Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Why No IAH-BUR Nonstop?  
User currently offlineOmad420 From United States of America, joined Aug 2005, 22 posts, RR: 0
Posted (8 years 8 months 2 weeks 4 days ago) and read 3553 times:

Im sorry that I had to kick off my first post w/ a stupid question

I was just wondering why there is no nonstop service to Burbank from Houston. I would assume it would due well w/ O&D. I hate traveling to LAX during the holiday season. My only easy alternative is connecting in DFW w/ AA. It's not fair that DFW gets a nonstops to BUR and not IAH  Sad

sorry if this has been discussed.

-omad


SERENITY NOW!!! SERENITY NOW!!!
27 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineLaxintl From United States of America, joined May 2000, 24326 posts, RR: 47
Reply 1, posted (8 years 8 months 2 weeks 3 days 23 hours ago) and read 3492 times:

Good question.

I'm not sure when the last time Continental served Burbank. Could be during its Denver Stapleton hub days.

I would think the carrier could fill a couple B737s or even several Continental Express Embraers between Houston and Burbank.



From the desert to the sea, to all of Southern California
User currently offlineHomer71 From United States of America, joined Jul 2001, 2240 posts, RR: 15
Reply 2, posted (8 years 8 months 2 weeks 3 days 23 hours ago) and read 3355 times:

I guess they figured with LAX, ONT and SNA, they pretty much got the area covered...

BTW, does a CO codeshare partner (NW, DL, etc.) serve BUR? From where?



"On spaceship earth there are no passengers...only crew."
User currently offline737-990 From United States of America, joined Apr 2000, 364 posts, RR: 1
Reply 3, posted (8 years 8 months 2 weeks 3 days 23 hours ago) and read 3330 times:

Not a dumb question at all. Two or three times daily 73G service would be very viable on Continental. Only rarely would it hit weight restrictions as the 73G is the perfect a/c to operate out of BUR. The problem for Continental at BUR is that the ticket counter lobby is now full and it would have to share a gate with another airline. Your best bet is to lobby Southwest for a non-stop to Hobby  Wink


Happiest is a man who has his vocation as a hobby
User currently offlineOmad420 From United States of America, joined Aug 2005, 22 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (8 years 8 months 2 weeks 3 days 23 hours ago) and read 3334 times:

Quoting Homer71 (Reply 2):



Quoting Homer71 (Reply 2):
BTW, does a CO codeshare partner (NW, DL, etc.) serve BUR? From where?

I think you would have to connect in SLC for DL, and I dont think NW serves
BUR

-omad



SERENITY NOW!!! SERENITY NOW!!!
User currently offlineIkramerica From United States of America, joined May 2005, 21417 posts, RR: 60
Reply 5, posted (8 years 8 months 2 weeks 3 days 23 hours ago) and read 3318 times:

Burbank doesn't have much room, and CO would need to have many flights daily. They could easily fill them, but don't seem to want to. Maybe they don't want to open another western station that only serves IAH but not EWR or CLE? And with BUR limitations, serving CLE and EWR would be too much of a hassle.

I would much prefer they flew into BUR, as it is closer/easier than LAX for me, too.



Of all the things to worry about... the Wookie has no pants.
User currently offlineLaxintl From United States of America, joined May 2000, 24326 posts, RR: 47
Reply 6, posted (8 years 8 months 2 weeks 3 days 23 hours ago) and read 3311 times:

No Northwest in Burbank, however Delta has a presence with CRJs to SLC and a single daily B757 to Atlanta.
At one time Delta was one of the larger operators at Burbank following its takeover of Western.
Also sadly gone are PSA and AirCal  Sad



From the desert to the sea, to all of Southern California
User currently offlineIkramerica From United States of America, joined May 2005, 21417 posts, RR: 60
Reply 7, posted (8 years 8 months 2 weeks 3 days 23 hours ago) and read 3249 times:

Could the 752s from CO make it to EWR and CLE fully loaded under all conditions? I know the 757 is ideal for this, but is the runway too short and weather/wind potentially too unfavorable?

Of course, the idea of filling 752s to CLE is pretty crazy, but I suppose 1 or 2 a day to EWR could work, and be more reliable than B6. It would also make having the station make more economic sense, with 2x EWR and 4x IAH a day.



Of all the things to worry about... the Wookie has no pants.
User currently offlineOmad420 From United States of America, joined Aug 2005, 22 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (8 years 8 months 2 weeks 3 days 23 hours ago) and read 3214 times:

I remember one of the times i flew out of BUR, i think Xmas of 98, It was an AA M80 via DFW, we had to unload fuel so we can take off and stop in PHX to refuel. yadda yadda yadda i missed my AA flight to IAH, but the good news was i got to ride ATR72 to Hobby. It was a cool expierence, 1st time on a prop.

-omad

[Edited 2005-08-08 04:50:06]


SERENITY NOW!!! SERENITY NOW!!!
User currently offlineIkramerica From United States of America, joined May 2005, 21417 posts, RR: 60
Reply 9, posted (8 years 8 months 2 weeks 3 days 22 hours ago) and read 3141 times:

well, the 73G has better performance on a 1500 mile flight than an MD80, as it wouldn't need a full load of fuel, but the MD80 would be much closer to MTOW.


Of all the things to worry about... the Wookie has no pants.
User currently offlineB4real From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 2611 posts, RR: 6
Reply 10, posted (8 years 8 months 2 weeks 3 days 22 hours ago) and read 3105 times:

DL flies a daily 757 ATL-BUR, I wanted to fly that one, but never got around to it. Kept going to LAX instead.

But I think the real issue why CO does not fly IAH-BUR is because WN has such a good position @ BUR. WN would be flying BUR-HOU if the market dictated a need for the flight. CO and COEX also already flies to LAX, SNA, and ONT. That is actually pretty good coverage of Southern California for an airline of CO's size.

Just my humble opinion.



B4REAL, spelled like it sounds
User currently offlineIkramerica From United States of America, joined May 2005, 21417 posts, RR: 60
Reply 11, posted (8 years 8 months 2 weeks 3 days 22 hours ago) and read 3036 times:

Quoting B4real (Reply 10):
WN would be flying BUR-HOU if the market dictated a need for the flight.

But it isn't about Houston traffic, but BUR-IAH would be about connections beyond IAH on CO, including to central and south america. WN can't provide that through HOU. WN can provide connections through LAS though, which they do.

But I think you are right, and that if anything CO would increase frequency at LAX before adding BUR. After all, CO's LAX frequency is below the pre911 frequency, and with smaller planes. There was a time when CO ran IAH-LAX hourly, and more than 6 flights a day to EWR. Rather than adding 3-4 BUR frequencies, they have room for 3-4 more LAX frequencies. Rather than add BUR-EWR, they could add a 9:30am or 1:30pm LAX-EWR.



Of all the things to worry about... the Wookie has no pants.
User currently offlineAirWillie6475 From United States of America, joined Jan 2005, 2448 posts, RR: 1
Reply 12, posted (8 years 8 months 2 weeks 3 days 18 hours ago) and read 2952 times:

Kind off topic but can anyone explain to me why WN is starting BUR to MDW on saturdays this september? Kind of random isn't it? BUR to Houston would have made more sense to me.

User currently offlineThelowfarehero From Cayman Islands, joined Aug 2005, 144 posts, RR: 0
Reply 13, posted (8 years 8 months 2 weeks 3 days 10 hours ago) and read 2860 times:

BUR to MDW makes total sense, now that the transcon service is picking up out of there. UA doesn't even have a nonstop to ORD from BUR. I think a chicago route would be great. Brings to mind when UA operated a twice daily nonstop BUR-ORD with a 767-200 back in 86/87. Deffinately CO would be a great addition especially if they did BUR-EWR and BUR/IAH with 757 service.


I HAATE AA!
User currently offlineIkramerica From United States of America, joined May 2005, 21417 posts, RR: 60
Reply 14, posted (8 years 8 months 2 weeks 3 days 10 hours ago) and read 2849 times:

Quoting Thelowfarehero (Reply 13):
Deffinately CO would be a great addition especially if they did BUR-EWR and BUR/IAH with 757 service.

But that's such a big plane to fill. And 24F or 16BF seats to boot. 73G would be more likely, but I still think they'd expand more at LAX, even though personally I'd love BUR service.



Of all the things to worry about... the Wookie has no pants.
User currently offlineDrerx7 From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 5065 posts, RR: 8
Reply 15, posted (8 years 8 months 2 weeks 3 days 9 hours ago) and read 2824 times:

If CO started service to BUR from IAH it would undoubtedly go to an XR with perhaps a 735 on some days. Ultimately it would probably go to 73G--I doubt a 757 would go on the route before IAH-LAX recieves a round of increases. They don't even use a 757 on the IAH-SNA route--besides 752s are becoming more precious as they introduce them on international flights.


Third Coast born, means I'm Texas raised
User currently offlineOmad420 From United States of America, joined Aug 2005, 22 posts, RR: 0
Reply 16, posted (8 years 8 months 2 weeks 3 days 4 hours ago) and read 2728 times:

Well, I wouldn't mind an ERJ to BUR. I travel to L.A.(Santa Clarita) twice a year, and BUR is a lot closer to Santa Clarita than any other L.A. airport. I would prefer CO b/c I've racked up quite a few miles on them. Oh well, I guess I'm just gonna have suck it up and stick to LAX. Thanx for all the responses.

-omad

[Edited 2005-08-08 22:57:52]


SERENITY NOW!!! SERENITY NOW!!!
User currently offlineN1120A From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 26196 posts, RR: 76
Reply 17, posted (8 years 8 months 2 weeks 3 days 4 hours ago) and read 2711 times:

Quoting Omad420 (Thread starter):
I hate traveling to LAX during the holiday season.

Why?

Quoting Omad420 (Thread starter):
It's not fair that DFW gets a nonstops to BUR and not IAH

Not fair? AA has a MUCH bigger Los Angeles area presence that CO and is a larger carrier anyway. It makes sense that AA would have more service at BUR

Quoting Homer71 (Reply 2):
BTW, does a CO codeshare partner (NW, DL, etc.) serve BUR? From where?

NW doesn't fly to BUR

Quoting Ikramerica (Reply 7):
Could the 752s from CO make it to EWR and CLE fully loaded under all conditions?

Beyond Easily

Quoting Ikramerica (Reply 7):
I know the 757 is ideal for this, but is the runway too short and weather/wind potentially too unfavorable?

First, the runway is not too short. The 752 has better runway performance than ANY 737 and longer pure range to boot. DL flies their 752 to ATL from BUR as it is, which means CLE would be a breeze. EWR within the range of a 73G or 738 from BUR (as well as a weight-restricted A320) so a 752 will make it without breaking a sweat

Quoting AirWillie6475 (Reply 12):
Kind of random isn't it?

Not really. WN often tests markets with Saturday only flights first.

Quoting Ikramerica (Reply 14):
But that's such a big plane to fill. And 24F or 16BF seats to boot.

BUR can fill F seats easily

Quoting Omad420 (Reply 16):
I travel to L.A.(Santa Clarita) twice a year, and BUR is a lot closer to Santa Clarita than any other L.A. airport.

Ever thing of trying LAS



Mangeons les French fries, mais surtout pratiquons avec fierte le French kiss
User currently offlineThelowfarehero From Cayman Islands, joined Aug 2005, 144 posts, RR: 0
Reply 18, posted (8 years 8 months 2 weeks 3 days 4 hours ago) and read 2680 times:

A little off the beaten path, but I was just wondering if B6 might be thinking of expanding service to FLL and IAD from BUR once the EMB 120's come online and free up the a320's from the short haul east coast routes.


I HAATE AA!
User currently offlineDutchjet From Netherlands, joined Oct 2000, 7864 posts, RR: 57
Reply 19, posted (8 years 8 months 2 weeks 3 days 4 hours ago) and read 2687 times:

From what I hear, IAH-BUR is in CO's plans, with initial service operated by COEX with ER145s....dont look for the EWR-BUR service anytime soon, and forget about CLE-BUR.

User currently offlineThelowfarehero From Cayman Islands, joined Aug 2005, 144 posts, RR: 0
Reply 20, posted (8 years 8 months 2 weeks 3 days 4 hours ago) and read 2668 times:

CLE-BUR i really dont see happening whatsoever. Highly doubt CLE has that kind of market here. Would be great to add CO. My office overlooks rwy 8. Great view too! I do miss seing those AQ bids of paradise though.


I HAATE AA!
User currently offlineAtcman From United States of America, joined Aug 2005, 9 posts, RR: 0
Reply 21, posted (8 years 8 months 2 weeks 3 days 3 hours ago) and read 2644 times:

Hi everyone - new member, first post.

I am a controller at BUR, and would love to see more options out of there. I have always wondered why WN has not started some longer flights. Admittedly there is limited space at the terminal (thanks to the idiot NIMBYs), but with DL and B6 going to ATL and JFK, I was wondering if the others were considering adding some distance and choices for direct flights.

We have several controllers that would love to see B6 to FLL, but we all know it's probably a pipe dream.

Anyone out there "in the know" about any new plans for BUR, I'd love to know. Thanks.

Off topic, but they are supposed to start construction on a new taxiway abeam the terminal with high speeds early next year. That should greatly help with GA aircraft exiting runway 8, since they won't have to 180 or go into the terminal area.


User currently offlineOmad420 From United States of America, joined Aug 2005, 22 posts, RR: 0
Reply 22, posted (8 years 8 months 2 weeks 3 days 3 hours ago) and read 2631 times:

Like i said earlier, when i go to L.A. i actually go to Santa Clarita, I went last Thanksgiving, and it took almost 3 hours to get from LAX to my cousins in Santa Clarita,( I know all you L.A. natives are used to the traffic) BUR is just a hell of a lot closer, more convenient and less B.S.
I would connect in DEN, DFW, PHX or LAS, but I'd rather stay w/ CO and rack up some miles, Plus connecting sucks if your vacation is only 5 days. Thats why I will stick to LAX until Express Jet starts service one day. I just think IAH-BUR is long overdue.

-omad



SERENITY NOW!!! SERENITY NOW!!!
User currently offlineMD90fan From Bahamas, joined Jul 2005, 2931 posts, RR: 7
Reply 23, posted (8 years 8 months 2 weeks 3 days 1 hour ago) and read 2575 times:

Quoting Thelowfarehero (Reply 18):

A little off the beaten path, but I was just wondering if B6 might be thinking of expanding service to FLL and IAD from BUR once the EMB 120's come online and free up the a320's from the short haul east coast routes.

I thought B6 was getting EMB-190's ?

Does WN service BUR-HOU?



http://www.devanwells.blogspot.com/
User currently offlineN1120A From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 26196 posts, RR: 76
Reply 24, posted (8 years 8 months 2 weeks 3 days 1 hour ago) and read 2565 times:

Quoting Omad420 (Reply 22):
I would connect in DEN, DFW, PHX or LAS, but I'd rather stay w/ CO and rack up some miles

I did not mean connect, I meant just fly to LAS and drive from there. It is not that far from Santa Clarita

Quoting Omad420 (Reply 22):
Thats why I will stick to LAX until Express Jet starts service one day. I just think IAH-BUR is long overdue.

If CO did start service, the loads, yields and Burbank heat would likely call for a 737

Quoting MD90fan (Reply 23):
Quoting Thelowfarehero (Reply 18):

A little off the beaten path, but I was just wondering if B6 might be thinking of expanding service to FLL and IAD from BUR once the EMB 120's come online and free up the a320's from the short haul east coast routes.

I thought B6 was getting EMB-190's ?

They are getting E190s, and they don't have the range to make BUR from FLL or IAD

Quoting MD90fan (Reply 23):
Does WN service BUR-HOU?

No



Mangeons les French fries, mais surtout pratiquons avec fierte le French kiss
25 Ikramerica : yeah, I want to fly in an ER145 over 3 hours with no IFE, no place to put a reasonable carry on, etc. Flying them from IAH-SRQ is tedious enough. esp
26 Post contains images FlyingTexan : No non-stops, but connections thru Las Vegas or PHX.
27 Omad420 : Are you kidding me? I'm better off flying through ONT, SNA and maybe even SAN. It's like a four hour drive not counting traffic if I flew though LAS.
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
IB...Why No MAD-PTY Nonstop? posted Fri Apr 15 2005 05:23:52 by N77014
Why No JFK-BOM Nonstop? posted Sun Sep 29 2002 18:08:29 by Airplanetire
BA, Why No IAH-LHR posted Mon Nov 27 2000 04:00:02 by Cba
Why No EWR Or IAH To BUR On CO? posted Wed Nov 22 2006 03:28:19 by COEWRNJ
Why No BUR-ORD On AA Or UA? posted Fri Oct 13 2006 18:47:40 by Travelin man
Why No SV (PAX) Service To IAH? posted Fri Mar 31 2006 03:19:00 by Thomasphoto60
Why No CM Flight To IAH posted Tue Oct 25 2005 10:16:21 by Snaiks
Why No IND To SLC Or MSY Nonstop posted Mon Apr 18 2005 21:55:39 by LGAtoIND
Why No LGA-AUS/SAT Nonstop? posted Fri Apr 8 2005 08:08:10 by LGAtoIND
Why No UA Nonstop SFO-STL? posted Wed Sep 15 2004 02:33:57 by FrontierCPT