Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
UA To Resume Round The World  
User currently offlineFlyf15 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (13 years 11 months 2 weeks 1 hour ago) and read 2039 times:

United will, on April 1 2000, resume the round the world flight. It will be: LAX-IAD-LHR-DEL-HKG-LAX. All flights will be flown by the 747-400.

9 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlinePA006 From United States of America, joined Jan 2000, 160 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (13 years 11 months 2 weeks 1 hour ago) and read 1911 times:

Should be 4/1/2001.

User currently offlineDrew From United States of America, joined Dec 2005, 0 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (13 years 11 months 2 weeks 1 hour ago) and read 1901 times:

This is great news, but what has changed that has made United change its mind and begin flying this route again? Improvement of the Asian economies? Stronger hub at Dulles? I am curious if anyone else has better (and more informed insights) and enthused they are flying 'around the world' again.
Cheers, Drew


User currently offlineCV990A From United States of America, joined Sep 1999, 1402 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (13 years 11 months 1 week 6 days 19 hours ago) and read 1824 times:

I flew this route a while back, on the 767, and think it was abandoned because of some technicality about the aircraft they could use on the route. That's why there's no plane change in HKG and LAX on this version of the service.


Kittens Give Morbo Gas
User currently offlineVH-BZF From Australia, joined Oct 1999, 822 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (13 years 11 months 1 week 6 days 19 hours ago) and read 1816 times:

What so now re-routed through IAD instead of JFK?

Why?



Ansett Australia - (was) One of the worlds great airlines!
User currently offlineBig777jet From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (13 years 11 months 1 week 6 days 17 hours ago) and read 1799 times:

Will UA fly back round the world from LAX-HKG-DEL-LHR-IAD-LAX?

Thanks...


User currently offlineVirginA340 From United States of America, joined Jul 2005, 15 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (13 years 11 months 1 week 6 days 17 hours ago) and read 1787 times:

HEY UAL!!! Whats the matter with JFK? Why don't you fly there instead of IAD?


"FUIMUS"
User currently offlineDesertJets From United States of America, joined Feb 2000, 7737 posts, RR: 16
Reply 7, posted (13 years 11 months 1 week 6 days 17 hours ago) and read 1790 times:

After reading the actual press release United decided to restart the service b/c of the demand for flights to India and also cited the turnaround in the Asian economy as to why. The Asian economy slump was the main reason why the service was pulled. As for the routing through Dulles as opposed to Kennedy I can only imagine that b/c they are using a 747-400 instead of the 767-300 that the capacity is better suited to Dulles where other flights feed it. Don't hold me on this one. But how many aircraft would actually be needed to run this route fully. Just for the westbound sector flight #1 would take 2 days... obviously another ship would launch the following day for Hong Kong from LAX but can a 747-400 operate 2 full days without being sent back to the home base for an overnight check???
http://www.ual.com/site/primaryPR/1,10026,1528_597,00.html



Stop drop and roll will not save you in hell. --- seen on a church marque in rural Virginia
User currently offlineHypermike From United States of America, joined Dec 1999, 1001 posts, RR: 5
Reply 8, posted (13 years 11 months 1 week 6 days 17 hours ago) and read 1790 times:

I believe they will. According to the press release, http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/000518/il_ual_rou.html, they're going to be going both ways.


User currently offlineMEL From Canada, joined Oct 1999, 1096 posts, RR: 13
Reply 9, posted (13 years 11 months 1 week 6 days 17 hours ago) and read 1785 times:

I think the decision to route the flight through IAD rather than JFK is a smart one. I don't think JFK-LHR could support a 747-400, only they reduced the number of JFK-LHR flights from 3 to 2 (from 3-763s to 1-763 and 1-744). The IAD-LHR market in the summer on UA is booming. Almost every night this past week United has oversold every single one of its 3-daily non-stops from IAD-LHR and back, and the summer travel season has only begun. I think it was a bad idea for UA to drop 744s from IAD-LHR and IAD-FRA this summer, as they would surely be full if they were on the service. Maybe the aircraft were needed on other routes (ORD-FRA/SFO-LHR).


NO URLS in signature
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
NZ To Offer Round The World Service posted Tue May 23 2006 21:51:03 by Tockeyhockey
How To Plan A Round The World Easier? posted Tue Oct 28 2003 21:41:43 by Kl911
What Will Happen To UAL's 'Round The World Route? posted Thu Aug 16 2001 19:02:15 by United Airline
LH To Start Round The World Service? posted Mon Feb 19 2001 06:48:10 by Hailstone
UA ... Round The World posted Mon Oct 16 2006 22:46:59 by Flyingrob
Round-the-world: What To Look Out For?! posted Thu Apr 15 2004 14:05:00 by Ratypus
Quick Round The World Trip; Where To Go? posted Tue Sep 30 2003 06:40:59 by VS340
Will UAL Resume The 'Round The World' Service? posted Mon Dec 3 2001 19:04:57 by United Airline
Round The World Airlines... posted Sun Nov 12 2006 06:51:21 by Ikramerica
Round The World From MAN Charter Flight posted Mon Oct 23 2006 10:39:40 by Oly720man