hours 31 minutes (16:31).

* OPERATIONAL FLIGHT INFO * TG 791 -2 WE 06JUL
CITY INFO HOUR (LOCAL)
JFK LEFT THE GATE 800P
TOOK OFF 858P
PLANE IS LATE (IN HOURS MINUTES) 0021
COMMERCIAL PUBLICITY / PASSENGER CONVENIENCE
PLANE IS LATE (IN HOURS MINUTES) 0009
LATE ARRIVAL OF AIRCRAFT
ESTIMATED TIME OF ARRIVAL 025A BKK
BKK AIRCRAFT LANDED 029A
ARRIVED 043A

* 1A PLANNED FLIGHT INFO * TG 791 -2 WE 06JUL ASM
APT ARR DY DEP DY CLASS/MEAL EQP GRND EFT TTL
JFK 730P WE CDJZUYBMHQT/M 346 17:10
KSVW/M
BKK 1140P TH 17:10


User currently offlineLGAtoIND From United States of America, joined Jan 2005, 490 posts, RR: 1
Reply 6, posted (9 years 5 months 2 weeks 4 days 8 hours ago) and read 2356 times:

Is there any regular scheduled KIX-JFK/EWR service? If the answer is no, then why not?

User currently offlineLUV4JFK From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 462 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (9 years 5 months 2 weeks 3 days 20 hours ago) and read 2120 times:

Northwest use to fly JFK-KIX-SYD many years ago three days a week. Why the route was stopped is beyond me. I guess not enough connecting passengers in New York as well as the fact that they still had a nonstop flight to NRT, which is a NW hub and obviously more convenient for connections in Japan and the rest of Asia. I was always hoping that JAL would launch that route from JFK, but I guess it won't happen.

LUV4JFK
 yes 



John F. Kennedy International Airport: Where America Greets The World.
User currently offlineDutchjet From Netherlands, joined Oct 2000, 7864 posts, RR: 56
Reply 8, posted (9 years 5 months 2 weeks 3 days 20 hours ago) and read 2105 times:

Quoting Bkkair (Reply 5):
The return flight, TG791/06 Jul, an A346 made it from JFK-BKK non-stop in 16hours 31 minutes (16:31).

I wonder if this is some kind of record....for example, the longest commercial flight by an A346. Isnt the CX JFK-HKG A346 flight the longest segment being flown by the A346??

Quoting LGAtoIND (Reply 6):
Is there any regular scheduled KIX-JFK/EWR service? If the answer is no, then why not?

There is not - I guess that since NYC-Japan is basically all about O&D traffic, there is not enough demand for a daily service which is what most premium pax demand; I do not think that a 3 or 4 times per week service would work.

As pointed out, NW did fly JFK-Osaka for a while - that flight was operated in connection with the continuing service to Australia which became a very big mess - there was a rather akward dispute over the number of pax boarding at Osaka and number of pax that originated in the US. The result was that NW dropped the JFK-Osaka flight and then pulled out of Australia altogether.

There was speculation that CO would launch a EWR-Osaka flight (to be followed by a IAH-Osaka route) with a 772 - this was many years ago during the very optimistic late 1990s period - obviously, it never happened. The subsequent downturn in air traffic brought those rumors to an end, and CO seems to have bypassed Osaka at the moment and has/will launch flights to HKG, Dehli and Bejing (and maybe Shanghai if it gets the authority) instead with repsect to Asian destinations.


User currently offlineGigneil From United States of America, joined Nov 2002, 16347 posts, RR: 85
Reply 9, posted (9 years 5 months 2 weeks 3 days 16 hours ago) and read 1922 times:

Quoting Bkkair (Reply 5):
The return flight, TG791/06 Jul, an A346 made it from JFK-BKK non-stop in 16hours 31 minutes (16:31).

That is positively back asswards. The plane should have had no trouble on the Eastbound segment, but should have hit headwinds on the return route.

N


User currently offlineAirbazar From United States of America, joined Sep 2003, 8658 posts, RR: 10
Reply 10, posted (9 years 5 months 2 weeks 3 days 16 hours ago) and read 1892 times:

Quoting Gigneil (Reply 9):
That is positively back asswards. The plane should have had no trouble on the Eastbound segment, but should have hit headwinds on the return route.

Uh? You should know better. Tail winds are Eastbound. It takes less time to fly US-Europe and Europe-SE Asia, than it does the other way around.


User currently offlineFoxBravo From United States of America, joined Nov 2003, 3008 posts, RR: 4
Reply 11, posted (9 years 5 months 2 weeks 3 days 15 hours ago) and read 1824 times:

Quoting Gigneil (Reply 9):

That is positively back asswards. The plane should have had no trouble on the Eastbound segment, but should have hit headwinds on the return route.

If you look on a polar map, BKK is pretty much directly opposite NYC on the globe--just like SQ's EWR-SIN flight, it's not a clear cut "eastbound vs. westbound" distinction (like a typical transatlantic/transpacific flight). My understanding is that both legs are often "eastbound" (from BKK over Japan and the Pacific to JFK, then from JFK over northern Europe back to BKK), or neither (on days when the winds aren't as helpful and it goes straight over the Pole). So, the more difficult leg depends more on winds, weather and loads than simply direction.

I could imagine a scenario where, taking off from steamy Bangkok with a heavy load and a weak jetstream over the Pacific, a fuel stop was required for BKK-JFK, whereas if the weather in NY was cooler (which it certainly is today!), the load lighter and the winds favorable over the Atlantic, a nonstop was possible. This is entirely speculation and I don't know the actual circumstances of these flights, but my point is that it's not impossible that the return could be done nonstop while the outbound required a stop.



Common sense is not so common. -Voltaire
User currently offlineAirbazar From United States of America, joined Sep 2003, 8658 posts, RR: 10
Reply 12, posted (9 years 5 months 2 weeks 3 days 15 hours ago) and read 1788 times:

The outbound flight is almost always over the Pacific and the return over the N.Atlantic. This is to take advantage of the winds. There was a thread recently about SQ substituting a 777 for the A345 in the near future, with a stop in Japan IIRC. Same reason.

User currently offlineGigneil From United States of America, joined Nov 2002, 16347 posts, RR: 85
Reply 13, posted (9 years 5 months 2 weeks 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 1755 times:

Quoting Airbazar (Reply 10):
Uh? You should know better. Tail winds are Eastbound. It takes less time to fly US-Europe and Europe-SE Asia, than it does the other way around.

Planes flying from Bangkok to the US are flying East, taking advantage of the winds. Duh.

Quoting FoxBravo (Reply 11):
I could imagine a scenario where, taking off from steamy Bangkok with a heavy load and a weak jetstream over the Pacific, a fuel stop was required for BKK-JFK, whereas if the weather in NY was cooler (which it certainly is today!), the load lighter and the winds favorable over the Atlantic, a nonstop was possible.

Yeah I could ponder such a circumstance as well, but still... the Atlantic route is so much farther that even with favorable winds a A346 should have had issues.

There could easily have been a weak jetstream over the Pacific... but I can't imagine winds being favorable enough to make the flight work over the Atlantic.

Quoting Airbazar (Reply 12):
There was a thread recently about SQ substituting a 777 for the A345 in the near future, with a stop in Japan IIRC.

Yes, Airbazar, the return has a stop. The outbound from Singapore does not, because the winds favor the Eastbound pacific crossing.

N


User currently offlineFoxBravo From United States of America, joined Nov 2003, 3008 posts, RR: 4
Reply 14, posted (9 years 5 months 2 weeks 3 days 11 hours ago) and read 1697 times:

Quoting Gigneil (Reply 13):
Yeah I could ponder such a circumstance as well, but still... the Atlantic route is so much farther that even with favorable winds a A346 should have had issues.

Actually, although the distances are similar, the Atlantic route is often a bit shorter. That's why the quickest connecting flights from JFK to BKK are usually via Europe (in particular, BA's daytime flight to LHR, connecting immediately to the evening QF codeshare to BKK), and why MH routes its 1-stop service between EWR and KUL via ARN. The connections via NRT tend to be more popular simply because NW and UA's hub operations there generally mean shorter layover times than in Europe, where flights often arrive from NY in the morning but leave for SE Asia in the evening.

To illustrate this, look at the Great Circle Mapper: http://tinyurl.com/dcxjw
JFK to BKK via ARN (which I picked arbitrarily as a northern European city) is only 9060 miles, whereas BKK to JFK via KIX is 9528 miles.



Common sense is not so common. -Voltaire
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Thai Airways Non-stop To New York posted Mon Oct 25 2004 20:12:32 by JBLUCREW
Thai To Fly To New York? posted Sat Sep 6 2003 17:54:43 by RoyalOrchid773
British Airways To Fly Cardiff - New York JFK? posted Mon Dec 4 2006 01:55:13 by 8herveg
SilverJet Announces New Service New York To London posted Tue Nov 28 2006 14:47:14 by Fll2993
Long-term Expansion Of Airports In New York City? posted Mon Oct 23 2006 05:47:53 by CoolGuy
Qantas' Sydney - New York JFK Flight...non-stop? posted Mon Oct 23 2006 02:03:03 by 8herveg
Aerolíneas Argentinas Non Stop To New York posted Sat Oct 14 2006 14:13:41 by Cedars747
Luton To New York (EWR) - Here We Come! posted Thu Oct 12 2006 22:52:09 by Gilesdavies
Emirates To Fly Hamburg To New York posted Thu Oct 12 2006 16:48:34 by Semsem
New York's Concorde Searching For A New Home posted Mon Oct 2 2006 04:05:07 by FlyingTexan