Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Lack Of Competition Between Legacy Carriers  
User currently offlineCory6188 From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 2686 posts, RR: 5
Posted (9 years 2 months 1 week 1 day 19 hours ago) and read 2228 times:

B6's recent announcement that they're planning on starting EWR service had me wondering...

Why do the legacy carriers never try to encroach upon each other's territory. Clearly, at least in hub cities, there are travelers with loyalty to a certain airline, but that hasn't stopped any of the LCCs from trying to move in.

For example, why hasn't CO tried to move into MIA? Or AA try to gain a foothold in DTW? Etc, etc.

It might seem like a stupid question, but I really became more curious the more I thought about it, especially considering that all of the LCCs have no qualms about diving into a legacy carrier's fortress hub.

Is there some sort of gentleman's agreement between the Big Six that keeps them from competing on the same routes and cities, or is there some other force at work here?

I would love to hear your opinions.

[Edited 2005-07-13 01:58:00]

5 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineDtwclipper From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (9 years 2 months 1 week 1 day 19 hours ago) and read 2221 times:

Quoting Cory6188 (Thread starter):

Is there some sort of gentleman's agreement between the Big Six that keeps them from competing on the same routes and cities, or is there some other force at work here?

They are already competing on the same routes. The hub system allows them to create city pairs, such as GRR-SYR, AA through ORD, NW through DTW, CO through CLE etc.

There is no need to encroach on some one elses HUB when you already have the the facilities


User currently offlinePSU.DTW.SCE From United States of America, joined Jan 2002, 7591 posts, RR: 27
Reply 2, posted (9 years 2 months 1 week 1 day 18 hours ago) and read 2196 times:

The reason being, that many of these routes from hub cities can't exist solely on O&D, specifically with the aircraft sizes and frequencies that they offer. For example, AA could ever operate DTW-SYR with any sort of stand alone O&D, if they were lucky, at best 1 ERJ a day. Our national transportation network wouldn't be able to provide the air service levels to many small and mid-sized communities without the hub cities and the large operations in key markets that ensues.

User currently offlineDtwclipper From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (9 years 2 months 1 week 1 day 18 hours ago) and read 2187 times:

Quoting DTW.SCE" class=quote target=_blank>PSU.DTW.SCE (Reply 2):
The reason being, that many of these routes from hub cities can't exist solely on O&D, specifically with the aircraft sizes and frequencies that they offer

I guess I should have gone further into detail, but you are absolutly right.

There is no way for example, that DTW could support 2X DTW-FRA, 2X DTW-CDG, 2XDTW-NRT, let alone KIX and what is it now 4X DTW-AMS. It's all hub traffic.


User currently offline1MillionFlyer From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (9 years 2 months 1 week 1 day 18 hours ago) and read 2168 times:

At least in the case of CO/NW/DL they are part of Skyteam and code share which really allows them to share some of the costs of those big hubs.

User currently offlineDutchjet From Netherlands, joined Oct 2000, 7864 posts, RR: 57
Reply 5, posted (9 years 2 months 1 week 1 day 18 hours ago) and read 2175 times:

It complicated, as far as the legacy carriers are concerned, its all about hubs and connections - each legacy carrier can get you from Boston to Los Angeles, for example, some will do it nonstop, others via hubs located throughout the US. Thus, they are all competing. The other side of the story is that there is limited competition at the specific hub cities - CO dominates at EWR, AA at DFW, etc. Legacy carriers do compete on specific routes - but the overall view is that as long as any of the legacy carriers can move you from one city in the US to another, the airlines are competing - look at the route network instead of the routes. Airlines dont invade eachothers hub because it usually sets off an expensive and needless fare war - and to be honest, there are enough hubs in the USA airline system.

LCCs are less hub oriented and move in on specific routes, JetBlue for example is big on the NYC-Florida market and competes with the legacies and LCCs.....one of the biggest complaints concerning LCCs is that they only target high demand routes: JetBlue is great if you are travelling from JFK to FLL, but they are of little help if you are flying from Charleston to Boise or from Austin to Portland. Legacy carriers claim this is partly why there costs are be higher - they provide more comprehensive service and dont simply pick and chose the highest demand routes.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Future Of US Legacy Carriers Post-new Threats posted Fri Aug 11 2006 15:57:30 by B777A340Fan
Unadvertised Benefits Of The Legacy Carriers posted Sat Dec 24 2005 02:21:13 by Cory6188
Sum Up The Future Of US Legacy Carriers posted Sun Sep 18 2005 02:43:35 by Afrikaskyes
Legacy Carriers Defense Of Fortress Hubs posted Tue Jul 19 2005 22:55:02 by Apodino
A Complete List Of The Benefits Of Legacy Carriers posted Thu Mar 10 2005 06:52:42 by UnitedStarGold
Future Of Legacy Carriers- Article posted Sat Dec 27 2003 00:37:31 by SWAbubba
American Eagle Service (lack Of) posted Sat Nov 25 2006 07:32:37 by Pilotdude09
Lack Of Star Alliance In Oz Domestic Routes! posted Mon Nov 6 2006 06:36:01 by ThaiA345
767 With RR Engines - Why The Lack Of Orders? posted Mon Sep 25 2006 00:06:13 by 1337Delta764
Athens - Lack Of Low Cost Flight posted Thu Aug 31 2006 13:49:08 by Britannia191A