Jorge1812 From Germany, joined Apr 2004, 3152 posts, RR: 6
Reply 7, posted (10 years 4 months 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 4202 times:
Quoting Jeffry747 (Reply 6): Is it me or does that 767 look like it has been heavily photoshopped?
The B-52 looks fine but it seems to me the 767 was added in. Maybe it is my computer and I am dead wrong. Are there more photos?
Even in this thread someone has to call this a fake...
UA777222 From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 3348 posts, RR: 10
Reply 11, posted (10 years 4 months 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 4166 times:
Quoting COAMiG29 (Reply 8): not calling it a fake but there is a fuzz around the edges of the 767 (which has the numbers 787 painted on it) i can understand why someone could think it was fake
1) It's a crappy picture to begin with, quality sucks, contrast is minimal, etc...
2) It's a paint mock-up. This body has clearly been reworked many times for different airlines including Boeing. I would not expect perfection nor would I expect that to be the actual body of the aircaft. Can someone please conferm or correct me in stating that painting a body more than when it's "Needed" will ware away at the body itself....