Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
JetBlue At LAX Today?!?!?!?  
User currently offlineWilax From United States of America, joined Jun 2002, 465 posts, RR: 3
Posted (9 years 1 month 2 weeks 2 days 2 hours ago) and read 5512 times:

While working out this evening, just before sunset, in Inglewood, I saw a JetBlue A320 with the "tiles" tail on final approach to LAX 25L. What gives? Why would a JB land at LAX? If LGB arrivals were being diverted, I should have seen a stream of JB's landing, not just one. Can anyone find a flight report on that plane or someone in the know at LAX?

24 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineLaxintl From United States of America, joined May 2000, 25401 posts, RR: 49
Reply 1, posted (9 years 1 month 2 weeks 2 days 1 hour ago) and read 5464 times:

You are right. Flight 295 JFK-BUR diverted to LAX around 1920.


From the desert to the sea, to all of Southern California
User currently offlineThelowfarehero From Cayman Islands, joined Aug 2005, 144 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (9 years 1 month 2 weeks 1 day 17 hours ago) and read 5229 times:

makes no sense at all...Why the divertion?


I HAATE AA!
User currently offlineOPNLguy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (9 years 1 month 2 weeks 1 day 17 hours ago) and read 5181 times:

Quoting Thelowfarehero (Reply 2):
makes no sense at all...Why the divertion?

If I had to venture a guess, it'd be that they had some type of mechanical problem that precluded their landing on BUR's short runway...

I've run 737s in there over the years, and some mechanical problems that develop inflight require additional runway length that BUR just doesn't have available. As examples, an anti-skid going inop, landing gear problems, or an engine being shutdown (which on a 737 requires landing at flaps-15 versus the normal flaps-40 you plan at BUR). When these kinds of things crop up, you go somewhere else with a longer runway that can handle whatever performance degradation that the mechanical problem entails...


User currently offlineIkramerica From United States of America, joined May 2005, 21532 posts, RR: 59
Reply 4, posted (9 years 1 month 2 weeks 1 day 17 hours ago) and read 5168 times:

But ONT is closer for an emergency.

The valley developed a high wind condition yesterday afternoon/evening out of the blue. My balcony door kept slamming shut, and the trees were going a little nuts. I can see the BUR landing path from my balcony, and am not too far away. Might that have had something to do with it?



Of all the things to worry about... the Wookie has no pants.
User currently offlineThelowfarehero From Cayman Islands, joined Aug 2005, 144 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (9 years 1 month 2 weeks 1 day 17 hours ago) and read 5150 times:

ok..sounds logical. Makes plenty of sense. Especially with the length of rwy 8. A little off the topic, but alot of WN pilots love flying in there, say it's like landing on a carrier, especially for all the x-navy guys. SAN looks fun too.


I HAATE AA!
User currently offlineOPNLguy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 6, posted (9 years 1 month 2 weeks 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 5083 times:

Quoting Ikramerica (Reply 4):
Might that have had something to do with it?

Unless the winds were such that max crosswind limits were exceeded (30 kts. on a 737, don't know about an A320) I'd sort of doubt it and my money would still be on a mechanical issue...

Quoting Ikramerica (Reply 4):
But ONT is closer for an emergency.

From the center of LAX to the center of BUR is 18.0 miles, versus 46.5 miles for the center of LAX to the center of ONT.

Sometimes, the closest is not always the best. The Southwest LAS-BUR flight that had a main gear problem on arrival about 10 years ago went to ONT (even though it was farther) in order to avoid blocking a runway at LAX for several hours. With a far lesser amount of traffic, ONT was better able to tolerate it...

[Edited 2005-08-08 18:36:32]

User currently offlineGigneil From United States of America, joined Nov 2002, 16347 posts, RR: 84
Reply 7, posted (9 years 1 month 2 weeks 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 5075 times:

Max landing xwind component for the A320 family is 33kts.

N


User currently offlineSkaggs From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 144 posts, RR: 2
Reply 8, posted (9 years 1 month 2 weeks 1 day 14 hours ago) and read 4911 times:

Quoting OPNLguy (Reply 6):
Sometimes, the closest is not always the best. The Southwest LAS-BUR flight that had a main gear problem on arrival about 10 years ago went to ONT (even though it was farther) in order to avoid blocking a runway at LAX for several hours. With a far lesser amount of traffic, ONT was better able to tolerate it...

I was in ONT last month and they are down to 1 runway. 26R/8L is closed for a year.

Ontario, California (April 26, 2005) --- Ontario International Airport’s (ONT) $50 million Runway 26R/8L Reconstruction Project will result in its closure to aircraft operations for approximately 12 months beginning at 4 p.m. PST Saturday, May 7. The project involves reconstruction of the runway’s westerly 10,200 feet and includes the removal and replacement of existing asphalt pavement, signage, runway lights, storm drains, service roads, electrical vault, markings, and taxiway intersections.

“During the construction period, all aircraft landings and take-offs will take place from the airport’s parallel runway, Runway 26L/8R, which is 10,200 feet,” said Kim Ellis, ONT’s acting airport manager. “This runway can accommodate all types of aircraft and, with coordination from aircraft operators and the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) air traffic controllers at ONT, will support the airport’s existing aircraft traffic load. Therefore, the reconstruction project is not expected to cause heavy flight delays.”

The project’s construction management company is Parsons Brinckerhoff Constructions Services, Inc. The construction contractor is Griffith Company.

ONT management and staff will continue to hold meetings with the airport’s air carriers, general aviation aircraft operators, FAA, and other applicable agencies to discuss plans and procedures for minimizing departure and arrival delays, as well as noise impacts on surrounding communities,” said Ellis.

During reconstruction, aircraft operations will maintain their normal flight pattern of aircraft departing to the west and landing from the east, wind conditions permitting.

“Los Angeles World Airports (LAWA) invests millions of dollars into Ontario International’s infrastructure to accommodate the growth we are experiencing," added Ellis. “The runway project will facilitate aircraft movement and operations at ONT such as accommodating the Airbus A380 that will enter service in 2006 as the world’s largest aircraft.

ONT is located in Southern California’s vast “Inland Empire” region that includes San Bernardino and Riverside Counties. The airport is one of four owned and operated by LAWA, a Los Angeles City department that oversees an airport system in the nation’s second largest metropolitan area. The other airports owned and operated by LAWA are Los Angeles International, Palmdale Regional and Van Nuys.



It takes a big man to cry, but it takes a bigger man to laugh at that man.
User currently offlineLaxintl From United States of America, joined May 2000, 25401 posts, RR: 49
Reply 9, posted (9 years 1 month 2 weeks 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 4788 times:

OPNLguy is 100% percent correct.

The aircraft developed some flap problems which precluded the Burbank landing. After arrival LAX passengers were offered bus transportation back to Burbank.

The aircraft involved N589JB spent the night at LAX and departed this morning on a short ferry flight down to LGB at about 9am.

Also to cover last nights BUR-JFK redeye due to the LAX diversion, N510JB was ferried up from Long Beach.

As far as the diversion to LAX vs ONT discussion, Jetblue has established contingency handling at LAX which is the preferred diversion airport for its BUR/LGB/ONT flights, primarily as the facility is 24hrs, offers CAT II/III runways, has maintenance facilities, and most importantly offers the best passenger accommodation options (hotels, ground transport etc.) Last winter we saw a few diversions due weather and curfews.



From the desert to the sea, to all of Southern California
User currently offlineOPNLguy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 10, posted (9 years 1 month 2 weeks 1 day 11 hours ago) and read 4605 times:

Quoting Skaggs (Reply 8):
I was in ONT last month and they are down to 1 runway. 26R/8L is closed for a year.

Fully aware of that; the incident I was refering to was about 10 years ago and both runwats were open then, at least until ours landed on 2 of 3 gears...  Wink


User currently offlineFSPilot747 From United States of America, joined Oct 1999, 3599 posts, RR: 12
Reply 11, posted (9 years 1 month 2 weeks 1 day 10 hours ago) and read 4581 times:

what's a runwat.  Wink




User currently offlineSRT75 From United States of America, joined Jul 2005, 260 posts, RR: 0
Reply 12, posted (9 years 1 month 2 weeks 1 day 10 hours ago) and read 4570 times:

Quoting Thelowfarehero (Reply 5):
A little off the topic, but alot of WN pilots love flying in there, say it's like landing on a carrier, especially for all the x-navy guys.

Yes, and landing at BUR is quite an experience for the pax. In the summer you can alway expect some mountain turbulence on the way in.

BUR also was the home of a runway overrun, although not as spectacular as the recent AF crash in Canada, whena WN failed to stop and came to rest on the street.

Other fun landings - RNO -- guaranteed turbulence on the approach.


User currently offlineOPNLguy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 13, posted (9 years 1 month 2 weeks 1 day 10 hours ago) and read 4537 times:

Quoting FSPilot747 (Reply 11):
what's a runwat.

56K brain, 300 bps fingers...  Wink


User currently offlineCactus739 From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 2448 posts, RR: 30
Reply 14, posted (9 years 1 month 2 weeks 1 day 9 hours ago) and read 4472 times:

Quoting Laxintl (Reply 9):
Also to cover last nights BUR-JFK redeye due to the LAX diversion, N510JB was ferried up from Long Beach

Since I haven't seen a thread on it yet... where this flight fuel stop on the way to JFK?

 spin   spin   spin   spin   spin   spin 



You can't fix stupid.... - Ron White
User currently offlineN1120A From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 26499 posts, RR: 75
Reply 15, posted (9 years 1 month 2 weeks 1 day 9 hours ago) and read 4432 times:

Quoting Ikramerica (Reply 4):
But ONT is closer for an emergency.

No it isn't

Quoting Cactus739 (Reply 14):

Since I haven't seen a thread on it yet... where this flight fuel stop on the way to JFK?

Mike, you are funny



Mangeons les French fries, mais surtout pratiquons avec fierte le French kiss
User currently offlineLaxintl From United States of America, joined May 2000, 25401 posts, RR: 49
Reply 16, posted (9 years 1 month 2 weeks 1 day 9 hours ago) and read 4417 times:

Quoting Cactus739 (Reply 14):
Since I haven't seen a thread on it yet... where this flight fuel stop on the way to JFK?

Last nights redeye made it nonstop, however this mornings flight stopped in Buffalo.

I think we have given up on talking about the diversions as they seem to be a normal occurance even while having the passenger booking caps on the Burbank flights.



From the desert to the sea, to all of Southern California
User currently offlineN1120A From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 26499 posts, RR: 75
Reply 17, posted (9 years 1 month 2 weeks 1 day 9 hours ago) and read 4413 times:

Quoting Laxintl (Reply 16):
I think we have given up on talking about the diversions as they seem to be a normal occurance even while having the passenger booking caps on the Burbank flights.

Hell, B6 should just lift the cap as it is not helping and get the extra revenue

[Edited 2005-08-09 01:53:01]


Mangeons les French fries, mais surtout pratiquons avec fierte le French kiss
User currently offlineCactus739 From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 2448 posts, RR: 30
Reply 18, posted (9 years 1 month 2 weeks 1 day 9 hours ago) and read 4397 times:

Quoting Laxintl (Reply 16):
think we have given up on talking about the diversions

It was actually meant as a joke my dear friend....  Smile

Quoting N1120A (Reply 15):
Mike, you are funny

a girl does what she can.......  spin 



You can't fix stupid.... - Ron White
User currently offlineIkramerica From United States of America, joined May 2005, 21532 posts, RR: 59
Reply 19, posted (9 years 1 month 2 weeks 1 day 9 hours ago) and read 4383 times:

Quoting N1120A (Reply 15):
No it isn't

Yes, it is. If you are flying from JFK, and you experience trouble before reaching BUR, ONT is closer. Now, if you experience trouble on the BUR final approach from the West, THEN LAX is closer.

I thought he meant it experienced trouble on the initial approach, and ONT would be closer.

But if there is only one runway and it isn't a life or death, I can see going to LAX as to not close ONT completely should the plane not be able to leave the runwat  Smile



Of all the things to worry about... the Wookie has no pants.
User currently offlineWesternDC1010 From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 327 posts, RR: 3
Reply 20, posted (9 years 1 month 2 weeks 1 day 9 hours ago) and read 4369 times:

Quoting Laxintl (Reply 9):
The aircraft developed some flap problems which precluded the Burbank landing. After arrival LAX passengers were offered bus transportation back to Burbank.

Where did N589JB park last night at LAX to disembark passengers? Was it at one of the remote stands at the northwest end of the field or one of the Imperial stands? Was it at one of the gates of a specific terminal?

Ron
Western DC-10-10



Western Airlines - The Only Way To Fly
User currently offlineN1120A From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 26499 posts, RR: 75
Reply 21, posted (9 years 1 month 2 weeks 1 day 9 hours ago) and read 4334 times:

Quoting Ikramerica (Reply 19):
Yes, it is. If you are flying from JFK, and you experience trouble before reaching BUR, ONT is closer. Now, if you experience trouble on the BUR final approach from the West, THEN LAX is closer.

If you are coming from the Northwest, as most planes into BUR seem to do, LAX is definately closer. Also, if they knew of the problem well beforehand, they could plan the LAX stop. LGB could be thought of as a good diversion site for B6, except that it is not all that close to BUR, there is only the one long runway even though there are 5 runways in total and it is possible they wanted United Services to look at the aircraft



Mangeons les French fries, mais surtout pratiquons avec fierte le French kiss
User currently offlineOPNLguy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 22, posted (9 years 1 month 2 weeks 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 4316 times:

Quoting Ikramerica (Reply 19):

Yes, it is. If you are flying from JFK, and you experience trouble before reaching BUR, ONT is closer. Now, if you experience trouble on the BUR final approach from the West, THEN LAX is closer.

I mentioned the distances between the respective airports back in reply 6.

When it comes time to divert a flight, us folks that actually do so base what's "closest" on where the airports are in relation to each other. Additionally, this jibes with diversion fuel calculations to the alternate, which are based from missed approach (right off the runway's end) to the alternate, and not an infinite number of directions/distances from the airport.


User currently offlineFLAIRPORT From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 23, posted (9 years 1 month 2 weeks 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 4253 times:

Quoting N1120A (Reply 17):
Quoting Laxintl (Reply 16):
I think we have given up on talking about the diversions as they seem to be a normal occurance even while having the passenger booking caps on the Burbank flights.

Hell, B6 should just lift the cap as it is not helping and get the extra revenue

True...if the passegers know there is a chance of a fuel stop and fly it anyway, might as well.


User currently offlineCyberual From United States of America, joined Dec 1999, 177 posts, RR: 0
Reply 24, posted (9 years 1 month 2 weeks 1 day 1 hour ago) and read 3264 times:

Just curious who handles JB at LAX and who does the mx for them?

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
JetBlue At ITH Today posted Sun Nov 5 2006 01:50:50 by BatonOps
Backfire While Starting WN Jet At LAX Today posted Thu Aug 24 2006 08:24:51 by 747hogg
Was Spotting At LAX Today... posted Mon Nov 14 2005 04:59:11 by ZOTAN
727 Landing At LAX Today posted Wed Aug 31 2005 01:49:59 by MDW22L31C
NW DC-10 At LAX Today posted Fri Dec 31 2004 05:21:33 by N229nw
Independence Air RJ At LAX Today posted Fri Dec 17 2004 08:04:17 by NZblue
QF Abort At LAX Today posted Tue Aug 31 2004 06:46:57 by Qantasguy
Frontier JetExpress At LAX Today posted Sat Jun 19 2004 08:00:31 by AirplaneBoy
Jetblue At LAX posted Thu Jun 17 2004 17:25:16 by Asa_737
Awesome Planes At LAX Today! posted Sat Jun 28 2003 05:53:15 by QANTAS747-438