Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
User currently offlineAAFlyer From United States of America, joined May 2000, 24 posts, RR: 0
Posted (16 years 2 weeks 6 days 12 hours ago) and read 2620 times:

Im going to be taking a trip to NRT in December and my options of getting there are either American or Continental. I would like to know what people thought about AA and CO's international services. The routes I was looking at are BUF-EWR-NRT on CO or BUF-ORD-NRT. I would like to know everyones opinion... especially those who have flown on AA or CO's intl routes.

Thank you!

18 replies: All unread, jump to last
User currently offlineUal747 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (16 years 2 weeks 6 days 11 hours ago) and read 2506 times:

I have flown AA from OKC-DFW-NRT twice and I must say that the service was excellent. The 777's are wonderful, especially if you are sitting on the side with a window or aisle. The international service is great. We had sushi, with other Japanese dishes, and then they gave us a box of chocolates that said, "International Flagship Service." It was very impressive. I have also heard good things about Continental, but can't comment on them since I haven't flown on the internationally. Oh, by the way, the AA flight attendants on the DFW-NRT trip were HOT! There was one especially who said she was half-hawaiian and she was the translator. OH MY GOD!! Well, just thought I'd let you know. It's nice to have something to look at for the 13 hour trip from DFW. As far as entertainment goes, it is pretty decent. There are around 20 channels on the PTV's, one being the airshow, and I think there are 2 different movies playing continuously throughout the flight so you can watch them anytime you want to. It was really a great flight and once you are at cruising altitude, those big RR engines whine down to a soft purr, and the ride is very smooth and quiet. There are some people that will say that the 777 is a lot louder than the A340, but I didn't think so at all. And I know that people bitch about the 2-5-2 seating, but the cabin seems much more airy and open than the A340, not to mention more attractive and modern. Have a great trip and enjoy Japan. It is a wonderful country with wonderful people who go out of their way to make sure you are a satisfied visitor. I love it there.

User currently offlineNYC-AIR From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 196 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (16 years 2 weeks 6 days 3 hours ago) and read 2468 times:

I can't comment on AA since the last time a flew them internationally was 6 years ago flying JFK-LHR, although I remember it being a good flight on a 763. I did fly CO EWR-CDG and back last summer and had two great flights on their 777s. I am a big fan of CO and a big fan of their operation at EWR. Their 777s are excelent and they have chosen the 3-3-3 seating which some find more comfortable than 2-5-2. The PTVs are great!! I'm sure you will have a great flight no matter who you choose! If you choose CO you can count on a good flight!


User currently offlineTrvlr From United States of America, joined Feb 2000, 4430 posts, RR: 19
Reply 3, posted (16 years 2 weeks 6 days 3 hours ago) and read 2458 times:

You will probably have the same experience on either airline but it will be better than most because of the fact that they use 777s. A few Japanese publications ranked Continental as the best foreign airline to go to Japan, if that helps any. If you want to space your trip out, though (east-coast to NRT is a long way!!), maybe you should try the minutely shorter AA trip from ORD.

Aaron G.

User currently offlineCALPilot From United States of America, joined Oct 1999, 1002 posts, RR: 13
Reply 4, posted (16 years 2 weeks 6 days 2 hours ago) and read 2446 times:

I'm sorry I can not comment on the service on AA. All I can say is look at the facts. We have won almost every award for service the past 4yrs both domestic, and internationlly. The size of American Airlines says that they know what they are doing also,and I'm sure it is nothing to laugh at; however, NRT flight is one of our most visiable flights and we run it very well from what I see. One last thing is , if you chose coach, or business class, I think you will like the 3-3-3 CO in back much more than 2-5-2 at AA; plus the Buss. seats on CO have all the same extras as almost every airline is using with these seats. Thank you for your consideration in CO.


User currently offlineBacardi182 From United States of America, joined Jan 2000, 1091 posts, RR: 1
Reply 5, posted (16 years 2 weeks 6 days 1 hour ago) and read 2420 times:

i recomend going with the airline that you always fly with because your flight is going to get you allot of miles. My dad gained executive platinum status by flying dfw-nrt a few times

User currently offlineTexairport From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 6, posted (16 years 2 weeks 6 days 1 hour ago) and read 2411 times:

Serving Heathrow means having prestige as an international airline, bottom line. Unless you are a plane spotter, Gatwick is a better airport, easier to get to and less crowded. The US carriers feel they need this prestige to be a player in the international market. Even AA (UA didn't fly to London) felt like stepchildren because of PA and TW when they had Heathrow services.

User currently offlineBlink182 From United States of America, joined Oct 1999, 5499 posts, RR: 14
Reply 7, posted (16 years 2 weeks 6 days ago) and read 2405 times:

i would recommend AA even though i haven't flown continental international. I flew ord-zrh on AA buissness class on a 763 and even with out the extended legroom, i still found the legroom to be a very generous amount, the seats were very stylish and comfortable and reclined 150 degrees and i slept very well on that flight. and the menu was all gourmet and the service was very generous and I would recommend AA internationally to anyone who asks me. go with AA

Give me a break, I created this username when I was a kid...
User currently offlineAAFlyer From United States of America, joined May 2000, 24 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (16 years 2 weeks 5 days 20 hours ago) and read 2387 times:

Thanks for your opinions!
I normally flew Delta to NRT when I lived at PDX. but now im either switching to AA or CO.


User currently offlineNYC-AIR From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 196 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (16 years 2 weeks 5 days 19 hours ago) and read 2384 times:

CALPilot makes a very good point about the EWR-NRT being one of CO's most visible flights. I remember a while back they had radio advertisements here in NYC specifically for that flight. CO probably puts a lot into it because it is quite new and CO had to try to get the customers in NYC who were loyal to JAL, NW, UA, and ANA as they all fly from JFK. AA's ORD-NRT flight is just another one of AA's many flights. Fly CO!!

Please tell us when you make a reservation.

User currently offlineAirNondo From Moldova, joined May 2000, 241 posts, RR: 1
Reply 10, posted (16 years 2 weeks 5 days 14 hours ago) and read 2358 times:


Just curious, being that you have flown the PDX-NRT route on delta, what you think of it?

User currently offlineAAFlyer From United States of America, joined May 2000, 24 posts, RR: 0
Reply 11, posted (16 years 2 weeks 5 days 12 hours ago) and read 2354 times:

about the DL PDX-NRT service. The service was overal good. They fly MD-11's on that particular route. The seating in economy is 2-5-2. I would recommend getting a seat on teh window side, I've been stuck in the middle row of 5 and found it to be the most uncomfortable espeically for a flight of that length. The movies played in economy aren't that great. 30 minutes after take off they'll show you a sitcom.. either friends, home improvement, wil and grace or seinfeld.. later on they'll show 1 late run movie and then after that it's pure crap.. either films from the 80's and some lame short films.. you'll get served drinks once you reach the cruising altitude.. of about 33,000 to 35,000 ft. Shortly after that you'll get served lunch, since the flight departs around lunch time.. The meals are usually your typical beef, chicken and sometimes they offer japanese selections. Leg room is generous if you're lucky enough to get seat 30.. which is hte first row of seats in the main economy cabin.. the rest of hte sears are tight on legroom that's if you're tall.. in my case im only 5'9" and don't mind it. Last december I flew to NRT and used my miles to upgrade to business elite and got seat 1a.. which is merely feet from teh cockpit. The service in bus elite is excellent! They offered us a choice of orange juice or champagne before take off and we also got bottled water before we took off as well.. Like all busness/first class services on other airlines, you'll recieve the typical amentites kit, which includes: a toothbrush, toothpaste, mouthwash, kleenex, ear plugs, do not disturb stickers, lotion, socks, and a blind fold.. The seats in bus elite were very comfortable.. and they went back far enough for you to enjoy a good nap on the trip.. the food services were good. They start out with a snack of roasted nuts, which was nice and warmed up.. you get drinks offered allll hte time through out the flight. They will refill it for you as often as you'd like. I thought they were generous with the amoutn of drinks offered. The lead FA usually caters to all bus elite passengers. They call you mr. name, ms name. etc.. very polite.. You get 2 menues.. 1 has a selection of meals.. which I should've kept, but I left it on the plane.. and a 2nd menu with a big selection of wines and spirits. They offer you a ton of different appetizers.. such as sushi, rolls, salads. etc.. and then onto the main entrie.. they serve it to you by first placing a table cloth, and placing everything onto your table neatly.. after your meal you're then offered more drinks.. The bus elite was far better than other business classes that i've expericesed with Northwest and Korean Air. Well if there is anything else you'd like to know post it here and i'll get back to you..


User currently offlineAAFlyer From United States of America, joined May 2000, 24 posts, RR: 0
Reply 12, posted (16 years 2 weeks 5 days 12 hours ago) and read 2351 times:

Thank you everyone!
I will get back to you guys on what I choose.. I will probaly make the reservations this summer.. I am leaning a little more towards continental.. as they have partnerships with northwest. I've heard many good things about continental and appreciate everyones comments on CO and AA.


User currently offlineAirNondo From Moldova, joined May 2000, 241 posts, RR: 1
Reply 13, posted (16 years 2 weeks 4 days 22 hours ago) and read 2340 times:

Thanks AAFlyer, I've heard similar views about pdx-nrt from others. I'd like to get over to tokyo sometime, though it takes a little more planning than other vacations.

Just curious, if you don't mind me asking, do you usually go to japan just for pleasure, or business, or family? I'm always interested in travel tips, etc.

Thanks, Mario

User currently offlineGoooooaaal From United States of America, joined Apr 2000, 87 posts, RR: 0
Reply 14, posted (16 years 2 weeks 4 days 22 hours ago) and read 2331 times:

I don't know about service to Japan, but I do fly frequently to Bogota as my wife is Colombian. CO and AA are the only two U.S. airlines currently serving Colombia and I fly both depending on cheapest airfare and flight availability.

AA flights are consistent. No frills, they get you there safetly, efficiently, relative comfort and on time more or less. AA uses B757 and A300-600 which is comfortable for these flights.
CO service is better to me because the entire staff seems to value your business more in comparison to AA who doesn't even seem to notice you are there. However, because CO has fewer flights, delays can be a problem. I spent one long, cold night in Newark waiting for connection to Boston, and also flying IAH-BOG in a 737 is not the most comfortable thing.

My first choice would be CO because of the little extras in service. I am sure that will make a difference in the very long flight between East Coast and Japan...

User currently offlineAAFlyer From United States of America, joined May 2000, 24 posts, RR: 0
Reply 15, posted (16 years 2 weeks 4 days 17 hours ago) and read 2314 times:

I usually go to NRT for pleasure.. not business as im only in unversity right now. I also visit family, but in SEL.. which is a short flight from NRT. I usually take about 3-5 trips to NRT per year. I always look for new routes to NRT. I've flown on Northwest, United, and Delta to NRT and im intersted in flying AA or CO. I would fly USAir if they were awarded a route to NRT.


User currently offlineN503JB From Hong Kong, joined May 2000, 306 posts, RR: 2
Reply 16, posted (16 years 2 weeks 4 days 4 hours ago) and read 2295 times:

I have flown AA from NRT-SJC, SEA, DFW and SEA-NRT twice. I loved the service as they did. The MD-11 and B777 are great. I am going to take the other trip from ORD-NRT at the end of May. I must say AA is the best airline in the American. Even though the stuffs who was badly to me from ticket office and advantage department.

HKIA Ramp Spotters
User currently offlinePANAMAN From United States of America, joined Sep 1999, 439 posts, RR: 0
Reply 17, posted (16 years 2 weeks 4 days 3 hours ago) and read 2287 times:

Honestly, I'd consider flying UA via ORD to get on a 744. I have flown on 777's of UA and BA, and they are extremely nice, but I have yet to get on a 744. I would think that that would be the best aircraft for long trans-pacific flights. But both AA and CO offer great servive. Enjoy!


Sorry I moved from SXM, looking for a new house on Anguilla now!
User currently offlineAAFlyer From United States of America, joined May 2000, 24 posts, RR: 0
Reply 18, posted (16 years 2 weeks 4 days ago) and read 2271 times:

I would not consider UAL as I haven't heard anything good about United. They lost my dads luggage on an international flight last year and they also lost my dads friends luggage too. I prefer American and Continental over UAL. I've flown on lots of different aircrafts including the 744-400. I prefer the 777 over those aircraft.

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Most Aggressive In LatAm. AA Or CO posted Sun Apr 24 2005 02:47:56 by TACAA320
AA And CO To Queretaro, Mexico? posted Fri Mar 28 2003 20:38:03 by AM
SAS Or Swiss To Nrt? posted Sun Jun 9 2002 19:45:02 by SPRINGBOK
AA Flight Returns To NRT posted Mon Nov 20 2000 18:40:58 by AA@DFW
UA Or CO To California Fro NY posted Thu Oct 12 2000 15:13:28 by ContinentalEWR
Why No EWR Or IAH To BUR On CO? posted Wed Nov 22 2006 03:28:19 by COEWRNJ
DL/AA Or DL/CO Merger posted Sat Nov 18 2006 02:42:12 by 1337Delta764
Connecting To SQ In LAX - Should I Fly AA Or UA? posted Fri Jul 7 2006 17:49:17 by Ssides
1st Class Product On AA 777s To NRT posted Mon Nov 14 2005 11:43:24 by QantasHeavy
CO To ADZ And/or CTG Someday? posted Fri Sep 16 2005 16:29:25 by 2travel2know