Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Difficult Landings For Pilots  
User currently offlineMjb69 From United States of America, joined May 2000, 32 posts, RR: 0
Posted (14 years 5 months 2 weeks 4 days 8 hours ago) and read 5264 times:

Does anyone know which airports have the most difficult (challenging) landings for pilots, both in th US and abroad?

I'd imagine LGA is fairly tough.

Mjb69

13 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineBig777jet From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (14 years 5 months 2 weeks 4 days 5 hours ago) and read 5116 times:

The most difficult landings is at Washington Reagan National Airport. The approach make turn right into RWY 19 along Potmac River. Also, Orange County AIrport is in Santa Ana, Cailfornia (SNA) is the shortest runway (5,700FT) to landing on the meduim aircraft handles 757 and A320 everyday. Also, most difficult to land at Dutch Harbor, Alaska has 3,900 FT with a Alaska's 737-200 everyday. A little bit quite difficult in Burbank airport is too narrow taxiway along the runway.



User currently offlineAaron atp From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 533 posts, RR: 2
Reply 2, posted (14 years 5 months 2 weeks 4 days 4 hours ago) and read 5089 times:

Telluride, Colorado.

gusty winds and low vis; maybe not the most difficult, but if you go missed you'll be counting beads (if you're catholic that is)



aaron


User currently offlineL-188 From United States of America, joined Jul 1999, 29802 posts, RR: 58
Reply 3, posted (14 years 5 months 2 weeks 4 days 2 hours ago) and read 5095 times:

Boy I was going to mention Dutch but somebody beat me too it!!!!

I actually flew in there once on a 737, Markair not Alaska.....It was....Shall we say interesting....

We should mention the approach into Juneau AK. as being particually challenging to do also....You are flying on instruments into a fjord basicly.



OBAMA-WORST PRESIDENT EVER....Even SKOORB would be better.
User currently offlineL-188 From United States of America, joined Jul 1999, 29802 posts, RR: 58
Reply 4, posted (14 years 5 months 2 weeks 4 days 2 hours ago) and read 5084 times:

I forgot to mention that Dutch Harbor is 3900' now......It was quite a bit shorter and unpaved when the 737 ops first began.

These two shots are of Dutch Today and are from the FAA......I should mention the weather is not usually as nice as it is in that picture. The third one is a shot of the original airstrip that was taken during the war.....Hard to belive that the Navy flew PBY's out of it. That curve in the runway isn't an optical illusion...I got that photo via the National Archives










OBAMA-WORST PRESIDENT EVER....Even SKOORB would be better.
User currently offlineJohn From United States of America, joined Sep 1999, 1374 posts, RR: 5
Reply 5, posted (14 years 5 months 2 weeks 3 days 20 hours ago) and read 5030 times:

This fascinates me! How can a 737 possibly operate safely from a 3900ft runway! That is so absurd! I can imagine the breaking and FULL REVERSE THRUSTERS, as soon as the wheels touch down at Dutch Harbor. Does the FAA have a special exemption for the 737-200 to land on this runway? Alaska's 737 MUST be equipped with special breaks, I would imagine. Any one care to comment any further on this subject. How about some AS pilots out there? Thanks.

User currently offlineGoooooaaal From United States of America, joined Apr 2000, 87 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (14 years 5 months 2 weeks 3 days 18 hours ago) and read 5003 times:

Alaska Airlines operates 737s into some of the toughest airports in the U.S. and the World!

Ketchikan, Sitka, Juneau!
The Juneau approach in particuar is a thriller!

And according to FAA computer models, the "Lemon Creek" takeoff at Juneau is a crash and burn every time, yet AS crew do it every day!



User currently offlineL-188 From United States of America, joined Jul 1999, 29802 posts, RR: 58
Reply 7, posted (14 years 5 months 2 weeks 3 days 16 hours ago) and read 4997 times:

Only the -200 models make the Dutch run. Yes you do get thrown forward in your seat pretty roughly.

There aren't any changes to the brakes.....They just use them really hard....But still the problems isn't getting the aircraft in...It is getting it out again. The 737 is limited to a 98,000lb takeoff weight, Normally they weight closer to 130.000 lbs for takeoff.....Is they any 37 drivers that can give a better number out there.

I don't have any good photo imaging equiptment but it looks like there is an AK 737 in the two color shots on the middle one there appears to be an aircraft parked on the near edge of the ramp....Right next to the passenger terminal. It looks white so it could be a NAC DC-6 but their building is about two buildings over.....Any tech wiz with a good image enhansing program want to take a shot at identifing the aircraft????



OBAMA-WORST PRESIDENT EVER....Even SKOORB would be better.
User currently offlineL1011 From United States of America, joined May 1999, 1675 posts, RR: 9
Reply 8, posted (14 years 5 months 2 weeks 3 days 12 hours ago) and read 4977 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

I have landed and taken off at Dutch Harbor in Lockheed Electras, and it seemed that the instant we touched down, the props went into full reverse. I thought something was wrong. Do you see that island in the water in the top picture that is in line with the approach end of the runway? It sticks up, and I thought we were going to clip it on final approach. And on takeoff, we banked to the right in a sharp turn almost immediately after we broke ground. I was almost afraid to look out the window, because I was sure I would see the wingtip strike the ground. But we made it. It was one of my most heart-stopping landings and takeoffs.

Bob Bradley
Richmond, VA



Fly Eastern's Golden Falcon DC-7B
User currently offlineBig777jet From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 9, posted (14 years 5 months 2 weeks 3 days 10 hours ago) and read 4964 times:

Ahh, I forgot you mentioned that Telluride, Colorado if missed approach too Bad!!. But the most dangerous missed approach is in Cape Newenham, Alaska. You cannot use miss approach RWY 14. The runway elevation is 230 feet touchdown you landing rolling went uphill end of runway 32 elevation is 541 feet. That's a scary to death hit the mountain if you are really miss runway!! :[] Oh boy!!!

User currently offlineATRpilot From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 10, posted (14 years 5 months 2 weeks 3 days 9 hours ago) and read 4953 times:

Dutch Harbor....

Oh Wow.

Thats one pilots comment!


User currently offlineJohn From United States of America, joined Sep 1999, 1374 posts, RR: 5
Reply 11, posted (14 years 5 months 2 weeks 3 days 6 hours ago) and read 4935 times:

The only other airport, I can think of, in the world, that has a simiiar VERY SHORT runway is London's LCY. They accept jets, but only the BAE/Avro RJ's, as far as I know. These aircraft are specifically designed for that type of runway, however. But a 737, come on! Must be like landing on an aircraft carrier, at Dutch Harbor. Hell, some general aviation airports have runways longer than that, for pete's sake! Boca Raton, FL has 5000ft, but only limited to private jets, such as Gulfstreams or Citations.

User currently offlineL-188 From United States of America, joined Jul 1999, 29802 posts, RR: 58
Reply 12, posted (14 years 5 months 2 weeks 3 days 2 hours ago) and read 4911 times:

Well since we are talking about dangerous approaches and somebody else came up with Cape Newenham, I figured a few pictures is needed to show that airport too. It should be noted that Cape Newenham is a military strip to support a DEW line station.

The First Photo is by Don Bowers. It is from the Firebirds website These nuts flew ski equipted C-130's up here and on the Greenland ice pack for a number of years. Note the radar domes of the base on the upper right hand peak.




This photo is also from the Firebirds website. It is by Roy Jared and is taken from the right seat of a C-130 landing at Cape Newenham.






I don't have any pictures of it but my understanding that the landing strip at Sparrevohn LRRS is even more exciting.



OBAMA-WORST PRESIDENT EVER....Even SKOORB would be better.
User currently offlineL-188 From United States of America, joined Jul 1999, 29802 posts, RR: 58
Reply 13, posted (14 years 5 months 2 weeks 3 days 2 hours ago) and read 4903 times:

Sorry I should have given you the link for the firebirds website

www.firebirds.org



OBAMA-WORST PRESIDENT EVER....Even SKOORB would be better.
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Flyforbeans.com Looking For Pilots posted Fri Jul 27 2007 13:30:21 by Levent
Country With Most Opportunities For Pilots posted Fri Jan 26 2007 19:01:09 by Detroitflyer
What Is The European Job Market For Pilots Like? posted Sat Nov 25 2006 02:42:57 by JAM747
World Record Attempt For Pilots posted Sun Nov 5 2006 16:26:37 by BMIFlyer
Question For Pilots Of Different Aircraft posted Tue Sep 19 2006 07:02:09 by QXatFAT
New Spanish LCC Catair Looking For Pilots! posted Mon Jun 12 2006 00:33:38 by EUROBUS
Dress Code For Pilots posted Wed Mar 15 2006 00:58:05 by Scalebuilder
Aircraft Ratings For Pilots posted Thu Feb 9 2006 01:23:50 by Fvyfireman
The Carmen Systems For Pilots posted Sun Jan 8 2006 12:54:29 by FJWH
Delta Pay Cut Deal A Rare Win For Pilots posted Mon Dec 12 2005 23:18:03 by Sunking737