Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Media Mistakes Regarding AF YYZ Crash  
User currently offlinePROSA From United States of America, joined Oct 2001, 5628 posts, RR: 5
Posted (8 years 11 months 3 weeks 4 days 15 hours ago) and read 2538 times:

From Yahoo News:

The Airbus A-340's twin tail-mounted engines had just started to burn

Really, there's nothing I can add, this speaks for itself.


"Let me think about it" = the coward's way of saying "no"
14 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlinePVD757 From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 3411 posts, RR: 17
Reply 1, posted (8 years 11 months 3 weeks 4 days 15 hours ago) and read 2498 times:

Don't they mean the propellers???

User currently offlineFlyabunch From United States of America, joined Nov 2004, 517 posts, RR: 4
Reply 2, posted (8 years 11 months 3 weeks 4 days 14 hours ago) and read 2462 times:

I knew there had to be more engines somewhere to help with that "horrible" rate of climb! Airbus must have added them just before the authorities grounded all of their planes as unsafe!  Yeah sure

User currently offlineJeffSFO From United States of America, joined Dec 2004, 836 posts, RR: 4
Reply 3, posted (8 years 11 months 3 weeks 4 days 14 hours ago) and read 2419 times:

That's funny, I just read the offending article a few minutes before seeing your thread.

Here it is:

http://news.yahoo.com/s/cpress/20050803/ca_pr_on_na/plane_crash_25

It looks like Yahoo News picked it up from the Canadian Press, or CP, which seems like a Canadian version of the Associated Press. Can any Canadian members clarify that?

Cheers,
Jeff


User currently offlineBristolFlyer From United Kingdom, joined May 2004, 2290 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (8 years 11 months 3 weeks 4 days 14 hours ago) and read 2384 times:

Normally the sort of inaccuracies picked up by a.netters are pretty pedantic ('everyone knows that an A340-300 has 32 X-Y capacitors instead of the 30 as reported by such-and-such news' etc) but this really is pretty poor. You would think that yahoo of all people could do a search and see that the engines on an A340.

BF



Fortune favours the brave
User currently offlineJtamu97 From United States of America, joined Mar 2001, 658 posts, RR: 2
Reply 5, posted (8 years 11 months 3 weeks 4 days 14 hours ago) and read 2326 times:

I do not know if any one heard the audio feed from CTV I think yesterday a few minutes after the crash. The guy they were interviewing pretended to know all kinds of stuff. While to the public it did make sense what he said did not. He first said it landed on 25R even though there is no such thing, which okay, I will give him that mistake. Then he procedeed to talk about planes overshooting the runway and performing missed approaches, well pilots know thr MAP is well before the end of the runway, and this went on and on and on and on. This goes back to what we have all said, just do a little research. On the evening news when there is a wreck, I have rarely heard them identify the wrong brand or type of vehicle, so get it correct in aviation!!


Propeller, we don't need no stinkin propeller
User currently offlineStarlionblue From Greenland, joined Feb 2004, 16991 posts, RR: 67
Reply 6, posted (8 years 11 months 3 weeks 4 days 14 hours ago) and read 2289 times:

Quoting Jtamu97 (Reply 5):
On the evening news when there is a wreck, I have rarely heard them identify the wrong brand or type of vehicle, so get it correct in aviation!!

Jtamu97, you finally gave me ammo in this debate. Everyone always tells me "it's hard to get it right blablabla". But you make a great point. If there is a car crash no one has any difficulty in identifying it correctly.



"There are no stupid questions, but there are a lot of inquisitive idiots."
User currently offlineJeffSFO From United States of America, joined Dec 2004, 836 posts, RR: 4
Reply 7, posted (8 years 11 months 3 weeks 4 days 13 hours ago) and read 2263 times:

Quoting Jtamu97 (Reply 5):
I do not know if any one heard the audio feed from CTV I think yesterday a few minutes after the crash. The guy they were interviewing pretended to know all kinds of stuff.

Good point. I heard that feed from CTV which was carried on CNN and cringed at some of the things that were said. However, when you're interviewing eyewitnesses at the scene, you're going to get all kinds inaccurate information.

Back in 1996, I remember seeing feed coverage of the TWA Flight 800 disaster and one of the first reporters on the scene was a complete moron and asked all different kinds of stupid questions to the people handling the rescue effort (it had not turned into a recovery effort by that point).

So there's no such thing as a stupid question? Okay, there are just stupid people.  Wink

Cheers,
Jeff


User currently offlineYOWza From Canada, joined Jul 2005, 4863 posts, RR: 15
Reply 8, posted (8 years 11 months 3 weeks 4 days 13 hours ago) and read 2258 times:

Quoting JeffSFO (Reply 3):
It looks like Yahoo News picked it up from the Canadian Press, or CP, which seems like a Canadian version of the Associated Press. Can any Canadian members clarify that?

CP is indeed Canada's equivalent of the AP. Normally they are quite accurate but this is so ridiculous it kinda takes your breath away.

As for the article I think 30 seconds on google or airbus.com might have been a worthy investment of time before circulating this piece of "journalism."

YOWza



12A whenever possible.
User currently offlineRedngold From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 6907 posts, RR: 45
Reply 9, posted (8 years 11 months 3 weeks 4 days 13 hours ago) and read 2156 times:

What you've got here is the quandry of timeliness vs. accuracy. People want to know as much as possible as soon as possible. The reporters don't always have time to confirm facts before a managing editor calls them and says "give me everything you've got." Then the editor is pressured to broadcast the story ASAP lest s/he come in second with the breaking news.

People demand details, and yet most don't give the same details a second thought.

It's a terrible dilemma.


redngold



Up, up and away!
User currently offlineBWI757 From Israel, joined Dec 2004, 429 posts, RR: 2
Reply 10, posted (8 years 11 months 3 weeks 4 days 13 hours ago) and read 2135 times:

*grumble* just watched an interview on the Foxnews website, the interviewer asks the 20 year old kid "So you are telling us that the weather was definitely a factor in this crash" - in the tone that one would use asking a question during a press conference with the NTSB.

Kid was NOT wearing any a-net apparel.

BWI757



I live in the US but my heart is in Jerusalem!
User currently offlineJtamu97 From United States of America, joined Mar 2001, 658 posts, RR: 2
Reply 11, posted (8 years 11 months 3 weeks 4 days 12 hours ago) and read 2115 times:

I think we can deal with certain inaccuracies so the information gets to us quicker such as people on board, departure airport, etc. It is just ashame when the inaccuracies are so obvious to us, but not to others such as stating it was a Lufthansa 737, someone saying how much fuel is "dumped" on descent, reporters questioning why the plane has not exploded and asking when will it. I just can't stand all of these aviation "experts" that pop up during crashes, including some of us on here. Plus the media should back off and not ask such aviation related questions to the eye witnesses. Just let them tell us their story as they see it. Back to my car crash example, you don't just have some hippi off the streets analyzing why this Ford motorcycle hit this Kawasaki Hummer. I just jumped off my soap box.


Propeller, we don't need no stinkin propeller
User currently offlinePROSA From United States of America, joined Oct 2001, 5628 posts, RR: 5
Reply 12, posted (8 years 11 months 3 weeks 4 days 12 hours ago) and read 2064 times:

Quoting Redngold (Reply 9):
What you've got here is the quandry of timeliness vs. accuracy. People want to know as much as possible as soon as possible. The reporters don't always have time to confirm facts before a managing editor calls them and says "give me everything you've got." Then the editor is pressured to broadcast the story ASAP lest s/he come in second with the breaking news.

That's true, except the story in question appeared around noon EDT on Wednesday, in other words 20 hours since the incident occurred. It had long since ceased to be breaking news. It is possibly understandable if a report immediately after the incident had referred to the 340's "tail mounted" engines. In the present case, however, there had been more than enough time to do the very basic fact-checking that would have exposed the error.



"Let me think about it" = the coward's way of saying "no"
User currently offlineKaitak From Ireland, joined Aug 1999, 12407 posts, RR: 37
Reply 13, posted (8 years 11 months 3 weeks 4 days 12 hours ago) and read 2025 times:

There was a real beaut on the Beeb today:

In June 1978, an Air Canada DC-9 leaving the airport had barely left the ground when the pilot aborted take-off.

(Obviously, he didn't quite get the concept of "decision speed"!)


User currently offlineRedngold From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 6907 posts, RR: 45
Reply 14, posted (8 years 11 months 3 weeks 4 days 11 hours ago) and read 1953 times:

Quoting PROSA (Reply 12):
That's true, except the story in question appeared around noon EDT on Wednesday, in other words 20 hours since the incident occurred.

In that case, I agree with you. Someone probably did a cut and paste, which IMHO isn't journalism at all (unless you cite the source in a prominent position, like at the beginning of the article.)



Up, up and away!
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
AF YYZ Crash On F/A School Tonight posted Fri Feb 24 2006 02:47:05 by F9fan
Causes Of AF A343 Crash Last Summer posted Sun Dec 4 2005 15:34:11 by LY777
Media Mistakes On Aviation posted Mon Nov 21 2005 21:31:31 by AirWillie6475
AF After Crash Questions - What Would You Request? posted Mon Aug 8 2005 18:18:20 by Squirrel83
Doors Jammed On Crashed AF @ YYZ posted Sun Aug 7 2005 19:34:21 by Jetdeltamsy
AF 358, A Crash Or A Simple Accident? posted Wed Aug 3 2005 06:37:27 by A5XX
How Is Immigration Dealt In AF/YYZ Case? posted Wed Aug 3 2005 05:20:56 by Venezuela747
Funniest Media Mistakes Concerning Aviation posted Tue Aug 13 2002 00:10:13 by 737doctor
What Happened To The AF A320 Crash At Airshow? posted Fri Aug 25 2000 00:23:01 by Qantas777
AF Concorde Crash Video Downloads? posted Sat Jul 29 2000 19:12:55 by Olympic A-340