Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
CO Loads On CLE-LGW  
User currently offlinePITA333 From United States of America, joined Mar 2005, 391 posts, RR: 3
Posted (9 years 5 months 5 days ago) and read 4369 times:

I know that this has been discussed before but I'm interested in how this route is doing this year now that it has returned. Is the 757 filling up or is it going over half full? Any insight would be much appreciated.

Thanks,
PITA333

24 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineN766UA From United States of America, joined Jul 1999, 8366 posts, RR: 23
Reply 1, posted (9 years 5 months 4 days 23 hours ago) and read 4300 times:

I don't know about this year, but I know in the past the CLE-LGW leg has been nearly full every time. Maybe Falcon can help us with his access to coair.com?


This Website Censors Me
User currently offlineFlyHoss From United States of America, joined Feb 2005, 598 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (9 years 5 months 4 days 23 hours ago) and read 4231 times:

From what I've seen, primarily checking the loads out of curiosity when passing through CLE, CO66 CLE-LGW tends to run pretty heavy but not always at capacity.


A little bit louder now, a lil bit louder now...
User currently offlineEwr767 From United States of America, joined Oct 2004, 95 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (9 years 5 months 4 days 21 hours ago) and read 4109 times:

I can tell you from first hand experience as I fly that route. The loads are FULL.

User currently offlineGoCOgo From United States of America, joined Jan 2005, 701 posts, RR: 1
Reply 4, posted (9 years 5 months 4 days 21 hours ago) and read 4097 times:

It's doing well enough that next year is already available for booking. Too bad it can't maintain the loads during winter and has to go away.


"Why you fly is your business, how you fly is ours"
User currently offlinePITA333 From United States of America, joined Mar 2005, 391 posts, RR: 3
Reply 5, posted (9 years 5 months 4 days 20 hours ago) and read 4006 times:

Thanks for all of your answers, for some reason I thought the route was dead.

User currently onlineMasseyBrown From United States of America, joined Dec 2002, 5599 posts, RR: 7
Reply 6, posted (9 years 5 months 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 3758 times:

The British CAA site says 8707 pax for the month of June, 2005 on LGW-CLE. That's an average of 145 a day in one direction or a load factor of about 84% on a 752. In terms of rear cabin comfort, more than half the middle seats are occupied.

84% means the flight is full on the most popular days and CO is probably turning away some business.



I love long German words like 'Freundschaftsbezeigungen'.
User currently offlineCOEWR777 From United States of America, joined Jan 2005, 428 posts, RR: 1
Reply 7, posted (9 years 5 months 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 3739 times:

I can go on coair and check. Hold on

User currently offlineCOEWR777 From United States of America, joined Jan 2005, 428 posts, RR: 1
Reply 8, posted (9 years 5 months 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 3732 times:

Ok just checked 8 dates.

All of them were going out about 90% full sorry if i am wrong with the percent cant do it off the top of my head.

6 of the dates had 160 people booked the 757 holds 170

the other two had 130 or so people.


User currently offlineSwatpamike From United States of America, joined May 2004, 581 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (9 years 5 months 3 days 13 hours ago) and read 3713 times:

Hello all


Just a question COEWR777, will that service be running in October? Was planning a trip to the Duxford airshow on the 16.

Cheers

swatpamike


User currently offlineARGinLON From Vatican City, joined Jun 2005, 614 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (9 years 5 months 3 days 11 hours ago) and read 3657 times:

Quoting Swatpamike (Reply 9):
Just a question COEWR777, will that service be running in October? Was planning a trip to the Duxford airshow on the 16

It finishes on the 1st of October


User currently offlineVS747SPUR From United Kingdom, joined Mar 2005, 373 posts, RR: 0
Reply 11, posted (9 years 5 months 3 days 8 hours ago) and read 3587 times:

Loads seem very favourable which is great.
Why is there little demand in the winter though ?

VS747SPUR



Fly DL
User currently offlineCLE757 From United States of America, joined Apr 2005, 1144 posts, RR: 0
Reply 12, posted (9 years 5 months 3 days 4 hours ago) and read 3499 times:

Right now the LGW-CLE portion is running about 90-100%, the CLE-LGW portion is running 80-90%..In May and June it was the opposite.

Quoting VS747SPUR (Reply 11):
Loads seem very favourable which is great.
Why is there little demand in the winter though ?

Some days in the winter it did very well, others it did not..But I think it should operate at least 4-5 days per week in the winter.



Cleveland the best location in the Nation
User currently offlineDutchjet From Netherlands, joined Oct 2000, 7864 posts, RR: 56
Reply 13, posted (9 years 5 months 3 days 3 hours ago) and read 3413 times:

I heard again and again that CO would like to get the CLE-LGW back to a year-round operation as soon as it makes financial sense - operating 5 flights per week during the low demand winter period. It doent seem to be happening for the Winter 2005 schedule, so maybe next year.

From what CLE757 stated above, the loads seem rather good this summer on the route (80-90% loads and full on certain days)......is this better than in previous years?


User currently offlineCLE757 From United States of America, joined Apr 2005, 1144 posts, RR: 0
Reply 14, posted (9 years 5 months 3 days 2 hours ago) and read 3363 times:

Quoting Dutchjet (Reply 13):
From what CLE757 stated above, the loads seem rather good this summer on the route (80-90% loads and full on certain days)......is this better than in previous years?

The loads are probably slightly better, than last year, but the ticket revenue is surely up with all the fare increases.



Cleveland the best location in the Nation
User currently onlineMasseyBrown From United States of America, joined Dec 2002, 5599 posts, RR: 7
Reply 15, posted (9 years 5 months 3 days ago) and read 3310 times:

It has been regularly been said by posters here that CO wants to run the flight all year. So what's stopping them? April and October would be modestly profitable; Thanksgiving, Christmas, and Presidents Day holiday periods would probably be profitable. So that leaves about 80 days of off-season trouble. If they cut 2 or 3 flights a week during the "quiet periods," they could minimize the loss.

Two problems are: 1) can CO easily get the winter slot back? 2) do they really care about CLE? During their earnings conference call this morning they referred to "all the hubs" doing well, but gave specifics only for EWR and IAH. The "C" word was never mentioned by anybody.



I love long German words like 'Freundschaftsbezeigungen'.
User currently offlineJoeman From United States of America, joined Apr 2005, 786 posts, RR: 0
Reply 16, posted (9 years 5 months 2 days 23 hours ago) and read 3280 times:

Quoting MasseyBrown (Reply 15):
It has been regularly been said by posters here that CO wants to run the flight all year. So what's stopping them?



Quoting MasseyBrown (Reply 15):
If they cut 2 or 3 flights a week during the "quiet periods," they could minimize the loss.



Quoting MasseyBrown (Reply 15):
do they really care about CLE? During their earnings conference call this morning they referred to "all the hubs" doing well, but gave specifics only for EWR and IAH. The "C" word was never mentioned by anybody.

Unfortunately, as usual...


User currently offlineVS11 From United States of America, joined Jul 2001, 1111 posts, RR: 0
Reply 17, posted (9 years 5 months 2 days 22 hours ago) and read 3210 times:

Why would they run the service during the winter, if there is not enough demand, when they can send those CLE pax to LON via EWR? My understanding is that the 757 European strategy is only for the summer. Well, the 787 may change that - isnt it meant for this type routes?

User currently offlineJoeman From United States of America, joined Apr 2005, 786 posts, RR: 0
Reply 18, posted (9 years 5 months 2 days 22 hours ago) and read 3172 times:

Quoting VS11 (Reply 17):
My understanding is that the 757 European strategy is only for the summer

Are all the new EWR-Europe services proposed to end for winter likewise? Maybe so, does anyone know for sure?

Quoting VS11 (Reply 17):
Well, the 787 may change that - isnt it meant for this type routes?

I believe so, but


User currently offlineARGinLON From Vatican City, joined Jun 2005, 614 posts, RR: 0
Reply 19, posted (9 years 5 months 2 days 22 hours ago) and read 3169 times:

Quoting Joeman (Reply 18):
Are all the new EWR-Europe services proposed to end for winter likewise? Maybe so, does anyone know for sure?

The only CO European summer route is LGWCLE. All the others will be reduced in terms of frequencies but will operate during the winter months. For example, BRSEWR goes down to five weekly.


User currently offlineDutchjet From Netherlands, joined Oct 2000, 7864 posts, RR: 56
Reply 20, posted (9 years 5 months 2 days 21 hours ago) and read 3168 times:

CO will operate the 757s from EWR to Europe year round - some cities will see a reduction in frequency from daily to 5 times per week. CO will also use the 757 on its second daily departures from EWR to LGW, CDG and AMS this winter.......thus each of those cities will see 2 flights per day from EWR, one with a 777 or 767 and the other with a 757.

CLE-LGW continues to be a seasonal route - as has been discuseed, although the flight does well during the summer, CO will not commit to operating the flight during the winter season for financial reasons.


User currently offlineJoeman From United States of America, joined Apr 2005, 786 posts, RR: 0
Reply 21, posted (9 years 5 months 2 days 20 hours ago) and read 3129 times:

Quoting ARGinLON (Reply 19):
The only CO European summer route is LGWCLE. All the others will be reduced in terms of frequencies but will operate during the winter months. For example, BRSEWR goes down to five weekly.

Interesting, another thread about the new BRS-EWR route discusses the low load factors this new route has been experiencing this summer. The yield must be very good.


User currently offlineJoeman From United States of America, joined Apr 2005, 786 posts, RR: 0
Reply 22, posted (9 years 5 months 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 2949 times:

Quoting Ewr767 (Reply 3):
can tell you from first hand experience as I fly that route. The loads are FULL.



Quoting GoCOgo (Reply 4):
It's doing well enough that next year is already available for booking. Too bad it can't maintain the loads during winter and has to go away.



Quoting MasseyBrown (Reply 6):
The British CAA site says 8707 pax for the month of June, 2005 on LGW-CLE. That's an average of 145 a day in one direction or a load factor of about 84% on a 752. In terms of rear cabin comfort, more than half the middle seats are occupied.

84% means the flight is full on the most popular days and CO is probably turning away some business.



Quoting COEWR777 (Reply 8):
Ok just checked 8 dates.

All of them were going out about 90% full sorry if i am wrong with the percent cant do it off the top of my head.

6 of the dates had 160 people booked the 757 holds 170

the other two had 130 or so people.



Quoting CLE757 (Reply 12):
Right now the LGW-CLE portion is running about 90-100%, the CLE-LGW portion is running 80-90%..In May and June it was the opposite.



Quoting Joeman (Reply 21):
Quoting ARGinLON (Reply 19):
The only CO European summer route is LGWCLE. All the others will be reduced in terms of frequencies but will operate during the winter months. For example, BRSEWR goes down to five weekly.

Interesting, another thread about the new BRS-EWR route discusses the low load factors this new route has been experiencing this summer. The yield must be very good.



Quoting MasseyBrown (Reply 15):
It has been regularly been said by posters here that CO wants to run the flight all year. So what's stopping them? April and October would be modestly profitable; Thanksgiving, Christmas, and Presidents Day holiday periods would probably be profitable. So that leaves about 80 days of off-season trouble. If they cut 2 or 3 flights a week during the "quiet periods," they could minimize the loss.

INDEED!!


User currently offlineFalcon84 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 23, posted (9 years 5 months 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 2834 times:

Most days, you're looking at at least 12 up front, and around 130 at least in the back. Haven't had the overbooked flights like in the past, but most days the loads are good. I think the bombings in London have made some people cancel their records, since loads are down a bit. There are days when it's not very full, but overall, the loads are still strong.

Quoting CLE757 (Reply 12):
Some days in the winter it did very well, others it did not..But I think it should operate at least 4-5 days per week in the winter.

I worked it the first two years it ran year-round, and the loads were horrid. You just don't have the tourist traffic in the winter, for obvious reasons, that you have in the summer. Even EWR and IAH cut back on their LGW routes last winter. I think 4 to 5 days in the winter is too many. I think to maximize loads in the winter, you should have no more than 2 or 3 a week CLE-LGW.

Quoting MasseyBrown (Reply 15):
So what's stopping them?

Again, the history of horrible loads the first two winters the flight ran year-round. It just didn't make sense to run CLE-LGW with 60 people a day.


User currently offlineGte439u From Canada, joined Nov 2003, 361 posts, RR: 1
Reply 24, posted (9 years 5 months 1 day 15 hours ago) and read 2798 times:

Quoting Falcon84 (Reply 23):
I think to maximize loads in the winter, you should have no more than 2 or 3 a week CLE-LGW.

Although, I am Clevelander now, and would love to see year-round European service from Hopkins, 2-3 flights per week are not a frequency that would make sense to London. Passengers demand more frequent service to such cities, and few would switch their business to CO based only on 2 nonstops per week. CO can easily route passengers though EWR, and allocate the 752 to another, more profitable market.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Can Anyone Tell Me Loads On DL2 LGW-JFK? posted Thu Nov 16 2006 20:30:27 by BY188B
Loads On BA LGW-SKG posted Thu Jul 28 2005 22:45:37 by Mika10021
CO To Resume CLE-LGW In April posted Tue Dec 18 2001 19:29:32 by Watewate
Update On CO CLE-LGW posted Thu Feb 1 2001 05:38:21 by Thomacf
Cargo Loads On CO B757 Europe Flights? posted Sat Oct 1 2005 20:50:04 by Avianca
Loads On This CO Flight posted Thu May 12 2005 04:31:36 by Hawaijahaz
CO Resumes CLE-LGW Today posted Mon May 2 2005 16:08:16 by GoCOgo
CO Using 757's On EWR-LGW posted Mon Feb 21 2005 04:50:57 by COEWR2587
Loads On CO IAH-SJU posted Sat Jan 15 2005 04:18:03 by Whiteguy
CO 15 On 7/15 Loads? posted Thu Jul 15 2004 03:36:52 by COEWRNJ