Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
British Midland--NYC  
User currently offlineFLY777UAL From United States of America, joined May 1999, 4512 posts, RR: 3
Posted (15 years 4 months 1 week 5 days 14 hours ago) and read 750 times:

With BM's proposed new route from LHR to New York, what large aircraft will they choose??


FLY777UAL

7 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineNYC Int'l From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (15 years 4 months 1 week 4 days 18 hours ago) and read 746 times:

A330s I guess. They are now receiving new Airbus narrow bodie jets into their fleets,A320s,A321s & A319s I think. It is only logical that they would now get Airbus widebodies for transatlantic service since they can be so quickly delivered & they would probablly get a really cheap price from Airbus. Not to mention the commonality issue

Lance


User currently offlineMirage From Portugal, joined May 1999, 3125 posts, RR: 14
Reply 2, posted (15 years 4 months 1 week 4 days 14 hours ago) and read 746 times:

I agree with Lance, but I think they are not receiving A319's only A320's and A321's.
However, until the US and UK governments can formulate a new bilateral air services agreement allowing greater transatlantic access, BMA will be unable to launch service to New York.

Luis, Faro, Portugal


User currently offlineSashA From Russia, joined May 1999, 861 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (15 years 4 months 1 week 4 days 14 hours ago) and read 747 times:

How about if they lease some A-310s, before they get their A330 delivered??

I don;t somehow think they'd get their A330 loaded full...

Alexander Alexeyev
Scotland - Russia.



An2/24/28,Yak42,Tu154/134,IL18/62/96,B737/757/767,A310/320/319,F100,BAe146,EMB-145,CRJ,A340-600,B747-400,A-330-300,A-340
User currently offlineNwa-msp From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (15 years 4 months 1 week 4 days 14 hours ago) and read 746 times:

Isnt BM a high qaulity high service airline? If they were theyd have no problem doing business here...i know id fly them....


User currently offlineNYC Int'l From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (15 years 4 months 1 week 4 days 10 hours ago) and read 746 times:

British Midland continued a long-running bid to enter the transatlantic market yesterday, with a special request to be allowed to start services between London Heathrow and New York.

The European short-haul carrier asked the US government to grant the airline a special exemption from the current restrictive Anglo-US air services agreement.

In a petition to the US Transportation Secretary Mr Rodney Slater, the airline argued that three US carriers were permitted to sell seats on the route, while only two British airlines can fly to New York out of Heathrow.

"It would be appropriate to add British Midland as a third carrier on the route, which is restricted to [ British Airways ] and Virgin Atlantic," the airline said.

Only two US carriers, American Airlines and [ United Airlines ] , are actually allowed to operate services on the route, while [ Continental Airlines ] can only sell seats under a code-sharing alliance with Virgin.

But British Midland said the granting of an exemption would signal "a bold and significant pro-competitive move" at a time when Britain and the US were trying to renegotiate the bilateral air services agreement to allow more carriers into Heathrow.

Negotiators are due to meet in London next week for an informal meeting designed to pave the way to formal talks resuming next month in Washington.

The thorniest issue in eight years of talks has remained access to Heathrow, the world's busiest international airport, and the most lucrative for transatlantic air traffic.

But Britain has refused to guarantee runway space for newcomers, and in turn has demanded that the US opens up its domestic market to foreign airlines.

Now, Sir Michael Bishop, chairman of British Midland, has said he believes a compromise is in the offing.

From the Birmingham Post, UK


User currently offlineCX747 From United States of America, joined May 1999, 4454 posts, RR: 5
Reply 6, posted (15 years 4 months 1 week 4 days 8 hours ago) and read 746 times:

I would hope that they would be allowed to operate that route, but if they do then another American carrier should be allowed to operate into Heathrow.


"History does not long entrust the care of freedom to the weak or timid." D. Eisenhower
User currently offlineNYC Int'l From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 7, posted (15 years 4 months 1 week 4 days 6 hours ago) and read 746 times:

Perhaps BM could join in an alliance with Delta. Joining with them would allow Delta to sell seats on BM to LHR if they were not to become the third US carrier alloted to fly to Heathrow. BM, would be almost immediatly able to offer destinations all over the US through Delta apon becoming a member of the transaltantic club while actually flying just three or four routes themselves. A link-up between DAL & BM would be more beneficial to DAL than their current link-up with SwissAir & Austrian.

Lance


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
British Midland Rip Off Tax posted Wed Feb 22 2006 11:54:59 by Britannia191a
British Midland 737-400 posted Wed Oct 12 2005 05:30:57 by Patches
British Midland 92 Crash On National Geographic posted Mon Sep 26 2005 02:14:53 by PipoA380
British Midland MME - LHR - MAD posted Sat Aug 27 2005 21:33:29 by Jonty
British Midland Needing More Than Food Sales? posted Mon Aug 22 2005 21:43:24 by Ubidenmark
British Midland Better Than BMI? posted Mon May 30 2005 23:25:02 by Concorde001
British Midland India Ops posted Tue May 17 2005 15:29:00 by HAWK21M
British Midland To Mumbai – A330 Or A340? posted Mon Dec 20 2004 15:10:27 by Udo
BMI- British Midland A330 posted Tue Oct 26 2004 16:20:20 by Airgeek12
British Midland Orders? posted Sat Oct 9 2004 19:46:46 by European