Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
How About A Country Prefix Re-assignment  
User currently offlineBirdwatching From Germany, joined Sep 2003, 3836 posts, RR: 51
Posted (9 years 5 months 2 weeks 3 days 10 hours ago) and read 2274 times:

Country prefixes - the situation today:

1) Many different formats exist, e.g. D-ABYY, N169DZ, HP-1525CMP, etc.

2) Country prefixes do not logically represent their countries (EC = Ecuador? - Spain; N=USA=why? TF=Iceland=why? and so on.)

Wouldn't a standardization to ISO country codes, followed by four letters, solve a whole lot of confusion?

For example, a plane that was formerly registered D-ABVA would become DE-ABVA. No big deal.
All US planes would be US-XXXX, where they could do the first two letters according to the airline (US-AAXX for an AA plane), which would give them 676 slots before they need a second one)
Ireland planes would become like IE-ALAX for example. (taking EI-LAX as an example).
UK planes would be like GB-BDXG where it was G-BDXD before.

What do you think about this?

Here's a link to the ISO standardized country codes:
http://www.iso.org/iso/en/prods-serv...2iso-3166-code-lists/list-en1.html


All the things you probably hate about travelling are warm reminders that I'm home
8 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineBHXFAOTIPYYC From Portugal, joined Jun 2005, 1644 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (9 years 5 months 2 weeks 3 days 9 hours ago) and read 2243 times:

To be honest I think there is too much standardisation in the world as it is. I like seeing miles / pints etc in England and the US. I was very disappointed to arrive at Karachi's new Jinnah international airport and see the golden arches of MacDonalds as I walked outside.

I have no idea why CS for Portuguese registered a/c



Breakfast in BHX, lunch in FAO, dinner in TIP, baggage in YYC.
User currently offlineVH-KCT* From Australia, joined May 2001, 479 posts, RR: 2
Reply 2, posted (9 years 5 months 2 weeks 3 days 9 hours ago) and read 2231 times:

I think that while it's a nice idea, standardisation should be concentrated on matters of safety rather than cosmetics.

Also for callsigns (in Australia at least) the prefixes for Australian aircraft are omitted in RT, so changing to AU-XYZ would make no difference other than the expense of repainting a few thousand aircraft, and printing a whole lot of new CORs.



I am The Stig
User currently offline727EMflyer From United States of America, joined Mar 2005, 547 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (9 years 5 months 2 weeks 3 days 9 hours ago) and read 2198 times:

The system is in place. It works. Don't need to fix it. And it would cost a lot of folks a lot of money to do it. Aviation is expensive enough as it is!

User currently offlineBirdwatching From Germany, joined Sep 2003, 3836 posts, RR: 51
Reply 4, posted (9 years 5 months 2 weeks 3 days 3 hours ago) and read 2088 times:

I don't think it would be that expensive. The new regs could be stickers until the planes are due to be re-painted anyway. The rest is mostly inside the computers.


All the things you probably hate about travelling are warm reminders that I'm home
User currently offlineKilljoy From Finland, joined Dec 1999, 646 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (9 years 5 months 2 weeks 3 days 1 hour ago) and read 2045 times:

The country prefixes may not be standardized by ISO, but they are, however, standardized by ITU. See this list.

User currently offlineStarlionblue From Greenland, joined Feb 2004, 17174 posts, RR: 66
Reply 6, posted (9 years 5 months 2 weeks 3 days ago) and read 2024 times:

Quoting Birdwatching (Thread starter):
Ireland planes would become like IE-ALAX for example. (taking EI-LAX as an example).

You're forgetting that Ireland is actually "Eire", which makes EI perfectly logical.

As for the rest, it would be a lot of bureaucratic effort (your tax money at work) for very little benefit. I'm not saying it's hard to do technically but the political wrangling and the changing of software would take forever.



"There are no stupid questions, but there are a lot of inquisitive idiots."
User currently offlineIakobos From Belgium, joined Aug 2003, 3316 posts, RR: 34
Reply 7, posted (9 years 5 months 2 weeks 3 days ago) and read 2011 times:

Quoting Birdwatching (Thread starter):
Wouldn't a standardization to ISO country codes, followed by four letters, solve a whole lot of confusion?

Sorry but there is no confusion, except perhaps for the lazy, the uninformed, the casual observer...and even if there was it is quite safe to think that the task would be of gigantic proportions.
The registration of the aircraft is no number plate, it is (also) the call sign of the aeronautical (radio) station and as such follows the ITU country coding.
The same applies (in principle) to every single registered wireless transmitter in all services, fixed and mobile terrestrial, maritime and aeronautical; civilm and military.
We are talking in the millions, many millions.


User currently offlineKukkudrill From Malta, joined Dec 2004, 1123 posts, RR: 4
Reply 8, posted (9 years 5 months 2 weeks 3 days ago) and read 1993 times:

Quoting Birdwatching (Thread starter):
Wouldn't a standardization to ISO country codes, followed by four letters, solve a whole lot of confusion?

I've been thinking much the same thing. The ISO codes are more logically organised than the ITU system and they are much more widely known thanks to e-mail and internet. But I don't see it happening.



Make the most of the available light ... a lesson of photography that applies to life
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
How About Your Country? posted Wed Aug 15 2001 22:41:43 by SQ325
Nice TK 332 Interiors, How About 340s? posted Tue Oct 3 2006 03:11:56 by TK787
How About This View... posted Thu May 25 2006 09:17:06 by DL Widget Head
How About Some Odd Flight Delays?... posted Tue May 23 2006 17:01:36 by Ulfinator
How About A Non-military C17 posted Sun Feb 5 2006 18:47:01 by Flybynight
Forget Retro Jets: How About Retro Flights? posted Mon Jan 30 2006 00:15:40 by Matt D
How About Reverse Engineering An US Airline? posted Sat Jan 21 2006 05:16:55 by Malaysia
PDX Area A.netters: How About A Meet? posted Fri Dec 23 2005 21:10:38 by S12PPL
How About A Classic Airline Or Flying Museum? posted Fri Jul 1 2005 16:44:51 by JAM747
How About A Windowless Airliner? posted Tue May 10 2005 23:32:24 by Birdwatching