Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Economical...  
User currently offlineMCOtoATL From United States of America, joined Sep 1999, 474 posts, RR: 4
Posted (14 years 5 months 1 week 3 days 17 hours ago) and read 996 times:

During a time of raised fuel prices, we hear about some airlines taking a financial hit because of their older planes. Airlines flying 737-200s and DC-9s are paying the price as those older planes are not as effecient as the newer models.

What is the difference in effecieny between the older planes and newer planes?

What makes the newer ones more effecient? Is it simply technological advances, lighter materials, etc...?

Just curious. Thanks for your help.


2 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineBuff From Australia, joined Mar 2007, 0 posts, RR: 1
Reply 1, posted (14 years 5 months 1 week 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 934 times:

The modern high bypass engines produce more thrust per pound of fuel. They go faster and further on the same tank of gas. Can't give you any specific numbers, but that's the thumbnail explanation!

Best Regards,

Buff


User currently offlineATRpilot From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (14 years 5 months 1 week 3 days 13 hours ago) and read 928 times:

Well, the answer can be kind of complex, but the reason why newer jet aircraft or more effecient is primarily because of how they produce thrust. The engines on newer jets are extremely efficient, many orders of magnitude greater than the old style turbojets.

Mostly, they use less fuel because they are "turbofans" and not turbojets. The burning of fuel and compresed air inside the engine creates a high velocity, high temperature gas which is ducted toward the rear of the engine. This high energy air crosses a series of trubines (sort of like a water wheel, but for high temperature/velocity gases). These wheels, among other things, spin via a shaft a huge fan in front of the engine. This fan in turn greatly increases the speed of the air coming in the front of the engine and accelerates it around the core of the engine (where all the combustion takes place) and out the back of the cowling. This high velocity flow represents a large portion of the thrust developed by a turbofan engine. The reason this is more efficient in comparison to older turbojets (where all the air that goes in the front of the engine is used in the combustion process) is that only a small portion of the air going through the front of the turbofan engine is used in the burning of fuel. Thus, the less air going in the combustion chamber, the less fuel is needed.

This also has the added benefit of putting a shroud of cool air around the hot exhuast gases from the core, having a noise supressing effect.

You are also correct about lighter materials... composite structures do have allot to do with the fuel savings as well.

Sorry for the long winded narative... help it helped.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
FG:SAS's MD80 Economical EvenIf Fuel Price Doubles posted Tue Mar 4 2008 09:09:25 by Jdevora
New System For Auto Push Back - Economical? posted Sun Sep 18 2005 19:27:37 by Glidepath73
ERJ-140, Is It Economical? posted Thu Aug 28 2003 21:46:45 by Cba
Economical Consequences After 9/11 posted Wed Apr 17 2002 21:25:24 by Tg 747-300
Most Economical Aircraft posted Sat Feb 23 2002 01:41:17 by Airlineguy
A340s Transpacific- Economical? posted Thu Jan 3 2002 02:24:16 by Airplanetire
Would A 744D Be Economical In The US posted Sat Dec 8 2001 14:28:31 by Lubcha132
Are Older Aircraft More Economical? posted Fri Aug 18 2000 15:31:31 by IndianGuy
Economical... posted Tue May 16 2000 03:38:23 by MCOtoATL
Why Is Flying Close To North Pole Economical? posted Sun Oct 31 1999 00:58:35 by Evgeni