Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
BA Stopped Lusaka?  
User currently offlineChiefT From Germany, joined Jun 2005, 357 posts, RR: 0
Posted (9 years 2 weeks 5 days 12 hours ago) and read 2221 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

There is a rumour, that British Airways stopped Lusaka due to the high local fuel prices. Any confirmation?


Aircraft are marginal costs with wings.
34 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineAirMale From Botswana, joined Sep 2004, 377 posts, RR: 1
Reply 1, posted (9 years 2 weeks 5 days 12 hours ago) and read 2214 times:

As per Amadeus reservation system flights LHR-LUN (3 times weekly) are still loaded until 26OCT06, but that could change anytime....


.....up there with the best!
User currently offlineIlgrancapo From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (9 years 2 weeks 5 days 12 hours ago) and read 2213 times:

Sincerely, I don't know anything. I see in Amadeus system that there are active flights from London to Lusaka in February 2006!!!  Wow!

User currently offlineBackfire From Germany, joined Oct 2006, 0 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (9 years 2 weeks 5 days 12 hours ago) and read 2206 times:

BA to stop freight flights to Lusaka on 9 August owing to high fuel costs - that's from BA.

User currently offlineOrion737 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (9 years 2 weeks 5 days 12 hours ago) and read 2163 times:

BA really are showing an increasing lack of commitment to African destinations, with the exception of SA.

Services to Lilongwe have been axed and Lusaka much reduced. No new African destinations for ages either. Banjul and Freetown (now stable) could be started but BA are as interested in Africa as they are in South America it seems.


User currently offlineMyt332 From United Kingdom, joined Sep 2003, 9112 posts, RR: 70
Reply 5, posted (9 years 2 weeks 5 days 12 hours ago) and read 2151 times:

Quoting Backfire (Reply 3):
BA to stop freight flights to Lusaka on 9 August owing to high fuel costs

That's fine. If it's not profitable then why do it? They are a business afterall.

Quoting Orion737 (Reply 4):
No new African destinations for ages either.

Is there much need for a 4X daily 744 service inc First cabin to MGQ these days?



One Life, Live it.
User currently offline7LBAC111 From United Kingdom, joined Jul 2004, 2566 posts, RR: 35
Reply 6, posted (9 years 2 weeks 5 days 11 hours ago) and read 2150 times:

Quoting Orion737 (Reply 4):
BA really are showing an increasing lack of commitment to African destinations,

I think it's more a business decision than a lack of commitment. If they can't make it profitable why should they fly there?

Quoting Orion737 (Reply 4):
BA are as interested in Africa as they are in South America it seems.

Didn't somebody explain the reason WHY BA aren't everpresent in South Americato you about a week ago? (Due largely on the relationship with Iberia and the limited number of UK originating travellers who travel there)

7LBAC111



Debate is what you put on de hook when you want to catch de fish.
User currently offlineOrion737 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 7, posted (9 years 2 weeks 5 days 11 hours ago) and read 2140 times:

OK clever clogs. I watched a Programme on BBC World as part of Africa month on the BBC which was all about air travel or lack of in Africa and how it was hindering growth.

There was a report that BA had reported high demand for flights to Lusaka and was planning an increase in flights. This was only last month. What has happened to BA's commitment to Africa and its economic development??


User currently onlineSpeedbird2155 From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2005, 871 posts, RR: 5
Reply 8, posted (9 years 2 weeks 5 days 11 hours ago) and read 2141 times:

Quoting Orion737 (Reply 4):
BA really are showing an increasing lack of commitment to African destinations, with the exception of SA.

BA now has increased services to some African destinations, so I don't see how this suggests any lack of commitment. Dropping unprofitable routes is merely smart business sense. This summer alone has seen increases to both Lagos and Abuja.

In addition to this BA has a franchise arrangement in South Africa which allows it to route passengers on to other African destinations, that might not make sense to operate direct services from London. This more suggests a proper strategy to maintain a market visability in some of these cities.

[Edited 2005-08-05 12:41:07]

User currently offlineCornish From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2005, 8187 posts, RR: 54
Reply 9, posted (9 years 2 weeks 5 days 11 hours ago) and read 2129 times:

Quoting Orion737 (Reply 4):
Services to Lilongwe have been axed and Lusaka much reduced. No new African destinations for ages either. Banjul and Freetown (now stable) could be started but BA are as interested in Africa as they are in South America it seems.

If there's a business case to fly it they will - such as Angola. They don't fly just for the sake of it.

Remeber they also hve Comair in SA - any expansion of that airline could see a connection in JNB and then on to a relatively short 737 flight to the likes of Lliongwe in the future - surely makes more sense than sending a big 747 or 777 there....



Just when I thought I could see light at the end of the tunnel, it was some B*****d with a torch bringing me more work
User currently offlineOrion737 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 10, posted (9 years 2 weeks 5 days 11 hours ago) and read 2129 times:

Yes but according to a programme shown as part of BBC Africa month an interview with somone from BA made out that BA was committed to helping Africa grow socially and economically by maintaining and expanding services to the continent, particularly to Zambia where air links to Europe are poor and BA is one of the few carriers to serve the city.

You would have though having watched that programme that BA had a social as well as financial agenda.


User currently offlineCornish From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2005, 8187 posts, RR: 54
Reply 11, posted (9 years 2 weeks 5 days 11 hours ago) and read 2120 times:

BA Comair do serve Zambia from SA - ok, not Lusaka however.


Just when I thought I could see light at the end of the tunnel, it was some B*****d with a torch bringing me more work
User currently onlineSpeedbird2155 From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2005, 871 posts, RR: 5
Reply 12, posted (9 years 2 weeks 5 days 11 hours ago) and read 2120 times:

Quoting Orion737 (Reply 10):
You would have though having watched that programme that BA had a social as well as financial agenda.

Social agenda does not mean having to increase services if it isn't profitable to do so. A social agenda involves being a good corporate citizen and contributing in different ways to society.


User currently offline7LBAC111 From United Kingdom, joined Jul 2004, 2566 posts, RR: 35
Reply 13, posted (9 years 2 weeks 5 days 11 hours ago) and read 2116 times:

Quoting Orion737 (Reply 10):
somone from BA made out that BA was committed to helping Africa grow socially and economically by maintaining and expanding services to the continent,

But by routing pax through Comair, as Cornish says, you can see that they are maintaining a presence, and will be able to feed these countries through Comair.

Quoting Orion737 (Reply 10):
You would have though having watched that programme that BA had a social as well as financial agenda

If BA operated routes because 'it was the right thing to do' they wouldnt be around today for you to complain about.

7LBAC111



Debate is what you put on de hook when you want to catch de fish.
User currently offlineOrion737 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 14, posted (9 years 2 weeks 5 days 11 hours ago) and read 2107 times:

The representative on that programme from BA, made the company out to have a clear commitment to maintaining and increasing air links to Zambia from London. She stressed that it was vital for Zambia as BA was the only European carrier with regular services.

You would have thought this lady was 'Bob Geldof' not some money hungry airline person. I realise now this was a cheaap (very cheap) thing for BA to do to make out that although they were a business, they were a caring one helping Africa and Zambia (what the programmes was about).

I wish I had the name of the programme and the lady from BA's name because it was only shown last month and was actually all about air travel to Zambia.


User currently offline7LBAC111 From United Kingdom, joined Jul 2004, 2566 posts, RR: 35
Reply 15, posted (9 years 2 weeks 5 days 11 hours ago) and read 2101 times:

Quoting Orion737 (Reply 14):
The representative on that programme from BA, made the company out to have a clear commitment to maintaining and increasing air links to Zambia from London.

But Air Links doesn't necessarily mean direct air service.

Quoting Orion737 (Reply 14):
wish I had the name of the programme and the lady from BA's name because it was only shown last month and was actually all about air travel to Zambia.

Would you write a letter?? Big grin

7LBAC111



Debate is what you put on de hook when you want to catch de fish.
User currently offlineOrion737 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 16, posted (9 years 2 weeks 5 days 11 hours ago) and read 2096 times:

I saw the programme, wish I had a copy to show you 7LBAC111, I would loved to ask you round for a private viewing (fight!)so you could eat some humble pie. The programme was very specific. It said that BA had recently increased flights to Lusaka from LHR using a 763 and made great claims that BA was the only carrier from Europe dedicated to serving Lusaka.

It would make embarrassing viewing for BA if they are now cutting back only a month after that programme was shown.


User currently offline7LBAC111 From United Kingdom, joined Jul 2004, 2566 posts, RR: 35
Reply 17, posted (9 years 2 weeks 5 days 11 hours ago) and read 2090 times:

Quoting Orion737 (Reply 16):
I would loved to ask you round for a private viewing

You're so not my type Orion! .  rotfl 



Debate is what you put on de hook when you want to catch de fish.
User currently onlineSpeedbird2155 From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2005, 871 posts, RR: 5
Reply 18, posted (9 years 2 weeks 5 days 11 hours ago) and read 2084 times:

Orion737

you clearly have a beef with BA, but you are yet to say anything to prove that BA isn't showing a commitment to Africa or that the BA representative was wrong for suggesting that BA cares about Africa and in particular Zambia. BA is correct in that they are one of the few with regular service to Zambia and because this might not increase to your satisfaction, the point is that BA is there. BA does contribute to various charitable causes, but the airline is at the end of the day a business and have to answer to shareholders. If the business case is there to increase services to Zambia, you can be sure that BA will take that step, provided that the fleet availability allows this to be done.


User currently offlineOrion737 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 19, posted (9 years 2 weeks 5 days 11 hours ago) and read 2079 times:

I just wondering if you would like to come round and then fly back home on 'Fisticuffs airlines' Big grin

User currently offlineBlooBirdie From Lesotho, joined Sep 2003, 257 posts, RR: 0
Reply 20, posted (9 years 2 weeks 5 days 11 hours ago) and read 2078 times:

If you try to book on JNB - LUN on BA you get routed through... LHR! You can fly BA / MN direct to LVI though.

User currently offlineMhodgson From United Kingdom, joined Dec 2002, 5047 posts, RR: 25
Reply 21, posted (9 years 2 weeks 5 days 11 hours ago) and read 2066 times:

I thought only freight flights (BA World Cargo) were being cut? There is nothing on BA.com to suggest that passenger flights are being cut at all


No trees were harmed by this message. However, several million electrons were terribly inconvenienced
User currently offlineCornish From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2005, 8187 posts, RR: 54
Reply 22, posted (9 years 2 weeks 5 days 11 hours ago) and read 2061 times:

Quoting Orion737 (Reply 14):
You would have thought this lady was 'Bob Geldof' not some money hungry airline person. I realise now this was a cheaap (very cheap) thing for BA to do to make out that although they were a business, they were a caring one helping Africa and Zambia (what the programmes was about).

Remind me again what that program is that BA does where it collects the foreign currency change from passengers. Don't they raise millions for charities - including ones from Africa - in that way.

Quoting 7LBAC111 (Reply 17):
Quoting Orion737 (Reply 16):
I would loved to ask you round for a private viewing

You're so not my type Orion! .

I have visions of Craig and Anthony from the latest UK Big Brother in my head - can't think why  Wink

No prizes for guessing which is which  Wink



Just when I thought I could see light at the end of the tunnel, it was some B*****d with a torch bringing me more work
User currently offlineFlyCaledonian From United Kingdom, joined Dec 2003, 2081 posts, RR: 3
Reply 23, posted (9 years 2 weeks 5 days 11 hours ago) and read 2047 times:

Mhodgson, you restore my faith that people on here read the posts other than the thread starter before making their own post! It is only BA World Cargo that is dropping direct flights to Zambia due to fuel costs. Jet fuel in Zambia is apparently twice as expensive as in neighbouring countries, something the country's President has asked aviation officials to look at with BA World Cargo's departure (Mentioned on Airwise report).

As for a lack of commitment to Africa, BA have a fairly good netwrork: -

14 weekly flights to Johannesburg
_7 weekly flights to Cape Town (Increasing to 12 for the Winter)
_3 weekly flights to Mauritius
_3 weekly flights to Harare
_3 weekly flights to Lusaka
_3 weekly flights to Dar es Salaam
_3 weekly flights to Entebbe/Kampala
10 weekly flights to Nairobi
_1 weekly flight to Luanda
_7 weekly flights to Lagos (Increasing to 10 for the Winter)
_5 weekly flights to Abuja (Increasing to _7 for the Winter)
_7 weekly flights to Accra

In addition, Morrocco and Tunisia are served by GB Airways, BA shorthaul serves Algeria and Libya, BA longhaul serves Cairo, and BMED serves Addis Ababa and Khartoum.

As was also mentioned Comair serve a number of destinations from JNB, while until BA was forced to terminate the franchise agreement it also had Regional Air serving some destinations from NBO.

You won't see BA big in West and Central Africa because historically the majority of the countries there have closer ties to France and Belgium, just as in South America ties are closer to Spain and Portugal.



Let's Go British Caledonian!
User currently offlineOrion737 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 24, posted (9 years 2 weeks 5 days 10 hours ago) and read 2032 times:

We do have some historical/colonial/cultural ties in West Africa in both the Gambia and Sierra Leone and British Caledonian served Dakar for years so their once was demand.

Think particularly Banjul would be a good addition for BMed with a 320 for the small business traffic/and premium holiday traffic who would prefer scheduled flights as opposed to a cramped charter.


25 AlanUK : I have just returned (yesterday) from Africa with BA, as crew. It was HELL. I was due to come back from Nairobi, where I was staying with the whole 76
26 MainMAN : Not so much a beef with BA, as a concern with Zambia/Africa, the way I see it. Even though I moan about BA's perceived commitment to the UK regions,
27 Post contains images MainMAN : methinks thou protesteth too much
28 MD90fan : what aircraft was the Lusaka flight operated? 763,772,744?
29 MainMAN : According to the BA timetable, 763
30 Yyz717 : BA is a for-profit carrier and will only operate commercially viable routes. BA is not providing a social development service for African development.
31 BA001Concorde : That is really awful to hear!!! I don't know how I would handle that situation, but it would probably be a lot less dignified than your response.
32 MD90fan : ok thanks for the information -Devan
33 AlanUK : Trust me, after such a hell flight, it took a LOT of self control not to take physical action... You know what I mean. al.
34 WindowSeat : Yes absolutely, and I laud you for your restraint! However, you need to realise that such eventualities, although deplorable must never be judged as
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Have BA Stopped Handling AA At Manchester? posted Thu Apr 20 2006 00:34:56 by Concorde001
A319 BA Stopped In Take-off Queue posted Tue May 17 2005 18:42:53 by Lazyshaun
BA A319 LGW Stopped? posted Fri Jun 17 2005 11:09:14 by Atco2b
BRU-LGW Route Stopped By BA And Virgin Express? posted Sun Jan 4 2004 14:09:49 by BRUspotter
BA V Virgin To MCO From LGW,the Fuel Costs. posted Sun Dec 10 2006 18:32:38 by Readytotaxi
DTW & IAH Spotters, BA 777 On Its Way posted Sun Dec 10 2006 14:15:58 by SpeedBird203
BA, VS, 9W - BOM-LHR Convenient? posted Sun Dec 10 2006 06:15:17 by B773ER
Deteriorating Industrial Relations @ BA posted Sun Dec 10 2006 00:25:38 by BAStew
BA - New Club World? posted Sat Dec 9 2006 02:24:31 by B773ER
Why Don't BA Operate GB Airways Flights? posted Fri Dec 8 2006 19:43:45 by 8herveg