Flying Belgian From Belgium, joined Jun 2001, 1983 posts, RR: 13 Posted (4 years 4 months 3 weeks 4 days 22 hours ago) and read 12325 times:
Hi guys,
I regret having to announce that but from what I've read on a popular aviation French forum spotting has become a risky hobby for our fellow French spotters. http://fr.groups.yahoo.com/group/kerozen/
Since 7/7 London attacks, French Authorities have reinforced security measures to a higher level (they call it the Vigipirate plan). Which means that all spotters seen by the French Military Police in CDG are ousted... I've even read that you CANNOT stand more than 5 minutes on the cycling path along the runways. I don't even talk about a very popular place like the // taxiways in front of the Sofitel Hotel...
A spotter even told me that for French Police taking pictures anywhere in airport perimeter is FORBIDDEN !!
So in which world are we living ?? Why are they focusing on us ??
I'm really sad because I spotted in CDG the day before the London attacks and we really had a lot of fun with many French, British and Swedish spotters being there as well.
Shall a letter/email be set to ADP ?
SQNo1 From United Kingdom (England), joined Sep 2004, 676 posts, RR: 2 Reply 2, posted (4 years 4 months 3 weeks 4 days 22 hours ago) and read 12224 times:
Intresting, I took many pictures of planes in terminal 1 and the building. See my trip report below.
SWISSER From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR: Reply 3, posted (4 years 4 months 3 weeks 4 days 22 hours ago) and read 12214 times:
This is sad...
Maybe we should send a message from A.net to ADP so in the future if this whole thing collapses and our hobby is in danger because of some silly rebels, so at least they could issue some sort of pass to fellow spotters...
AOMlover From France, joined Jul 2001, 1241 posts, RR: 18 Reply 4, posted (4 years 4 months 3 weeks 4 days 21 hours ago) and read 12193 times:
Oh mon dieu ! That's sad, CDG is an awesome place for spotting ! I've spent so many hours in front of that Sofitel...I also feel sorry for Philippe Noret and all the spotters who've been posting gorgeous pictures taken at CDG on this website.
Upcoming flights: NCE-DXB-BKK EK 332/388, BKK-PHS TG 734, CNX-BKK TG 744, BKK-DXB-NCE EK 332/388
BA319-131 From United Kingdom, joined Jan 2001, 6232 posts, RR: 52 Reply 5, posted (4 years 4 months 3 weeks 4 days 21 hours ago) and read 12137 times:
Really? I spent the entire sunday there last week both inside the terminal near the TGV and on the roof also near the TGV. no problems at all.
Airplanepics From United Kingdom (England), joined Jun 2003, 2705 posts, RR: 54 Reply 6, posted (4 years 4 months 3 weeks 4 days 21 hours ago) and read 12069 times:
I was there a few weeks ago after a visit to the airshow. Certainly had some graet locations. Shame the heat haze spoilt the photos though.
UN_B732 From United States, joined Jul 2001, 4209 posts, RR: 6 Reply 7, posted (4 years 4 months 3 weeks 4 days 21 hours ago) and read 12024 times:
I'm shocked and appalled... Many French constantly criticise the Americans and now are confining the freedom of their own people.
Who wants to get a petition going? Do we have someone who knows French who can draft a letter to ADP?
Flying Belgian From Belgium, joined Jun 2001, 1983 posts, RR: 13 Reply 8, posted (4 years 4 months 3 weeks 4 days 17 hours ago) and read 11737 times:
Well of course I didn't say there were new fences and new indications BUT when a patrol nears a group of spotters, there are absolutely no discussions possible... I'm wondering on which law basis you can prevent people from taking pictures on a public area !!! THIS IS NOT LEGAL !!
Even in China spotting is allowed !!
SATL382G From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR: Reply 10, posted (4 years 4 months 3 weeks 4 days 17 hours ago) and read 11703 times:
Quoting UN_B732 (Reply 7): Many French constantly criticise the Americans and now are confining the freedom of their own people.
You're surprised?
Looking for clarification. The original post is a little vague -- Is it really official policy to forbid spotting or are the security agencies merely questioning spotters more often? Sorry I'm not a french speaker....
'Longreach' From Australia, joined Jul 2001, 502 posts, RR: 1 Reply 11, posted (4 years 4 months 3 weeks 4 days 17 hours ago) and read 11690 times:
I am not a spotter but I suggest that airliners.net admin produce something as a whole, rather than one or two people complaining.
In the letter/petition suggest an alternative. Name the spots which are the best and request one or two of them be void of these new rules for spotting purposes. Unfortunately its the world we live in, and they do have a job to do.
DeltaWings From Switzerland, joined Aug 2004, 1282 posts, RR: 27 Reply 12, posted (4 years 4 months 3 weeks 4 days 16 hours ago) and read 11607 times:
Im for all members on A.net, about 19272?, write a complaint letter to CDG. I think they would soon get the mesage, just imagine 19272 complaint messages..!
[Edited 2005-07-24 16:33:26]
Homer: Marge, it takes two to lie. One to lie and one to listen.
Newkai From United States, joined Jul 2004, 330 posts, RR: 1 Reply 13, posted (4 years 4 months 3 weeks 4 days 16 hours ago) and read 11580 times:
Fight the system! Let's see how many a.netters can get arrested! I suggest 40 of us show up at the same time in the same spot and start taking photos, then chain ourselves to something for effect!
Starlionblue From Greenland, joined Feb 2004, 13604 posts, RR: 68 Reply 15, posted (4 years 4 months 3 weeks 4 days 15 hours ago) and read 11168 times:
Quoting Newkai (Reply 14):
There's always ways for authorities to get around laws using "emergency provisions."
Of course. What are you going to do, sue the government? Of course you can, but unless you have the money, time and energy for a protracted legal fight (which you are in now way sure of winning) it's alost cause.
Tact Is For People Who Aren't Witty Enough To Be Sarcastic
Mhodgson From United Kingdom (England), joined Dec 2002, 4972 posts, RR: 40 Reply 17, posted (4 years 4 months 3 weeks 4 days 15 hours ago) and read 11023 times:
Another great loss, if true.
Spotting attracts tourists, and I reckon it boosts security, with all those additional eyes and ears keeping watch for free.
No trees were harmed by this message. However, several million electrons were terribly inconvenienced
Thomas_Jaeger From Switzerland, joined Apr 2002, 1901 posts, RR: 41 Reply 18, posted (4 years 4 months 3 weeks 4 days 15 hours ago) and read 10995 times:
I don't think sending 5'000 letters to ADP will help at all. It is one of the worst run state enterprises I have ever heard of (I say that from both a passenger and airline perspective). They will ignore you as long as they possibly can. Newkai's idea seems more feasible, go there and bring some TV guys with you and see whether they leave you in peace. I would want to see them asking 300+ spotters (typical day at CDG during Air Show) to move on .
Swiss aviation news junkie living all over the place
Cxsjr From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR: Reply 19, posted (4 years 4 months 3 weeks 4 days 14 hours ago) and read 10637 times:
Quoting Newkai (Reply 13): Fight the system! Let's see how many a.netters can get arrested! I suggest 40 of us show up at the same time in the same spot and start taking photos, then chain ourselves to something for effect!
Probably not a good idea, given what happened the day before yesterday in Stockwell, South London - I know this was the British police but looks like nobody's taking any prisoners at the moment!
Guy From Canada, joined Jul 2005, 2 posts, RR: 0 Reply 20, posted (4 years 4 months 3 weeks 4 days 14 hours ago) and read 10562 times:
How about setting up an "Airport Watch" program similar to the one in CYOW. They are mainly spotters who have gone through a police security check and simply report back to the security center about suspicious activities around the airport perimeter. They are not to intervene. Just observe and report.
Starlionblue From Greenland, joined Feb 2004, 13604 posts, RR: 68 Reply 21, posted (4 years 4 months 3 weeks 4 days 14 hours ago) and read 10466 times:
Quoting Cxsjr (Reply 19):
Probably not a good idea, given what happened the day before yesterday in Stockwell, South London - I know this was the British police but looks like nobody's taking any prisoners at the moment!
From reports, it seems the guy didn't follow police orders. Chaining yourself to a fence is a mite different.
This whole thing is silly. It's pretty easy to shoot down a plane with an shoulder launched AA missile from zillions of locations, many pretty far from airports. Prohibiting spotting from close to an airport is amazingly useless when it comes to bolstering security. If terrorists want data on aircraft, movements, etc all they have to do it get jobs at the airport, search the web, etc... Why expose themselves by sitting at the perimeter fence?
Tact Is For People Who Aren't Witty Enough To Be Sarcastic
Grimey From Ireland, joined Jun 2005, 235 posts, RR: 5 Reply 22, posted (4 years 4 months 3 weeks 4 days 14 hours ago) and read 10448 times:
There was a tread a while back where spotters are being used as security in MEL I wonder why they don't do that in other airports, put my name down on any letter of complaint because I was in CDG only once but I was like a child in a candy store with all the sights there.
Rev3oh2 From United States, joined Apr 2004, 137 posts, RR: 1 Reply 23, posted (4 years 4 months 3 weeks 4 days 13 hours ago) and read 9888 times:
Quoting Starlionblue (Reply 21): Prohibiting spotting from close to an airport is amazingly useless when it comes to bolstering security. If terrorists want data on aircraft, movements, etc all they have to do it get jobs at the airport, search the web, etc... Why expose themselves by sitting at the perimeter fence?
Very good points. At Charlotte Douglas International, our big US Airways hub, the most visible security measure taken post-9/11 was to take down all trees at the end of runway 18R, where the best public viewing area is located.
Not only did it expose any possible hiding places, but it also vastly improved the view of traffic on final approach.
...let us run with perseverance the race marked out for us.
MD80Nut From United States, joined Jul 2003, 828 posts, RR: 12 Reply 24, posted (4 years 4 months 3 weeks 4 days 13 hours ago) and read 9803 times:
I'm really sorry to hear spotting is forbidden at CDG. Sadly, I expect we will see more of that in other major airports around the world. I hope I'm wrong.
ZRH From Switzerland, joined Nov 1999, 5006 posts, RR: 41 Reply 25, posted (4 years 4 months 3 weeks 4 days 13 hours ago) and read 9718 times:
This is ridiculous. Simply again a most stupid overreaction which won't prevent any terrorist attack.
26 Gary2880: first ABZ.. then CDG... all the big airports are going under =( granted not everywhere here but the best and most useful area
27 ConcordeBoy: ....didn't IAH (at least temporarily experiement with) unofficially employing spotters to keep an eye on a certain spot?
28 Jacobin777: wow..@ SFO...they only prevented spotters going from certain locations, and added a security fence along part of the taxiiway to get to the 28's (as b
29 SATL382G: Because it's the easiest and quickest way. If they get a job they have to go thru all the motions -- training, immigration checks, etc. Web use can b
30 Voodoo: What are the alternatives for those of us who plan, i.e. have tickets bought, for CDG in the near future? Whats Orly like these days? And, besides the
31 Boysteve: Does CDG, or other airports have an official viewing area, such as the one at MAN. Surely this is a good idea as all spotters gather in one location,
32 Udo: It's also the easiest and quickest way to be spotted by the police, so only totally stupid terrorists would stay for a while at those places. Web use
33 Starlionblue: Point taken, but as Udo says spotters are hardly anonymous either. If you really want info on aircraft movements, get flight tracker software, a good
34 Atmx2000: Well not exactly. They did hang around airports as they scoped out flights they were interested in hijacking by flying on those same flights.
35 Kyril: What i did today worked. I called a couple of friends that are lawyers... Went to CDG and play my country's favorite sport: "to f*ck" this autorities.
36 SWISSER: Maybe the police has some difficulties between recognizing an EOS with a very nice lense and a Bazooka with those binary brains?
37 Udo: So that would make all pax much more suspicious than those spotters hanging around at the fence. Regards Udo
38 MissedApproach: I think I heard of a program similar to that in the US somewhere, & it sounds like a good idea to me. Who could resist free labour? Does anyone serio
39 ManchesterMAN: Yet again airport authorities react in the wrong way to spotters/photographers. More airports should have the attitude of MAN and use spotters to figh
40 Starlionblue: And that's the way it should be...
41 SATL382G: Well actually they did but not in the manner you're thinking of.... You are thinking like a spotter. The guy who is on his jihad is not a spotter and
42 SpdbrdConcorde: I think that the baboons in the white house must be twisting arms...
43 StealthZ: And at SYD, a few folks at the Tower mound waiting for JQ logo jet(which landed on a different runway!!)... the "long arm of the law" (Aust. Protectiv
44 Udo: Then what did they do? How do you know? These guys are smarter than many people think, including you. Then security patrols should frequently change
45 DID747: Hi, dear friends, I remember when I was young in 1980. I'm from Normandy and at the time, I spent all my summer holiday time with my aunt and my uncle
46 SATL382G: Ahhh, ok kind of obvious here that that you do not know much about the subject. I'd suggest you do some reading on the training activities these fell
47 CA228: This is sad, but I think you will see this in all international airports in the near future, if not already. Regardless if there are any official anno
48 Udo: They had training lessons in flying, but tell me one source which suggests they were hanging around at an airport fence. Well, if there were random c
49 SATL382G: I didn't say that and frankly neither did you... What you said and what I was responding to was: And it's quite obvious the 9/11 terrorists did not h
50 Udo: It's not obvious at all that they spent hours of time at the airport fence like spotters do. All the activities you mention are not typical for spott
51 Nonrevman: The odd thing about CDG is that most of the video and photos of the Concorde crash likely came from spotters. I challenge anyone to tell me otherwise
52 Newkai: Yes, but that man ran from the police. It's quite dumb to run from police, especially onto a subway car when police are chasing you the day after bom
Sponsor Message: 
From Belgium, joined Jun 2001, 1983 posts, 
From , joined Dec 1969, posts, .gif){kind=small}
From United Kingdom (England), joined Sep 2004, 676 posts, 
From France, joined Jul 2001, 1241 posts, 
From United Kingdom, joined Jan 2001, 6232 posts, 
From United States, joined Jul 2001, 4209 posts, 
From Australia, joined Jul 2001, 502 posts, 
From Switzerland, joined Aug 2004, 1282 posts, 
From Greenland, joined Feb 2004, 13604 posts, 
From Canada, joined Jul 2005, 2 posts, 
From Ireland, joined Jun 2005, 235 posts, 
Printer friendly format 
