Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Discrepancy In Movie "Island In The Sky"?  
User currently offlineOlympus69 From Canada, joined Jun 2002, 1737 posts, RR: 7
Posted (8 years 8 months 2 weeks 6 days 16 hours ago) and read 4547 times:

I have just been watching the recently released DVD of this movie, which stars John Wayne, from the novel of the same name written by E.K.Gann. The story is closely based on a true incident in which the author participated. This occurred in 1942 when the US Transport Command had just been formed and was using mostly civilian pilots seconded from many US airlines. Gann himself came from American Airlines. These pilots wore whatever they pleased, though many of them continued to wear their airline caps.
This situation is also pictured in the movie, but for some reason all the C-47 planes in the film have polished metal finishes and carry the titles 'United States Air Force'. I believe that this title came into effect in 1948. Before that it was the US Army Air Corps and then the US Army Air Force. Since Ernie Gann wrote the screenplay himself I can't imagine that this is just a simple mistake - though with Hollywood anything is possible. If, on the other hand, the story was updated to the post-war era, why do they still have civilian pilots flying USAF Transport Command aircraft?
As Yul Brynner said in the movie 'The King and I' - " 'tis a puzzlement".

4 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineOPNLguy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (8 years 8 months 2 weeks 6 days 15 hours ago) and read 4531 times:

Just a guess, but maybe the movie folks changed the script (from the book) to reflect what the aircraft (that they could get ahold of) said, without having to repaint them...

User currently onlineRevelation From United States of America, joined Feb 2005, 11930 posts, RR: 25
Reply 2, posted (8 years 8 months 2 weeks 6 days 14 hours ago) and read 4472 times:

Funny you should mention this. The movie was played on TV, I think on the American Movie Classic channel, and my TiVo recorded it. I saw that Mr. Gann got credited as "technical advisor", so it's strange that this flaw was allowed. It seems from this link that the movie was made in 1953 which is well after the USAAF became the USAF.

There were a bunch of other minor flaws in the movie. One thing I thought was cheezy was the fake motion of the plane in turbulence as well as the simulation of hail hitting the hull, which sounded like some stage hand was wacking the plane with a hammer.

Not to be too morbid, but about 1/3rd of the way through the movie Frank Lovatt dies, and about 2/3rds of the way through the movie the crew is suffering due to lack of food, so I was somewhat expecting to see the late Mr. Lovatt make a very direct contribution to the survival of the rest of the crew, if you know what I mean! I guess the movie viewers of 1953 weren't ready for that kind of thing, unlike the viewers of 1993.



Inspiration, move me brightly!
User currently offlineIsitsafenow From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 4984 posts, RR: 24
Reply 3, posted (8 years 8 months 2 weeks 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 4413 times:

I have another one. The movie "The Aviator", the story of Howard Hughes who at one time owned a big hunk of TWA...there was a scene that was to have been in 1948. The background was a building with the words.."Trans World..." on it. The problem was that TWA was known at Transcontinental and Western until 1950 when the name was changed to Trans World Airlines.
safe



If two people agree on EVERYTHING, then one isn't necessary.
User currently offlineYBCS From Australia, joined Mar 2005, 25 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (8 years 8 months 2 weeks 6 days 12 hours ago) and read 4384 times:

Come on guys, surely you know by now that Hollywood is all about entertainment. They really don't care to let the facts get in the way of a good yarn. By the way, my wife HATES watching movies & shows with me that involve aviation. According to her, I pick them apart too much. She says just relax and enjoy the story.

We just have to take a deep breath, relax and have the satisfaction of knowing the truth our selves.

NAH, forget that last bit, I'll still blast 'em.



"All that is necessary for evil to succeed is that good men do nothing" - Edmund Burke
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Help Identify Aircraft In The Movie "The Aviator" posted Mon Jan 10 2005 17:35:12 by A380900
A.net User Quoted In "Today In The Sky" posted Fri Aug 19 2005 18:21:48 by FlyerBoyEK
"Survival In The Sky" TV Program posted Mon Jul 26 2004 06:30:35 by N766UA
Remember "Diamonds In The Sky"? posted Fri Apr 23 2004 20:12:07 by ORDagent
"AF Must Invest In AZ Rescue To Get Stake" posted Tue Oct 24 2006 17:43:46 by Mindscape
Betty In The Sky With A Suitcase posted Wed Oct 11 2006 02:27:25 by UAL757
How Many In The Sky At Once? posted Thu Apr 6 2006 15:54:27 by Chuffy
SAS Celebrate 60 Years In The Sky posted Thu Feb 2 2006 23:18:39 by Solnabo
Ovals In The Sky Over New Jersey? posted Thu Jan 12 2006 22:58:27 by Rampart
Today In The Sky By USA Today posted Wed Nov 30 2005 21:11:01 by Squirrel83
SAF Manager In Talks With "another Major Airline" posted Wed Nov 25 2009 19:44:49 by 1337Delta764
Irish Aviation 29/09: Our Place In The Sky posted Sun Oct 18 2009 19:18:32 by Kaitak
Diamonds In The Sky Documentary. posted Sun Aug 23 2009 18:23:35 by Skytony
787.... Resturant In The Sky posted Tue Mar 31 2009 18:05:27 by ANCsupercub