Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Will NWA Ever Lean Towards Boeing Again?  
User currently offlineAirRyan From United States of America, joined Mar 2005, 2532 posts, RR: 5
Posted (9 years 1 month 2 weeks 2 days ago) and read 4491 times:

So what will the future hold for NWA - Boeing or Airbus?

The few remaining DC-10's and DC-9's will eventually need to be replaced. Since NWA has already bought A330 and A319's their replacements seen logically inevitable.

However, since we have seen NWA sign on with the 787 to perhaps replace and/or expand upon the 757 service, is it possible that NWA would ever consider the 777?

And with the 747's would NWA be leaning towards the 747ADV or will they even consider the A380? With the cargo ops, perhaps the 777 Freightor or a freightor version of the 747ADV?

Perhaps at this point it's just a matter of flipping a coin and to see which company offers NWA the best deal, but can it even accurately be hypothesized as to what aircraft types would better serve them?

35 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineJetjack74 From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 7410 posts, RR: 50
Reply 1, posted (9 years 1 month 2 weeks 1 day 23 hours ago) and read 4387 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Well, we just ordered 18 787's with 50 options. That's quite a statement considering that we're still taking delivery of A330's. The 777 issue is a dead one as of the moment. I think that a 74A could be a distinct possiblilty when the 744's start showing their age. But we only have a few routes that require a 747's range and load capacity, DTW, MSP, LAX, And JFK-NRT. SEA-NRT, I think could use a 400 in the summer months with the heavy loads.


Made from jets!
User currently offlineGigneil From United States of America, joined Nov 2002, 16347 posts, RR: 84
Reply 2, posted (9 years 1 month 2 weeks 1 day 23 hours ago) and read 4365 times:

Quoting AirRyan (Thread starter):
However, since we have seen NWA sign on with the 787 to perhaps replace and/or expand upon the 757 service, is it possible that NWA would ever consider the 777?

The 787 has absolutely nothing to do with the 757 for the most part. NW gets GREAT revenue from Japanese originating passengers at NRT, so they'll continue that whenever possible.

The 787 will help open new nonstop routes from the US.

N


User currently onlinePSU.DTW.SCE From United States of America, joined Jan 2002, 7591 posts, RR: 27
Reply 3, posted (9 years 1 month 2 weeks 1 day 23 hours ago) and read 4320 times:

Many people say that NW is becoming an Airbus-only operator, and the recent 787 order put that one to rest.

NW has always been, and will continue to be a large customer for both Airbus and Boeing. They simply choose the aircraft that best suits their needs both operationally and economically.


User currently offlineN766UA From United States of America, joined Jul 1999, 8268 posts, RR: 23
Reply 4, posted (9 years 1 month 2 weeks 1 day 23 hours ago) and read 4282 times:

Seems to me NW has never really leaned toward anybody. They've flown all kinds of Douglas, Boeing, and Airbus aircraft over the years. From the DC-6, DC-9, DC-10s to the 707, 757, 747 to the A319, A320, A330 they're pretty even.


This Website Censors Me
User currently offlineAirRyan From United States of America, joined Mar 2005, 2532 posts, RR: 5
Reply 5, posted (9 years 1 month 2 weeks 1 day 23 hours ago) and read 4282 times:

Quoting Jetjack74 (Reply 1):
But we only have a few routes that require a 747's range and load capacity, DTW, MSP, LAX, And JFK-NRT. SEA-NRT, I think could use a 400 in the summer months with the heavy loads.

That is what I was thinking about in regards to the A380 - it's just too large for what NWA would prefer, so a 747ADV would be a logical replacement for they and possibly the freightors if they wouldn't want to add a 777F just for freightor duty which would make sense.

Quoting Jetjack74 (Reply 1):
Well, we just ordered 18 787's with 50 options. That's quite a statement considering that we're still taking delivery of A330's.

I agree - I was expecting an A350 announcement more than that 787 order. I confused CO 10+options 787 order for NWA order, it's a good deal. Hopefully this threat of a strike won't hurt the bottom line too much at NWA even though things aren't looking good right now.

Quoting Gigneil (Reply 2):
The 787 has absolutely nothing to do with the 757 for the most part. NW gets GREAT revenue from Japanese originating passengers at NRT, so they'll continue that whenever possible.

Could be a good reason why NWA went with the 787 over the A350 being that a significant portion of the 787 will be coming from Japan.


User currently offlineJetjack74 From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 7410 posts, RR: 50
Reply 6, posted (9 years 1 month 2 weeks 1 day 17 hours ago) and read 4040 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting AirRyan (Reply 5):
I was expecting an A350 announcement more than that 787 order

So was everyone else. It is possible that we could divert some of our options other aircraft types, such as 747Adv or 777 in the future. I don't think I will ever close the door on the 777. I still think there is a slight chance we could order te airplane if Boeing pushed hard enough. They're on a roll with the 787 orders, a little $ shove could push us a long way, a very long way. That's what drove us to the Airbus.



Made from jets!
User currently offlineGoBoeing From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 2698 posts, RR: 14
Reply 7, posted (9 years 1 month 2 weeks 1 day 17 hours ago) and read 3983 times:

My prediction:

The 747-400s will go to NWA Cargo, the A-330s are gone after the DC-10s which will stay around a little longer for a round-the-world route, and 787s will replace all.

Nick


User currently offlineAzjubilee From United States of America, joined Apr 2000, 3931 posts, RR: 27
Reply 8, posted (9 years 1 month 2 weeks 1 day 5 hours ago) and read 3712 times:

Yea, go boeing... the 189 seat 787 will replace the 243-298 seat airbusses! Riiiight... The 787s will complement the 744 and 330s in the international fleet.


AZJ


User currently offlineGLA MD11 From France, joined Mar 2000, 277 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (9 years 1 month 2 weeks 1 day 5 hours ago) and read 3699 times:

People talk about the replacement of NW 744 by A380s or B747ADV. First, considering how long they are keeping aircraft types, I would not count on replacement anytime soon. Second, what about B744 replacement by B773ER? That seems to be a logical move...

User currently offlineAirRyan From United States of America, joined Mar 2005, 2532 posts, RR: 5
Reply 10, posted (9 years 1 month 2 weeks 1 day 1 hour ago) and read 3502 times:

Quoting GLA MD11 (Reply 9):
First, considering how long they are keeping aircraft types, I would not count on replacement anytime soon. Second, what about B744 replacement by B773ER? That seems to be a logical move...

Point taken but NWA was a launch customer for the 744 and even took delivery of the first 744 to come off the line - if others are retiring and/or replacing their 744's than how could NWA not? (Miles, money?)


User currently offlineDutchjet From Netherlands, joined Oct 2000, 7864 posts, RR: 57
Reply 11, posted (9 years 1 month 2 weeks 1 day 1 hour ago) and read 3450 times:

While some here at a.net think that airlines, as part of their business plan, have a goal to be all-Boeing or all-Airbus, nothing can be further from the truth. Airlines will pick the best aircraft for each particular mission - sometimes that aircraft will be manufactured by Boeing and other times it will be manufactured by Airbus. So many assumed that NW would automatically go with the A350 simply because it is an A330 customer - and look what happened, NW placed a large 787 order.

NW went with the A32X family for its narrow body needs since it was an ideal 72S/MD80 replacement, and over time, the A319 has gone on to replace many DC9-50s in the NW fleet. NW was an early customer for the A320 - NW liked the increased range and versatility that the type offered over the 737 2nd generation.

NW went with the A330 to replace the DC10-30 fleet since, in NW's opinion, the A333 was the ideal aircraft for transatlantic operations - NW itself stated that it went with the A333 since it felt that the 777 was too much airplane for transatlantic services. When NW converted some A333 orders to A332 orders and decided to use the A332 for transpacific services, things did get a bit confused as far as the mission of the A330 in the NW fleet (I still dont think that the A332 is a long term solution for transpacific routes, its simply too small), but the A332 is a very flexible and capable aircraft for which NW can find many roles for in its route network.

But, remember while all of this was going on, NW ordered additional 752s, selected the 753 as its DC10-40 replacement (and from what we hear, NW is sorry that it did not order more 753s as NW really likes the economics of this aircraft), NW continues to fly a large 747 fleet and has now ordered the 787 (with Trent engines - can you believe it?). If NW's financial situation was better, I think that NW would be signing up as a launch customer for the 747 Advanced (just as it was a launch customer for the 744) to replace its 747/744 fleets.........but that is simply not possible at the moment.

Airlines want and need both Boeing and Airbus to be in business and every airline world wide will continue to do business with both manufactures. Competition is necessary.


User currently offlineORDagent From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 823 posts, RR: 1
Reply 12, posted (9 years 1 month 2 weeks 1 day ago) and read 3397 times:

Welcome to my respected users list Dutchjet! That was one of the most well reasoned and balanced views on this kind of subject without being an A or B basher!

I would love to see an A380 with NW! I think the last livery would have been fantastic! Oh well, time will tell how they are going to do. NW is going to fly those 747-400s until they are antiques! Remember the DC-9/DC-10 fleets!


User currently offlineIRelayer From United States of America, joined Jul 2005, 1073 posts, RR: 2
Reply 13, posted (9 years 1 month 2 weeks 1 day ago) and read 3351 times:

It would be hilarious if NW retired their A330's before their 744's. Seriously. I think it could happen too.

-IR


User currently offlineAirplaneDork From United States of America, joined Jul 2005, 96 posts, RR: 0
Reply 14, posted (9 years 1 month 2 weeks 23 hours ago) and read 3266 times:

Quoting Azjubilee (Reply 8):
Yea, go boeing... the 189 seat 787 will replace the 243-298 seat airbusses!

We're talking about the 787, not the 737. The 787-8 and -9 will seat 223-259 passengers depending on configuration. The -3 (shorter-range version, which would probably used domestically for transcons) can seat up to 296 in Boeing's 2-class config.



To fly, the dream of man and flightless bird alike!
User currently offlineAzjubilee From United States of America, joined Apr 2000, 3931 posts, RR: 27
Reply 15, posted (9 years 1 month 1 week 6 days 5 hours ago) and read 3015 times:

Dork - my bad... I got my numbers confused. In the NWA configuration the 787 will seat 36 in WBC and 185 in Y class for a total of 221. My point still remains the same, they aren't replacing 243/298 seat 330s with the 221 seat 787. I repeat, the 787 will complement the 330s and 744s in the international fleet.


AZJ


User currently offlineKeesje From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 16, posted (9 years 1 month 1 week 6 days 5 hours ago) and read 2964 times:

NWA & UAL are the US-ASIA specialists, with NWA gaining lately.

Lets be realistic. If the ASIA market will grow at least 200% in the next 20 years as Boeing & Airbus think, something 30% larger then a 744 in the next decade is not a completely groundless gamble for NWA IMO.



Have to agree with earlier posts, NWA will buy what they need, irrespective who builds it.


User currently offlinePADSpot From Germany, joined Jan 2005, 1676 posts, RR: 5
Reply 17, posted (9 years 1 month 1 week 6 days 5 hours ago) and read 2942 times:

Quoting AirRyan (Reply 5):

Could be a good reason why NWA went with the 787 over the A350 being that a significant portion of the 787 will be coming from Japan.

Deplyoing an airplane on ex-Japan routes only because a significant share of parts originate from Japan? I don't see a connection there.

99,9% of airline customers either don't care or don't know in which type of airplane they are sitting; nor do they know how many parts of this specific airplane are produced by local companies ... .


User currently offlinePHXinterrupted From United States of America, joined Apr 2002, 474 posts, RR: 0
Reply 18, posted (9 years 1 month 1 week 6 days 4 hours ago) and read 2902 times:

About the only thing Northwest is leaning towards right now is bankruptcy.


Keepin' it real.
User currently offlineN1120A From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 26487 posts, RR: 75
Reply 19, posted (9 years 1 month 1 week 6 days 4 hours ago) and read 2880 times:

Quoting AirRyan (Thread starter):
The few remaining DC-10's and DC-9's will eventually need to be replaced

Few remaining DC-9s? Try around 100

Quoting AirRyan (Thread starter):
Since NWA has already bought A330 and A319's their replacements seen logically inevitable.

And just how many more A319s are they taking? Also, want to explain how a 130 seat plane replaces a 100 seat one

Quoting AirRyan (Thread starter):
However, since we have seen NWA sign on with the 787 to perhaps replace



Quoting AirRyan (Thread starter):
and/or expand upon the 757 service

The 787 is no 757 replacement. They have completely different missions

Quoting AirRyan (Thread starter):
is it possible that NWA would ever consider the 777?

No, it is too heavy or too small, depending on what they need

Quoting N766UA (Reply 4):
Seems to me NW has never really leaned toward anybody. They've flown all kinds of Douglas, Boeing, and Airbus aircraft over the years. From the DC-6, DC-9, DC-10s to the 707, 757, 747 to the A319, A320, A330 they're pretty even.

They do, however, lean Pratt

Quoting AirRyan (Reply 10):
if others are retiring and/or replacing their 744's than how could NWA not?

Last I checked, there has not been a single 744 WFU for scrapping

Quoting Dutchjet (Reply 11):
NW itself stated that it went with the A333 since it felt that the 777 was too much airplane for transatlantic services.

Correction. It is too much airplane for NW's transatlantic services, not transatlantic services in general



Mangeons les French fries, mais surtout pratiquons avec fierte le French kiss
User currently offlineUdo From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 20, posted (9 years 1 month 1 week 6 days 4 hours ago) and read 2865 times:

Quoting N1120A (Reply 19):
Few remaining DC-9s? Try around 100

By mid-July there were 99 DC-9-30, 12 DC-9-40 and 32 DC-9-50 in operation, for a total of 143. Their fuel bills must hurt...


Regards
Udo


User currently offlineEjmmsu From United States of America, joined Oct 2004, 1692 posts, RR: 0
Reply 21, posted (9 years 1 month 1 week 6 days 4 hours ago) and read 2854 times:

Quoting Udo (Reply 20):
By mid-July there were 99 DC-9-30, 12 DC-9-40 and 32 DC-9-50 in operation, for a total of 143. Their fuel bills must hurt...

I was told that the DC-9-50 (wich virtually identical capacity to an A319) has better economics on short stage lengths than the A319.

Of course, the A319 has better range.



"If the facts do not conform to the theory, they will have to be disposed of"
User currently offlineN1120A From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 26487 posts, RR: 75
Reply 22, posted (9 years 1 month 1 week 6 days 4 hours ago) and read 2851 times:

Quoting Udo (Reply 20):
By mid-July there were 99 DC-9-30, 12 DC-9-40 and 32 DC-9-50 in operation, for a total of 143. Their fuel bills must hurt...

Thanks for the count Udo and no the bills don't hurt. The DC-9 is still competitively efficient, particularly considering their fully amortized status.



Mangeons les French fries, mais surtout pratiquons avec fierte le French kiss
User currently offlineBeauing From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 23, posted (9 years 1 month 1 week 6 days 4 hours ago) and read 2850 times:

Quoting N1120A (Reply 19):
The 787 is no 757 replacement. They have completely different missions

The 787-300 has a similar range to the 757, however it carries mor pax.


User currently offlineUdo From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 24, posted (9 years 1 month 1 week 6 days 4 hours ago) and read 2849 times:

Quoting Ejmmsu (Reply 21):
I was told that the DC-9-50 (wich virtually identical capacity to an A319) has better economics on short stage lengths than the A319.

That's hard to believe. Do you have any further info?


Regards
Udo


25 N1120A : Like I said, different missions. The 783 will rarely be used in the same range mission as the 757 either, flying shorter segments that have high pass
26 Lat41 : It's over now, but if only NW had rescued the 717 line to use as their smallest main line aircraft, it would have made me very happy and maybe would h
27 Beauing : WHAT? Could you say that in English?
28 Ejmmsu : Unfortunately, no. I was hoping someone on here could confirm/deny the claim.
29 Thelowfarehero : A NW 737-700 with winglets in the new colors...that one be one sharp lookin bird!
30 Dutchjet : Yes, NW's transatlantic services, I was talking about NW since this thread is about NW, not any other carrier. I think that the meaning is that the 7
31 PSU.DTW.SCE : To add on to the previous post, the A319/A320 beats out the DC-9 on the longer flights. Hence why as NW has taken on more A319's, they have pulled the
32 Atmx2000 : If NW thought the A332 was too small, I don't think they would be buying 788s. No doubt some of them will end up on transpacific services.
33 Fpofllflyboi : I agree with you on that. They just want the right aircraft to get the job done economically. Just my 2 cents
34 Dutchjet : Point taken - I can certainly see the 788 flying transpacific routes like MSP-OSA or DTW-HKG or the like.....the 788 will allow NW the possibility of
35 Beauing : Didn't NW initiate service from SEA, PDX, in addition to SFO when they introduced the A330? This validates Boeing's idea of smaller planes flying thi
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Will IND Ever Become A Major Hub Again? posted Tue Sep 28 2004 20:25:42 by 7E72004
Will NWA Bring 744 To MSP Again? posted Tue Jul 31 2001 00:17:48 by SESGDL
Will We Ever See Another 3-engine A/c Again? posted Sun Mar 18 2001 03:20:44 by FlagshipAZ
Will TWA Ever Fly To Rome Again? posted Fri Jul 28 2000 15:17:21 by ContinentalEWR
Will There Ever Be Nonstop DTW-HNL Service Again? posted Mon Feb 6 2006 22:02:16 by KDTWFlyer
Will We Ever See A NWA A340? posted Sat Nov 5 2005 01:32:52 by AirWillie6475
Will HAL Ever Fly Their Very Own Again? posted Mon Jun 20 2005 00:11:53 by FlyHI777
Will MSP Ever See KLM Again? posted Wed Aug 27 2003 06:20:26 by Aviatortj
Will Aviation Ever Be FUN Again? posted Thu Mar 28 2002 16:43:10 by CactusA319
Will You Ever Fly AA Again? posted Tue Nov 13 2001 15:46:59 by Wing